Attachment_0001_UC_Soft_Client_SOO_Draft.docx
DOCX document 279 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W52P1J16R0172
About this file
Attachment 0001 Draft UC Soft Client Statement of Objectives (SOO)
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment_0008_ASSIST_Information_and_General_Instructions.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_0005_UC_Soft_Client_Pricing_Model_Draft.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_0004_ContractParticipationMatrix_Draft.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_0002_Section_L_UC_Soft_Client_Draft.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_0007_Security_Form_DDForm254.pdf | ||
| Attachment_0006_Form_PPI-002-M_Draft.doc | DOC document | |
| Draft_Request_for_Proposal_W52P1J-16-R-0172.pdf | ||
| Attachment_0003_Section_M_UC_Soft_Client_Draft.docx | DOCX document | |
| EXHIBIT_A_UC_Soft_Client_Contract_Data_Requirements_Summary_List_DDForm1423.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNITED STATES ARMY
PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS
(PEO EIS)
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Unified Capabilities Soft Client Subscription Service Statement of Objectives (SOO)
Product Lead Enterprise Content Collaboration and Messaging
(PL EC2M)
AUG 2016
Statement of Objectives
Statement of Objectives
Table of Contents
| 1 | Overview | 5 |
| 1.1 | Background | 5 |
| 1.2 | Scope | 5 |
| 1.3 | Period and Place of Performance | 6 |
| 1.4 | Data Storage, Data Rights, and Data Ownership | 6 |
| 2 | UC Soft Client Service Objectives and Requirements | 6 |
| 2.1 | UC Soft Client Service Hosting Objectives | 6 |
| 2.1.1 | On Premise Hosting | 6 |
| 2.1.2 | Off Premise Hosting | 7 |
| 2.2 | UC Soft Client Service Requirements | 7 |
| 2.2.1 | Voice Requirements at IOC | 7 |
| 2.2.2 | Voice Requirements at FOC | 8 |
| 2.2.3 | Video Requirements at IOC | 8 |
| 2.2.4 | Video Requirements at FOC | 8 |
| 2.2.5 | IM/Chat Requirements at IOC | 8 |
| 2.2.6 | IM/Chat Requirements at FOC | 9 |
| 2.2.7 | Presence Requirements at IOC | 9 |
| 2.2.8 | Presence Requirements at FOC | 10 |
| 2.2.9 | Desktop (Screen) Sharing Requirements at IOC | 10 |
| 2.2.10 | General Requirements at IOC | 10 |
| 2.2.11 | General Requirements at FOC | 11 |
| 2.3 | Cybersecurity Requirements | 12 |
| 2.4 | Fielding Objectives | 12 |
| 2.5 | Management Objectives | 12 |
| 2.6 | Help Desk Support Objective | 13 |
| 2.7 | Contractor Service Level Agreement (SLA) and Reporting Objectives | 13 |
| 2.8 | Service Reporting | 13 |
| 2.9 | Training Objective | 13 |
| 2.10 | Change Management Objective | 13 |
| 2.11 | Test and Evaluation (T&E) Objective | 13 |
| 2.12 | Accessibility - Section 508 | 14 |
| 2.13 | Identity Management and Synchronization Objective | 14 |
| 2.14 | XMPP Gateway Objective | 14 |
| 2.15 | Client Software Deployment Objective | 14 |
| 2.16 | Client Hardware Specification Requirement | 14 |
| 2.17 | Licensing Approach Objective | 15 |
| 3 | System Interfaces | 15 |
| 3.1 | Network Interfaces | 15 |
| 3.1.1 | Cloud Access Point (CAP) | 15 |
| 3.1.2 | Joint Regional Security Stacks (JRSS) | 15 |
| 3.2 | DoD Identity and Authentication Services | 15 |
| 3.2.1 | Enterprise Directory Services (EDS) and Identity Management | 15 |
| 3.2.2 | Synchronization Options | 16 |
| 3.2.3 | Third Party Application Integration | 16 |
| 3.2.4 | DISA Authentication Gateway Services (AGS) | 17 |
| 3.3 | DISA DSN and Voice ISP Interface | 17 |
| 3.4 | XMPP Interface | 17 |
| 3.4.1 | Tactical | 17 |
| 3.4.2 | Other | 18 |
| 3.5 | Client Software Deployment Objective | 18 |
| Appendix A. References | 19 | |
| Appendix B. CDRL Summary | 23 | |
| Appendix C. Acronym List | 39 | |
| Appendix D. Additional Cybersecurity and General Security Requirements | 44 | |
| D-1. Personnel Security | 44 | |
| D-2. Access and General Protection Security Policy and Procedures | 44 | |
| D-3. Antiterrorism | 44 | |
| D-3.1. Antiterrorism Level I Training | 44 | |
| D-3.2. Threat Awareness and Reporting Program (TARP) Training | 44 | |
| D-3.3. iWATCH | 44 | |
| D-3.4. Emergencies and Force Protection Conditions | 45 | |
| D-4. Use of Subcontractors or Other Service Providers | 45 | |
| D-5. Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) | 45 | |
| D-6. Facility Inspections | 45 | |
| D-7. Notification | 45 | |
| D-8. Installation Cybersecurity Program | 46 | |
| D-8.1 Computing Environment (CE) Certification | 46 | |
| D-8.1 Security Clearances | 47 | |
| D-8.2. Training Requirement for SIPRNet Access. | 47 | |
| D-8.3. Operations Security (OPSEC). | 47 | |
| D-8.4. Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) | 48 | |
| D-8.5. Infrastructure System Security | 48 | |
| D-8.6. Data Security Requirements | 49 | |
| D-8.7. Limitations on Access To, Use, And Disclosure Of, Government Data and Government-Related Data | 49 | |
| D-8.8. Government Records | 50 | |
| D-8.9. Records | 50 | |
| D-9. Information Security (INFOSEC) Guidance and Certification and Accreditation | 50 | |
| D-10. Cybersecurity Reporting | 50 | |
| D-11. Security Compliance Checks | 50 | |
| D-12. Password Control Management | 51 | |
| D-13. Communications Security (COMSEC) Service | 51 | |
| D-14. Compliance | 51 | |
| D-15. Indemnification | 51 | |
| D-16. Insurance | 51 | |
| D-17. Jurisdiction | 51 | |
| D-18. Law Enforcement | 52 | |
| D-19. Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) | 52 | |
| D-20. Right of Termination | 52 | |
| D-21. Return of data | 52 |
Overview This document describes the Army’s objectives and requirements to provide worldwide accessible Unified Capabilities (UC) Subscription services, which includes voice, video, instant messaging/chat, presence and desktop sharing capabilities delivered from a Contractor Owned and Contractor Operated (COCO), on premise or off premise, cloud-based (Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)) service solution. U.S. Army Business users will access the UC Services from a standardized application on the user’s end-user devices, such as desktop computer, laptop, or mobile device.
0. Background The Army provides voice, video, and data services to over 1 million personnel on bases, camps, posts, and stations (B/C/P/S) world-wide. The current architecture is a mixture of new and old technologies. Disparate and de-centralized communication and collaboration services limit Army operational effectiveness, create cost inefficiencies, and do not leverage information technology advances. The older networks are comprised of stove-piped infrastructure that separates data, voice and video into duplicative infrastructures and separate local systems.
Currently, local commands provide capabilities such as Time Division Multiplexing (TDM) switches, Asynchronous Transport Mode (ATM) switches, Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) circuits, and Primary Rate Interfaces (PRI) via legacy circuit switched infrastructure. Legacy systems and services consist of multiple applications for IM/chat, presence, awareness, and screen sharing using disparate services such as Defense Collaboration Service (DCS), Office Communication Server (OCS) and Jabber. Voice and video services reflect incongruent TDM voice switches, Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) switches, telephone firewalls, Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) circuits, and secure telephones. Video teleconference (VTC) end points, circuits, and multiple control units (MCUs) complicate and negate interoperability and integration for communications across the Defense Information Systems Network (DISN).
0. Scope UC Soft Client Subscription Services will provide integrated voice, video, instant messaging / chat, presence, and screen sharing. UC Soft Client Subscription Services enables non-assured synchronous collaboration for up to 900,000 Non-classified Internet Protocol Router Network (NIPRNet) and up to 100,000 Secret Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNet) Army business users worldwide on any approved desktop or mobile device. Separate instances of the UC Soft Client Subscription Services must be provided for the NIPR and SIPR. Assured voice subscription services and extension of the subscription services to coalition networks are not within scope of this effort. Specialized users, missions and locations that cannot be supported by this subscription services may be supported by other solutions outside the scope of this effort. End-user headsets and cameras are outside the scope of this effort. The SIPRNet UC Soft Client Service will be standalone and will not connect to PSTN, DSN, or other Voice Systems.
Period and Place of Performance The base Period of Performance will be one (1) year from date of award with four (4) one (1) year options.
Place of performance may be on premise at Army or other Government owned facilities or off premise at Contractor provided facilities. Cloud Service Providers (CSP)s may maintain all government data not physically located on DoD premises within the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and outlying areas of the US (as defined at FAR 2.10145), unless otherwise authorized by the responsible Authorizing Official (AO) as described in DoDI 8510.01.
All hosting solutions will be COCO. The Government prefers off-premise hosting wherever possible. For more information on hosting requirements refer to Section 5.2, Legal Considerations, in the DoD Cloud Computing Security Reference Guide (SRG) v1r2.
Data Storage, Data Rights, and Data Ownership All data, including but not limited to documents, administrative data, support data, and billing data, transmitted via the system or maintained in the system shall reside at all times in servers located in the United States or in servers of which the operation and maintenance are subject only to the laws of the United States. The system will be used to store and transmit sensitive Government and private entity data. Data transmitted must only be subject to disclosure pursuant to U.S. Federal law and not the laws of any other jurisdiction or foreign nation. All DoD information/data placed or created by DoD users in a Cloud Service Provider’s (CSP) Cloud Service Offering (CSO) is owned by the DoD, the Mission Owner, and/or their Information Owner. The CSP has no rights to the DoD’s information/data. For more information on data storage, data rights, and data ownership requirements refer to Section 5.2, Legal Considerations, in the DoD Cloud Computing Security Reference Guide (SRG) v1r2.
UC Soft Client Service Objectives and Requirements The following sections specify UC Soft Client Service Objectives and Requirements.
0. UC Soft Client Service Hosting Objectives The goal of this effort is to procure a COCO, cloud-based UC Soft Client Subscription Service. Contiguous United States (CONUS) NIPRNet UC Soft Client Subscription Services may be hosted in an on premise or off premise cloud-based environment, with preference to off premise hosting. CONUS for purposes of this acquisition is defined as the 48 contiguous states, including the District of Columbia, Alaska, Hawaii, and US Terrotories. OCONUS is defined as outside the CONUS as definedabove. OCONUS UC Soft Client Subscription Services must be hosted on premise. The following sections describe different hosting options.
On Premise Hosting On premises includes DoD data centers or other facilities located on a DoD Base/Camp /Post/Station (B/C/P/S) under the direct control of DoD personnel and DoD security policies. This option requires the contractor to obtain and maintain a DoD Provisional Authorization (PA) at level 5 (NIPRNet) and level 6 (SIPRNet). If an on premise hosting solution is proposed, the contractor must specify the number of distributed Data Centers (DC) and provide each DC requirement, such as:
· HVAC (tons) - include high density compute/cooling requirements
· Per-rack Power requirements (single phase, 3-phase, amperage, voltage, etc.)
· Floor (Rack) Space (Sq. ft.)
· Bandwidth (Mbps)
· Physical Security/Separation requirements
· Physical access requirements
· Remote management requirements
· Networking environment (IP addressing, sub netting, Computer Network Defense (CND) For on-premise hosting, candidate data center locations are:
Fort Bragg, North Carolina Fort Knox, Kentucky Fort Carson, Colorado, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama Camp Humpreys, Korea Camp Walker, Korea Kaiserslautern, Germany Grafenwoehr, Germany Camp Zama, Japan Fort Shafter, Hawaii The Contractor and the United States Government (USG) shall address the specific requirements and the final locations for all on premise solutions in the Contractor’s proposal. Any on premise solutions, the facilities provided will be considered Government Furnished Equipment and/or Property (GFE or GFP). .
For on premise solutions, the contractor shall address in its PWS how it will handle and account for the GFE provided.
Off Premise Hosting Off premise hosting refers to commercial data centers, systems, and Cloud Service Provider (CSPs) operating within facilities that are not under the direct control of the DoD. This option requires the contractor to obtain and maintain a DoD Provisional Authorization (PA) at level 5 (NIPRNet) and level 6 (SIPRNet).
UC Soft Client Service Requirements The contractor shall achieve two sets of requirements: one at Initial Operation Capability (IOC) and one at Final Operating Capability (FOC) The proposed solution shall be implemented pursuant to the DoD Unified Capabilities Requirements 2013 (UCR 2013) Change 1 dated June 2015 and on the DoD UC Approved Products List (UC APL).
Voice Requirements at IOC
· Users shall have the ability access voice services via a software client (softphone) on any Army approved End User Device (EUD) (e.g., desktop, laptop, and tablet computers; Army mobile devices such as smart phones).
· Voice Conferencing shall provide the ability to link together multiple point-to-point calls in a multi-party conference using a conference bridge or initiated from a telephony end instrument (EI).
· Voice conference session hosts shall have the ability to allow/disallow access to the session through the UC Soft Client Service user interface.
· The Voice Conference capability shall have the ability to display a participant list for a Voice Conference which includes a visual indicator of which participants are currently speaking.
· The Voice service capability shall have the ability to provide microphone control features (example: the ability to mute/unmute at the user's discretion).
· The Voice service shall provide the ability for Bridges to be developed to include access for VoIP or PSTN telephone users once PSTN/VoIP integration is implemented.
· The Voice service shall provide the ability to add or remove a voice call in an existing collaboration session.
· The Voice service shall provide the ability to enable a Call Forwarding Variable (redirection to another Directory Number).
· The Voice service shall provide the ability to enable call forwarding for a busy line.
· The Voice service shall provide the ability to enable call forwarding for "no answer" (redirection after specified number of ring cycles).
· The Voice service shall support the following audio standards for audio-only conferencing: G.711; G.722; G.729/G.729A.
Voice Requirements at FOC
· The Voice service shall provide the ability to define voice conferencing groups from contact lists or conference participants for planned or ad-hoc meetings.
· The Solution shall be fully interoperable with the Public Switched Telephone Network and the Defense Switched Network to enable Non-Assured Voice and Video for DoD and Commercial access.
Video Requirements at IOC
· Video conference session hosts shall have the ability to allow/disallow access to the session through the UC Soft Client Subscription Service user interface.
· The Video service shall have the ability to accommodate users on the same conference at different video rates, resolutions, and frame rates according to EI capability and not at the lowest common denominator level.
· The Video service shall provide the ability to make changes to Active Conferences or sessions without interrupting the continual video.
· The Video service shall have the ability to allow user preference update during active sessions.
· The Voice service shall provide the ability to add or remove a video call in an existing collaboration session.
Video Requirements at FOC
· The Video service shall provide the ability to select video display arrangements.
· The Video service shall provide the ability to limit a view to a single video or data source, with the option to enable video source switching to the current speaker.
· Commercial Video Access shall have the ability and provides interoperability with external VTC services and/or video enabled web conference services outside the DoD.
IM/Chat Requirements at IOC
· The IM/Chat service shall provide the ability to incorporate plain text, rich text, and active hyperlinks in a session.
· The IM/Chat service shall provide the ability for users to turn on or off history log. The default setting shall be turned on.
· The IM/Chat service shall provide the ability to insert a timestamp Instant Message when the user sends an IM or initiates another type of session.
· The IM/Chat service shall provide the ability to conduct Persistent and Non-Persistent Chat sessions that can be uniquely named by the session owner.
