ATT_5_Past_and_Present_Performance_Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 66 KB Posted

Attached to
Laguna Campground Improvents Project Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
1291U4-19-R-0002
Issued by
Department of Agriculture Forest Service R5-Pacific Southwest Region

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Laguna Campground Improvents Project, newest first.
File Type Posted
1291U419R0002_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
Laguna_Campground_Site_Visit_Attendance.pdf PDF
Laguna_Campground_Improvements_RFIs.pdf PDF
Laguna_Campground_AutoCAD.zip ZIP file
Drawings_and_Plans_ALL_24x36.pdf PDF
1291U419R0002_Laguna_Campground_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
31_20_01__ArchaeologicalMonitoring_Final.pdf PDF
ATT_2_Project_Drawings_and_Plans.pdf PDF
ATT_3_FirePlan.pdf PDF
ATT_1_Specifications.pdf PDF
ATT_4_WD_CA190001_CA1.pdf PDF
1291U4-19-R-0002_Laguna_Campground.pdf PDF
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

April 16, 2019 Contractor’s responding to Laguna Campground Improvements shall send this Past Performance Questionnaire for their references to fill out.

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

“Contractor Name = the contractor responding to the solicitation”

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________

Address: ____________________________ Fax Number: _________________________

Point of Contact: ______________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _________________________________________

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________________ Contract Number Reference: ________________________ Dollar Amount: $__________________ Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts for the same or similar requirement with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

“Respondent = Name of the Reference filling out the Questionnaire” Name of Respondent:

_____________________ Title: ____________________________

Address: _____________________

Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________ Fax Number:___

Email Address: ______________________

C. E-MAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: Please send no later than 4:30 PM (PST) 17 May 2019 to Daniel Lara. Phone (707) 562-9165.

Email: (Daniel.lara@usda.gov).

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate number on the scale (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 4 or 5.

1
2
3
4
5
Substantial Confidence
Satisfactory Confidence
Limited Confidence
No Confidence
Unknown Confidence
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

THE CONTRACTOR
1
2
3
4
5
1
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4
Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5
Followed approved quality control plan.
6
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies
9
Identified problems as they occurred.
10
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12
Developed realistic progress schedules.
13
Met established project schedules.
14
Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
15
Was responsive to contract changes.
16
Provided adequate project supervision.
17
Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
18
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
19
Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
20
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
21
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
22
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
23
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO
24
Is the contractor rated in CPARS?
YES/NO

Additional Remarks

Revised Mar 11

File details come from the government source that posted it.