ATTACH0004TechnicalEvaluation.pdf
PDF 113 KB Posted
- Attached to
- BLDG 212 Chiller Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W52P1J-17-R-5004
About this file
Attachment 4 Technical Qualification Evaluation
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SIGNED_W52P1J-17-C-5006.pdf | ||
| W52P1J-17-R-5004_AMENDMENT_001.pdf | ||
| ATTACH0003Nondisclosure.pdf | ||
| W52P1J-17-R-5004.pdf | ||
| DPW_SOW_-_PR_2009-3202_Chillers_212_-_15Dec16.pdf | ||
| ATTACH0002DBWageRates.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT COMMAND
US ARMY GARRISON-ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL
1 ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL
ROCK ISLAND, ILLINOIS 61299-5000
ATTACHMENT 4
Technical Qualification Evaluation
PR 2009-3202, Chiller Replacement and Upgrade
Evaluation will be based upon the Contractor Proposal. The proposal must demonstrate a thorough understanding and compliance with the Scope of Work (SOW) and associated Request for Proposal (RFP) documents and demonstrate the necessary experience to successfully complete the work set forth in the SOW.
The Technical Evaluation will be rated as either Acceptable or Unacceptable. The ratings used and the descriptions are provided below.
1. Technical: Each offeror will be evaluated for technical acceptability based on its adherence to the subfactors listed below:
a. Contractor shall provide documentation that they have constructed one (1) satisfactory project involving either air cooled or water cooled chillers within the last five (5) years. The size of the chilled water system shall be comparable to or larger than the proposed chiller system. In that documentation, please include the contracting activity (Government or commercial), Contract number, award date, dollar value, customer point of contact, and project photos (if available).
b. Contractor shall provide proof of license of the Registered Professional Structural Engineer for the design of the as referenced in the Scope of Work, Section 1.1.14.
2. Technical acceptability documentation shall be submitted with each offeror’s proposal.
3. The two rating categories listed below will reflect the Government’s evaluation of each offeror’s adherence to each sub-factor listed above, as demonstrated in its proposal. All sub-factors must be rated “Acceptable” in order to receive an overall “Acceptable” rating for the Technical Factor.
Rating Description
Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the technical qualification requirements of the solicitation.
Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the technical qualifications requirements of the solicitation.
4. An offeror must be rated Acceptable in order for their proposal to be compared in price. The lowest total evaluated price offeror who meets the technical qualification will be considered the successful contract awardee.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .