Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionaire.pdf
PDF 93 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CNC Cylindrical Outside Dimension (OD) Grinder (Updated 8/11) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W911KF-21-Q-0054
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and information on a solicitation for a CNC cylindrical outside dimension grinder. The Army seeks delivery, installation and performance testing of a CNC cylindrical outside dimension grinder at Anniston Army Depot in Alabama. The small business set-aside solicitation will be issued electronically on SAM.gov on or after July 15, 2021. Interested parties should periodically check the website for amendments. The contact for inquiries is the contract specialist listed. The past performance questionnaire requests a contractor's experience on criteria including customer satisfaction, schedule, technical requirements and responsiveness in order to evaluate past performance for the requirement.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 21Q0054 Amendment 3.pdf | ||
| SOW Large Cylindrical OD Grinder - Revised as of 8-11-21.pdf | ||
| 21Q0054 Amendment 2.pdf | ||
| 21Q0054 Amendment 1.pdf | ||
| Attachment 8 - Building Layout.pdf | ||
| Attachment 7 - DD Form 1664 CNC Cylindrical Grinder.pdf | ||
| 21Q0054 Cylindrical Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - SOW Large Cylindrical OD Grinder.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Evidence of Authority To Sign Offers.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 - DD Form 1423 for CNC Cylindrical Grinder.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - SioanForm380-2 Personal Data Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - Request for Technical Literature.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire This Questionnaire relates to solicitation requirements for CNC Cylindrical Outside Diameter Grinder
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE –
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection for Anniston Army Depot.
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail or send by facsimile [FAX: 256-235-6353
Director of Contracting Anniston Army Depot 7 Frankford Ave.
Anniston, AL 36201-4199
ATTN: Kishawn Banks, Contract Specialist Phone: 256-240-3753 E-mail: kishawn.n.banks.civ@mail.mil
Desired Response Date is the closing date of this solicitation.
When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.
Proposed prime contractor
1. OFFEROR NAME OFFEROR ADDRESS
Contractor Name and Address and contract/project information being addressed in this questionnaire
2. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS: 2. CONTRACT NO.:
3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:
4. COMPLETION DATE:
5. CONTRACT VALUE (with options):
6. TYPE OF CONTRACT:
7. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT REQUIREMENTS:
W911KF-21-Q-0054
mailto:sara.b.young.civ@mail.mil
8. Point of Contact: Provide the following information for the company and individual completing this questionnaire:
Company/Agency Name and Address:
Name of person completing this questionnaire:
Title:
Role/responsibility for the effort being addressed in the survey:
Phone Number:
E-Mail:
Rating Scale:
EXCELLENT: Superior performance. Objectives/requirements essentially always achieved or exceeded, with inconsequential exceptions.
GOOD: Highly satisfactory performance. Objectives/requirements achieved with only rare exceptions, and the exceptions had minor consequences.
ADEQUATE: Generally satisfactory performance. Objectives/requirements generally achieved with occasional exceptions, and, in most cases, the exceptions had minor consequences.
MARGINAL: Occasionally unsatisfactory performance of significance.
Objectives/requirements were not fully achieved, with significant consequences in some cases.
POOR: Frequently unsatisfactory performance of significance. Objectives/requirements frequently not achieved, with significant consequences.
UNKNOWN: Unable to rate, not observed, or not a significant aspect of performance.
9. Questionnaire: Please indicate the rating that best reflects your experience with this contractor and provide a short narrative addressing the basis for the ratings assigned. Address compliance with requirements, actual performance, problems encountered and problem resolution. Use additional sheets if necessary. Excellent contract management, attention to Detail and Quality Assurance.
A. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s business-like concern for its customers, including such factors as dependability, flexibility, early problem identification, communication, and responsiveness.
B. Schedule – Assess the contractor’s adherence to delivery commitments; responsiveness to requests for accelerations; and early identification and mitigation of schedule slippages.
C. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s performance in conforming to contract specifications:
D. Technical Responsiveness – Assess the contractor’s ability to identify and resolve technical problems effectively and in a timely manner, including correction of faulty work and warranty claims:
Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown
Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown
Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown
Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown
E. Overall Assessment: Provide your overall assessment.
Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown
Past Performance Questionnaire
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .