Attachment_9-_Past_Performance_Questionare_(PPQ).docx
DOCX document 32 KB Posted
- Attached to
- New Amendment for Common Driver Trainer
- Solicitation number
- W900KK-18-R-0037
About this file
This document contains a past performance evaluation questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for a Common Driver Trainer. The Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Orlando Contracting Center is seeking proposals for a Common Driver Trainer Virtual Product Line through solicitation number W900KK-18-R-0037. Offerors are required to complete the past performance evaluation questionnaire to be evaluated for a single-award IDIQ contract with a ceiling of $110 million over five years. The contract will utilize firm-fixed-price and cost-plus-fixed-fee contract types. The Common Driver Trainer Virtual Product Line will provide initial familiarization and sustainment training for wheeled and tracked vehicles at CONUS and OCONUS sites using a product line approach leveraging the Live Training Transformation Integrated Development Environment.
Attachment 9- Past_Performance_Questionare_(PPQ)
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CDT Request for Proposal
W900KK-18-R-0037
Attachment 9
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM
Contractor:________________________ Contract No.:________________________ Subcontract No. (if applicable):____________________________________
| POC:________________________ | Title:_________________________ | |
| (Name) | (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM) |
(Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)
Please provide your candid responses. The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past five (5) years) and current performance.
The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does.
The following ratings shall be used in your response:
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Good
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Points of Contact identified below:
| Blake McIlvane, Contract Specialist | Eric C. Hertl, Contracting Officer | ||
| 12350 Research Parkway | 12350 Research Parkway | ||
| Orlando, FL 32826-3224 | Orlando, FL 32826-3224 | ||
| Telephone: (407) 208-3318 | Telephone: (407) 208-3474 | ||
| Email: blake.l.mcilvane.civ@mail.mil | Email: eric.c.hertl.civ@mail.mil |
| _________________________________ | ____________________ | |
| Signature | Date |
Typed or Printed Name
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION – PROTECT IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104 Page 5 of 5
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .