Enclosure1_PastPerformanceQuestionnaire_(PPQ).docx

DOCX document 47 KB Posted

Attached to
Wedge Barriers Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W912PF18R0022
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Expeditionary Contracting Command Regional Contracting Office Vicenza-Africa 414th CSB

About this file

Enclosure 1: Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Wedge Barriers, newest first.
File Type Posted
Enclosure_2_Decoder_Data_Sheet.pdf PDF
Enclosure_1_Monitor_Data_Sheet.pdf PDF
W912PF18R0022_0001.pdf PDF
Updated_SOW.pdf PDF
Enclosure2_Antimafia_Self_Certification.docx DOCX document
Attachment_1_SOW.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-_Bid_Schedule.XLSX XLSX spreadsheet
W912PF18R0022.pdf PDF
Enclosure3_Format_of_a_Bid_Bond.doc DOC document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information
Firm Name:CAGE Code:
Address:DUNs Number:

Phone Number: Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify): Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:
Complexity of WorkHighMedRoutine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: Clients are highly encouraged to submit completed questionnaires directly to the Government, in which case the Government may then contact the client for confirmation of past performance. Alternatively, the client may complete this questionnaire and submit it directly back to the offeror. The offeror will then submit the completed questionnaire with their proposal. The Government reserves the right to verify any and all information on this form.

Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(VG) Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were

effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory
Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not

performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(U) Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an

unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable
No information or did not apply to your contract
Rating will be neither positive nor

negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

VG
S

U

N

b) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

VG

S

U

N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?

VG
S

U

N

b) Overall customer satisfaction

VG
S

U

N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

b) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

c) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractual price(s)?

b) Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? If yes, please explain below.

Yes

No

c) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes

No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) Contractor complied with all safety requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

7. GENERAL

a) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)

b) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

c) Provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

File details come from the government source that posted it.