W9124P-16-R-A004__Past_Performance_Evaluation_Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 223 KB Posted

Attached to
Intrusion Detection Service Amendment Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W9124P-16-R-A004
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Aviation and Missile Life Cycle Management Command

About this file

Attachment 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Intrusion Detection Service Amendment, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment_4_-_BOSCH_Video_List.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_-_IDS_-_PRS-2016.pdf PDF
W9124P-16-R-A004_02.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_-_IDS_Solicitation_Questions_and_Answers.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-_Zone_List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_2_-_Document_Summary_List.pdf PDF
W9124P-16-R-A004_01.pdf PDF
W9124P-16-R-A004-2_Solicitation_IDS.pdf PDF
W9124P-16-R-A004_SOLICITATION.pdf PDF
Zone.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
IDS_PWS.pdf PDF
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

W9124P-16-R-A004

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

Contractor __________________ Contract No.: Subcontract No. (if applicable):

POC:

Title:

(Name) (e.g., PCO/ACO/TM) ____________________________________ (Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Adderss & Fax Number)

The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

file_0.wmf

Contractor/Company Name/Division: Address:

Program Identification/Title: Contract Number:Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above): Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date: Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

file_1.wmf

Name: Title: Date:

Telephone Number: Address:

mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship file_2.wmf

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Good
Acceptable
Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

file_3.wmf

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Good
Acceptable
Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

file_4.wmf

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Good
Acceptable
Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

file_5.wmf

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Good
Acceptable
Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest file_6.wmf

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Good
Acceptable
Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

file_7.wmf

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

file_8.wmf

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

file_9.wmf

Organization: Name:

Title: Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

Signature Date

Typed or Printed Name

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .