DECU_Market_Survey_29_SEP_2015.docx

UNCLASSIFIED

MARKET SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

Engine Control Unit, (ECU) Build and Repair units for AGT 1500 Engine on M1 Abrams tank

Purpose: The Program Executive Office for Ground Combat Systems (PEO GCS), Project Director Main Battle Tank Systems (PD MBTS), Product Manager Abrams (PdM Abrams) is conducting a market survey to identify, as potential sources, companies that may possess the expertise, capabilities, and experience to produce and repair electronics units that control the AGT 1500 turbine engine via software for different variant Abrams tanks. The ECU is used to control the AGT 1500 turbine engine fuel flow and receives driver inputs and engine signals and sends outputs to interface with the Abrams tank via a MIL-STD-1553 bus.

GENERAL INFORMATION

The submission of information in response to this market survey is for planning purposes only, and is not to be construed as a commitment by the U.S. Government to procure any items/services described herein, or for the Government to pay for the information received.

Respondents that cannot answer all the market survey questions in this survey need not respond. Receipt of an incomplete market survey will not be reviewed.

As a condition of responding to this survey, it is a requirement that potential responders be a United States (US) company, and possesses the means to properly store and work on information and hardware classified at the SECRET/No Foreign Nationals (NOFORN) level.

Participation in this market survey is strictly voluntary and the U.S. Government will not reimburse contractors for any cost incurred for their participation in this survey. All information is to be submitted at no cost or obligation to the Government.

This is NOT a pre-solicitation notice. This notice does not constitute an Invitation to Bid or Request for Proposal and is not to be construed as a solicitation, and no award shall be made on the basis of this notice. There is no formal solicitation available at this time, no solicitation will be issued against this notice, and this request for information does not obligate the Government to issue a solicitation.

Respondents to this market survey are specifically instructed to refrain from submitting any type of proprietary data, trade secrets, or other business sensitive information.

Data submitted in response to this market survey will not be returned. The market survey is NOT a request to seek contractor interest in being placed on a solicitation mailing list.

Respondents shall not be notified of the results of the survey or results of information submitted. Telephone or email inquiries will not be honored.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE QUESTIONNAIRE

The survey response shall NOT exceed 50 pages. Submittal will be in text format only. Do not send pictures, graphics, etc.

· All questions must be addressed.

· Font size no smaller than 12.

· Responses must include the question number associated with the applicable answer.

· Spell out acronyms in their first instance.

· Electronic responses are required using AMRDEC Safe located at https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/. Please title contractor response as “Market Survey Response for Digital Electronics Control Unit (DECU) Build and Repair for AGT 1500 Engine.”

Please include the following administrative information:

1. Company Name

2. Mailing Address and Website

3. Location of facilities

4. CAGE Code (if applicable)

5. North America Industry Classification System (NAICS) number

6. Business size and eligibility under USG socio-economic programs and preference

7. Does your company use a cost system that has been certified by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA)?

Person Responding to Questionnaire:

8. Name

9. Title

10. Company Responsibility

11. Telephone Number/Fax Number

12. E-Mail Address

Please send the Market Survey response to Contract Specialist Peter Costantin via email at peter.j.costantin.civ@mail.mil.

No telephone responses will be accepted.

Responses are due no later than close of business on XXXX.

Describe your firm’s recent and relevant experience in the competencies outlined below. Your experience must have been within the last three years. When citing Government work you must include Contract numbers and Government POCs.

1. Describe your company’s experience with development of electronics units capable of executing engine control software for tanks and ground combat vehicles.

2. Describe your company’s experience with building electronics units capable of executing engine control software and how they were integrated for tanks and ground combat vehicles.

3. Describe your company’s experience with development of electronics units capable of interfacing with MIL-STD-1553.

4. What is your company’s current rate of production for electronic engine control units? Can your company start delivering 40 units per year starting in December 2017?

5. What is your company’s experience with repairing electronics engine control units?

6. How does your company provide spare electronics engine control units and spare parts (ex: circuit card assemblies, connectors, wiring harnesses, etc.)?

7. Describe you company’s experience with designing units to meet nuclear hardness criteria and ensuring they meet a nuclear hardness specification?

8. Describe your company’s Engineering Change Process and how you do configuration management.

9. Describe your company’s in-house quality testing to include the test facilities and fixtures.

10. Describe your experience working with Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). Provide program names and contract numbers relating to the experience. Include the functions DCMA participated in (contract management, quality assurance, test, etc).

GENERAL INFORMATION: The Government appreciates the time and effort taken to respond to this survey. The Government acknowledges its obligations under 18 U.S.C. 1905 to protect information qualifying as “confidential” under this statute. [To avoid possible confusion with the meaning of the term “confidential” in the context of Classified Information, we will use the term “PROPRIETARY.”] Pursuant to this statute, the Government is willing to accept any PROPRIETARY (e.g., trade secret) restrictions placed on qualifying data forwarded in response to the survey questions and to protect it from unauthorized disclosure, subject to the following:

1. Clearly and conspicuously mark qualifying data with the restrictive legend (all caps) “PROPRIETARY” with any explanatory text, so that the Government is clearly notified of what data needs to be appropriately protected.

2. In marking such data, please take care to mark only those portions of the data or materials that are truly proprietary (over breadth in marking inappropriate data as “PROPRIETARY” may diminish or eliminate the usefulness of your response – see Item 6 below). Use circling, underscoring, highlighting or any other appropriate means to indicate those portions of a single page which are to be protected.

3. The Government is not obligated to protect unmarked data. Additionally, marked data that is already in the public domain or in the possession of the Government or third parties, or is afterward placed into the public domain by the owner or another party through no fault of the Government will not be protected once in the public domain. Data already in the possession of the Government will be protected in accordance with the Government’s rights in the data.

4. Proprietary data transmitted electronically, whether by physical media or not, whether by the respondent or by the Government, shall contain the “PROPRIETARY” legend, with any explanatory text, on both the cover of the transmittal e-mail and at the beginning of the file itself. Where appropriate for only portions of an electronic file, use the restrictive legends “PROPRIETARY PORTION BEGINS” and “PROPRIETARY PORTION ENDS.”

5. In any reproduction of technical data or any portions thereof subject to asserted restrictions, the Government shall also reproduce the asserted restriction legend and any explanatory text.

6. The Government sometimes uses support contractors in evaluating responses. Consequently, responses that contain proprietary information may receive only limited or no consideration, since the Respondent’s marking of data as “PROPRIETARY” will preclude disclosure of same outside the Government and therefore, will preclude disclosure to those support contractors assisting the evaluation effort. The Government will use its best efforts to evaluate those responses that contain proprietary information without using support contractors consistent with the resources available.