Asbestos_Lead_Survey_Bldg-9410_20150803.pdf

August 3, 2015

Mr. Aaron Williams USACE, Tulsa District 1645 South 101st East Avenue Tulsa, OK 74128 Phone: (918) 669-4915

RE: Submittal of Hazardous Building Material Surveys Contract No. W912BV-10-D-2011, Task Order 0002 Ft. Bliss Bldg. # 9410

Dear Mr. Williams, This document summarizes the Asbestos Survey and/or Lead Paint Survey Reports for the subject building.

The below listed information was utilized to complete the Scope of Work Tasks:

Bldg. No. 9410 POC: Jesse Moncada Phone No: 915-568-1838 Building Square Footage (SF) Reported: 6,440 Technical Summary:

1. LEAD PAINT. ENCON performed a total of one-hundred and twenty-three (123) XRF analyses, which included one-hundred and nine (109) building component measurements and fourteen (14) calibration checks. Forty-two (42) of the building readings tested positive for lead paint. Refer to the attachments for more details.

2. ASBESTOS. A total of one-hundred and two (102) bulk samples were effectively collected for lab analysis of this common Barracks Facility. The attached analytical results indicated that asbestos containing materials were present in the subject building. Contact Ft. Bliss, DPW regarding the latest overall status of any asbestos or lead paint materials.

SUMMARY TABLE (with Action Level) Previously Surveyed by others

Were Found

Were Not Found

Actions Required Yes / No

1. Lead Containing Paint Materials (≥0.3 mg/cm2) X Yes

2. Asbestos Containing Materials (>1 %) X Yes

Please contact me with any technical questions, or follow-up needs that you may have.

Sincerely, David Epperly, Ph.D., P.E.

Project Manager – ALL Consulting

CC: Jesse Moncada (Ft Bliss DPW) Barry Vercoe (CESFW-PEC-TM)

ATTACHMENTS

1. Lead Paint Survey Report

2. Asbestos Survey Report

ATTACHMENT 1

Lead Paint Survey Report

COMPREHENSIVE LEAD PAINT SURVEY

BUILDING 9410

FORT BLISS, TEXAS 79916

Prepared for:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Tulsa District

Prepared by:

ALL CONSULTING TEAM

ENCON International, Inc.

7307 Remcon Circle, #103

El Paso, TX 79912 and

ALL Consulting, LLC 1718 S. Cheyenne Ave.

Tulsa, OK 74119

Inspection Start Date:

June 23, 2015

LEAD PAINT SURVEY REPORT

Ft. Bliss, Texas ─ Building 9410

PURPOSE

The ALL Consulting Team was contracted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Tulsa

District, to perform comprehensive Hazardous Building Materials Surveys to identify the presence of any asbestos or lead paint at a number of buildings at Ft. Bliss, Texas. This project also included the development and population of a database to store the survey reports for access by the Ft. Bliss

Directorate of Public Works (DPW), and others. The buildings that are included within this contract scope of work includes buildings at McGregor Base Camp and Doña Ana Base Camp within the New Mexico portion of Ft. Bliss, in addition to the Ft. Bliss buildings within Texas.

BACKGROUND

Ft. Bliss has a large number of buildings constructed before 1990 when the use of asbestos and lead paint was prevalent in the construction of buildings. Because the presence of these materials still exists in these buildings, Ft. Bliss is required to identify the extent of the lead paint remaining at these buildings, as well as their condition. Lead in paint is a hazard that is regulated by the

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) under 29 CFR 1926.62 for worker exposure. In addition to the dangers of occupational exposure to construction and maintenance workers, as well as building occupants, lead particles and lead dust may be inadvertently carried home on clothes and shoes to expose their families. Identifying components containing lead paint will not only protect the workers and their families, but will help to indemnify Ft. Bliss by preemptively identifying the location of these potential hazardous materials.

INTRODUCTION

In accordance with OSHA Lead Regulation 29 CFR 1926.62, and the OSHA Hazard

Communication standard (29 CFR 1910.1200), where lead exists workers must be notified and steps must be taken to protect them from the inherent hazards. By identifying the lead containing components in these buildings, and, when appropriate, removing the hazards or potential hazards, Ft. Bliss avoids the liability of workers becoming exposed. Lead paint was banned for use in residential dwellings starting in January of 1978, but lead paint is still available for non-residential applications.

FACILITY DESCRIPTION

Building 9410 was constructed in 1959, and was unoccupied at the time of inspection. Its previous use was listed as a “barracks.” A description of this building is presented in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1 – BUILDING DESCRIPTION

Building Items Description Area of building 6,440 square feet Date of Construction 1959 Number of floors One (1) floor Exterior wall materials CMU

Roof type Center wing: Flat North & South wing: Pitched

Roof material Center wing: Roll roofing North & South wing: Shingles

Interior walls Drywall, CMU, concrete Interior floors Concrete

Interior floor coverings Mechanical Room, Laundry Room, Janitor Closet & Restrooms: None Rest of building: 12x12 vinyl floor tiles (2 layers)

Ceilings Plaster, drywall & 2x4 lay-in ceiling tiles Notes:

UNIQUE PAINTING HISTORY

Lead can be found in paint, varnish, shellac, and stain, so any coated surface other than a factory coating is suspect for lead paint. A Lead Paint Survey is based upon coated components which are grouped into similar components with a similar (unique) painting history. This would include components with the same substrate, built or installed at the same time, with a common painting history. Items such as window components (sash and mullions), window frame (trim, header, sill, and apron), doors, and door frame materials, should be considered to have a possible separate painting history, and could have had different coatings applied throughout the years.

REGULATORY STANDARDS

Lead-based paint in residential structures, or Child Occupied Facilities (day care facilities, etc.), is regulated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under 24 CFR 35, and also by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) under 40 CFR 745. Only a few of these types of facilities have been identified in the buildings included in this contract. For all buildings included in this category, both HUD and EPA regulations will apply. All other buildings identified in this project would be regulated under the OSHA standards pertaining to worker protection from hazards (29 CFR 1926.62).

Sampling protocols have already been thoroughly established by the HUD and the EPA for residential housing units. For non-residential structures, there is no specified lead paint sampling protocol, but HUD / EPA protocols were generally followed. These comprehensive lead paint surveys include thorough inspections to identify all lead painted components.

SAMPLING METHODOLOGY

The building materials survey tasks were performed in accordance with the Final Hazardous

Building Materials Surveys, Sampling Plan, Fort Bliss, Texas, December 2014, prepared by ALL

Consulting and ENCON International, Inc. A visual inspection of the building was conducted to develop a sampling strategy. This included identifying component groups with similar painting histories. Each component group was sampled throughout the building to establish whether or not the building contained lead at the prescribed action level for this project, at the time of the survey.

This Lead Paint Inspection was performed on June 23 and 24, 2015 using an x-ray fluorescence

(XRF) analyzer, to identify if any lead amounts in the paint were at or above 0.3 mg/cm2. A total of one-hundred and twenty-three (123) XRF analyses were performed, which included one-hundred and nine (109) building component measurements and fourteen (14) calibration checks.

Drawings that illustrate the locations of all building measurements that tested positive for lead have been provided in Appendix A of this Report.

XRF RESULTS

The XRF analyzer indicated that lead-containing paint was identified in the building component types listed in the following Table 2. The table also provides additional details regarding building component types, and if the tested components were located at the exterior or interior of the subject building.

TABLE 2: LEAD CONTAINING COMPONENT TYPES

Component Substrate Condition Color

Exterior Building

CEILING WOOD POOR TAN

FLOOR CONCRETE POOR RED

SOFFIT WOOD FAIR TAN

WINDOW METAL FAIR TAN

EXTERIOR SILL CMU FAIR TAN

WINDOW METAL POOR TAN

WALL CMU FAIR TAN

MULLION METAL FAIR TAN

FRIEZE BOARD WOOD FAIR TAN

DOOR CASING WOOD POOR BROWN

RISER CONCRETE POOR TAN

Interior Building

WALL CMU FAIR WHITE

CROWN MOLDING WOOD FAIR WHITE

BASEBOARD WOOD POOR BROWN

DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN

BASEBOARD METAL FAIR BROWN

DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN

DOOR WOOD FAIR WHITE

WALL CMU FAIR BLACK

WALL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE

WALL TRIM WOOD FAIR TAN

SHELF WOOD FAIR TAN

BASEBOARD WOOD POOR TAN

DOOR CASING METAL POOR BROWN

WALL CMU FAIR TAN

CEILING PLASTER FAIR WHITE

The following Table 3 indicates that a total of forty-two (42) of the building measurements tested positive, which confirmed the presence of lead at or above 0.3 mg/cm2. The complete XRF lead paint data, including negative measurements and calibration readings, have been provided in

Appendix B of this Report. Note that the XRF analyzer makes a final determination regarding if a building component is positive or negative for lead in paint. This analytical determination is s u t st 0.3 mg/cm2), the measurement obtained, and the analytical range of the margin of error for the XRF analyzer. On occasion, a measurement obtained using this test method

(EPA method # 6200) that is slightly above or below the standard may effectively result in a positive or negative determination, due to the analyzer’s margin of error. Any measurements that are determined to be positive or negative for lead paint by the XRF analyzer, will be accepted as such, during this Survey. Any results to which this would apply would have been noted with an asterisk (*) in the “Results” column of Appendix B of this Report.

TABLE 3: POSITIVE XRF LEAD PAINT MEASUREMENTS

No. Component Substrate Condition Color Measurement Location Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2) Exterior Building

7 CEILING WOOD POOR TAN N WING; E PORCH 0.3 5.8

8 FLOOR CONCRETE POOR RED N WING; E PORCH 0.3 0.3

13 SOFFIT WOOD FAIR TAN N WING; E AREA; S SIDE 0.3 3.8

14 WINDOW METAL FAIR TAN N WING; E AREA; S SIDE 0.3 1.6

15 EXTERIOR SILL CMU FAIR TAN CENTER WING; E WALL 0.3 0.6

16 SOFFIT WOOD FAIR TAN CENTER WING; E SIDE 0.3 4.2

17 WINDOW METAL FAIR TAN S WING; E AREA; N WALL 0.3 2.3

19 CEILING WOOD POOR TAN S WING; E PORCH 0.3 7.6

23 SOFFIT WOOD FAIR TAN S WING; E AREA; S SIDE 0.3 4.3

24 WINDOW METAL POOR TAN S WING; S WALL 0.3 1.6

25 WALL CMU FAIR TAN S WING; W AREA; S WALL 0.3 0.5

28 CEILING WOOD POOR TAN S WING; W PORCH 0.3 3.3

30 MULLION METAL FAIR TAN S WING; N WALL; W WINDOW 0.3 0.5

31 SOFFIT WOOD FAIR TAN CENTRAL WING; W SIDE 0.3 5.4

32 FRIEZE BOARD WOOD FAIR TAN CENTER WING; W WALL 0.3 4.1

33 DOOR CASING WOOD POOR BROWN CENTER WING; W WALL 0.3 0.7

39 WALL CMU FAIR TAN N WING; W WALL 0.3 0.6

40 RISER CONCRETE POOR TAN N WING; W PORCH 0.3 0.8

43 WINDOW METAL FAIR TAN N WING; W AREA; N WALL 0.3 2.3

44 SOFFIT WOOD FAIR TAN N WING; N SIDE 0.3 4

45 FRIEZE BOARD WOOD FAIR TAN N WING; N WALL 0.3 2.9

46 WALL CMU FAIR TAN N WING; N WALL 0.3 0.5

Interior Building

57 WALL CMU FAIR WHITE N WING; OFFICE A; E WALL 0.3 0.6

58 CROWN MOLDING WOOD FAIR WHITE N WING; OFFICE B; W WALL 0.3 0.8

61 BASEBOARD WOOD POOR BROWN N WING; W AREA; W WALL 0.3 0.6

62 WALL CMU FAIR WHITE N WING; W AREA; S WALL 0.3 3.2

64 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN N WING; W AREA; E WALL 0.3 0.6

71 BASEBOARD METAL FAIR BROWN N WING; E AREA; N WALL 0.3 0.6

72 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN N WING; CENTER AREA; S WALL 0.3 0.5

No. Component Substrate Condition Color Measurement Location Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

75 DOOR WOOD FAIR WHITE CENTER WING; LAUNDRY ROOM 0.3 1.5

76 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN CENTER WING; LAUNDRY ROOM 0.3 0.6

81 WALL CMU FAIR BLACK CENTER WING; LAUNDRY ROOM; E

WALL 0.3 0.5

82 WALL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE CENTER WING; HALLWAY; E WALL 0.3 0.6

90 WALL TRIM WOOD FAIR TAN CENTER WING; HALLWAY; W WALL 0.3 0.6

97 BASEBOARD WOOD POOR BROWN CENTER WING; HALLWAY; E WALL 0.3 0.5

100 SHELF WOOD FAIR TAN CENTER WING; JANITOR CLOSET; N

WALL 0.3 0.5

101 BASEBOARD WOOD POOR TAN CENTER WING; JANITOR CLOSET; E

WALL 0.3 0.8

103 DOOR CASING METAL POOR BROWN S WING; CENTER AREA; N WALL 0.3 *0.29

104 WALL CMU FAIR TAN S WING; CENTER AREA; N WALL 0.3 0.6

108 CEILING PLASTER FAIR WHITE S WING; OFFICE C 0.3 0.4

109 WALL CMU FAIR TAN S WING; OFFICE C; N WALL 0.3 1.9

114 WALL CMU FAIR TAN S WING; W AREA; S WALL 0.3 0.5

QUALIFICATIONS

This Comprehensive Lead Paint Survey was performed by an Inspector that was qualified to perform work in Texas, per the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), and in New

Mexico per USEPA certification credentials. This individual has received training under the HUD

/ EPA training criteria for the required Lead Paint Inspector and/or Risk Assessor courses and has received the refresher training within the prescribed period for each jurisdiction. Company and individual licenses and credentials have been provided and are available for review in the project sampling plan documents, which have been submitted to the USACE.

LIMITATIONS

The overall purpose of this Comprehensive Lead Paint Survey was to identify if lead-containing components were present, within the qualifications and limitations summarized below. Reliance on this Report is specifically limited to gathering initial information regarding the presence of lead in paint. Any time that lead-based paint may be identified during the performance of a lead inspection, the owner of the building is responsible to the occupants and to the public to properly manage these materials, per Local, State and Federal regulations. Prior to the abatement or removal of any lead containing materials, a Lead Project Design should be properly performed, by a qualified Lead Firm, to 1) ensure that materials will be properly managed, and 2) to prepare a more accurate estimate of actual materials to be addressed. This Survey Report was specifically prepared for ALL Consulting’s Client (USACE and Ft. Bliss), and the extent of liability incurred, is limited to the amount of the Report Fee paid by its Client. The USACE agrees that the ALL

Consulting Team cannot be held responsible for any liability based on reliance of this Report by any third party.

CONCLUSIONS

1. Specific Conclusions. Lead-containing paint was found on components either inside and / or outside of this building.

• Lead paint should not be disturbed without proper procedures in place. Should the lead paint need to be disturbed, personnel should be evacuated in advance, and only properly trained persons with adequate PPE should be allowed to disturb the lead paint material.

• Lead painted components in poor condition should be stabilized with interim controls or abatement procedures by properly trained personnel.

• Lead hazard air monitoring should be performed during abatement activities.

• Following abatement activities, clearance wipe samples should be collected and sent to an approved laboratory for lead paint analysis.

• The OSHA Hazard Communication Standard and the Lead Paint Standard both require anyone working in such areas to be informed of lead paint hazards and methods to avoid the hazards.

2. General Conclusions. Proper notification should be made to the appropriate authorities prior to disturbance of any lead-containing materials, including abatement activity, renovations, or operations and maintenance (O&M) activities, or demolition of any facilities or public buildings.

Other personnel working in the area must be alerted by signage and the appropriate regulated area designations. OSHA specifies worker protection and engineering controls, as well as work practices to ensure the safety of workers and anyone who will be in the area after the conclusion of the work.

Contact the personnel listed below with any clarifications that may be needed.

Inspected by: Reviewed by: Approved by:

Tim Jones, RPIH Alex Woelper, P.E., RPIH David Epperly, Ph.D., P.E.

Lead Inspector Environmental Consultant Project Manager ENCON International, Inc. ENCON International, Inc. ALL Consulting, LLC License # 2070306

APPENDICES:

A. Lead Paint Measurement Location Drawing(s) B. XRF Lead Paint Data

APPENDIX A

Lead Paint Measurement Location Drawing(s)

Project: # 139-14

Hazardous Materials Surveys

Draw by: JA 7307 Remcon Cir, Ste 103 El Paso, Texas, 79912 915.833.3740

Sheet

ENV-1

ENCON INTERNATIONAL, INC

NOT TO SCALE

Location: Ft. Bliss Installation

Building: 9410 McGregor Base Camp, NM

Office A

LR

JC

M RR

W RR

Mech.

Room

Office B

Office C

Office D

Mechanical Room

South Wing

Floor Plan Areas:

North Wing

Mechanical Room

Central Area Mechanical Room

Central Area

South Wing

North Wing

Floor Plan Areas

N

Date:

07-16-2015

Hazardous Materials Surveys

Draw by: JA 7307 Remcon Cir, Ste 103 El Paso, Texas, 79912 915.833.3740

Sheet

ENV-1

ENCON INTERNATIONAL, INC

NOT TO SCALE

Date:

07-17-2015

Location: Ft. Bliss Installation

Building # 9410 McGregor Base Camp, NM

Office A

LR

JC

M RR

W RR

Mech.

Room

Office B

Office C

Office D

Lead Paint Measurement Locations - Floor Plan

## Positive Lead Paint Measurement Locations

N

232425

43 45 46

75 76

103104

APPENDIX B

XRF Lead Paint Data

Note that the XRF analyzer makes a final determination regarding if a building component is positive or negative for lead in paint. This analytical determination is based upon the standard (≥0.3 mg/cm2), the measurement obtained, and the analytical range of the margin of error for the XRF analyzer. On occasion, a measurement obtained using this test method (EPA method # 6200) that is above or below the standard may effectively result in a negative or positive determination, due to the analyzer’s margin of error. Any measurements that are determined to be negative or positive for lead paint by the XRF analyzer, will be accepted as such, for this Survey. Any results that apply to this situation will be noted with an asterisk (*) in the table to follow.

McGregor Base Camp, New Mexico XRF Lead Paint Data Bldg. 9410

No. Component Substrate Condition Color Measurement Location Results Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

1 SHUTTER_CAL 5.76

2 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 1.1

3 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.9

4 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 1.1

5 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN N WING; E PORCH; E WALL Negative 0.3 0 6 DOOR METAL FAIR TAN N WING; E PORCH; E WALL Negative 0.3 0 7 CEILING WOOD POOR TAN N WING; E PORCH Positive 0.3 5.8 8 FLOOR CONCRETE POOR RED N WING; E PORCH Positive 0.3 0.3 9 RISER CONCRETE POOR TAN N WING; E PORCH Null 0.3 0.12

