Additional_Solicitation_Attachments.pdf

PDF 55 KB Posted

Attached to
Fall Creek Fish Facility Pipe Lining Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W9127N-17-R-0069
Issued by
Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Portland

About this file

Additional Solicitation Attachments (Offeror Experience Form, Past Performance Questionnaire, Small Business Participation Plan)

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Fall Creek Fish Facility Pipe Lining, newest first.
File Type Posted
W9127N-17-R-0069_FCFF_Pipe_Lining_-_Amendment_0002_SF30.pdf PDF
W9127N-17-R-0069_FCFF_Pipe_Lining_-_Amendment_0002_Specs_Package.pdf PDF
Site_Visit_Sign-In_Sheets.pdf PDF
W9127N17R00690001_-_Bidder_Inquiry_Key_Amendment.pdf PDF
W9127N-17-R-0069_Drawing_Set.pdf PDF
W9127N-17-R-0069_Specs_Package_-_Final.pdf PDF
For_Info_Only_-_Additional_Drawings.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

ATTACHMENT A

OFFEROR’S EXPERIENCE FORM

NAME OF OFFEROR:

PROJECT TITLE:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:

CONTRACT AWARD AMOUNT (U.S. DOLLAR)

FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT (U.S. DOLLAR)

CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:

CONTRACT DURATION (PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE):

(If not complete, provide % currently complete)

DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT’S SCOPE AND MAGNITUDE: (The description should provide sufficient detail to demonstrate the similarities with the proposed project.)

DETAILS OF OFFEROR’S INVOLVEMENT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PROJECT: (Include whether your firm participated as a prime, subcontractor, or joint-venture, and state percentage performed and whether performed as subcontractor or prime. Specifically describe your roles and responsibilities in the design/construction portion of the project and specific tasks accomplished that are similar to the solicitation requirement.

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

ATTACHMENT B

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

1. The USACE Form PPQ shall be utilized for all evaluations that require a Past Performance Questionnaire.

2. Solicitations:

“Solicitation Submittal Requirements: IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the PPQ included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 2, Recent of Current Past Performance. AN

OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment B), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow- up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Mitchell Johnson, via email at Mitchell.J.Johnson@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.”

USACE Form PPQ will be made accessible on FBO website as a separate attachment.

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code: Address: Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work: High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED

QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE

HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR.

HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT

THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT

TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST

REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S

PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract.

There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner.

A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Contractor Information (Firm Name): Client Information (Name): TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical f E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, d/ l b f ?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this ff

E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? E VG S M U N

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Contractor Information (Firm Name):

Client Information (Name):

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back- up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or

E VG S M U N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)

E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. E VG S M U N

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

ATTACHMENT C

SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN

All Offerors (both large and small businesses) are required to complete a Small Business Participation Plan. Offerors shall propose the level of participation of small businesses (as a small business prime and/or small business subcontractors) in the performance of the acquisition relative to the objectives/goals set forth in the evaluation of this area.

Check the applicable size and categories for the PRIME offeror only -- Check all applicable boxes:

{ } Large Prime or { } Small Business Prime; also categorized as a

{ } SDB (includes 8(a)) { } Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB) { } Historically Underutilized Zone (HUB Zone) Small Business { } Veteran Owned Small Business (VOSB) { } Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB)

(a) Submit the total combined percentage of work to be performed by both large and small businesses (include the percentage of work to be performed both by Prime and Subcontractors):

Example: If Prime proposes a price of $1,000,000 (including all options), and small business(es) will provide $250,000 in services/supplies as a prime or subcontractor, the % planned for small businesses is 25%; and 75% for large business equaling 100%.

Total Percentage planned for %=$ Large Business(es)

Total Percentage planned for %=$ Small Business(es)

(b) Please indicate the total percentage of participation to be performed by each type of subcategory small business. The percentage of work performed by Small Businesses that qualify in multiple small business categories may be counted in each category:

SDB %

HUB Zone Small Business %

Woman Owned Small Business %

Service Disabled Veteran Owned SB %

Veteran Owned Small Business %

(c) List of principle small business firms by name and/or socioeconomic category and the services/supplies to be performed/acquired from the company:

Name of Company Identified Type of Service/Supply

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Small:

SDB/8(a):

Women-Owned Small:

HUB Zone Small:

Veteran Owned Small:

Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small:

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

(d) Describe the extent of commitment to use each of the identified small business. Offerors do not need to submit copies of commitment instruments in their proposals. Rather, identify what types of commitments are in place with each company —i.e. a written contract, letter of commitment, verbal agreement, joint venture, mentor-protégé agreement, including how long agreement in place.

Company: Type of Commitment:

(e) Past performance of the offerors in complying with requirements of the clauses at FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns and 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan. Offerors are required to submit verifiable information on at least three projects that demonstrate the degree (by total dollars and percentage of contract value) to which the contractor utilized small business firms in performing the project. The projects to be considered for this element do not have to be the same as those submitted for Factor 5.

Project 1:

Title: Company Name Current representative & contact info Contract awarded amount Project completion date Dollar amount and Percent Self Performed Dollar amount and Percent of contract Subcontracted Dollar amount and Percent Subcontracted to Small Business Dollar amount and Percent Subcontracted to Large business

Project 2:

Title:

Company Name Current representative & contact info Contract awarded amount Project completion date Dollar amount and Percent Self Performed

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Dollar amount and Percent of contract Subcontracted Dollar amount and Percent Subcontracted to Small Business Dollar amount and Percent Subcontracted to Large

Project 3:

Title: Company Name Current representative & contact info Contract awarded amount Project completion date Dollar amount and Percent Self Performed Dollar amount and Percent of contract Subcontracted Dollar amount and Percent Subcontracted to Small Business Dollar amount and Percent Subcontracted to Large

Important Note for other than U.S. Small Businesses only.

Separate from Small Business Participation Plan, other than U.S. Small Business offerors must also submit a subcontracting plan meeting the requirements of FAR 52.219-9 and DFARS 252.219-7003 (or DFARS 252.219-7004 if the offeror has a comprehensive subcontracting plan). Other than U.S. small businesses must submit acceptable subcontracting plans to be eligible for award.

Subcontracting Plans shall reflect and be consistent with the commitments offered in the Small Business Participation Plan.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .