A.07.23_Attachment_3_PPQ_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 37 KB Posted

Attached to
FY18 81st Various Resets-MS007 HVAC Reset Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W912HP18R1004
Issued by
Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Charleston

About this file

Attachment 3

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to FY18 81st Various Resets-MS007 HVAC Reset, newest first.
File Type Posted
A.07.24_AMD_0002_18R1004_FY18_81st_Resets.pdf PDF
A.07.24_AMD_0001_MS007_Bldg_JK215_Lead_Paint_Sample_Locations.pdf PDF
A.07.24_AMD_0001_MS007_Bldg_JK215_Asbestos_Sample_Locations.pdf PDF
A.07.24_AMD_0001_FY18_81st_Resets.pdf PDF
KY043_HVAC_Reset_Drawings_RTA_06_22_18.pdf PDF
NC019_HVAC_RESET_SPEC_RTA_06_28_18.pdf PDF
MS007_HVAC_Reset_Drawings_RTA_06_22_18.pdf PDF
A.07.23_Attachment_2_Descriptive_Summary_Sheet.docx DOCX document
AL040_HVAC_RESET_SPEC_RTA_06_28_18.pdf PDF
A.07.23_Attachment_1_Proposal_Data_Sheet.docx DOCX document
NC027_HVAC_RESET_SPEC_RTA_06_28_18.pdf PDF
FL037_HVAC_ELEC_RESETS_SPEC_RTA_06_28_18.pdf PDF
MS007_HVAC_RESET_SPEC_RTA_06_28_18.pdf PDF
A.07.23_Attachment_4_Project_Proposal_Chart.docx DOCX document
FL037_HVAC_Reset_Drawings_RTA_06_22_18.pdf PDF
KY043_Plumbing_Reset_Drawings_RTA_06_15_18.pdf PDF
FL037_ELEC_Reset_DRAWINGS_06_15_18.pdf.pdf PDF
KY043_Plumbing_Reset_Drawings_RTA_06_15_18.pdf PDF
A.07.23_Solicitation_W912HP18R1004_81st_Resets.pdf PDF
AL040_HVAC_Reset_Drawings_RTA_06_22_18.pdf PDF
NC019_HVAC_Reset_Drawings_RTA_06_26_18.pdf PDF
KY043_HVAC_PLUMB_RESETS_SPEC_RTA_06_28_18.pdf PDF
NC027_HVAC_Reset_Drawings_RTA_06_26_18.pdf PDF
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 3

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHIC H BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts
EVGSMUN
b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance
EVGSMUN
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
EVGSMUN

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract
EVGSMUN

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?
EVGSMUN

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
EVGSMUN
d) Overall customer satisfaction
EVGSMUN

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
EVGSMUN
b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort
EVGSMUN
c) Government Property Control
EVGSMUN
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel
EVGSMUN
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns
EVGSMUN
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines
EVGSMUN
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes
EVGSMUN
h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
EVGSMUN

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?
E
VG
S
M
U
N
b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client
E
VG
S
M
U
N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back- up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E

VG

S

M

U

N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.
Yes

No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes

No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.
Yes

No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

VG

S

M

U

N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.
E
VG
S
M
U
N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

VG

S

M

U

N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)
E
VG
S
M
U
N
c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)
Yes

No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
E
VG
S
M
U
N

NOTE: USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATINGDEFINITIONNOTE
(E) Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
(VG) Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory
Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
(M) Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
(U) Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
(N) Not Applicable
No information or did not apply to your contract
Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

File details come from the government source that posted it.