am3.pdf

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Command and Control Facility, 1st Armored Division Headquarters, Fort Bliss, El Paso, TX

Note : The Proposal Submission Date of December 23, 2008 at 3:00 PM shall remain unchanged.

1 Encl.

1. Revised Pages: 00110-3, 00110-4

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) a

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDER

NO.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

is not, copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer tended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDG- MENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

is extended, B.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CON-

TRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

6. ISSUED BY

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) is required to sign this document and return

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

PAGE OF PAGES 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

15C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

16C. DATE SIGNED

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE CODE

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

is not ex-copies to the issuing office.

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

USAPPC V2.00

10A.

30-105-02

N/A

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814-2922

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814-2922

CODE

FACILITY CODE

1 3

0003 DEC. 19 , 2008 N/A

W91238-09-R-0004

NOVEMBER 21, 2008

N/A

W91238-09-R-0004 experience provided in the supplemental narrative. The Government may place greater importance on projects performed as a prime contractor than as a subcontractor, depending upon overall role and relevancy considerations. Federal Government project experience will not be rated inherently more important than non-Federal Government project experience.

5.2.2. The Offeror must submit the requested information to demonstrate a record of recent, related experience in both design and construction, for the facility types (which may include similar state or local government or private counterparts) included in this contract, as described in Section 00 22 10. Recent experience includes projects well underway (see above criteria) or those completed and turned over within five (5) years of the proposal issue date for this RFP for design or construction experience. Joint Venture partners should each demonstrate experience commensurate with their role on this project or explain in the supplemental narrative how their experience qualifies them for their role on this project.

5.2.3. The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing the Corps of Engineers Construction Contractor (or Architect-Engineer) Appraisal Support System (CCASS/ACASS), other DOD or Government appraisal systems or to interview owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

5.2.4. To receive credit for extent (amount) of experience, the Offeror and its proposed design firm(s) shall demonstrate a history of recent, relevant experience. A firm will not receive credit under this factor for the relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project.

5.2.5. The Government will consider extent of recent experience, degree of relationship of such experience to this project, demonstrated familiarity with applicable codes and local conditions. Some examples of relevancy to this project may include, but not be limited to:

(1) Number, size, type work, complexity, location

(2) Dates (well under way or completed no more than 5 years preceding date of Solicitation)

(3) Firm's role and extent of work self-performed (brokering out all work and simply “pouring the sidewalks” on a cited project are examples of less relevant experience)

5.2.6. Previous design-build experience is not necessary for an acceptable rating. The Government may consider previous D- B experience a strength, even if the experience is on different type projects than this project. Similarly, the Government may consider previous recent teaming experience among the team members as value added, even if on different type design and/or construction projects than this project. The more relevant the experience, the more credit will be given.

5.2.7. The firm(s) preparing the design must demonstrate qualifications and experience in sustainable design and development and design, based on project experience on projects that have achieved US Green Building Council’s LEED certification or were certifiable at LEED silver or better or project experience on completed Corps of Engineers design-build projects that were validated as having achieving LEED silver rating for an acceptable rating. Additional consideration will be given if both the constructor and the design firm(s) demonstrate qualifications and experience on LEED.

6.0 TAB B – FACTOR 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE

6.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

6.1.1. Past performance refers to the quality of recent project experience from the owner's perspective. The Offeror and its

W91238-09-R-0004 design firm(s) (or prime contractor if design is to be self-performed) shall provide customer reference name(s), company affiliation and current phone numbers on the specific project experience sheets in TAB B. The Government will use the specific project experience sheets submitted for specialized experience in Tab B that were completed or well underway (as defined above) within five (5) years preceding the date of the solicitation. (no separate submittal for past performance for those projects, here). Include the performance rating by the owner on the form, if the Offeror was rated. Additional past performance examples may be submitted for consideration on any member of a Teaming Arrangement that will perform a major or critical aspect of the project. Projects cited shall be currently well underway (fully designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) or construction substantially completed within five (5) years preceding the date of this solicitation. If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division, unit or team member submitting the offer. The Government may contact and interview the points of contact and reserves the right to interview other individuals acting for the listed reference, if the listed reference is not available. See the Interview form at the end of this Section (attachment 4). The team members may also briefly provide information on problems encountered on identified contracts and the team member’s corrective action.

6.1.1. Past performance refers to the quality of recent project experience from the owner's perspective. The Offeror and its design firm(s) (or prime contractor if design is to be self-performed) shall provide customer reference name(s), company affiliation and current phone numbers on the specific project experience sheets in TAB B. The Government will use the specific project experience sheets submitted for specialized experience in Tab B that were completed or well underway (as defined above) within five (5) years preceding the date of the solicitation (no separate submittal for past performance for those projects, here). Include the performance rating by the owner on the form, if the Offeror was rated. Additional past performance examples may be submitted for consideration on any member of a Teaming Arrangement that will perform a major or critical aspect of the project. Projects cited shall be currently well underway (fully designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) or construction substantially completed within five (5) years preceding the date of this solicitation. If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division, unit or team member submitting the offer. The Government may contact and interview the points of contact and reserves the right to interview other individuals acting for the listed reference, if the listed reference is not available. See the Interview form at the end of this Section (attachment 4). Offerors are requested to complete items 1 through 9 on the form along with company name and address and forward the form to the customer POC identified on specialized experience forms (Attachs 2 & 3).

Request Customer POCs forward completed forms directly to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District Office ATTN: Contracting Division – Ankham Sybangone, 1325 J Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 FAX 916-557-5278. Past Performance Evaluation Telephone Interview Questionnaire forms are allowed to be submitted to the USACE Sacramento District Office no later than January 9, 2009. The team members may also briefly provide information on problems encountered on identified contracts and the team member’s corrective action.

6.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA:

6.2.1. The Government will perform a risk assessment, considering the degree of success of the D-B team's recent (well under way or turned over no longer than 5 years preceding the date of this solicitation), relevant experience. See explanation of “well underway” and relevancy under the Factor “Specialized Experience”. The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor performance. If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, The Government will only evaluate past performance of the division or unit submitting the offer or by the team member. Owners/references may be asked to comment on items such as quality of design or construction, timeliness, management of the work subcontractor management, including timely payment to subs or