am2.pdf

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Command and Control Facility, 1st Armored Division Headquarters, Fort Bliss, El Paso, TX

1 Encl.

1. Revised Pages: 00110-2, 00110-7

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDER

NO.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

is not, copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer tended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDG- MENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

is extended, B.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CON-

TRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

6. ISSUED BY

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) is required to sign this document and return

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

PAGE OF PAGES 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

15C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

16C. DATE SIGNED

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE CODE

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

is not ex-copies to the issuing office.

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

USAPPC V2.00

10A.

30-105-02

N/A

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814-2922

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814-2922

CODE

FACILITY CODE

1 3

0002 DEC. 15 , 2008 N/A

W91238-09-R-0004

NOVEMBER 21, 2008

N/A

Tab C

Factor 3

Organization and Technical Approach

3rd (Slightly less important than Factor 2)

4.0 TAB A - STANDARD FORM 1442 AND PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

4.1. Submit the SF 1442, completed and signed by a person authorized by the Offeror. Include the completed proposal data sheet (See attachment 1, provided at the end of this Section).

5.0 TAB B – FACTOR 1 - SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

5.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

5.1.1. The prime contractor and the design firm(s) (or prime contractor if design is to be self-performed) shall each demonstrate recent, relevant experience on similar projects, using Construction – Specialized Experience form – (Attachment 2), and Designer – Specialized Experience Form – (Attachment 3) at the end of the section. Offerors may identify state and local government and private contracts that are similar to the Government’s requirements. If the offeror is a joint venture, each firm shall provide information, demonstrating experience relevant to their role on this project. Submit projects selected from those discussed in the experience narrative that are currently well underway (designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) or completed and turned over no longer that five (5) years preceding the date of this Solicitation. If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those preformed by the division or unit submitting the offer or by the team member. Design firms may list prime contractors they have worked for or government, private or commercial customers. The offeror shall select the design firm(s). If projects were design-build, so identify them. Both the prime contractor and the design firm(s) shall each submit no more that five (5) projects for the following facility type:

• Battalion, Brigade Headquarters, or Command and Control Facilities or their equivalent or similar commercial or institutional type

5.1.2. The offeror may provide a supplemental narrative (not project lists), not to exceed two pages, explaining how any corporate experience that is not directly related to the specific projects above is applicable to this project and how the Government will benefit. The following information may be considered.

5.1.2.1. The offeror should describe any previous teaming experience between current team members, if not described in the project list. Describe team members’ experience on LEED projects, if not included on the project list. Offeror may describe design-build experience on other type projects. The above information is limited to projects that are well underway or that have been completed and turned over no longer than the past five years preceding the date of this solicitation.

5.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA:

5.2.1. The Government will evaluate the extent of recent, related experience of the prime contractor and design firms in design, construction or design-build, as relevant to their role on this project. If the design will be accomplished in-house, rather than by subcontract, then the design element of specialized experience will still be evaluated, realizing that the work is being done in-house. Experience on the similar projects identified in the project lists will receive more consideration than experience, dedicated to fire protection engineering that can be verified with documentation. The minimum experience requirements for the Project Manager are at least 5 years construction and construction management experience. The minimum experience requirements for the Design manager are at least 5 years of design experience or at least 5 years of construction and construction management experience. The minimum experience requirements for the on-site manager are at least 3 years managing projects with multiple subcontractors and familiarity with scheduling. The minimum experience requirements for the superintendent are at least 5 years experience as superintendent, managing multiple trades and subcontractors. If alternates are proposed for key positions, the evaluation rating will consider the lesser qualified or experienced person, if there is a difference.

8.0 PHASE 1 OVERALL RATING

8.1. In addition to individual factor ratings, the Government will assign an overall rating for the Phase 1 proposal using the same rating system listed under paragraph 9.4.3.

9.0 PHASE 1 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

9.1. SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION BOARD (SSEB)

9.1.1. The SSEB will be established to conduct the evaluation of proposals received in response to this solicitation. The evaluation will be based on the content of the proposal, proposal corrections and any information obtained from other sources, e.g. past performance information. The SSEB will not consider any proposal incorporated by reference, except as expressly allowed by this solicitation.

9.2. EVALUATION

9.2.1. The SSEB will evaluate the proposals and assign a consensus rating for each evaluation factor and subfactor. Offerors are cautioned to put forth their best efforts for the Phase 1 submission, and to furnish all information clearly to allow the Government to determine their performance capability. Offerors should not assume that they will have an opportunity to clarify or correct anything in their proposal after submitting it in response to Phase 1.

9.2.2. The Government reserves the right to allow proposal corrections, if deemed necessary to determine the most highly qualified offerors to shortlist for Phase 2.

9.2.3. The Contracting Officer, independently exercising prudent business judgment, will select up to 3 (three) of the most highly qualified offerors to short-list for Phase 2.

9.3. DEFINITIONS

9.3.1. Deficiency

A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

9.3.2. Weakness

A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

9.3.3. Significant Weakness