Am_0002.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

Amendment No. 0002

INDOOR SMALL ARMS FIRING RANGE, BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE, COLORADO

See attached documentation for content of the amendment changes to RFP

Date for receipt of proposals is 15 SEP 2017 at 1400 hours

Government Point of Contact: Katherine Fisher,Contract Specialist (402) 995-2102

U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA DISTRICT

CONTRACTING OFFICE

1616 CAPITOL AVE.

OMAHA, NE 68102-4901

See Item 6

W9128F-17-R-0073

09/01/2017

08/14/2017

09/01/2017

Am #0002 - 2 (Continuation of SF 30)

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

Omaha District, Corps of Engineers 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

:NOTICE: Failure to acknowledge : Solicitation No. W9128F 17 R 0073 :all amendments may cause rejec- :

:tion of the offer. See FAR : Date of Issue: 14 AUG 2017 :52.215-1 of Section 00 21 00 : Date of Receiving Proposals:

15 SEP 2017

Amendment No. 0002

1 SEP 2017

SUBJECT: Amendment No. 0002 to Request for Proposal Solicitation Package for Design and Construction of Indoor Small Arms Firing Range at Buckley Air Force Base, Colorado

Solicitation No. W9128F 17 R 0073

TO: Prospective Offerors and Others Concerned

1. The specifications and drawings for subject project are hereby modified as follows (revise all specification indices, attachment lists, and drawing indices accordingly).

a. Specifications (New and/or Revised and Reissued). Delete and substitute or add specification pages or sections as noted below. The substituted pages or sections are revised and reissued with this amendment.

Pages or Sections Deleted Pages or Sections Substituted or Added 00 10 00 00 10 00* 00 22 00 00 22 00* 01 35 26 01 35 26* 01 81 00 01 81 00* 01 89 00 01 89 00* 02 82 13.00 10 02 82 13.00 10* 02 82 13.00 20 02 82 13.00 20* 02 84 16 02 84 16

* - In specification sections marked with an asterisk above, revised language has been identified by highlighting. All portions of reissued specification pages shall apply whether or not changes have been indicated in this fashion.

b. Drawings (Reissued). The following drawings are revised with a revision date as shown on the drawings cover page and reissued with this amendment.

All drawings in the advertised package are reissued with this amendment. See Sheet G-002, Index, in revised drawing package (Appendix E) for a complete list of reissued drawings. The second volume, consisting of as-builts (Appendix F), does not have a corresponding index page.

2. This amendment is a part of the proposing papers and its receipt shall be acknowledged on the Standard Form 1442. All other conditions and requirements of the request for proposal remain unchanged. If the proposals have been

Am #0002 - 3 (Continuation of SF 30) mailed prior to receiving this amendment, you will notify the office where proposals are received, in the specified manner, immediately of its receipt and of any changes in your proposal occasioned thereby.

a. Hand-Carried Proposals shall be delivered to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District, Contracting Division, 1616 Capitol Avenue, Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901.

b. Mailed Proposals shall be addressed as noted in Item 8 on Page 00 10 00-1 of Standard Form 1442.

3. Offers will be received until 2:00 p.m., local time at place of receiving proposals, 15 SEP 2017.

Attachments:

Spec Pages listed in 1.a. above Sign-in Sheet from 23 AUG 2017 Drawings listed in 1.b. above (under separate cover) Civil Design Files.zip (under separate cover)

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

1 SEP 2017

jlb/2099

00 10 00 Page 1

SOLICITATION, OFFER

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

W9128F-17-R-0073

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

3. DATE ISSUED

14 AUG 2017

PAGES OF PAGES

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO. 5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE CT 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA

Contracting Division (CENWO-CT) 1616 Capitol Ave Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA

Attn: CONTRACTING DIVISION (CENWO-CT) 1616 Capitol Ave Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

9. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

A. NAME

Katherine Fisher

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

(402) 995-2102

SOLICITATION

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying no., date):

The offeror hereby agrees to do all work described in the documents entitled:

INDOOR SMALL ARMS FIRING RANGE

BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE, COLORADO

RETURN WITH OFFER: INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 00 10 00 (SF1442), SECTION 00 22 00, AND SECTION 00 45 00.

*BLOCK 13A. – REFER TO SECTION 00 22 00 FOR THE NUMBER OF COPIES TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE ORIGINAL OFFER.

THIS SOLICITATION IS UNRESTRICTED AND IS OPEN TO BOTH LARGE AND SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPITATION.

This solicitation contains additional security requirements that were not in effect prior to 2014. Please reference Section 01 30 00.24, Paragraph 1.4.

11. The Contractor shall begin performance within 10 calendar days and complete it within 540* calendar days after receiving award, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable.

*NOTE: Please see Section 00 22 00 for additional information regarding the period of performance.

12A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

YES NO

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and * copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by 1400 (hour) local time 15 SEP 2017. If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than ___60_____ calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442(REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA FAR(48 CFR) 53.236-1(d)

, p p p y, g *NOTE: Please see Section 00 22 00 for additional information regarding the period of performance.

540*

Am_0002

00 10 00 Page 2

14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code) 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

DUNS or Unique Entity Identifier Number:

16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than Item 14)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within __60____ calendar days after the date offers are due. (Insert any number equal to or greater than the minimum requirement stated in Item 13D.

Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS

SEE ATTACHED CLIN PRICING SCHEDULE

Contractor’s Fax No. CAGE CODE Contractor’s E-Mail address

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation - give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER

(Type or print)

20B. SIGNATURE 20C. OFFER DATE

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

ITEM 25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c) ( )

26. ADMINISTERED BY CODE 27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY

U.S. Army Engineer District, Omaha 1616 Capitol Ave.

Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

USAED Omaha c/o USACE Finance Center 5722 Integrity Drive Millington, TN 38054-5005

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT (contractor is required to sign this document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish and deliver all items or perform all work, requisitions identified on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award,

(b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED

TO SIGN (Type or print)

31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30B. SIGNATURE 30C. DATE 31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

31C. AWARD DATE

STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK (REV. 4-85)

CONTRACT LINE ITEM PRICING SCHEDULE

ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT AMOUNT

BASIC ITEMS

Entire work complete to Design an Indoor Small Arms Firing Range and Sitework, including Option item(s) listed below.

Job

Construct an Indoor Small Arms Firing Range, up to 5 feet outside of the building, excluding Option item(s) listed below.

Construct Sitework, complete from the five-foot line to the limits of construction of the Indoor Small Arms Firing Range, excluding Option item(s) listed below.

TOTAL BASIC AMOUNT $_____________________________

OPTION ITEMS

[Option 1]

Additional cost to Construct Option Area of Indoor Small Arms Firing Range as shown on the Plans.

[Option 2]

Additional cost to Demolish and Remove Existing Bullet Trap, in lieu of leaving it in place, as shown on the Plans.

[Option 3]

Additional cost to Procure and Install Ledgestone Wainscoting, in lieu of concrete finishing, as shown on the Plans.

[Option 4]

Additional cost to Procure and Install Roller Window Shades, in lieu of horizontal blinds, as shown on the Plans.

[Option 5]

Construct an additional 13 parking stalls, as shown on the Plans.

TOTAL AMOUNT (BASIC PLUS OPTIONS) $_________________________________

NOTES:

1. See SECTION 00 21 01, INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, & NOTICES TO BIDDERS for evaluation of options. The Government reserves the right to exercise the options within 180 days after issuance of Notice to Proceed.

2. Prices must be entered for all items of the schedule. Total amounts submitted without prices being entered on individual items will be rejected. Additions will be subject to verification by the Government. In case of variation between the Job (lump-sum) prices and the total amount, the lump-sum prices will be considered the price submitted.

3. A modification to a proposal which provides for a single adjustment to the total amount submitted, should state the application of the adjustment to each respective lump-sum price affected. If the modification is not so apportioned, the single adjustment will be applied to Item No. 0001.

Section 00 22 00 W9128F-17-R-0073

Section 00 22 00 Page 1

SECTION 00 22 00 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF

AWARD

1.0 OVERVIEW

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

4.0 PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS AND SUBFACTORS

4.1. VOLUME 1 – TECHNICAL AND SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION

4.2. VOLUME 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

4.3. VOLUME 3 – PRICE AND PRO-FORMA INFORMATION

5.0 VOLUME 1 –FACTOR 1 – TECHNICAL

5.1. TAB A –SUBFACTOR 1 – SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

5.2. TAB B –SUBFACTOR 2 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

5.3. TAB C –SUBFACTOR 3 – KEY PERSONNEL CAPABILITIES AND EXPERIENCE

5.4. TAB D –SUBFACTOR 4 – SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN

6.0 VOLUME 2 – FACTOR 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE

6.1 TAB A - FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

7.0 VOLUME 3 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

7.1. GENERAL

7.2. TAB A – FACTOR 3 – PRICE (STANDARD FORM 1442, PROPOSAL DATA SHEET AND CONTRACT

LINE ITEM SCHEDULE)

7.3. TAB B – EVIDENCE OF BONDABILITY

7.4. TAB C– REQUIRED PRE-AWARD INFORMATION

7.5. TAB D – SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

8.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

8.1. SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION BOARD (SSEB)

8.2. EVALUATION

8.3. DEFINITIONS

8.4. EVALUATION RATING SYSTEM

8.5. PAST PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT RATING SYSTEM

Section 00 22 00 Page 2

ATTACHMENTS

1 - COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE CONSTRUCTION OR PRIME CONTRACTOR

2 - COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE DESIGN FIRM OR IN-HOUSE DESIGN CAPABILITY

3 - COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE KEY SUBCONTRACTOR (OR PRIME IF WORK NOT TO BE

SUBCONTRACTED)

4 - PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION TELEPHONE INTERVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE

5 - KEY PERSONNEL RESUME

6 - LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR KEY PERSONNEL

7 - LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR (DESIGN FIRM OR KEY SUBCONTRACTOR)

8 - PROPOSAL DATA SHEETS

Section 00 22 00 Page 3

1.0 OVERVIEW

1.1. This is a “Best Value” solicitation for the Design and Construction of Small Arms Indoor Firing Range at Buckley AFB, Aurora, CO. The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein, and award a firm-fixed-price contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforms with all the terms and conditions of the solicitation and whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government.

1.2. PROPOSAL FORMAT

The Packaging that contains the Proposals shall be sealed and marked:

“Proposals for Solicitation No. W9128F-17-R-0073, to be opened by Contracting Personnel Only”

Written materials: 8 ½” x 11” format in bound volumes using 10 point or larger font size and using 3-ring binders. Combine Volumes 1 and 2 into a single binder. For each binder, provide a title sheet on the cover, table of contents and labeled tabs matching this documents’ Table of Contents. Provide a title sheet within each volume identifying the prime, consortium, or joint venture’s name, address, telephone, fax and email address and point of contact. Include the signature, title and contact information of the official that can bind the firm.

Volume number and tab section submitted shall appear in the bottom right corner of each page (along with the revision number and revision date for the amended page, if necessary)

Number of copies: Submit only one original and one copy of Volume 1 and 2 (in a single/shared binder) as well as one CD in read-only format, using .PDF files. Submit Volume 3 in a sealed envelope as well as one CD (with only Volume 3). It is imperative that none of the pricing or Volume 3 information show up in Volumes 1 or 2. The offeror has the option of excluding an electronic copy of only Section 00 10 00 (SF 1442 and CLIN Pricing Schedule) from the CDs and submitting it only in hard copy format. The CDs shall contain the balance of the printed materials electronically in PDF file format.

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

2.1. The Contracting Officer will award a firm-fixed-price contract to that responsible Offeror whose proposal the Source Selection Authority has determined conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and offers the best overall value to the Government, considering all non-price factors described herein, and price. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined, are considered significantly more important than price; however, the Contract award should not exceed the cost limitation described in Section 00 21 01 for this project. The intent of this solicitation is to obtain the best proposal within the cost limitation. There is no obligation to approach or match the cost limitation in the offer. After the Government individually evaluates and rates each proposal, the Contracting Officer/Source Selection Authority will compare proposals to determine which proposal represents the best value. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer or to reject all offers. The Government will not award a contract to an Offeror whose proposal contains a deficiency, as defined in FAR 15.001. If there is a lower priced, conforming offer(s), the Contracting Officer/Source Selection Official must determine that the added value of a more expensive proposal (within the cost limitation) would justify award to that offeror.

3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

3.1. Proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint. Do not assume that offerors will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposals.

3.2. The proposal shall describe the capability of the Offeror to perform the requirements of the RFP. The proposal should be specific and complete in every detail and should be prepared simply and

Section 00 22 00 Page 4 economically, providing a straightforward and concise description of capabilities to satisfactorily perform the requirements. The proposal should be practical, legible, clear, and coherent.

3.3. In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all proposals, the Contracting Officer must receive information containing sufficient detail to allow review and evaluation by the Government. Proposal clarity, organization, and cross-referencing are mandatory. Failure to submit and organize proposals as requested may adversely affect an Offeror’s evaluation.

3.4. Firms formally organized as design-build entities, design firms and construction contractors that have associated specifically for this project, consortia of firms or any other interested parties may submit proposals. Associations may be as joint ventures or as key team subcontractors. Any legally organized Offeror may submit a proposal, provided that the Offeror or Offeror’s subcontractor has or will have professional architects and engineers, registered in the appropriate technical disciplines and provided that the requirements specified in Contract clause, “Requirements for Registration of Designers”, are met. All designs must be under the direct supervision of appropriately licensed professionals for each discipline involved.

3.5. Submit proposals in tabbed, three-ring binders per paragraph 1.2 above. Note that the Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits, where indicated below.

4.0 PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS AND SUBFACTORS

4.1. VOLUME 1 –TECHNICAL AND SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION

Factor/Sub Factor Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 1 TECHNICAL

Factor 1 is slightly more important than Factor

2. All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined are significantly more important than cost or price (Factor 3).

Subfactor 1 Vol. 1 TAB A Specialized Experience Most Important Subfactor

Subfactor 2 Vol. 1 TAB B Project Management Plan Second most Important Subfactor

Subfactor 3 Vol. 1 TAB C Key Personnel Capabilities and Experience

3rd most Important Subfactor (significantly less important than Subfactor 2)

Subfactor 4 Vol. 1 TAB D Small Business Participation Plan 4th most Important Subfactor (significantly less important than Subfactor 3)

4.2. VOLUME 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

Factor/Sub Factor Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 2 Vol. 2 TAB A Past Performance

Factor 1 is slightly more important than Factor

2. All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined are significantly more important than cost or price (Factor 3).

N/A Relevancy Used in determining rating for Factor 2

N/A Confidence Used in determining rating for Factor 2

Section 00 22 00 Page 5

4.3. VOLUME 3 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

Factor/Sub Factor Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 3 Vol. 3 TAB A Price (Standard Form 1442, Proposal Data Sheet And Contract Line Item Schedule)

Factor 1 is slightly more important than Factor

2. All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined are significantly more important than cost or price (Factor 3).

N/A Vol. 3 TAB B Evidence of Bondability Not Rated

N/A Vol. 3 TAB C Required Pre-Award Information Not Rated

N/A Vol. 3 TAB D Sub-Contracting Plan Not Rated

NOTE: 8(a) Joint Venture Offeror or Offeror submitting Proposal as HubZone Joint Venture shall submit evidence from Offerors SBA Servicing Agency that the Offeror has notified and discussed the proposed joint venture for this specific project with the appropriate SBA Representative or business Opportunity Specialist.

5.0 VOLUME 1 –FACTOR 1 – TECHNICAL

5.1. VOLUME 1 -TAB A – SUBFACTOR 1 - SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

5.1.1. Submission Requirements:

5.1.1.1. Design and Construction Projects. The Offeror shall submit between three (3) and five (5) projects performed by the Prime Construction Entity. Additionally, the Offeror shall submit between three (3) and five (5) projects performed by the Lead Design Entity. Limit one (1) page per project submitted, with one additional page allowed for describing past teaming experience between current team members (see below). Any information presented beyond the page limit will not be evaluated.

5.1.1.2. Teaming Experience. In one page, the Offeror shall demonstrate any previous teaming experience between current team members. Teaming experience information is limited to projects that are well underway or that have been completed and turned over no longer than the past five years preceding the issue date of this solicitation.

5.1.1.3. Special Requirements. One (1) of the construction projects submitted and one (1) of the design projects shall clearly demonstrate experience with CONUS Small Arms Indoor Firing Ranges no smaller than 5,000 square feet in size. The government intends to hire experts in Small Arms Indoor Firing Range design and construction.

5.1.1.4. Project Information. All projects submitted should demonstrate experience on similar projects of similar or greater value. Submit projects that are currently well underway (designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) or completed and turned over no longer than five (5) years preceding the issue date of this solicitation. The proposed prime construction and lead design entities shall have performed in the same role as the prime or lead entities on the projects submitted. Offerors may identify state and local government and private contracts that are similar to the Government’s requirements set forth in the RFP. If the Offeror is a joint venture, each firm shall provide information, demonstrating experience relevant to their role on this project. If the Offeror has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division or unit submitting the offer or by the team member.

If projects were design-build, so identify them.

Section 00 22 00 Page 6

Project information shall CLEARLY include:

(a) Type of Facility Represented

(b) Name of Firm

(c) Name of Project

(d) Location of Project

(e) Owner, including reference POC with confirmed contact information

(f) General Scope of Construction Project

(g) Summary of Your Role in the Project

(h) Construction Cost at completion

(i) Extent and Type of Work Subcontracted Out

(j) Dates Construction Began and Completed

5.1.2. Evaluation Criteria: The following criteria are not listed in any particular order of importance.

5.1.2.1. Experience on similar projects that exceed the scope and value may be rated more favorably.

5.1.2.2. Federal Government project experience may be rated more favorably than non-Federal Government project experience.

5.1.2.3. Proposals that include more than one (1) construction project with experience in CONUS Small Arms Indoor Firing Ranges may be rated more favorably.

5.1.2.4. Proposals that include more than one (1) design project with experience in CONUS Small Arms Indoor Firing Range may be rated more favorably.

5.1.2.5. Projects that are not “well underway” or completed as defined above may be rated less favorably.

5.1.2.6. The Government will consider extent of demonstrated familiarity with applicable codes and local conditions. Previous experience in the Colorado “Front Range” region may be rated more favorably.

5.1.2.7. Previous design-build experience is not necessary for an acceptable rating. The Government may consider previous D-B experience a strength.

5.1.2.8. The Government may consider previous recent teaming experience among the team members as a strength. The more relevant the experience, the more favorably it may be rated.

5.1.2.9. Note: The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing DoD or Government appraisal systems, or through interviewing owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

5.1.2.10. Note: A firm will not receive credit under this subfactor for the relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project while employed at a different firm.

5.2. VOLUME 1 - TAB B – SUBFACTOR 2 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

5.2.1. Submission Requirements:

Section 00 22 00 Page 7

5.2.1.1. Provide information that describes the offeror’s Project Management approach to executing the design-build contract per the detailed requirements herein. Clearly and concisely describe the organizational and technical approaches to project management and execution, and proposed contract duration. Limit the information to fifteen (15) pages or less.

5.2.1.2. Organization. List the design and construction entities and describe their resources and how their resources will be utilized, their roles and responsibilities and any contractual arrangements that have been established. Clearly describe any teaming or joint venture arrangements, including a clear description of each entity’s roles and responsibilities on the project. A copy of the teaming or joint venture agreement(s) shall be appended to the plan (not included in the page limitation). Include a simple organizational chart, illustrating the organization, including the proposed quality control group(s).

Identify the design firm(s) chosen for the project, if not to be self-performed. The Offeror shall document unequivocal teaming arrangements with its lead design entity (ies) and key subcontractors. Describe the proposed management structure for the team, describing the how the design and construction process will be managed and the authorities and the delegations of authority within the team. Include a key personnel organization chart that clearly depicts the key positions and the names of the personnel, their firm affiliations and their job locations and their job/position title within the organization. The key personnel organization chart shall be consistent with the corporate organization chart, with the matrix of responsibilities assigned to the D-B team entities, and with the list of key personnel to be provided under the Tab, “KEY PERSONNEL CAPABILITIES AND EXPERIENCE”.

5.2.1.3. Technical Approach for Design and Construction. Describe the technical approach to design and construction of the facility. Include considerations for management of Small Arms Indoor Firing Range construction. Include any considerations of fast-tracking design and construction, panelized construction, pre-engineered components, etc. The Government is looking for ways to streamline construction and manage labor and other resource constraints in an effort to reduce costs and achieve an aggressive schedule while minimizing impact to the base. The Government is looking for ways to minimize impacts of the construction.

5.2.1.4. Proposed Contract Duration: The offeror shall clearly propose the contract duration in this Tab of the proposal.

5.2.2. Evaluation Criteria: The following criteria are not listed in any particular order of importance.

5.2.2.1. Organization. The Government will evaluate the clarity and strength of the overall organization and how well it is organized, structured and staffed to execute the entire scope of work. This subfactor will be rated as unacceptable if the Offeror has not selected and committed to use its lead design entity (ies). Joint venture participants’ contribution to the organization should be commensurate with their skills and background.

5.2.2.2. Technical Approach for Design and Construction. Proposals that clearly and concisely demonstrate a thorough understanding of the constraints and impacts of the Small Arms Indoor Firing Range construction may be rated more favorably. The Government places a higher value on an offer that provides proposed methods to streamline construction and manage labor and other resource constraints, in an effort to reduce costs and support an aggressive schedule including such things as fast-tracking, etc. The Government will also consider whether the approach reduces on-site craft labor and susceptibility to inclement weather delays.

5.2.2.3. Proposed Contract Duration: Unless changed during negotiations, this duration will become the contractually binding performance period. The Government will rate the proposed duration matching or shorter than the benchmark duration as “acceptable”. No advantage will be considered for proposals that provide a duration shorter than the proposed benchmark. A proposed duration that is longer than the proposed benchmark duration will be viewed as a deficiency. The Government will consider an unreasonably condensed contract duration, which places undue risk on the Government or which may create a risk of contract or performance failure, as a significant weakness or a deficiency, depending upon the evaluators' judgment.

5.3. VOLUME 1 - TAB C – SUBFACTOR 3 - KEY PERSONNEL CAPABILITIES AND EXPERIENCE

5.3.1. Submission Requirements:

Section 00 22 00 Page 8

5.3.1.1. For key personnel provide a brief resume using the Key Personnel Resume form at the end of this Section. Indicate the position title on each project listed in resumes. Provide the name, owner, dollar amount, date of completion, and brief scope of each resume project.

Include resumes for the following key personnel:

- Project Manager responsible for the overall project (Prime Construction Contractor Employee)

- Construction Quality Control System Manager (Prime Construction Contractor Employee)

- General Superintendent (Prime Construction Contractor Employee)

- Design Manager

5.3.1.2. The minimum experience requirement for the Project Manager is 5 years of experience as a Project Manager, managing similar projects to this solicitation and a Bachelor’s degree, according to section 01 33 00.32.

5.3.1.3. The minimum experience requirement for the Contractor Quality Control (CQC) System Manager is 5 years of experience as a Quality Control Manager on similar projects to this solicitation. CQC System Manager shall comply with personnel requirements listed in Section 01 45 00.

5.3.1.4. The minimum experience requirement for the Superintendent is 5 years’ experience as superintendent, managing multiple trades and subcontractors.

5.3.1.5. The minimum experience requirements for the Design manager and designers of record are at least 5 years of design experience. The Design Manager and designers of record should be a registered in accordance with FAR 52.236-25.

5.3.1.6. Offeror shall provide unequivocal letters of commitment from all proposed key personnel NOT currently employed by the Offeror. Use the form letter at the end of this section.

5.3.1.7. Each of the key personnel shall demonstrate experience on at least one project that included a minimum 5,000 square foot Small Arms Indoor Firing Range completed or well underway in the past 5 years (as required for projects in Tab A).

5.3.2. Evaluation Criteria: The following criteria are not listed in any particular order of importance.

5.3.2.1. The Government will evaluate the required information to determine how well the offeror identifies and demonstrates that its key personnel meet or exceed minimum qualifications necessary, which includes previous satisfactory experience in similar type work, to manage, control and perform the design, and to perform construction.

5.3.2.2. Resumes that do not clearly state the personnel’s specific duties and job title on previous projects may be rated less favorably.

5.3.2.3. Project Managers that hold active architect or engineer professional registration will be rated more favorably.

5.3.2.4. Offerors that propose key personnel who worked on the projects in Tab A may be rated more favorably.

5.3.2.5. Key personnel that exceed the required minimum experience with Small Arms Indoor Firing Range may be rated more favorably.

5.3.2.6. Key personnel that exceed the required minimum years of experience in their position may be rated more favorably.

5.3.2.7. Previous design-build experience may be rated more favorably.

Section 00 22 00 Page 9

5.3.2.8. Previous Federal government project experience may be rated more favorably.

5.3.2.9. Performance of key personnel proposed for this project may be taken into account when it comes to the attention of the Government. This shall be achievable with other projected on-going work.

5.4. VOLUME 1 - TAB D –SUBFACTOR 4 – SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN (REQUIRED FOR

ALL OFFERORS)

5.4.1. Submission Requirements:

5.4.1.1. This sub-factor requires all offerors, regardless of size status to address their planned small business usage for this project. All offerors are required to provide a Small Business Participation Plan. It should address their corporate approach and methodology for acquiring, soliciting and using small businesses in the performance of this contract. All plans should address the Offeror's commitments to providing subcontracting opportunities, as well as evidence of planned and /or continued outreach efforts to encourage and use small businesses. This Participation Plan should include a breakdown of small business subcategories to be used as shown on the chart in (d) below.

5.4.1.2. The Participation Plan should demonstrate commitment to all federally designated categories of small business: Small Businesses (SBs), Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (VOSBs), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSBs) HUBZone Small Businesses (HUB), Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDBs), Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSBs), and when applicable, Historically Black Colleges/Universities/Minority Institutions (HBCU/MIs).

5.4.1.3. The plan should identify all categories for participation as part of the Offeror's team. This should include a general description of the type of work, product or service anticipated to be supplied via a small business concern. The Offeror shall not exceed more than 10 pages for the submitted Small Business Participation Plan. A specific format is not required, however, items stated below (a) through (e) shall be provided as a minimum.

Small Business Participation Plan requirements:

(a) Provide a Narrative addressing the corporate approach and methodology for acquiring, soliciting and using small businesses in the performance of this contract. The Narrative should address the Offeror's commitment to providing subcontracting opportunities, as well as evidence of planned and /or continued outreach efforts to encourage and use small businesses. The Narrative should provide detailed supporting documentation regarding the individual commitments expressed in percentages for evaluators to determine that the goals stated are realistic.

(b) Provide the applicable size and categories for the PRIME Offeror for this procurement.

______Large Business Prime Offeror ______Small Business Prime Offeror (also check type of SB below) ____Small Disadvantaged Business

____Woman-Owned Small Business ____HUB Zone Small Business ____Veteran Owned Small Business ____Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business ____Historically Black College/University or Minority Institution

(c) Submit the Total Percentages planned for Small Business. Percentages are based on Total Contract Value of the Offeror. For this project, the awardee is targeted to subcontract 15% of the Total Contract Value to the Small Business Community.

Total Percentage planned for Small Business: = __________% (Small Business Prime Contractors – Include yourselves in the above percentage.)

For example: If you are a Small Business Prime Contractor and will be doing 40% of the work and you will be subcontracting another 20% to other small business firms, then your Total Percentage planned for Small Business will = 60%

Section 00 22 00 Page 10

(d) Indicate the total percentage of participation, Supplies/Services to be provided and the name of the small business firms intended to be used by each type of subcategory small business.

Type of Small Business % Supplies/Services Name of Small Business Firms

Small Business Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) Woman Owned Small Business (WOSB) Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZone)

Service Disabled Veteran-Owned (SDVOSB) Veteran Owned (VOSB) Historical Black Colleges/Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI)

(e) Provide types of commitments, if any are in place, for this specific acquisition either written, verbal, enforceable, non-enforceable, joint venturing, mentor-protégé, etc.

5.4.2 Evaluation Criteria:

Small Business Participation Plans will be evaluated on the basis of:

• Percentage of performance of small businesses.

o All offeror’s proposals must meet the minimum mandatory Small Business Participation of 15% of the proposed Total Contract Value (through collective small business participation from any type of small business or sub-category small business). Offerors that exceed the targeted 15% will be rated more favorably than Offerors that meet it. Offerors that do not meet the targeted 15% will be rated lower.

o The subcategory small business goals provided will be reviewed to ensure they are realistic in respect to this project.

• The extents of identification of the work (Supplies/Services) small firms are to perform.

• The extent to which SB firms are specifically identified in proposals.

• The extent of commitment to SB firms.

All offerors will be evaluated on the level of Small Business commitment that they demonstrate for the proposed acquisition. Plans that contain greater detail and specificity will be evaluated more favorably than general statements and commitments.

6.0 VOLUME 2 – FACTOR 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE

6.1. VOLUME 2 – TAB A – PAST PERFORMANCE

6.1.1. Submission Requirements:

Section 00 22 00 Page 11

Submit past performance evaluations and ratings for each project the Offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1 - Volume 1 - Tab A Specialized Experience.

If available, submit Construction Contract Administration Support System (CCASS) or Architect- Engineer Contract Administration Support System (ACASS) Performance Evaluations ratings. For projects which were designed and/or constructed for other government entities, submit the performance appraisal sheets used by that government entity if available. For projects cited in Volume 1 - Tab A Specialized Experience not covered in the CCASS / ACASS database or other Government Design Performance Rating System, submit a Past Performance Questionnaire.

6.1.1.1. CPARS/CCASS/ACASS Evaluations

Firms are requested to retrieve their CPARS/CCASS/ACASS past performance information directly from the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) at http://www.ppirs.gov. PPIRS is an electronic repository of performance information collected by all the major federal performance reporting systems. Logging onto PPIRS will require the following: All firms must have purchased and installed a Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) certificate. If you do not have this certificate, you cannot access your information. Additional information about the PKI certificate is posted in red at the top, center portion, of the http://www.ppirs.gov web page. You will also need your DUNS number and Marketing Partner Identification Number (MPIN) to log onto PPIRS. The MPIN number was selected by whoever registered your firm in the Central Contractor Registry at http://www.ccr.gov . If you do not know your MPIN number, you will need to contact the CCR help desk by emailing them from the email link on the http://www.ccr.gov/help.asp web page. Please be aware that they will only release the MPIN number to the person who originally registered your firm.

There are two other ways to obtain a copy of CCASS / ACASS evaluations as follows: (1) Contact your government point of contact for the project you mentioned, and ask them if they can send you a copy, or

(2) Apply for “Contractor Corporate Senior Management Representative” access on the following CCASS / ACASS web page: http://www.cpars.csd.disa.mil/. This type of access is issued to only one person within the firm, typically a member of senior management. In addition to access to your completed CCASS / ACASS performance evaluations, you will also be able to view status of evaluations which have not yet been completed. Following receipt of your faxed application request, you will be emailed a logon and access instructions. This type of access will only let you see CCASS / ACASS information, so it is not as complete as PPIRS access which allows access to evaluations prepared by non-DOD federal agencies, as well as the DOD agencies which use CCASS / ACASS. Be aware that you will also need to have a PKI certificate to access the CCASS / ACASS system. This is a DOD requirement.

6.1.1.2. Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

The Past Performance Questionnaire is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client. The Past Performance Questionnaire should be completed by an owner or owner’s representative not affiliated with your firm. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.

Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client Information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

6.1.1.3. Government Utilization of Alternate Information Sources for Past Performance

The Government will assess the past performance on projects submitted under the Specialized Experience Subfactor and reserves the right to conduct telephone interviews with points of contact identified in the proposal or to review personal knowledge. In addition, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance of the Offeror on the submitted projects

Am_0002 http://www.ppirs.gov/ http://www.ppirs.gov/ http://www.ccr.gov/ http://www.ccr.gov/help.asp http://www.cpars.csd.disa.mil/

Section 00 22 00 Page 12 and any other previous work. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror's proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

6.1.2. Evaluation Criteria:

6.1.2.1. The Government will perform a performance confidence assessment of the offeror’s probability of successfully meeting the contract requirements, considering the degree of success of the D-B team's recent (well under way or turned over no longer than 5 years preceding the date of this solicitation), relevant experience. See explanation of “well underway” and relevancy under the Subfactor “Specialized Experience”. The rating system used for the performance confidence assessment is described in paragraph 8.5.

6.1.2.2. Relevancy: The Government will first assess and rate the relevancy of recent projects accomplished by the offeror to the scope of this contract for overall application to the performance confidence assessment ratings described hereinafter. The projects will include those submitted under the Specialized Experience SubFactor as well as from other sources described above. This rating is not a separate proposal rating but is only used in developing an overall past performance confidence assessment rating assigned to the Past Performance Factor. The past performance relevancy ratings are described below:

(a) Very Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

(b) Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

(c) Somewhat Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

(d) Not Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

6.1.2.3. Performance: The Government will next consider how well the offeror performed on the contracts. The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor performance. Past performance on projects with more relevance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment rating than past performance on projects of lesser relevance.

Owners/references may be asked to comment on items such as quality of design or construction, timeliness, management of the work, subcontractor management, including timely payment to subs or suppliers, safety, relations between owner and designer or contractor, level of support for such things as as-built documentation, O&M manuals, training, correcting design or construction errors, warranty work, etc. (see the interview form).