10 RISER CONCRETE POOR TAN N WING; E PORCH Null 0.3 0.07 11 RISER CONCRETE POOR TAN N WING; E PORCH Negative 0.3 0.01 12 WALL CMU FAIR TAN N WING; E WALL Negative 0.3 0.08 13 SOFFIT WOOD FAIR TAN N WING; E AREA; S SIDE Positive 0.3 3.8 14 WINDOW METAL FAIR TAN N WING; E AREA; S SIDE Positive 0.3 1.6 15 EXTERIOR SILL CMU FAIR TAN CENTER WING; E WALL Positive 0.3 0.6 16 SOFFIT WOOD FAIR TAN CENTER WING; E SIDE Positive 0.3 4.2 17 WINDOW METAL FAIR TAN S WING; E AREA; N WALL Positive 0.3 2.3 18 RISER CONCRETE POOR TAN S WING; E PORCH Negative 0.3 0.14 19 CEILING WOOD POOR TAN S WING; E PORCH Positive 0.3 7.6 20 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN S WING; E PORCH; E WALL Negative 0.3 0 21 EXTERIOR SILL CMU FAIR TAN S WING; E AREA; S WALL Negative 0.3 *0.3 22 SOFFIT WOOD FAIR TAN S WING; E AREA; S SIDE Null 0.3 4.6 23 SOFFIT WOOD FAIR TAN S WING; E AREA; S SIDE Positive 0.3 4.3 24 WINDOW METAL POOR TAN S WING; S WALL Positive 0.3 1.6 25 WALL CMU FAIR TAN S WING; W AREA; S WALL Positive 0.3 0.5 26 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN S WING; W PORCH; W WALL Negative 0.3 0 27 DOOR METAL FAIR TAN S WING; W PORCH; W WALL Negative 0.3 0 28 CEILING WOOD POOR TAN S WING; W PORCH Positive 0.3 3.3 29 THRESHOLD CONCRETE POOR TAN S WING; W PORCH; W WALL Negative 0.3 0.14 30 MULLION METAL FAIR TAN S WING; N WALL; W WINDOW Positive 0.3 0.5

Exterior Building

06/23/15 & 06/24/15 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 1

Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

31 SOFFIT WOOD FAIR TAN CENTRAL WING; W SIDE Positive 0.3 5.4 32 FRIEZE BOARD WOOD FAIR TAN CENTER WING; W WALL Positive 0.3 4.1 33 DOOR CASING WOOD POOR BROWN CENTER WING; W WALL Positive 0.3 0.7 34 DOOR METAL POOR BROWN CENTER WING; W WALL Negative 0.3 0.02 38 RISER CONCRETE POOR BLUE CENTER WING; W SIDE Negative 0.3 0.04 39 WALL CMU FAIR TAN N WING; W WALL Positive 0.3 0.6 40 RISER CONCRETE POOR TAN N WING; W PORCH Positive 0.3 0.8 41 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN N WING; W PORCH; W WALL Negative 0.3 0 42 DOOR METAL FAIR TAN N WING; W PORCH; W WALL Negative 0.3 0 43 WINDOW METAL FAIR TAN N WING; W AREA; N WALL Positive 0.3 2.3 44 SOFFIT WOOD FAIR TAN N WING; N SIDE Positive 0.3 4 45 FRIEZE BOARD WOOD FAIR TAN N WING; N WALL Positive 0.3 2.9 46 WALL CMU FAIR TAN N WING; N WALL Positive 0.3 0.5

47 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 1.1

48 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 1

49 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.9

35 FLOOR CONCRETE FAIR GREY MECHANICAL RM.; S AREA Null 0.3 0 36 FLOOR CONCRETE FAIR GREY MECHANICAL RM.; S AREA Negative 0.3 0 37 BASEBOARD WOOD POOR GREEN MECHANICAL RM.; S WALL Negative 0.3 0.16

50 SHUTTER_CAL 0.3 5.94

51 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 1.2

52 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 1

53 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 1.3

54 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE N WING; W AREA Negative 0.3 0.03 55 DUCT METAL FAIR TAN N WING; W ENTRANCE Null 0.3 0.16 56 DUCT METAL FAIR TAN N WING; W ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 -0.25 57 WALL CMU FAIR WHITE N WING; OFFICE A; E WALL Positive 0.3 0.6 58 CROWN MOLDING WOOD FAIR WHITE N WING; OFFICE B; W WALL Positive 0.3 0.8 59 BASEBOARD WOOD POOR BROWN N WING; W AREA; W WALL Null 0.3 0.25 60 BASEBOARD WOOD POOR BROWN N WING; W AREA; W WALL Null 0.3 0.4

Interior Building

06/23/15 & 06/24/15 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 2

Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

61 BASEBOARD WOOD POOR BROWN N WING; W AREA; W WALL Positive 0.3 0.6 62 WALL CMU FAIR WHITE N WING; W AREA; S WALL Positive 0.3 3.2 63 WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE N WING; W AREA; E WALL Negative 0.3 0 64 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN N WING; W AREA; E WALL Positive 0.3 0.6 65 WINDOW CASING METAL FAIR BROWN N WING; E AREA; S WALL Negative 0.3 0.11 66 WINDOW CASING METAL FAIR BROWN N WING; E AREA; N WALL Negative 0.3 0.18 67 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN N WING; E AREA; E WALL Negative 0.3 0 68 DOOR METAL FAIR TAN N WING; E AREA; E WALL Negative 0.3 0 69 CROWN MOLDING WOOD FAIR WHITE N WING; E AREA; E WALL Null 0.3 0.11 70 CROWN MOLDING WOOD FAIR WHITE N WING; E AREA; E WALL Negative 0.3 0.11 71 BASEBOARD METAL FAIR BROWN N WING; E AREA; N WALL Positive 0.3 0.6 72 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN N WING; CENTER AREA; S WALL Positive 0.3 0.5 73 DOOR DRYWALL FAIR WHITE N WING; CENTER AREA; S WALL Negative 0.3 0 74 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE CENTER WING; HALLWAY Negative 0.3 0.1 75 DOOR WOOD FAIR WHITE CENTER WING; LAUNDRY RM. Positive 0.3 1.5 76 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN CENTER WING; LAUNDRY RM. Positive 0.3 0.6 77 SCUTTLE CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE CENTER WING; LAUNDRY RM. Negative 0.3 0.14 78 CROWN MOLDING WOOD FAIR WHITE CENTER WING; LAUNDRY RM.; W WALL Negative 0.3 0.13 79 SHELF WOOD FAIR WHITE CENTER WING; LAUNDRY RM.; S WALL Negative 0.3 0 80 WALL CMU FAIR BLACK CENTER WING; LAUNDRY RM.; E WALL Null 0.3 0 81 WALL CMU FAIR BLACK CENTER WING; LAUNDRY RM.; E WALL Positive 0.3 0.5 82 WALL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE CENTER WING; HALLWAY; E WALL Positive 0.3 0.6 83 WINDOW METAL FAIR BROWN CENTER WING; HALLWAY; E WALL Negative 0.3 0.1 84 WALL DRYWALL FAIR TAN CENTER WING; N RESTROOM; E WALL Negative 0.3 0 85 CROWN MOLDING WOOD FAIR TAN CENTER WING; N RESTROOM; S WALL Negative 0.3 0.09 86 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR TAN CENTER WING; N RESTROOM Null 0.3 0.12 87 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR TAN CENTER WING; N RESTROOM Negative 0.3 0.1 88 WINDOW CASING METAL FAIR TAN CENTER WING; N RESTROOM; W WALL Negative 0.3 0.07 89 WALL CMU FAIR TAN CENTER WING; N RESTROOM; S WALL Negative 0.3 0.09 90 WALL TRIM WOOD FAIR TAN CENTER WING; HALLWAY; W WALL Positive 0.3 0.6 91 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN CENTER WING; S RESTROOM; E WALL Negative 0.3 0

06/23/15 & 06/24/15 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 3

Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

92 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR TAN CENTER WING; S RESTROOM Negative 0.3 0.1 93 CEILING VENT METAL FAIR TAN CENTER WING; S RESTROOM; W AREA Negative 0.3 0.1 94 WALL CONCRETE FAIR TAN CENTER WING; S RESTROOM; W WALL Negative 0.3 0.14 95 THRESHOLD AT WALL WOOD FAIR TAN CENTER WING; HALLWAY; E WALL Negative 0.3 0.15 96 THRESHOLD METAL FAIR GREY CENTER WING; HALLWAY Negative 0.3 0.04 97 BASEBOARD WOOD POOR BROWN CENTER WING; HALLWAY; E WALL Positive 0.3 0.5 98 SCUTTLE CASING WOOD FAIR TAN CENTER WING; JANITOR CLOSET Null 0.3 0.19 99 SCUTTLE CASING WOOD FAIR TAN CENTER WING; JANITOR CLOSET Negative 0.3 0.18

100 SHELF WOOD FAIR TAN CENTER WING; JANITOR CLOSET; N WALL Positive 0.3 0.5 101 BASEBOARD WOOD POOR TAN CENTER WING; JANITOR CLOSET; E WALL Positive 0.3 0.8 102 ELECTRIC PANEL METAL POOR TAN CENTER WING; JANITOR CLOSET; W WALL Negative 0.3 0.03 103 DOOR CASING METAL POOR BROWN S WING; CENTER AREA; N WALL Positive 0.3 *0.29 104 WALL CMU FAIR TAN S WING; CENTER AREA; N WALL Positive 0.3 0.6 105 DUCT METAL POOR TAN S WING; W AREA Negative 0.3 0 106 CROWN MOLDING WOOD FAIR TAN S WING; W AREA; W WALL Negative 0.3 0.03 107 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN S WING; W ENTRANCE; N WALL Negative 0.3 0 108 CEILING PLASTER FAIR WHITE S WING; OFFICE C Positive 0.3 0.4 109 WALL CMU FAIR TAN S WING; OFFICE C; N WALL Positive 0.3 1.9 110 CROWN MOLDING WOOD FAIR TAN S WING; OFFICE C; N WALL Negative 0.3 0.17 111 DOOR CASING CMU POOR BROWN S WING; W ENTRANCE; W WALL Negative 0.3 0 112 WALL METAL FAIR TAN S WING; OFFICE D; S WALL Negative 0.3 0.09 113 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN S WING; W ENTRANCE; S WALL Negative 0.3 0 114 WALL CMU FAIR TAN S WING; W AREA; S WALL Positive 0.3 0.5 115 DUCT METAL FAIR WHITE S WING; E AREA Negative 0.3 -0.11 116 WINDOW CASING METAL FAIR BROWN S WING; E AREA; N WALL Negative 0.3 0.11 117 WINDOW CASING METAL FAIR BROWN S WING; E AREA; S WALL Negative 0.3 0.16 118 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN S WING; E AREA; E WALL Negative 0.3 0 119 CROWN MOLDING WOOD FAIR TAN S WING; E AREA; E WALL Negative 0.3 0.06 120 BASEBOARD WOOD FAIR BROWN S WING; E AREA; N WALL Negative 0.3 0.21

121 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 1.2

122 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.9

06/23/15 & 06/24/15 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 4

Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

123 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 1

Null - Any result of "null" in the table above indicates that an inconclusive measurement was obtained with the XRF analyzer, and was therefore repeated in the same location until a measurement was obtained.

06/23/15 & 06/24/15 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 5

ATTACHMENT 2

Asbestos Survey Report

COMPREHENSIVE ASBESTOS SURVEY

BUILDING 9410

FORT BLISS, TEXAS 79916

Prepared for:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Tulsa District

Prepared by:

ALL Consulting, LLC 1718 S. Cheyenne Ave.

Tulsa, OK 74119

Inspection Start Date:

June 24, 2015

ENCON International, Inc.

7307 Remcon Circle, #103

El Paso, TX 79912

COMPREHENSIVE ASBESTOS SURVEY

Ft. Bliss, Bldg. 9410

PURPOSE

The ALL Consulting Team was contracted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Tulsa

District, to perform comprehensive Hazardous Building Materials Surveys to identify the presence of any asbestos or lead paint at a number of buildings at Ft. Bliss, Texas. This project also included the development and population of a database to store the survey reports for access by the Ft. Bliss

Directorate of Public Works (DPW), and others. The buildings that are included within this contract scope of work include buildings at McGregor Base Camp and Doña Ana Base Camp within the New Mexico portion of Ft. Bliss, in addition to the Ft. Bliss buildings within Texas.

BACKGROUND

Ft. Bliss has a large number of buildings constructed before 1990 when the use of asbestos and lead paint was prevalent in construction of buildings. Because these materials may still exist within these buildings, Ft. Bliss is required to identify (asbestos or lead containing materials), assess the condition (stable or deteriorating), determine the nature of building materials (i.e., drywall or floor tile), and the extent of these hazardous substances. In accordance with the Clean Air Act (40 CFR

61 Subpart M, Asbestos), any renovation, remodeling or demolition of any structure, (i.e., buildings, facilities, etc.), shall be surveyed for asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and properly abated prior to any disturbance of the material.

INTRODUCTION

The buildings selected for this project were provided to the ALL Consulting Team by USACE, Tulsa District. The selected buildings were located in four (4) geographic areas: Ft. Bliss main post, Biggs Field (now known as East Bliss), McGregor Base Camp, NM, and Doña Ana Base

Camp, NM. Records were available for some of these buildings where previous partial or complete inspections had been performed. When available, prior asbestos reports were referenced to enhance the thoroughness of the asbestos inspection performed during this project. The goal of this project was to provide a comprehensive inspection of the designated buildings, but destructive sampling was not authorized. Therefore, on rare occasion some ACMs may be hidden behind walls, under subfloors, or located in other areas that were inaccessible to the inspector. If or when any building is to undergo future demolition, an additional investigation may be undertaken in which destructive sampling is authorized.

REGULATORY STANDARDS

Asbestos in building materials is regulated on the federal level by the Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA), and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). On the state level, Texas also has regulations pertaining to sampling and abatement of asbestos in buildings.

The inspection was conducted to ensure compliance with National Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) – 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M, which states that “prior to the commencement of the demolition or renovation, thoroughly inspect the affected facility or part of the facility where the demolition or renovation operation(s) will occur for the presence of asbestos, including Category I and Category II non-friable ACM.” Regulated asbestos containing materials have been designated as RACM. Asbestos Inspectors for both Texas and New Mexico facilities were trained under the EPA AHERA (40 CFR 763) standards. For facilities in the State of Texas, the Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) were complied with, which specify inspector licensure and a minimum of three (3) samples for each homogeneous area. In New

Mexico, buildings were sampled under the applicable regulations from the EPA, 40 CFR 61.

FACILITY DESCRIPTION

Building 9410 was unoccupied at the time of inspection and had been previously used as a barracks on McGregor Base Camp, New Mexico. A description of this building is presented in Table 1 below:

TABLE 1 – BUILDING DESCRIPTION

Building Items Description Area of building 6,440 square feet Date of Construction 1959 Number of floors One (1) floor Exterior wall materials CMU Roof type Center wing: Flat

North & South wing: Pitched Roof material Center wing: Roll roofing; North & South wing: Shingles Interior walls Drywall, CMU, concrete Interior floors Concrete

Interior floor coverings Mechanical Room, Laundry Room, Janitor Closet: None;

Restrooms: Ceramic tiles; & Rest of building: 12x12 vinyl floor tiles

Ceilings Plaster, drywall & 2x4 lay-in ceiling tiles Notes:

FUNCTIONAL AREAS

Functional areas were areas (or groups of areas), within a structure or facility that were constructed to have the same use or purpose, constructed of the same materials, and were relatively the same age. A general administrative area, or several identical buildings within a facility, could typically be considered a single functional area.

The functional area, or purpose, of this Facility was identified as follows:

“McGregor Base Camp Open Configuration Barracks”

1. General. As part of this contract, all assigned buildings will be properly inspected for suspect asbestos containing materials by fully qualified personnel, in accordance with the USACE-approved Project Sampling Plan. Per the Project Sampling Plan, after an adequate number (20% or more) of similarly constructed facility buildings are confirmed to be similar (based on field observations and comprehensive laboratory sample results), then such buildings could be defined as a common “Facility,” per 40 CFR 61. A composite drawing, consisting of two (2) or more randomly selected building inspections, would be developed to illustrate where the sample locations of suspect materials common to the Facility had been collected. The remainder of such similarly constructed facility buildings will then be comprehensively inspected, with quality control (QC) samples collected to confirm consistency of construction materials and techniques throughout the common Facility. Confirming the consistency of building materials and construction techniques will be achieved by using the composite drawing sample locations to guide follow-up QC sample collection. Asbestos inspection teams will also identify and sample any newly identified homogeneous areas / materials, (or any potential anomalies) that may be observed during continuing inspections of the subject Facility.

2. Open Configuration Barracks #9400 Series Facility. After completing over 20%, (two [2] of six [6]), of the comprehensive asbestos inspections on similarly constructed 6,440 square feet

(SF) barracks buildings (9400 series) on McGregor Base Camp, it was confirmed that these buildings qualified as a common “Barracks Facility.” Sample location drawings from two (2) comprehensive asbestos surveys were used to develop a composite drawing of typical inspection sampling results. ENCON selected buildings 9413 and 9410 to comprise the composite Facility drawings, which are shown in Appendix A.

HOMOGENEOUS AREAS

Within functional areas, homogeneous areas were determined. Homogeneous Areas are areas of surfacing material, thermal system insulation (TSI), or miscellaneous materials that were uniform in color, texture, substrate, and were relatively of the same age. Table 2 lists the homogeneous areas and the general locations where they were identified for the subject building.

TABLE 2 - Homogeneous Areas and Locations Identified

Building Sample

Nos.

Homogeneous Areas

(Suspect Materials) Location

1 118-123 Txt. drywall & joint cpd. – popcorn ceiling Throughout building 2 124-126 Cove base and mastic Throughout central wing

3 127-129 Plaster ceiling Restrooms, office B, central wing hallway

4 130-132 Interior door caulking Throughout building 5 133-135 12x12 vinyl floor tile/mastic/leveling cpd. Throughout building 6 136-138 Interior window caulking Throughout building except offices 7 139-141 Interior window caulking – offices Offices 8 142-144 Interior window glazing Offices 9 145-147 CMU wall corner caulking Restrooms

10 148-150 Interior duct sealant Mechanical room 11 151-153 Drywall joint compound – ceiling Mechanical room 12 154-156 Hard elbows & fittings Mechanical room & center wing 13 160-162 Interior penetration sealant Office A & center wing 14 166-168 Caulking at vent Throughout building 15 163-165 Ceiling vent caulking Entryway ceilings 16 169-171 Caulking at crown molding Throughout building 17 172-174 Caulking at fixtures Center wing 18 175-177 Caulking at drywall & CMU N & S wings 19 178-180 Pipe sealant Center wing & mechanical room 20 181-183 Pipe Insulation Center wing & mechanical room 21 184-186 Txt. drywall joint cpd. – partition wall N & S wings 22 187-189 Storage tank (TSI) Mechanical room 23 217-219 Exterior wall expansion joint Throughout building 24 214-216 Exterior window caulking Throughout building except offices 25 193-195 Texture on exterior CMU walls Throughout building 26 196-198 Caulking at soffit Throughout building 27 199-201 Roof shingles N & S wing roofs 28 202-204 Roof penetration sealant At roof penetrations 29 205-207 Duct sealant At A/C units on roof 30 208-210 Roll roofing Center wing roof 31 211-213 Roof edge sealant - grey Center wing roof at N & S ends 32 190-192 Exterior window glazing Throughout building 33 115-117 Caulking at shelf Laundry room & janitor’s closet 34 157-159 Porch expansion joint At porches on the E & W sides

Table 2.1 provides the typical homogeneous areas and locations, as well as the composite sample numbers used to develop the composite Facility drawing.

TABLE 2.1 - Homogeneous Areas and Locations for the Composite Facility

Composite

Sample Nos.

Homogeneous Areas (Suspect Materials) Location

1-6

19-21 118-123

Txt. drywall & joint cpd. –ceiling Throughout building

2 7-9 124-126 Cove base and mastic Throughout central wing

3 10-12 127-129 Plaster ceiling Restrooms, office B, central wing hallway

4 13-15 130-132 Interior door caulking Throughout building

5 16-18 133-135 12x12 vinyl floor tile/mastic/leveling cpd. Throughout building

6 22-27 136-141 Interior window caulking Throughout building

7 28-30 142-144 Interior window glazing Offices

8 31-33 145-147 CMU wall corner caulking Restrooms

9 34-36 148-150 Interior duct sealant Throughout building

10 37-39 2x4 lay-in ceiling tiles Around duct in N & S wings

11 40-42 151-153 Drywall joint compound – ceiling Mechanical room

12 43-45 154-156 Hard elbows & fittings Mechanical room & center wing

13 46-48 Floor expansion joint Center wing 14 49-51 Caulking at 2x4 lay-in ceiling tiles Around duct in N & S wings

15 52-54 160-162 Interior penetration sealant Office A & center wing

16 55-57 166-168 Caulking at vent Throughout building

17 58-60 163-165 Ceiling vent caulking Entryway ceilings

18 61-63 169-171 Caulking at crown molding Throughout building

19 64-66 172-174 Caulking at fixtures Center wing

20 67-69 175-177 Caulking at drywall & CMU N & S wings

21 70-72 178-180 Pipe sealant Center wing & mechanical room

22 181-183 Pipe insulation Center wing & mechanical room

23 73-75 184-186 Txt. drywall joint cpd. – partition wall N & S wings

Composite

Sample Nos.

Homogeneous Areas (Suspect Materials) Location

24 76-78 187-189 Storage tank (TSI) Mechanical room

25 79-81 217-219 Exterior wall expansion joint Throughout building

26 82-87 214-216 Exterior window caulking Throughout building

27 88-90 193-195 Texture on exterior CMU walls Throughout building

28 91-93 196-198 Caulking at soffit Throughout building

29 94-96 199-201 Roof shingles N & S wing roofs

30 97-99 202-204 Roof penetration sealant At roof penetrations

31 100-102 Exterior door caulking Throughout building

32 103-105 205-207 Duct sealant At A/C units on roof

33 106-108 208-210 Roll roofing Center wing roof

34 109-111 211-213 Roof edge sealant Center wing roof at N & S ends

35 112-114 190-192 Exterior window glazing Throughout building

36 115-117 Caulking at shelf Laundry room & janitor’s closet 37 157-159 Porch expansion joint At porches on the E & W sides

SAMPLING METHODOLOGY

The building materials survey tasks were performed in accordance with the Final Hazardous

Building Materials Surveys, Sampling Plan, Fort Bliss, Texas, December 2014, prepared by ALL

Consulting and ENCON International, Inc. A visual inspection of the Facility was conducted to develop a sampling strategy. This task included determining both functional areas and homogeneous areas / materials, as well as sample collection locations. Friability was assessed by manually manipulating the suspect asbestos materials utilizing hand pressure to determine if the materials, when dry, could be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder. As listed in table 2, a total of thirty-four (34) homogeneous areas where identified for the subject building. Table 2.1 lists thirty-seven (37) common homogeneous areas and at least three (3) samples were collected from each common homogeneous area to adequately identify accessible asbestos within the barracks facility. Portions of the subject buildings that had suspect asbestos-containing surfacing, thermal system insulation, or miscellaneous materials were divided into homogeneous areas for sampling. These samples were each uniquely and individually identified and logged into a chain of custody document and prepared for shipment to a third-party, independent laboratory for analysis. Building materials that were not considered suspect ACM included the following;

concrete, metal, glass, asphalt, plastic, and wood. Destructive sampling was not authorized or performed to locate hidden or inaccessible materials.

One-hundred and two (102) samples were collected from this building and submitted for laboratory analysis. Bulk sample analyses were conducted utilizing polarized light microscopy (PLM), as per

EPA Test Method 600/R-93/116. This method separates the sample material into various layers based on their morphology, and then identifies the presence of the different asbestos fibers in each of these layers when detected. The analysis was performed by Apex Precision Analytical Services, Inc., located in Friendswood, TX. ACM is defined as a material that contains greater than 1% of any asbestos type including Chrysotile, Amosite, Crocidolite, Tremolite, Anthophyllite, and

Actinolite, or combinations of these materials. Asbestos materials were determined as recommended in the July 1993 EPA/600/R-93/116 document titled, "Method for the

Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials." Copies of the asbestos laboratory test results and related laboratory documentation have been provided in Appendix B of this Report. A summary of the common suspect ACMs found during comprehensive inspections of six (6) buildings within the 9400 Series Barracks Facility, is provided in Table 4 of Appendix B. The sample numbers for the typical composite set are in sequence for the two buildings (9413 and

9410). Samples one (1) to one-hundred and seventeen (117) and one-hundred and eighteen (118) to two-hundred and nineteen (219) were collected from buildings 9413 and 9410, respectively.

Field sample numbers that were re-assigned for clarity have been clearly noted in Table 5 of

Appendix B.

LABORATORY ANALYSIS

The sample collection and subsequent laboratory analysis indicated that asbestos was identified in the building materials listed below. The NESHAPS definitions were used to define the condition of ACMs, per 40 CFR 61, Subpart M. Table 3 and 3.1 describes the location of the homogeneous areas identified as ACM.

TABLE 3 – Identified Asbestos Containing Materials (> 1%) Building Sample

No.

Homogeneous Areas (Containing ACM)

Approx.

Qty. Location

Condition (friable, cat, damaged)

118-123 Txt. drywall & joint cpd. -popcorn ceiling 6,060 SF Throughout building Cat. I, Non-Friable

The quantities provided above are rough estimates only and must be field verified by any future abatement contractors. Additional composite drawings illustrating the typical asbestos sample locations and any homogeneous areas have been provided in Appendix A.

QUALIFICATIONS

The Comprehensive Asbestos Survey was performed by Inspector Tim Jones on June 24 and 25, 2015, and was conducted in accordance with the EPA National Emission Standards for Hazardous

Air Pollutants (NESHAP): 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M. The Inspector has received training under the AHERA required Inspector Course and has received annual refresher training within the past year.

LIMITATIONS

The overall purpose of this Comprehensive Asbestos Survey was to identify if ACM was present, within the qualifications and limitations summarized below. Reliance on this report is specifically

Building Sample

No.

Homogeneous Areas (Containing ACM)

Approx.

Qty. Location

Condition (friable, cat, damaged)

151-153 Drywall joint compound – ceiling 180 SF Mechanical room Cat. I, Non-Friable

181-183 Pipe insulation 93 LF Center wing & mechanical room RACM, Damaged

187-189 Storage tank (TSI) 126 SF Mechanical room RACM, Damaged 214-216 Exterior window caulking 660 LF Throughout building Cat. I, Non-Friable 217-219 Exterior wall expansion joint 200 LF Throughout building Cat. I, Non-Friable

TABLE 3.1 – Identified Asbestos Containing Materials (> 1%) for Composite Set Composite Sample No.

Homogeneous Areas (Containing ACM)

Approx.

Qty. Location

Condition (friable, cat, damaged)

03-06 19-21

118-123 Txt. drywall & joint cpd.-ceiling 6,260 SF Throughout building Cat. I, Non-Friable

30 Interior window glazing 208 LF Offices Cat. I, Non-Friable 40-42

151-153 Drywall joint compound – ceiling 180 SF Mechanical room Cat. I, Non-Friable

79-81 217-219 Exterior wall expansion joint 200 LF Throughout building Cat. I, Non-Friable

82-87 214-216 Exterior window caulking 660 LF Throughout building Cat. I, Non-Friable

100-102 Exterior Door caulking 100 LF Throughout building Cat. I, Non-Friable 181-183 Pipe insulation 93 LF Center wing & mech. room RACM, Damaged 187-189 Storage tank (TSI) 126 SF Mechanical room RACM, Damaged limited to gathering initial information regarding the presence of asbestos in building materials.

Any time that ACMs may be identified during the performance of an asbestos survey, the owner of the building is responsible to the occupants and to the public to manage these materials properly, per Local, State and Federal regulations. Prior to the abatement or removal of any ACMs, an asbestos project design should be properly created by a qualified asbestos consulting firm, 1) to ensure that materials will be properly managed, and 2) to prepare a more accurate estimate of materials to be abated. This Survey Report was specifically prepared for ALL Consulting’s Client

(USACE and Ft. Bliss), and the extent of liability incurred, is limited to the amount of the report fee paid by its Client. The USACE agrees that the ALL Consulting Team cannot be held responsible for any liability based on reliance of this report by any third party for any business reasons.

CONCLUSIONS

1. The ALL Consulting Team was retained by the USACE to perform a Comprehensive

Asbestos Survey at the subject building facility located within Ft. Bliss.

2. The survey for the subject building was successfully completed, as required, per State and

Federal environmental standards. Refer to Table 1 for building details.

3. One (1) functional area was identified for this facility.

4. Suspect ACMs were potentially identified in thirty-four (34) homogeneous areas at the subject building. Refer to Table 2 for a listing of homogeneous areas.

5. A total of one-hundred and two (102) suspect ACM samples were collected from the building interior, building exterior, or the roof, and were properly analyzed by an independent, qualified third-party laboratory. Refer to the Appendices for details regarding sample locations and descriptions.

6. A review of the laboratory test results indicated that ACMs were identified at the subject building. Refer to Table 3 for a listing of any identified ACMs

7. ACMs were identified in six (6) homogeneous areas at the subject building. Refer to the

Appendices for details regarding positive sample locations and descriptions.

8. Ft. Bliss is responsible for properly managing the ACMs at the subject building.

9. Prior to any renovation or demolition activities, asbestos related activities will need to be performed by properly licensed personnel. ACMs should not be disturbed by unlicensed and / or untrained personnel.

10. In the unlikely event that additional “hidden suspect ACMs” are encountered during any future renovation or demolition activities, then further sampling and lab analysis will be required. Ft. Bliss DPW personnel should be notified immediately for public safety and environmental compliance actions to properly manage any confirmed additional ACMs.

11. Any Asbestos Project Designs must be prepared by a Certified Asbestos Consulting Firm.

12. Proper 10-day advance NESHAP notification should be made to the appropriate authorities prior to disturbance of any ACMs. Such disturbance includes abatement activities, building renovations, routine operation & maintenance activities, or any planned demolition in facilities or public buildings.

13. If disturbance of ACMs is anticipated, then these materials shall be properly removed in advance by licensed and trained personnel, as required by State and Federal regulations.

14. Abatement activities should be performed by a licensed Asbestos Abatement Contractor, with project management and air monitoring support by a licensed Asbestos Consulting

Firm.

Contact the personnel listed below with any clarifications that may be needed.

Inspected by: Reviewed by: Reviewed by:

Tim Jones, RPIH Alex Woelper, P.E., RPIH David Epperly, Ph.D., P.E.

Asbestos Inspector Environmental Consultant Project Manager ENCON International, Inc. ENCON International, Inc. ALL Consulting, LLC License #10-5575

APPENDICES:

A. Asbestos Drawing(s) B. Laboratory Documentation

APPENDIX A

Asbestos Drawing(s)

Hazardous Materials Surveys

Draw by: JA 7307 Remcon Cir, Ste 103 El Paso, Texas, 79912 915.833.3740

Sheet

ENV-1

Date:

07-1 -2015

ENCON INTERNATIONAL, INC

NOT TO SCALE

Asbestos Sample Location Drawing - Floor Plan

## Asbestos Sample Locations

Positive Asbestos Sample Locations##

N

Location: Ft. Bliss Installation

Building # 9410 McGregor Base Camp, NM

Mechanical Room

Office A

Office B

Office C

Office D

LR

JC

M RR

W RR

Mech.

Room

130 131

141142

151152

187 - 189

181183

166, 167

173 174

175 176

199 (Roof)200 (Roof) 207 (Roof) 203 (Roof)

201 (Roof)

212 (Roof)

204 (Roof)

205 (Roof)

206 (Roof)

208 (Roof) 209 (Roof)

210 (Roof)

211 (Roof)

213 (Roof)

179, 180

218 216

202 (Roof)

Hazardous Materials Surveys

Draw by: JA 7307 Remcon Cir, Ste 103 El Paso, Texas, 79912 915.833.3740

Sheet

ENV-1

ENCON INTERNATIONAL, INC

NOT TO SCALE

Location: Ft. Bliss Installation Composite: 9410 9413 McGregor Base Camp, NM

Office A

LR

JC

M RR

W RR

Mech.

Room

Office B

Office C

Office D

Mechanical Room

South Wing

Floor Plan Areas:

North Wing

Mechanical Room

Central Area Mechanical Room

Central Area

South Wing

North Wing

Floor Plan Areas

N

07-1 -2015

Hazardous Materials Surveys

Draw by: JA 7307 Remcon Cir, Ste 103 El Paso, Texas, 79912 915.833.3740

Sheet

ENV-1

ENCON INTERNATIONAL, INC

NOT TO SCALE

## Asbestos Sample Locations

Positive Asbestos Sample Locations##

Office A

LR

Office B

North Wing

Composite Asbestos Sample Locations - Floor Plan

98, 203 (Roof)

166, 167…