16-R-0006_(ATTCH_2).pdf

Solicitation #: W912LP-16-R -0006

Your assistance is requested in support of a Source Selection. IMPORTANT: Offeror MUST NOT review the completed Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) before submission. All completed PPQs must be submitted by the reference directly to the USPFO-IA Contracting Office via email, fax, or mail:

Iowa Army National Guard Office of the U.S. Property & Fiscal Officer for Iowa Camp Dodge Joint Maneuver Training Center 7105 NW 70th Avenue Johnston, Iowa, 50131-1824 ATTN: SFC Tracy Canada, Contracting Specialist Email: tracy.c.canada.mil@mail.mil

FAX: (515) 252-4617

When completed, the information on this form becomes SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected, accordingly.

TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR SUBMITTING PROPOSAL

1. Offeror Name & Complete Address:

Offeror must complete blocks 2 -7 to identify the contract between the offeror and the evaluating organization.

NOTE: contract must be relevant (similar size, scope, complexity, target audience) to the RFP.

2. Contract No:

3. Contract Initiation Date:

4. Contract Completion Date:

5. Contract Value (including options): $

6. Type of Contract (i.e., Firm-Fixed Price (FFP), Cost, Time & Material):

7. Description of Service(s)/Course(s) provided under referenced contract. (Please add a continuation sheet if more space is required):

TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE

8. EVALUATION:

a) Evaluator’s Name, Position:

b) Evaluator’s Phone #:

c) Evaluator’s Email:

d) Duration of Business Relations with Offeror’s Firm:

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

ATTACHMENT #2

mailto:tracy.c.canada.mil@mail.mil

Please select the response code which best reflects your experience with this contractor.

EX = Exceptional – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VG = Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S = Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MG = Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

US = Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’ corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/O = Not Observed – Performance in this element or sub-element was not observed.

(Please provide narrative comments below each factor to identify specific strengths/weakness relative to that factor.)

A. Offeror’s Business Practices - Business/Contracting Relations EX VG S MG US N/O

Problem Resolution EX VG S MG US N/O

Process Improvement EX VG S MG US N/O

Lesson Learned Incorporation EX VG S MG US N/O

B. Customer Relationship - Cooperative Behavior EX VG S MG US N/O

Commitment to Customer Satisfaction EX VG S MG US N/O

Responsiveness EX VG S MG US N/O

C. Ability to Successfully Perform - Training EX VG S MG US N/O

Course Design & Development EX VG S MG US N/O

Instruction EX VG S MG US N/O

Course Curriculum EX VG S MG US N/O

Course Benefit in workplace EX VG S MG US N/O

D. Prior Experience - Technical Knowledge in Course Subject Matter EX VG S MG US N/O

E. Adherence to Schedule - Adherence to scheduled tasks EX VG S MG US N/O

F. Quality of Contractor’s Team - Thoroughness EX VG S MG US N/O

Accuracy EX VG S MG US N/O

Overall Quality EX VG S MG US N/O

G. Overall Assessment of Contractor EX VG S MG US N/O

9. For any elements identified above that were rated Marginal or Unsatisfactory, has unsatisfactory performance been shared with the contractor?

( ) Yes ( ) No If Yes, communications with the contractor were ( ) written / ( ) verbal.

10. PLEASE PROVIDE NARRATIVE COMMENTS TO IDENTIFY (please add continuation page for additional comments):

a) Offeror’s two or three best corporate “traits” or observed skills.

b) Areas of performance where the offeror has the most room for improvement.