EXHIBIT_1_QUALITY_ASSURANCE_AND_SURVEILLANCE_PLAN_16-T-0007.docx

DOCX document 20 KB Posted

Attached to
Nerve Fiber Testing
Solicitation number
W91YU0-16-T-0007
Issued by

About this file

EXHIBIT 1 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND SURVEILLANCE PLAN 16-T-0007

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

EXHIBIT 1 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)

QUALITY ASSURANCE AND SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)

for

NERVE FIBER TESTING

1. OBJECTIVE: This plan provides a quality surveillance strategy for Nerve Fiber Testing Services. The primary purpose of this plan is to provide a basis for the Government’s evaluation of the Contractor’s key areas of performance under this contract. The Contracting Officer (KO), in conjunction with input provided by the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR), will evaluate the Contractor’s performance. Oversight of the Contractor’s performance will assure quality and consistency of contract performance.

1. PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT OBJECTIVE: The key area(s) of the Contractor’s performance that will be evaluated during the term of the contract. The PWS reference will be provided for each performance measurement objective.

1. ASSESSMENT METHOD: Contractor performance is inspected and evaluated on key areas of performance: fill rate monthly; turnover rate and substantiated patient/staff complaints annually; qualified candidates as needed. Method of surveillance is 100% inspection.

1. ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL): The degree to which the Government will allow the Contractor’s key areas of performance to vary; the variance from the standard that the Contractor is allowed and the grading/measurement associated with deviation from the specific performance standard.

1. KEY AREAS OF PERFORMANCE:

The following Performance Measurements Requirement Summary applies. The Government may modify inspection methods in accordance with site specific requirements.

PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE
STANDARD
ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL
METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
REMEDY
Routine Testing Para 3.4
Turnaround time of less than 30 calendar days from receipt of specimen.
99% compliance.
Department and COR Monitor.
Document in CPARS. Complete Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR), as needed.
Abnormal results. Para 3.7
Reviewed and signed by a Board Certified Laboratory Director.
100% compliance.
Department and COR Monitor
Document in CPARS. Complete CDR, as needed.
Handling of Specimen or Request Discrepancies. Para 3.5.
No more than one (1) specimen is lost or otherwise compromised per month.
95% compliance
Department and COR Monitor
Document in CPARS. Complete CDR, as needed.
Specimen Result Reporting. Para 3.7.
Report all abnormal results to the MAMC Laboratory and the MAMC requesting healthcare provider telephonically.
100% compliance
Department and COR Monitor.
Document in CPARS. Complete CDR, as needed.
Management Reports. Para 5.
Monthly reports of tests performed under this contract.
950% compliance
Department and COR Monitor.
Document in CPARS. Complete CDR, as needed.
Combating Trafficking in persons (awareness program).
FAR Clause 52.222-50 and FAR Subpart 22.1703.
100% compliance (zero tolerance) regarding trafficking in persons policy.
COR documentation and program review. Any non-compliance must be brought to the immediate attention of the KO.
Immediate termination for cause.
Contractor Manpower Report (CMR). Para 7.
Complete Contractor Manpower Report and notify COR.
Completed report.
Review CMR records to ensure was completed. Contract Specialist and COR Monitor.
Document in CPARS. Complete CDR, as needed.
STANDARDMEASUREMENTPAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
99% to 100%ExceptionalDocument Past Performance
96% to 98%Very GoodAssessment Report, paying particular attention
95%Satisfactoryto performance that exceeds the standard.
92% to 94%Marginal
92% or LessUnsatisfactory

F. CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT. This report shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer monthly (unless otherwise agreed upon between the Contracting Officer and the Contracting Officer’s Representative).

G. RE-PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES. If any of the services do not conform with contract requirements, the Government will require the Contractor to re-perform the services in conformity with contract requirements, at no additional cost to the Government. When the defects in services cannot be corrected due to circumstances, the Government may (1) require the contractor to take necessary action to ensure that future performance conforms to contract requirements and (2) reduce the contract price to reflect the reduced value of the services performed. The Contracting Officer may exercise appropriate contractual remedy should the Contractor fail to promptly take the necessary action to ensure future performance is in conformity with contract requirements.

When apparent non-satisfactory work is identified, the Contracting Officer’s Representative shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR) and submit to the Contracting Officer for review, use DD Form 2772. The Contractor shall then be required to respond to the CDR. The Contractor shall explain reasons for substandard performance, how performance will be returned to acceptable levels, and how recurrence of the same or like problems will be prevented. The Contracting Officer will evaluate the Contractor's explanation, assess its validity, and determine whether it is acceptable.

The Contractor shall be required to correct/eliminate any deficiencies in services in a timely manner. Notification begins when pertinent documents (e.g., Customer Complaint Record or CDR) are issued to the Contractor. Time of notification and correction of all applicable deficiencies should be entered on all Government documents and retained in the contract file. The Government may execute a deduction in payment for non-compliance when validated by the Contracting Officer.

H. PERFORMANCE RATINGS.

The Government will rate past performance using the following performance standards.

EXCEPTIONAL:
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.
VERY GOOD:
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.
SATISFACTORY:
Performance meets contractual requirements.
MARGINAL:
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
UNSATISFACTORY:
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

Other performance evaluation factors that will be monitored and documented in the contractor’s performance records but cannot be quantified by numerical measurements:

Contractor providing personnel exceeding the minimum qualification standards, and/or performance above or below the standard, for above factors, will be documented in the Contractor’s Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) for the reporting period.

NOTE: This plan is provided for information purposes only. The QASP is not a part of the solicitation, nor shall it be part of any resulting contract. The Government has the right to change or modify inspection methods at its discretion.

(End of QASP)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .