A randomized, double-blind, multi-center comparative effectiveness study of spironolactone versus doxycycline hyclate for the treatment of acne in women
Active Cooperative Agreement Awarded Last action
- Award ID
- U01AR079752
- Recipient
-
The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania UEI GM1XX56LEP58
- Awarding agency
-
National Insititue of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services
- Obligated
- $6,745,582
Award facts
- Assistance listing
- 93.846 Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research
- Completion date 87% complete
- Originally
- Funding
-
- $5,705,114.00 Federal
- $1,040,468.00 Non-federal
- Place of performance
- Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Award details come from USAspending.gov.
Description
- Abstract
- Acne is one of the most common diseases worldwide, affecting 85% of adolescents and often persisting into adulthood. Acne is responsible for a greater global burden of disease than psoriasis, cellulitis, and melanoma. Although mild acne can usually be managed with topical medications, moderate to severe acne often requires treatment with systemic medications such as oral antibiotics, spironolactone, and isotretinoin. While these medications are a standard part of care, there are very few randomized clinical trials showing efficacy and none that show comparative effectiveness between these commonly used treatment options. The institute of medicine has identified this area as one of the top priorities for comparative effectiveness research. In addition, little is known about the effects of these different treatments on the microbiome. Previous work by our group has shown oral antibiotics are the most common systemic medication used in the treatment of acne and patients frequently use them for more than one year. In fact, dermatologists prescribe more antibiotics per capita than any other specialty. However, prolonged antibiotic use may be associated with a variety of adverse outcomes including bacterial antibiotic resistance, pharyngitis, collagen vascular illnesses, inflammatory bowel disease, and breast and colon cancer. As a result, there is growing international interest and attention specifically from the centers for disease control regarding improving antibiotic stewardship in the outpatient setting and multiple clinical guidelines for acne have recommended reducing the use of antibiotics through the use of non-antimicrobial therapies and by limiting the duration of therapy. For women with moderate to severe acne, spironolactone may represent an effective, well-tolerated therapeutic alternative to oral antibiotics. Originally developed as a potassium-sparing diuretic, for many years IT has also been used off-label for acne due to its potential impact on hormonal pathogenesis of this disease. However, despite expert opinion supporting the use of spironolactone in the treatment of acne, its use remains relatively uncommon and clinical evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of spironolactone is limited to small, often retrospective studies. Trials comparing the effectiveness of spironolactone to that of other medications such as oral antibiotics are lacking. In specific aim 1, we will conduct a double-blind randomized controlled non-inferiority comparative effectiveness study of spironolactone versus doxycycline for women with acne. Since oral tetracycline-class antibiotics like doxycycline are currently the most common systemic medication prescribed for acne, the results of this trial will have substantial implications for the treatment of acne. In specific aim 2, we will evaluate the impact of spironolactone versus doxycycline treatment on the microbiome, which will provide valuable insights regarding the relative effects of antibiotic (doxycycline) versus non-antibiotic (spironolactone) acne treatments on the microbiome. This trial will significantly influence healthcare practice with respect to the treatment of moderate to severe acne in women and inform policy regarding more appropriate use of antibiotics throughout medicine.
Transactions
| Action | Federal | Non-federal | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amendment | $681,600 | $0 | |
| Amendment | $883,902 | $0 | |
| Amendment | $0 | $0 | |
| Amendment | $0 | $0 | |
| Amendment | $0 | $0 | |
| Amendment | $0 | $0 | |
| Amendment | $1,029,338 | $0 | |
| Amendment | $1,029,338 | $0 | |
| Amendment | $1,040,468 | $0 | |
| Original award | $1,040,468 | $1,040,468 |
Subawards
| Subrecipient | Amount | Awarded |
|---|---|---|
| Brigham & Womens Hospital Inc. | $71,942 | |
| University Of Miami | $7,575 | |
| Johnson Dermatology | $13,560 | |
| Subrecipient not on record | $6,781 | |
| Subrecipient not on record | $12,106 | |
| Brigham & Womens Hospital Inc. | $81,730 | |
| Johnson Dermatology | $13,560 | |
| Subrecipient not on record | $12,106 | |
| Dermatologists Of Southwestern Ohio, LLC | $6,780 | |
| Oregon Health & Science University | $13,055 | |
| The Feinstein Institutes For Medical Research | $6,924 | |
| The Regents Of The University Of California. San Francisco | $3,188 | |
| The Ohio State University | $15,540 | |
| Brigham & Womens Hospital Inc. | $17,660 | |
| Oregon Health & Science University | $6,528 | |
| Johnson Dermatology | $27,120 | |
| Subrecipient not on record | $5,324 | |
| Oregon Health & Science University | $13,055 | |
| The Ohio State University | $7,770 | |
| Johnson Dermatology | $13,560 |
Show all 20
Quick answers
Who received award U01AR079752?
U01AR079752 was awarded to The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania by National Insititue of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (National Institutes of Health) on August 17, 2021.
How much is award U01AR079752 worth?
$6,745,582 has been obligated on U01AR079752: $5,705,114 in federal funding and $1,040,468 in non-federal funding.
On GovTribe
See this award's full record
- Every transaction and subaward
- The recipient's other awards and teaming partners
- Similar grant awards
- Ask GovTribe AI about this award