Attachment_14_Projnet_Q&A_Minneapolis.pdf

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Bid Inquiry Contractor Report All Inquiries

Project: 88th RSC PM-CM Minneapolis Region Review: Bidder Inquiry (00001) (sorted by CommentID ) Displaying 43 inquiries.

Id Discipline Sheet Detail Spec 7132281 General A.15 a Page Limitation Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

References initial project schedule is not included in the page count. Is this a requirement? If yes, can you provide instruction guidance as well as how it will be evaluated.

On: Aug 31 2017.

Government Response. . The services will be provided on an annual basis for 365 days upon award and then there will be a four years of options available, each for 365 days each. There are specific reports/inventories required throughout each year and the frequencies are outlined in the PWS. A formal schedule is not required at this time with your proposals, unless it is a part of your technical proposal somehow. On: Sep 02 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7135784 Facilities Maintenance Solicitation

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

1: Can you share who held/holds the incumenbt contract for this effort, and can you share any details of that contract?

2: The solicitation requires a minimum of 1 CMM, can you share how many the current provided employs for these servies?

3: Do you have any data to share about the historical number of TOs issued over a month/quarter/year, and any information about how many TOs should be expected to run concurrently?

4: You state that the CMM should remain 'on-site', which site should be considered primary for this role?

5: How often will the CMM be required to physically visit each site listed in attachment 4, Building List?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . This is a new requirement and there is no historical information/data or contract documents.

CMM will be offered an office/workspace at Fort McCoy, WI. Located with the regional facility operations specialist.

CMM should plan to travel to sites as work oversight is required. No specific site visits are required by the CMM but all inventories/report data collection, PM work, CM work should be provided by appropriate personnel In the outlined required timeframes/frequencies. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137280 Contracting RFP Addendum to FAR 52.121-1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Will the Government allow the usage of Font within the Arial family?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . No issue on font variation from Project Management Team On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137281 Contracting RFP Addendum to FAR 52.121-1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 1 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

9/14/2017https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicPublicReportAl...

Page 82 paragraph 8 states: "Double sided printing is preferred." But on page 84 paragraph 15.a states: "Technical Approach shall not exceed 20 single sided pages. Can the Government please confirm proposals are to be submitted electronically and printing is not required?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . The Government confirms that proposals are to be submitted electronically.

Corrections will be reflected in an upcoming RFP Amendment. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137282 Contracting RFP Addendum to FAR 52.121-1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

10.c.(2) Tab (B) should include Reps & Certs, Joint Venture/Teaming Agreements, etc. Can the Government be more specific, what else if any should be included in Tab (B)?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . This requirement is standard. Nothing else is required in Tab (B) On: Sep 08 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137283 Contracting RFP Addendum to FAR 52.121-1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

16. Page limitation Notes states: commitment letters are excluded from page count. Are letters of commitment required for Key Personnel? It is not listed as a requirement in the Addendum to FAR 52.121-2 Evaluation paragraph C.1.A.2. List of Key Personnel

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . Letters of commitment are not required unless offeror wishes to have the applicable past performance considered under Factor B. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137285 Contracting RFP Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 1. states, "Offers for the requirement to be provided shall be submitted electronically to the Contract Specialist, Chase Bonds, and the Contracting Officer, Lisa Hendrix (Contact Information below) by 10:00 AM CST, September 25, 2017." Section 4. (a) states, "Submit your RFP response no later than 10:00 AM CST, September 06, 2017." Would the Government confirm that Section 4. (a) should read September 25 and not September 06?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . Section 4.(a) should read September 25 and not September 06. However, we will be extending the proposal due date to Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 10 AM Central Time, due to the impending weather events. A solicitation amendment will be forthcoming. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137286 Contracting RFP Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 4. (a) states, "A completed and signed copy of the solicitation, and all solicitation amendments, indicating agreement to the provisions and clauses therein." Would the Government clarify if Offerors are to submit a copy of all 125 pages of the solicitation with the proposal response or just the SF 1449 and amendments?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . Offerors only need to submit the signed SF 1449 and amendments with their proposal On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Page 2 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

7137287 Contracting RFP Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 p. 92, C.3. and 'CLIN 1 Qtr RM' tab

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

This section instructs Offerors to, "submit price proposed per site for each preventative maintenance task identified."

The Attachment 2 'CLIN 1 Qtr RM' tab does not include a column for tasks and instead requests pricing per site (location). Would the Government clarify if pricing needs to be split out by task and if so, would the Government provide a revised Attachment 2 to include a column for Offerors to list the task?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . The tabs as provided in Attachment 2 define how you need to break out price.

On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137289 Contracting RFP Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 p. 93, C.3.a. (1) and 'Summary' tab

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

This section states, "Offeror shall provide hourly burdened rates for ALL labor categories provided on the Pricing Worksheet." Are labor rates to be burdened through fee or G&A only with the Corrective Maintenance Service Order Fee applied separately and in accordance with the "Fees" table contained in Attachment 2 Pricing Worksheet?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . Labor rates are to be burdened through OH/G&A only, with the corrective maintenance service order fee applied separately. Service Order fees only apply to work done under CLIN 0002. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137290 Contracting RFP Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 p. 93, C.3.a. (1) and 'Svs Ordr Labor Rates and Markup' tab

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

This section states, "Offeror shall NOT provide additional labor categories." The instructions on the 'Svs Ordr Labor Rates and Markup' tab in Attachment 2 state, "All labor categories planned to be utilized shall be input here. Attach more sheets if necessary." These instructions appear to contradict one another. May Offerors modify the labor categories listed on the 'Svs Ordr Labor Rates and Markup' tab in Attachment 2?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . RFP amendment forthcoming to correct this language. Offerors may modify the labor categories as needed. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137292 Contracting RFP Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 p. 93, C.3.a. (1) and 'Svs Ordr Labor Rates and Markup' tab

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

This section states, "Separate tabs have been provided for separate location labor rates." Attachment 2 does not contain separate tabs for Offerors to provide labor rates by location. Would the Government provide a revised Attachment 2 or remove this sentence from the solicitation?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . An RFP amendment is forthcoming to correct this language and remove the sentence from the solicitation. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137294 Contracting RFP Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 p. 93, C.3.a. (2) and 'CLIN 1 Qtr RM' tab

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 3 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Offerors are required to include breakdowns of equipment/supplies/materials costs to show the types of materials, unit costs, and extended unit costs. However, Attachment 2 does not include a place for Offerors to provide this information. Would the Government provide a revised Attachment 2 or clarify where the Government would like Offerors to provide this information?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . This language will be corrected in a forthcoming amendment. These costs will not be required. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137295 Contracting RFP Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

This section states, "All Corrective Maintenance SO Fees should be reflected in CLIN 0002 as a firm fixed price." As CLIN 0002 will not be priced, in accordance with the solicitation requirements, should this fee be changed from a firm fixed price to a percentage that would apply to work under CLIN 0002?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . A SO fee will only apply if the work is done by a Sub Contractor or done by in house labor (PM Teams) during other than normal duty hours. The SO fee (% of total amount of the work) should be listed as a part of the firm fixed price offered to address work defined under that SO. On: Sep 08 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137297 Contracting RFP Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 p. 94, C.3.a. (6)(c) and 'Summary' tab

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

This section references a subcontractor service order fee. Is this for subcontractor work under CLIN 0001 or CLIN 0002?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . SO fee should apply to CLIN 002 for any sub contracted work or after hours CM work done by the Vendor. On: Sep 13 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137300 Contracting RFP Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 p. 94, C.3.a. (6)(c) and 'Summary' tab

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

This section references a subcontractor service order fee. Should this field be a percentage or markup rate on subcontractor work versus a dollar amount?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . A SO fee will only apply if the work is done by a Sub Contractor or done by in house labor (PM Teams) during other than normal duty hours. The SO fee (% of total amount of the work) should be listed as a part of the firm fixed price offered to address work defined under that SO. On: Sep 08 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137301 Contracting RFP Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 p. 95, C.3.a. (7)(f) Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

This section states, "As part of the evaluation, the Government will evaluate the Contractor's Bidding Schedules, Bonds (if applicable), Recent Financial Statements, and Certified Cost and Pricing in the proposal." The solicitation instructions do not request financial statements and certified cost and pricing. Would the Government clarify whether or not these items are required and if so, where within the proposal they should be provided?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Page 4 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Government Response. . Information may be requested from an apparent awardee. No information is required from the offeror. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137302 Contracting General Workload History Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

What is the average number of service orders / work orders per month for the region?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . This is a new requirement. PM frequencies can be seen from the RS Means task list (Assembly number). Some of the PM equipment will require service on a monthly basis.

For CM Service orders there is no historical data to share. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137303 Contracting General Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Does the contractor use a government IMPACT Card?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . No, the contractor will not use or be issued a Government IMPACT card On:

Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137304 Contracting RFP 3.4.2 Telephone Services/Computer Access

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Will the government provide more than one (1) computer with NIPR access to the contractor's PM/CM team?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . No only CMM will have access to computer with NIPR access on the US Army Reserve Network. CMM will also need a CAC card. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137305 Contracting General Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

How is the PM/CM requirement being accomplished now? Who is the incumbent, if applicable?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . Seasonal changeover was considered minimal PM conducted throughout the 88th RSC. There is no incumbent doing this work.

There are JOC contracts within each region. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137306 Facilities Maintenance Attachment 2 PM Costs

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

RS Means Facilities Maintenance and Repair Package Assembly Numbers provided by the government ending in "00" are RS Means annual costs which are based on performing each operation listed in the PM Components one time in a given year. (D20252601900) Numbers ending in "50" are annualized costs which are based on performing each operation at the recommended periodic frequencies in a given year. (i.e., weekly, monthly, semiannually, Page 5 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User annually, etc.) Can the government confirm that the contractor is to price the PM components for a one-time PM per year on each component?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . Any PM tasks outlined in the assembly number task list is to be provided. Any Monthly, quarterly, Semi-annually, and annual requirements are required. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137307 Facilities Maintenance Attachment 2 CLIN 001 Qtr RM

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Should the RM acronym listed as the tab title be PM acronym instead? If not, can the government define what the RM acronym is?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . This will be corrected in an upcoming amendment to the PM acronym. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137309 Facilities Maintenance General Maps

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can the government provide the maps between the different locations that also show the distance between the sites?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . Addresses have been given in Technical Exhibit 1.0 for use to determine this.

Map included for unofficial reference. General distance can be seen in this map. Attachment included On:

Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137310 Facilities Maintenance Attachment 2 PM Costs

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Annual Cost for Mx Tasks Only.

Can the government explain what a Mx task is and what the contractor is expected to price here?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . In Technical Exhibit 2.0 Column C has RS Means Assembly Number which outlines the tasks required for each frequency of PM. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137311 Facilities Maintenance Attachment 2 Travel Info

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

List City Pairs for PM Travel Does the PM acronym mean the Project Manager or Preventive Maintenance? Can the government explain what they are expecting to see priced here?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . Preventative Maintenance. Typically PM trips can be done to cover multiple sites in one week or over a certain time. If you intend to plan travel in that manner to meet PM frequencies/tasks list which sites you will pair together. Also if you will have a hub city your PM team will operate out of list that as well. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Page 6 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137314 Contracting RFP C. EVALUATION FACTORS

AND CRITERIA

2. List of Key Personnel: v) Project Engineer

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can the government explain what the Project Engineer position would be needed for? Is this a stand alone position?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . This will be corrected in an upcoming RFP amendment. Position is a Project Manager. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137315 Facilities Maintenance Attachment 10 TE-7

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm travel costs are included in SO costs.

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . SO should include only travel for sub contractors and for in-house labor only for SOs executed outside of normal business hours. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137317 Facilities Maintenance PWS Section 5.3, page 39

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is Maximo (or legacy CSS system prior to Maximo development completion) established for Contractor use? Or will the contractor provide the CMMS?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . MAXIMO will be fielded by the time contract is awarded. Vendor will need to procure appropriate licenses in order to use the MAXIMO system. System will be loaded onto army reserve network as well as CSS legacy system which can be accessed through CAC card access on computer provided by 88th RSC. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137320 Facilities Maintenance PWS Section 5.3, page 39

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is the Contractor required to input data in Maximo?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . Yes Contractor is required to update/enter work orders in MAXIMO for any PM or CM work provided.

Work orders may be initiated for CM or PM by Government as well. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137321 Facilities Maintenance PWS Section C-2, page 24

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Service Order Threshold – are travel costs included as part of the cost basis in determining service order costs?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Page 7 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Government Response. . SO should include only travel for sub contractors and for in-house labor only for SOs executed outside of normal business hours. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137325 Facilities Maintenance PWS Section C-2, page 24

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Service Order Threshold – is the $500 threshold for material costs only?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . The threshold applies to materials plus subcontract costs plus self-performed labor that occurs outside of normal business hours (O/T). The FFP already includes the standard labor for the contractor's staff assigned for the contract, and contractor can take care of small jobs without paperwork burden, so SO can show additional hours that may be required, such as for an emergency, and more substantial repairs. So in the majority of situations, the threshold may tend to only entail material and sub costs. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137326 Facilities Maintenance PWS Section 1.7.1.1, page 11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm the requirements of PWS 1.7.1.1 that the Contractor is required to employ a minimum of one Competent Person for each project Task Order/service order to function as the Site Safety and Health Officer for all worksites and is included in the cost basis for service orders.

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . Yes, confirmed, see Technical Exhibit 8.0 for further safety details. On: Sep 08 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137327 Facilities Maintenance PWS Section 1.7.1.1, page 11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS 1.7.1.1 - This statement indicates the contractor would need multiple SSHO's, is this the Government's intent?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . No please refer to T.E. 8.0. for further details. An onsite SSHO is only required during high risk activities and a competent person can be onsite for all other work. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137328 Facilities Maintenance PWS Section 1.22.3, page 19

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Will the Government confirm that validation for all listed date fields in Maximo is in reference to the Attachment 5 TE-2 Equipment List? Will the Government identify when the last Annual RPIE Validation was conducted? Is the RPIE current and up-to-date?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . The RPIE Validation is current as of February 2017. MAXIMO is used to initiate and track all work orders on the RPIE equipment list. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137329 Facilities Maintenance PWS 5.5, page 43

Page 8 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Are Builder support requirements conducted as a service order?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . No, builder support requirements are a part of Firm Fixed price. On: Sep 08 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137331 Facilities Maintenance PWS 5.5.5, page 44

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Are RPIE support requirements conducted as a service order?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . No, RPIE support requirements are a part of Firm Fixed price. On: Sep 08 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137375 Facilities Maintenance

Proposal Instructions Due Date

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

We have offices leading/supporting this solicitation that are currently being affected with recent/ongoing weather events in TX and FL. Due to these circumstances we request a 2 week extension.

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . We will be extending the proposal due date to Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 10 AM Central Time, due to the impending weather events. A solicitation amendment will be forthcoming.

On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7137487 Contracting 0 Extension 0 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Our firm's CONUS-based operations are located in the Texas and throughout Southeast. Our offices and staff have been affected by Hurricane Harvey, which has forced many of our staff to tend to the immediate needs of their respective families, properties and communities.

Taking the impact of natural disaster in to consideration, would the Government consider extending the proposal due date by 10 days from the published RFP due date to allow us to effectively respond to the needs of the community and our family members? We believe this extension would allow the affected Southeast-based firms a chance to refocus their efforts on this proposal effort. The result would lead to increased competition which is always in the best interest of the Government and taxpayer.

Would the Government grant our request?

On: Sep 05 2017.

Government Response. . We will be extending the proposal due date to Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 10 AM Central Time, due to the impending weather events. A solicitation amendment will be forthcoming.

On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7138036 Facilities Maintenance PWS Section C-2, page 24

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 9 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Of all the service orders for the region, please identify the service orders by location and dollar value, to include how many exceeded the cost basis of $500 and were within the cost basis of $500.

On: Sep 06 2017.

Government Response. . This is a new requirement. There is no service order history available. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7138100 Facilities Maintenance PWS Workload History

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide the number and type of service calls for each facility within the region.

On: Sep 06 2017.

Government Response. . This is a new requirement. There is no service order history available. On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7138303 Facilities Maintenance Questions Due Date extension

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Could you extend the due date for questions by 1 or 2 weeks?

On: Sep 06 2017.

Government Response. . No, the Government cannot extend the due date for questions. On: Sep 08 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7138881 Facilities Maintenance Attachment 2 PM Costs Tab Preventive Maintenance

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

1. Is it intended for the Offeror to provide pricing for only the Annual PM in Column B and the Annualized cost for that piece of Equipment in Column C?

2.Are these costs to be priced per piece of equipment or for the entire Maintenance Zone?

On: Sep 06 2017.

Government Response. . All PM tasks are to be priced. You can offer all PM tasks required per task list at an annualized rate. And also present just annual tasks only. Price per task list (assembly number RS Means) On: Sep 08 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Report Complete

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Patent 11/892,984 ProjNet property of ERDC since 2004.

Page 10 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

9/14/2017https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicPublicReportAl...

Addendum to Projnet Questions

Question: Ref 7137230 and 7137233 - Attachment 2, ‘Summary’ tab: The Fees table shows that Offerors are to enter dollar amounts per contract year for Prime Contract SO Fee, Prime Contract Emergency Fee, and Subcontractor Fee/Markup. Should these values be percentages instead of dollar amounts?

Government Response: Yes, the values should be percentages. An updated attachment 2 will be provided with the upcoming RFP amendment 0001.

Question: Wage Determination, The Government provided Offerors with one WD number for each region. Based on the street addresses listed in TE-1, this WD does not appear to cover all of the locations within this region. Would the Government please clarify which WD(s) Offerors are to use for proposal preparation purposes?

Government Response: A wage rate table for all applicable sites will be provided within RFP amendment 0001.