12445523B0003PreBidQandA.docx

DOCX document 14 KB Posted

Attached to
Monongahela National Forest FR209 AOP Replacement Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
12445523B0006
Issued by
Department of Agriculture Forest Service

About this file

This document contains questions and answers from a pre-bid meeting for solicitation number 12445523B0003 for a project on the Monongahela National Forest. The project calls for an arch style culvert or equivalent, with clearing limits based on construction plans. If uncertain areas exist, the Forest Service will work with the contractor to establish limits. Onsite materials in the project area that meet specifications can be used for streambed simulation rock. If local suppliers do not have matching material, limestone may be used if approved by the Contracting Officer.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Monongahela National Forest FR209 AOP Replacement, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Monongahela National Forest FR209 AOP Replacement QA 230913.pdf PDF
Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
FR209 Pre-Bid QA.pdf PDF
12445523B0006 Solicitation.pdf PDF
FR209_Plans_signed.pdf PDF
RedRun.LRP-2022-0309 Location Map.pdf PDF
Bridge Inspection Report.pdf PDF
RedRun.LRP-2022-0309 NWP-14 Verification Letter-signed.pdf PDF
Limits of Disturbance Plan.pdf PDF
Red Run - 100 pct Supplemental Specs.pdf PDF
Wage Determination.pdf PDF
Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Project: 6AOP Solicitation No: 12445523B0003 The following questions were brought up during the pre-bid meeting held on 8/23/2023.

1. Project calls for a Conspan (or equivalent) arch style culvert. A contractor asked if a Box style (bottomless) is considered equivalent. This project has been designed for the “arch style culvert” and this type of structure will be required. The “equivalent” refers to supplier and/or brand name equivalent, and not the type of structure on this project.

1. The project does not show clearing limits will the FS stake them or do they use the constructions plans to determine the approximate location. The clearing limits will be based off the construction plans. If areas are uncertain the FS will work with the contractor in establishing them.

1. Contractor asked about the Streambed Simulation Rock, Bed Class 10. It is not something local suppliers typically carry, and they want to know what options they have for the material (example can they use Limestone which is carried by most local quarries). It was also mentioned that existing streambed material that meets the requirements and is located in the project area could be used (Note 7, sheet C-05 page 7). The FS considers the use of onsite materials that are in the project area to be used. It is the contractor's responsibility to supply the material to meet the project specifications. If no local suppliers have material that will match the project, the contractor may use a limestone product as an alternative, if approved by the Contracting Officer.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .