A.07.24_Solicitation_Amendment.pdf

W912HV-17-R-0004

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Subject solicitation entitled "Maintain/Repair Construct IDIQ" is hereby amended as follow s: The hour and date has been extended to NLT 10:00 am 8 June 2017 JST.

The follow ing pages are hereby superseded by the attached revised pages and addendums to the solicitation. The revision mark (Am-0001) is show n on each revised page in the specif ications. Revised section(s) w ill replace like numbered section(s) in the subject solicitation specif ications. Changes in specif ication are indicated by a red vertical line in the left margin of revised areas. Added text is underlined.

Deleted text is overstruck. All portions of the revised section(s) shall apply w hether or not changes have been indicated. Questions and Answ ers. Answ ers provided below do not amend the solicitation (specif ications/draw ings, etc.) unless such revision is specif ically incorporated into the solicitation. Continued on page tw o.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 37

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 26-May-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912HV-17-R-0004

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

17-Apr-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

18-May-2017

CODE

CONTRACTING DIVISION

USACE-JAPAN DISTRICT

RM 147, BLDG. 250

CAMP ZAMA

ZAMA-CITY, KANAGAWA 252-8511

JAPAN

W912HV 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

Continued from page one.

Revised Section(s) N/A Project Table of Contents, Cover and Page 1 00 10 00 Removed OMB language

Clarified language in Contract Minimum/Maximum Value 00 21 00 Rearranged Tropical Cyclone Conditions from section 00 21 00 to 00 73 00 00 22 16 Joint Venture language was added to section 5.0 Removed resource and schedule language from section 6.0 00 70 00 Added DFARS Clause 252.225-7044 and included items list

Deleted DFARS 252.225-7045 Tailored 52.228-15 Performance and Payment Bonds - Construction

00 73 00 Rearranged Tropical Cyclone Conditions from section 00 21 00 to 00 73 00 Added Antiterrorirm/Operations Security language Clarified bonding requirements

01 11 00 SUMMARY OF WORK, pages 1 through 16. Revised paragraphs 1.3.

Inserted new paragraph 1.5.2 and renumbered existing paragraphs and 1.5.2 through 1.5.7 as 1.5.3 through 1.5.8

Added Section(s) 01 45 00 RESIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONTRACTOR MODE (QCS), pages

1 through 8

SECTION 00 50 00 - CONTRACTING FORMS AND SUPPLEMENTS

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION, CONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (CLIN) SCHEDULE

The following have been modified:

Solicitation Information Description: The United States Army Corps of Engineers, District of Japan has a requirement to provide construction services to the Kanto Plain (Camp Zama, Sagamihara Family Housing Area, Sagami General Depot, Yokohama North Dock and Akasaka Press Center) area on an Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity contracting vehicle.

Point of Contact:

Christopher Taylor, Contract Specialist christopher.taylor@usace.army.mil

Requests for Information are due no later than May 11, 2017 see Section 00 21 00 for more details.

Requests for Information shall reference W912HV-17-R-0004.

NO TELEPHONE CALLS WILL BE ACCEPTED.

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation, Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) Schedule mailto:christopher.taylor@usace.army.mil

CONTRACT MINIMUM/MAXIMUM VALUE

(a) In accordance with the requirements of FAR 52.216-22 (Section 00 70 00), the maximum contract value of work that may be ordered through the issuance of task orders under this contract shall be ¥6,000,143,100 for the life of the contract to include all options. The Government obligates itself to order not less than ¥3,500,000 in services and may order up to ¥3,551,105,100 for the base of the contract.

Each option year (if exercised) the Government obligates itself to order not less than ¥3,500,000 in services and may order up to ¥1,224,519,000.

(b) The government will obligate the minimum guarantee at the time of awarding the basic contract and options, by issuing the minimum guarantee or task order.

(c) If the Government orders work in excess of the minimum but not up to the maximum amount as established for the life of the contract, this circumstance shall not constitute the basis for an equitable adjustment in price.

STATUTORY COST LIMITATION

Project(s) to be ordered through issuance of task order under this contract may be subject to Statutory Cost Limitations. Refer to DFARS 252.236-7006, Cost Limitation, in Section 00 73 00.

SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS

1. DELIVERY OF BIDS/OFFERS

a. Each bidder/offeror is solely responsible for ensuring that their bid/offer is received by the Government as specified in the solicitation. Please read the following statements to ensure timely submittal of your bid/offer:

(1) Closely coordinate the delivery of your bid/offer in sufficient time before the bid opening date/proposal due date.

(2) Bids/offers will not be accepted at the main gate of Government facilities.

(3) Bids must be mailed to

Attention: Christopher Taylor Contracting Division USACE-Japan District

RM 147, BLDG. 250

Camp Zama Zama-City, Kanagawa 252-8511 Japan

2. SOLICITATIONS FOR LOCAL SOURCES ONLY. This contract will be performed in its entirety in the country of Japan and is intended only for local sources. (See Federal Acquisition Regulation 5.202(a)(12) and Paragraph titled, ”Offeror Eligibility”.) (JED APR 2006)

3. SUBMISSIONS OF OFFERS IN JAPANESE YEN. Offers submitted in response to this solicitation shall be in terms of Japanese Yen, including any required bid guarantee. Offers received in other than Japanese Yen shall be rejected.

4. REQUEST FOR EXPLANATION OR INTEPRETATION. Request for explanation or interpretation of the solicitation, drawings, specifications, etc., must be submitted to the Government point of contact by

5. SIGNATURE ON OFFERS. Offers must be signed by an officer of the company or an individual who is authorized to sign offers for and on behalf of the company. An individual, other than an officer of the company, who signs an offer must submit evidence of his authority to sign such offer. This evidence must accompany the offer. Failure to comply with this requirement may be cause for rejection of the offer.

6. JOINT VENTURE. In the event the offeror is a joint venture, the offer must be signed by an authorized representative of each participant in the joint venture. Failure to comply with this requirement may be cause for rejection of the offer.

7. OFFEROR ELIGIBILITY. Only local sources will be considered under this solicitation. Local sources are sources (e.g. corporations, partnerships, or Joint Ventures [For a Joint Venture, the Joint Venture as an independent entity must satisfy the local source requirements or, in the alternative, each member of the Joint Venture must individually satisfy the local source requirements] that are physically located in Japan and authorized (i.e. licensed and registered) to perform in Japan, the type of construction work specific in this solicitation. Specifically, a prospective offeror must be duly authorized to operate and conduct business in Japan and must fully comply with all laws, decrees, labor standards, and regulations of Japan during the performance of the resulting contracts. In addition, prior to award of the contracts, offerors must be registered with the Government of Japan to do construction work in Japan and possess necessary construction licenses and permits to perform work required under this solicitation. The U.S.

Government will not offer “United States Official Contractor” status under Article XIV of the US-Japan Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) to U.S. contractors normally resident in the United States; nor will the U.S. Government certify employees of such contractors as “Members of the Civilian Component” under Article I(b) of the SOFA.

8. DEFINITION OF THE WORDS ITEM/ITEMS.

a. This solicitation contains a base period schedule and 2 option period schedules for award to a single offeror.

b. For the purpose of this solicitation, the words "ITEM" and "ITEMS" as used in provision(s) of this section shall be construed to mean "SCHEDULE" and "SCHEDULES", respectively.

9. METHOD OF PROCUREMENT. The US Army Corps of Engineers, Japan District, intends to solicit this requirement using the source selection procedures in accordance with the provisions set forth in this Request For Proposal (RFP). Single Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract will be awarded to the offerors who submits a proposal determined to be the lowest priced, technically acceptable proposal by the Government (see Section 00 22 16).

10. PRE-AWARD SURVEYS. The Government reserves the right to conduct a preaward survey of any firm under consideration to confirm any part of the information furnished by the offeror, or to require other evidence of managerial, financial, technical, and other capabilities, the positive establishment of which is determined by the Government to be necessary for the successful performance of the contract.

11. Bidder Inquiry

Technical inquiries and questions relating to this solicitation are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at (https://www.projnet.org) No Later Than (NLT) May 11, 2017. To submit and review inquiry items, prospective vendors will need to use the Bidder Inquiry Key presented below and follow the instructions listed below the key for access. A prospective vendor who submits a comment /question will receive an acknowledgement of their comment/question via email. Another email to the same address will notify the prospective vendor once the reply is available for viewing. All timely questions and approved answers will be made available through ProjNet. Approved answers to all timely questions will also be posted in an amendment to the solicitation in the form of a report generated from ProjNet as soon as the comment/question entering period is over and all answers are finalized. In the event of a conflict between the bidder inquiry responses and the solicitation, the solicitation shall govern.

The Bidder Inquiry Key is: X3REPA-J9T28H

The Solicitation Number is : W912HV-17-R-0004

Specific Instructions for ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access:

1. From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.

2. Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.

3. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.

4. Email. Enter the email address you would like to use for communication.

5. Click Continue. A page will then open saying that a user account was not found and will ask you to create one using the provided form.

6. Enter your First Name, Last Name, Company, City, State, Phone, Email, Secret Question, Secret

Answer, and Time Zone. Make sure to remember your Secret Question and Answer as they will be used from this point on to access the ProjNet system.

7. Click Add User. Once this is completed you are now registered within ProjNet and are currently logged into the system.

Specific Instructions for Future ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access:

1. For future access to ProjNet, you will not be provided any type of password. You will utilize your

Secret Question and Secret Answer to log in.

2. From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.

3. Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.

4. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.

5. Email. Enter the email address you used to register previously in ProjNet.

6. Click Continue. A page will then open asking you to enter the answer to your Secret Question.

7. Enter your Secret Answer and click Login. Once this is completed you are now logged into the system.

12. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE.

a. Offerors are strongly urged and expected to attend and participate in the pre-proposal conference. The purpose of this conference is to promote uniform interpretation of the solicitation documents and work requirements and can include discussions of any problems with interpretations of the solicitation documents and work execution identified by potential offerors through written questions. In no event will a failure to attend the pre-proposal conference constitute grounds for a claim after award of the contract.

b. Offerors are encouraged to ask questions at the conference. Any questions made at the conference may or may not be addressed at the conference, but will be addressed in the minutes of the conference.

c. This pre-proposal conference and site visit will be conducted at 1300 hours on 27 April 2017. The site visit will start at the front of Bldg 645, then move to Bldg. 951. To coordinate for base access, contact Roger Riddick (Roger.K.Riddick.civ@usace.army.mil) at 046-407-4374, Lorna Alvarado (Lorna.Y.Alvarado.civ@usace.army.mil) at 046-407-8061, or Janae Ball (Janae.C.Ball.civ@usace.army.mil) at 046-407-5159.

13. ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

In order to prevent a potential conflict of interest under FAR subpart 9.5, firms that prepared or assisted in preparing a statement of work, specifications, or plans for this project in any capacity (to include as a prime contractor, partner, subcontractor, or consultant) under any prior contract shall not be a bidder/offeror under this solicitation and shall not be a part of the bidder's/offeror's team in any capacity

(to include as a prime contractor, partner, subcontractor, or consultant). Failure to comply with this provision may result in termination for default.

SECTION 00 22 16 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

BASIC PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

The Government will not make assumptions concerning intent, capabilities, or experiences. Clear identification of proposal details shall be the sole responsibility of the Offeror. The Government may reject incomplete proposals after initial evaluation without further consideration. Therefore, the proposal shall meet the following basic requirements.

a. Proposals must be sent in two (2) separate volumes. Four Compact Disks are of the proposal are required. Each volume shall be contained within a separate Compact Discs Each volume shall be identified by the solicitation number, volume number, and name, address, and telephone number of the prime Offeror on the cover. Each volume shall contain a Table of Contents and include at the bottom left side of each page the volume and page number.

b.The Proposal shall be typed and submitted in English and easy to read.

c. Proposals shall be organized, concise, and submitted in the volumes and in the order indicated in 4.0 Proposal Information and related Evaluation Factors discussed in Section Procedures. See Section 00 22 16. Volumes shall be clearly identified.

d. Offerors shall verify that the information for all forms submitted are current, correct and complete including names of the points of contact, email address, fax number, and telephone number.

e. Offerors shall submit the Standard Form 1442 completely paying particular attention to boxes 19 and 20 and the bid schedule.

f. Offerors shall submit the CLIN schedule found in Section 00 10 00.

g. Offerors are reminded that elaborate corporate marketing information, formatting, special reproduction techniques, et al are not necessary. Proposals shall completely and adequately address the requirements of this solicitation.

h. If additional information is provided it shall be in regard to the solicitation requirements, only.

i. Contractors are cautioned against submitting conditional proposals. All questions and concerns shall be addressed to the Contract Specialist.

j. Proposal Expenses and Pre-Contract Costs: The Request for Proposal (RFP) solicitation does not commit the Government to pay any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of a proposal or for any other costs incurred by any firm submitting a proposal in response to this solicitation. Also, the Government will not be responsible for costs associated with preparing proposals for individual task orders.

k. The successful offeror’s proposal will become part of the contract to the extent it does not conflict with the solicitation or provides a betterment.

Proposal Package Format:

Volume 1

Tab A-Specialized Experience Tab B-Evaluation Orders Tab C-Past Performance

Volume 2 Tab A-Prices Tab B-Required Pre-Award Information

SELECTION PROCEDURES

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD ONE

STEP - - LOWEST PRICE/TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE

1.0 OVERVIEW

2.0 BASIS FOR AWARD

3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

4.0 PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

5.0 VOLUME 1 – TAB A - FACTOR 1: SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

6.0 VOLUME 1 – TAB B - FACTOR 2: EVALUATION ORDERS

7.0 VOLUME 1 – TAB C – FACTOR 3: PAST PERFORMANCE

8.0 VOLUME 2 – TAB A – FACTOR 4: PRICES -- THE EXHIBIT

9.0 VOLUME 2 – TAB B – NON RATED FACTOR: REQUIRED PRE-AWARD INFORMATION

10.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

ATTACHMENTS

1 - PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

2 - COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE FORM (PRIME CONTRACTOR)

3 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

1.0 OVERVIEW

1.1. Interested firms (here after referred to as Offerors) shall submit proposals demonstrating their capability to successfully execute the construction services contract resulting from this solicitation.

1.2 This is a lowest price technically acceptable source selection for the Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract for Exterior/Interior Work at Kanto Plain, Japan. The Government will evaluate proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein, and award a firm fixed price IDIQ contract to the responsible offeror, whose proposal conforms with all the terms and conditions of the solicitation and whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government utilizing procedures in accordance FAR PART 15.101-2 Lowest Price Technically Acceptable Source Selection Process. The lowest price technically acceptable source selection process is appropriate when best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price.

2.0 BASIS FOR AWARD

2.1 The Contracting Officer will award a firm fixed price IDIQ contract to the responsible Offeror whose proposal the Source Selection Authority has determined conforms to the solicitation and offers the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-price.

A. The evaluation factors that establish the requirements of acceptability shall be as set forth in the solicitation.

B. Proposals are evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using the non-cost/price factors.

C. Exchanges may occur (see FAR PART 15.306).

3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

3.1. Proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint. Do not assume offerors will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposals. In accordance with FAR 52.215-1, Para. (f)(4), the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with Offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint.

3.2 Submit proposal on separate Compact Discs. See Section 00 20 00 for details regarding proposal format.

4.0 PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

Location

Factor Number

Description

Rating

Volume 1, Tab A Factor 1 Specialized Experience Acceptable/Unacceptable

Volume 1, Tab B Factor 2 Evaluation Order Acceptable/Unacceptable

Volume 1, Tab C Factor 3

Past Performance Acceptable/Unacceptable

Location

Factor Number

Description file://POA-NETAPP1.POA.DS.USACE.ARMY.MIL/POA/CT/Private/CT-CW/FY15/15R0024%20St%20Paul%20Harbor/B.8.9.1_Source_Selection_Plan/Source%20Selection%20Plan.docx#P289_46237

Volume 2, Tab A

Factor 4

Prices -- Standard Form 1442 & Contract Line Item Schedule

Volume 2, Tab B

N/A

Required Pre-Award Information

Not Rated

5.0 VOLUME 1- TAB A - FACTOR 1: SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

5.1. Submission Requirement:

The offer shall submit ten (10) projects which demonstrate experience to complete task order requirements under this construction services contract. Projects shall have been completed within five (5) years prior to the date of this solicitation. Utilize the Attachments one, two and three at the end of the section.

The minimum requirement for this evaluation factor has been met when the offeror demonstrates experience, as a Prime Contractor (i.e. as it would appear in Block 14 of a SF 1442), on ten (10) projects which each meets all the below criteria for minimum acceptability:

• Experience utilizing multidisciplinary construction utilizing subcontractors where necessary to repair interior and exterior real properties:

o Ranging in value from ¥200,000 to ¥100,000,000 o That were performed in Japan o At least two (2) projects that contained hazardous waste o By the Offeror as the prime contractor

5.2. Evaluation Criteria:

The Government will evaluate the ten (10) submitted projects against the requirements listed in Section

5.1. To be acceptable, experience under all criteria in Section 5.1 shall be met.

Note: For purposes of evaluating construction experience as a prime contractor, the offeror and prime contractor are defined as the contractor identified in Block 14 of SF 1442. If a joint venture is identified in Block 14 of the SF 1442, then a signed joint venture agreement must be submitted with the proposal and the joint venture shall be registered as such in the System for Award Management (SAM). Projects performed by contractors other than the prime contractor (such as teaming partners) will not be evaluated as construction experience by a prime contractor unless those other contractors are part of a joint venture for this solicitation as demonstrated by a signed joint venture agreement. For projects in which your firm or a joint venture partner firm performed the role of a subcontractor, this will not count as construction experience as a prime contractor. The government will not consider prior projects completed by a joint venture prime contractor as construction experience by the prime contractor unless the offeror is the same joint venture entity that performed the work as the prime contractor on the prior project.

6.0 VOLUME 1 – TAB B – FACTOR 2: EVALUATION ORDERS

6.1. Submission Requirement:

Using the Evaluation Orders sketches and the Exhibit the offeror shall develop and submit a proposed pricing structure to complete the Evaluation Orders. The offeror must use only the Exhibit to propose the pricing structure.

6.2. Evaluation Criteria

The Government will evaluate the submitted proposed pricing structure against the Independent Government Estimate. To be acceptable, at least 80% of the pricing structure items proposed from the Exhibit must correspond to line items included in the Government Estimate.

Price and quantities of the overall Evaluation Order will not be a selection factor for the awarded IDIQ but shall be provided.

7.0 VOLUME 1 – TAB C – FACTOR 3: PAST PERFORMANCE

7.1. Submission Requirement:

Past performance refers to the quality of recent project experience from the owner's perspective. Past performance evaluations or questionnaires shall be provided for at least five projects. For Federal projects, the offeror may rely on finalized CCASS or CPARS reports, otherwise the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in this section is provided for the offeror to submit to the client for each project. Previously completed PPQ’s may be submitted; however, ensure a current phone number and email address is provided for the client point of contact. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal and may be duplicated for submission on future solicitations. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first 2 pages of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. Client requests for questionaires must be submitted to the Contract Specialist prior to the proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Projects cited shall be of a similar size, scope, or magnitude and currently well underway (at least 80% completed) or completed and turned over no longer than five (5) years preceding the date of this solicitation.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may be include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting Systems (CPARS), inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror. See FAR Subpart 42.15 for more information. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

7.2. Evaluation Criteria:

Past Performance will be rated on an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” basis using the ratings and descriptions shown below.

Acceptable – Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation from past performance information that the offeror will satisfactory perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown (see note below).

Unacceptable – Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to satisfactorily perform the required effort.

Note: An offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or is so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned will be determined to have ‘unknown’ past performance and shall not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably. Unknown past performance shall be considered “Acceptable”.

VOLUME 2 – PRICE

Submit the following information should be on a separate cd. See Section 00 20 00 for details regarding proposal format.

8.0 VOLUME 2 – TAB A – FACTOR 4: PRICES -- THE EXHIBIT

8.1. Submission Requirement:

8.1.1. Submit a properly filled out and executed SF 1442, along with the completed Exhibit containing proposed total item pricing. The price of each line item on the Exhibits shall be the fully burdened price covering all costs (direct, indirect including profit) in the performance of that particular item. These prices are used to add up the base year and two one year options. These totals are for evaluation purposes to determine the lowest evaluated price.

The number of hours/quantity for incidental items will be negotiated per project, when required, and the total price included in the lump sum price of the negotiated Task Order.

8.1.2. Supplemental Price Breakdown. If deemed necessary to evaluate the price proposals, the Government will request a price breakdown of the Contract Line items in a sealed envelope marked “Price Breakdown Information,” in Excel format. The Government will provide details on where and how to send the breakdown. This information will not be needed sooner than three (3) working days after the proposal submission due date. This information may be required for the initial proposal and, if requested, for any revised proposals. This information is not an opportunity for an offeror to revise its non-price or price proposal.

8.2. Evaluation Criteria:

8.2.1 Price will not be rated or scored, but will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis; comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation and comparison of proposed prices with the independent government estimate. The price evaluators will also check for appearance of unbalanced line item prices. Offerors are cautioned to distribute direct costs, such as material, labor, equipment, subcontracts, etc., and to evenly distribute indirect costs, such as job overhead, home office overhead, bond, etc., to the Exhibit line items.

8.2.2 If deemed necessary, the supplemental price breakdown information will be used to assist the Government in performing the price evaluations described above.

9.0 VOLUME 2, TAB B - REQUIRED PRE-AWARD INFORMATION

9.1 Submission Requirement:

Submit this information for the Contracting Officer’s determination of Offeror responsibility, which includes, but is not limited to the following:

(a) Joint Venture agreement or Limited Liability Company Certificate of Organization, Articles of Organization and Operating Agreement, if applicable.

(b) A list of present commitments, including the dollar value thereof, and name of the organization under which the work is being performed. Include names and telephone numbers of personnel within each organization who are familiar with the prospective contractor’s performance.

(c) A certified statement listing: (1) each contract awarded within the preceding three (3) month period exceeding $1,000,000.00 or Yen equivalent in value with a brief description of the contract;

and (2) each contract awarded within the preceding three (3) year period not already physically completed and exceeding $5,000,000.00 or Yen equivalent in value with a brief description of the contract. If the prospective contractor is a joint venture, each joint venture member will be required to submit the above defined certification.

(d) Competed Representations and Certifications included by full text in Section 00 45 00. List any changes to SAM (System for Award Management) in 52.204-8 for FAR Clauses and 252.204- 7007 for DFAR clauses. Provide for any certification where vendor indicated in SAM that certification would be provided with specific offer.

(e) One copy of the following information:

(1) Proof of Financial Ability (Most recent financial statement covering assets and liabilities)

(2) Number of years the firm has been in business

(3) Name, address and telephone number of firm’s bonding company

(4) Information showing offeror’s bondability for this project. Submit a letter from the prime contractor’s bonding company indicating the offeror’s ability to obtain performance and payment bonds in the amount of their proposal price.

(5) Name, address and telephone numbers of two credit/trade references.

9.2 Evaluation Criteria:

The Contracting Officer shall use this information in making an affirmative responsibility determination for award to the Successful Offeror, in accordance with FAR Part 9.

10. EVALUATION PROCEDURES

10.1. EVALUATION

10.1.1 The Government intends to award without discussions. Offerors are cautioned to put forth their best efforts, and to furnish all information clearly to allow the Government to evaluate proposals. Offerors should not assume that they will have an opportunity to clarify or correct anything in their proposal after submitting it.

10.1.2. A “Competitive Range” will be established in the event that the Government decides that discussions with offerors are required or are considered to be in the Government’s best interests.

10.1.3. If discussions are held, the Government may engage in a broad give and take with those offerors in the competitive range, in accordance with FAR 15.306(d). During discussions, the Government may ask the Offeror to further explain its proposal and to answer questions about it.

10.1.4. Upon conclusion of discussions, offerors will be afforded an opportunity to submit their proposal revisions for final evaluation.

10.2 EVALUATION RATING SYSTEM

10.2.1 General: The Government will review the proposals against the minimum requirements stated in the solicitation. The Government will support each rating with a narrative that clearly states how the proposal met or did not meet the factor criteria as well as any required clarifications.

10.2.2 Rating System: After determining whether the criteria has been met, the Government will assign a rating of “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” to each non-price factor.

Ratings: The following ratings will be used in the evaluation of all factors and sub-factors except past performance.

Acceptable (A): The proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable (U): The proposal does not clearly meet the listed requirements of each subfactor.

ATTACHMENT 1

PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

Name of Solicitation

Name of Firm

Address

Phone

E-mail

DUNS#:

Also provide any other assigned number that identifies the member firm(s) in the CPARS database. If a separate DUNS has been created for a joint venture (J-V) it must also be submitted. Provide a DUNS number for each company identified in any proposed Contractor-subcontractor association of firms. If the firm is a joint venture or contractor-subcontractor association of firms, list the individual firms and briefly describe the nature of the association. Provide DUNS for each.

Firm 1:

Firm 2:

Firm 3:

Nature of Association:

AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATORS. FAR 52.215-11

The Offeror represents that the following persons are authorized to negotiate on its behalf with the Government in connection with this Request for Proposals (RFP).

[List names, titles, and telephone number of the authorized negotiator.] Name of Person Authorized to Negotiate:

Negotiator's Address:

Negotiator's Telephone:

Negotiator’s E-mail:

ATTACHMENT 2

COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE (PRIME CONTRACTOR)

Provide the following information to show examples of projects your company completed within the last ten (10) years indicating experience with projects of similar type and scope. Use one form per project.

a. Type of Work

b. Your Firm’s Name

c. Name of Project (include Federal Contract Number if applicable)

d. Location of Project

e. Owner

f. General Scope of Construction Project

g. Your Role (Prime, Joint Venture, or Subcontractor, etc.) and Work Your Company Self-Performed :

h. Construction Cost

i. Extent and Type of Work You Subcontracted Out

j. Dates Construction:

Began Completed

k. Your Performance Evaluation by Owner, if known

l. Were You Terminated or Assessed Liquidated Damages?

(If either is “Yes”, attach an Explanation)

m. Owner’s Point of Contact for Reference (Name and Company ( Name and Company)

n. Current Telephone Number of Reference POC

o. Current Email Address of Reference POC

ATTACHMENT 3 PAST PERFORMANCE

QUESTIONNAIRE

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Offeror Information Firm Being Evaluated: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

Contract Title: Contract Location:

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete following blocks)

Client Information Name: Title:

Phone Number: Email Address:

Describe the client’s role in the project:

Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

Client’s Signature:

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR

EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication) Section 00 22 11 P 3

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and E VG S M U N concerned with the interests of the customer?

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E

VG

S

M

U

N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section. Yes

No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. Yes

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely

E VG S M U N

manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.

Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

END OF

QUESTIONNAIRE

NOTE: USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND

SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE

COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE

THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS

ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR.

HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE

CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT

RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

The following have been deleted:

52.211-10 52.211-12 52.211-13 52.236-15

SECTION 00 50 00 - CONTRACTING FORMS AND SUPPLEMENTS

The offer guarantee is not required has been added.

The standard size code $33,500,000 has been added.

The required response date/time has changed from 01-Jun-2017 02:00 PM to 09-Jun-2017 10:00 AM.

SECTION 00 70 00 - CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT

The following have been added by full text:

252.225-7044 BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM--CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL--BASIC (NOV 2014)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--

Commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) item--

(i) Means any item of supply (including construction material) that is--

(A) A commercial item (as defined in paragraph (1) of the definition of ``commercial item'' in section 2.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation);

(B) Sold in substantial quantities in the commercial marketplace; and

(C) Offered to the Government, under a contract or subcontract at any tier, without modification, in the same form in which it is sold in the commercial marketplace; and

(ii) Does not include bulk cargo, as defined in 46 U.S.C. 40102(4), such as agricultural products and petroleum products.

“Component” means any article, material, or supply incorporated directly into construction material.

“Construction material” means an article, material, or supply brought to the construction site by the Contractor or a subcontractor for incorporation into the building or work. The term also includes an item brought to the site preassembled from articles, materials, or supplies. However, emergency life safety systems, such as emergency lighting, fire alarm, and audio evacuation systems, that are discrete systems incorporated into a public building or work and that are produced as complete systems, are evaluated as a single and distinct construction material regardless of when or how the individual parts or components of those systems are delivered to the construction site.

Materials purchased directly by the Government are supplies, not construction material.

“Cost of components” means--

(i) For components purchased by the Contractor, the acquisition cost, including transportation costs to the place of incorporation into the end product (whether or not such costs are paid to a domestic firm), and any applicable duty (whether or not a duty-free entry certificate is issued); or

ii) For components manufactured by the Contractor, all costs associated with the manufacture of the component, including transportation costs as described in paragraph (1) of this definition, plus allocable overhead costs, but excluding profit. Cost of components does not include any costs associated with the manufacture of the construction material.

“Domestic construction material” means--

(i) An unmanufactured construction material mined or produced in the United States; or

(ii) A construction material manufactured in the United States, if--

(A) The cost of its components mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States exceeds 50 percent of the cost of all its components. Components of foreign origin of the same class or kind for which nonavailability determinations have been made are treated as domestic; or

(B) The construction material is a COTS item.

``United States'' means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and outlying areas.

(b) Domestic preference. This clause implements the Balance of Payments Program by providing a preference for domestic construction material. The Contractor shall use only domestic construction material in performing this contract, except for—

(1) Construction material valued at or below the simplified acquisition threshold in part 2 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation;

(2) Information technology that is a commercial item; or

(3) The construction material or components listed by the Government as follows:

58 Fence posts & accessories

1 aggregates (sand, gravel, soil, etc) 2 portland cement 3 concrete products (blocks, bricks, etc) 4 petroleum products (asphalt & other finished products) 5 acoustical ceiling tiles 6 Glass, clear (glazing) 7 Gypsum wallboard 8 Insulation board, mineral wool 9 Glass insulation, wool 10 Structural steel shapes 11 Ceramic tile 12 Reinforcing steel 13 Steel plate, galv 14 Elec rigid conduit 15 EMT conduit 16 PVC conduit 17 Outlet box, elec 18 Elec wiring 19 Elec cable 20 Industrial gases 21 Woods (logs, veneer & lumber of the Alaskan yellow cedar, angelique, balsa, ekki, greenheart, lignum vitae, mahogany & teak) 22 Shellac 23 Galvanized Steel Sheet 24 Stainless Steel Sheet, SUS 304 25 Steel Pipe & fittings 26 Copper Pipe & fittings 27 PVC pipe & fittings 28 Stainless Steel Pipe & fittings 29 Cast Iron Pipe & fittings 30 Pipe insulation, fiberglass 31 Pipe insulation, calcium silicate 32 Duct insulation, fiberglass 33 Valves, bronze 34 Strainer, bronze 35 Valves, Cast Iron (gate, glove, check) 36 Valves, Stainless Steel (gate, check) 37 Strainer, stainless steel 38 Water Closet 39 Pressure Switch 40 Pressure Gage 41 Vinyl Cove Base & Adhesive 42 Ceiling Access Panel 43 Metal Suspension System 44 Toilet Tissue Dispenser 45 Soap Dish 46 Vinyl Wall Covering 47 Exit Sign - with Kanji characters 48 Cubicle Transformer 49 Electrical Manhole 50 Electrical Handhole 51 Communication Manhole 52 Concrete utility pole 53 Transformer, pole mounted 54 Street light with steel pole 55 Vinyl Tile 56 Chainlink Fence 57 Barbed wire

(End of clause)

52.216-19 ORDER LIMITATIONS. (OCT 1995)

(a) Minimum order. When the Government requires supplies or services covered by this contract in an amount of less than ¥3,500,000, the Government is not obligated to purchase, nor is the Contractor obligated to furnish, those supplies or services under the contract.

(b) Maximum order. The Contractor is not obligated to honor:

(1) Any order for a single item in excess of ¥108,639,915 (insert dollar figure or quantity);

(2) Any order for a combination of items in excess of ¥108,639,915 (insert dollar figure or quantity); or

(3) A series of orders from the same ordering office within 10 days that together call for quantities exceeding the limitation in subparagraph (1) or (2) above.

(c) If this is a requirements contract (i.e.,…