BLDG_3_and_9_Asbestos__Memphis_IH__Survey_Results.pdf

Building 3 – Main Fabrication / Mechanics Shop

Building 3 – Main Fabrication / Mechanics Shop

Asbestos Survey The following ACMs results exceeded the EPA-NESHAPs, State of Tennessee and OSHA definition for a regulated ACM of >1% asbestos.

Building: Building 3 Inspection Date: 9/12/2011

Building ID:

Main Fabrication / Mechanics Shop

Sample No: 3-2B

Room / Area: Northwest Corner Material Assessment Sample No. 3-2A

Interior Window Glazing in Southwest Corner

Product Type Interior Window Glazing

Approx Quantity 2,142 LF Total

Condition Fair

Friability Non-Friable

Asbestos Type 1-2% Chrysotile

Comments

Southeast Corner*

*Not Analyzed = A “Stop at First Positive” approach was used for each group of homogeneous materials.

Building: Building 3 Inspection Date: 9/12/2011

Building ID:

Main Fabrication / Mechanics Shop

Sample No: 3-6A

Room / Area: Office 2 Entrance Material Assessment

Product Type Double-Layer Floor Tile/Mastic (12” Black over Gray Floor Tile/Mastic)

Approx Quantity 324 SF** Total

Condition Good

Friability Non-Friable

Asbestos Type Gray Floor Tile = 2-3% Chrysotile Mastic w/Gray = 5-10% Chrysotile

Comments

12” Black Floor Tile = None Detected Mastic (w/Black Floor Tile) = None Detected

**Office 3 contains 252 SF of 2’ x 2’ Fissured/Pinhole Ceiling Tile and 252 SF of Double-Layer Floor Tile/Mastic (12” Black over Gray Floor Tile/Mastic).

5. Friable and non-friable asbestos containing material (ACM) was observed to be in fair to good condition at the time of the survey. Friable material in fair condition could pose a hazard to anyone working in the area or further damaging the material.

Recommendation: Work with the Asbestos Program Manager to design an annual or semi-annual inspection of all known asbestos containing materials to check for damage. The Asbestos Program Manager is responsible for “locating, identifying, and assessing the condition of all types of ACM or PACM” in their buildings. These inspectors should be trained by an EPA or Tennessee Accredited Asbestos Inspectors course. In addition, all ACMs in fair condition should either be removed or repaired to an intact condition as soon as feasibly possible.

Asbestos Survey (Continued)

Building ID:

Main Fabrication / Mechanics Shop

Sample No: 3-7A

Room / Area: South-Center Material Assessment

Product Type Exterior Window Caulk

Approx Quantity 1,640 LF Total

Condition Fair

Friability Non-Friable

Asbestos Type 1-2% Chrysotile

Comments

Northeast Corner* North-Center*

Building ID:

Main Fabrication / Mechanics Shop

Sample No: 3-8C

Room / Area: West Side Material Assessment Sample No. 3-8A

Exterior Door Frame Caulk – South-Center

Product Type Exterior Door Frame Caulk

Approx Quantity 64 LF Total

Condition Fair

Friability Non-Friable

Asbestos Type 1-2% Chrysotile

Comments

6. Lead-Based Paint: Lead-Based paint was observed on some surfaces. Lead-Based paint was observed to be in poor to intact condition at the time of the survey. Lead-based painted surfaces in fair to poor condition could pose a hazard to anyone working on or further damaging the material.

Recommendation: It is recommended that if any painted material containing LBP greater than 1.0 mg/cm2 is to be disturbed, workers follow the OSHA “Lead In Construction” standard 29 CFR1926.62.

Lead-based painted materials in poor condition should be addressed as soon as feasibly possible.

Building 9 – Paint Shop

Building 9 – Paint Shop

Asbestos Survey The following ACMs results exceeded the EPA-NESHAPs, State of Tennessee and OSHA definition for a regulated ACM of >1% asbestos.

Building: Building 9 Inspection Date: 9/15/2011

Building ID: Paint Shop Sample No: 9-4A

Room / Area: Paint Shop – East Wall Material Assessment

Product Type Interior Window Glazing

Approx Quantity 68 LF Total

Condition Fair

Friability Non-Friable

Asbestos Type 2-3% Chrysotile

Comments

Paint Shop – West Wall* Records Storage – West Wall* (85 LF)

2. Friable and non-friable asbestos containing material (ACM) was observed to be in fair to good condition at the time of the survey. Friable material in fair condition could pose a hazard to anyone working in the area or further damaging the material.

Recommendation: Work with the Asbestos Program Manager to design an annual or semi-annual inspection of all known asbestos containing materials to check for damage. The Asbestos Program Manager is responsible for “locating, identifying, and assessing the condition of all types of ACM or PACM” in their buildings. These inspectors should be trained by an EPA or Tennessee Accredited Asbestos Inspectors course. In addition, all ACMs in fair condition should either be removed or repaired to an intact condition as soon as feasibly possible.

Asbestos Survey (Continued)

Building: Building 9 Inspection Date: 9/15/2011

Building ID: Paint Shop Sample No: 9-6A

Room / Area: Northeast Corner Material Assessment

Product Type Exterior Window Frame Caulk

Approx Quantity 90 LF Total

Condition Fair

Friability Non-Friable

Asbestos Type 2-3% Chrysotile

Comments

South Door* (34 LF Total) Southwest Corner*

Building: Dry Dock Inspection Date: 9/16/2011

Building ID: Dry Dock XRF Sample No: 23

Location: Exterior Material Assessment

Component: Upper Cavil

Window/Wall: North

Composition: Metal

Color: Yellow

Condition: Fair

Results(mg/cm2): 5.3

Comments

Lead-based painted surfaces in fair to poor condition could pose a hazard to anyone working on or further damaging the material.