· The IM/Chat service shall provide the ability to review the entire chat history for all persons entering a chat session.
· The IM/Chat service shall provide the ability to conduct multiple IM/Chat sessions at the same time.
· The IM/Chat service shall provide the ability for users to store and retrieve history logs both locally and remotely from the service provider.
· The IM/Chat service shall provide the ability for a participant in a two-party or multi-user chat to invite one or more additional users into a multi-user chat session.
IM/Chat Requirements at FOC
· The IM/Chat service shall provide the creator and participant the ability to forward an Instant Message transcript to another user.
Presence Requirements at IOC
· The Presence service shall permit end users to update their presence (e.g., Availability Status), and the host server shall in turn broadcast the updated presence information to all the user’s contacts who have an active subscription to that user’s presence information. By default, presence will automatically update based on active, idle, or locked state of the EI.
· The Presence service shall provide the user the ability to edit their own Availability Status message to add further description to the standard status categories of: Available, Away, In a Meeting, and Do Not Disturb.
· The Presence service shall provide the ability for end users to subscribe to another user’s presence (i.e., end user availability status) and to be notified when that state changes.
· The solution shall provide the ability for an authorized user to grant any other authorized user access to their presence data.
· The Solution shall provide the ability for a user to view Presence status and information whenever a contact (IETF RFC 6121) name is displayed.
· The Presence service shall provide the end user the ability to place themselves into a Do Not Disturb availability and thus preclude other users from opening a UC session with them.
· The Presence service shall automatically change the user's status to away when the EI is locked (example: remove the CAC). However, the user will remain logged into the Solution and automatically return to their previous presence status upon unlocking the EI.
· The Solution shall provide the ability for a user to organize the presence indicators for other users into groups that can be edited or deleted by the user as needed.
Presence Requirements at FOC
· The Presence service shall provide user ability to interface UC with their Defense Enterprise Email client for Email/Calendaring publishing of free/busy presence information to Rich Presence.
Desktop (Screen) Sharing Requirements at IOC
· The Desktop Sharing service shall provide the ability for the host/presenter, or any authorized user designated by the host/presenter to share the entire desktop, a section of the desktop, or an application window.
· The Desktop Sharing service shall provide the ability for users to permit or deny control of a shared application or desktop.
· The Desktop Sharing service shall provide the ability for any user to accept or deny desktop sharing session.
· The Desktop Sharing service shall provide the ability for session host/presenter to determine whether to share the entire desktop, a screen section, or a specific application.
General Requirements at IOC
· The Solution shall enable users the ability to conduct UC sessions which include Voice, Video, Desktop Sharing and IM/Chat sessions.
· The Solution shall provide a common, device-specific user interface to access all UC functionality.
· The Solution shall provide the ability to initiate a Voice, Video, Desktop Sharing and IM/Chat session when a user name is selected. (Example: for voice and video, user can select a contact from local directory whereas with IM user would select name from subscribed contacts).
· The Solution shall provide the ability to initiate an EMAIL via the EI native EMAIL application when another user name is selected.
· The Solution shall provide the ability to save a recording of UC sessions to an industry-standard File type before closing. Recordings will be ready for users to retrieve anytime for a period of 30 days after completion of the conference.
· The Solution shall provide the ability to notify UC session participants when a session is being recorded.
· The Solution shall provide the ability to display user name and Persona for session participants.
· The Solution shall allow a user the ability to look up the Name, Telephone Number, and E-Mail address of other users.
· The Solution shall enable any session or conference to show active or connected users.
· The Solution shall provide the ability to add multiple users to a UC session.
· The Solution shall provide the ability to view dialogues that have been saved to a File.
· The Solution shall provide the ability to create, import and export address books, individual contact lists, and organizational contact lists in the DoD Global Access List (GAL).
· The Solution shall provide a connection to the DoD Enterprise Directory Service to access user information for all Army users.
· The Solution shall provide the ability for a user to change its session capabilities from any combination of web, audio and video to any other combination of web, audio or video, before or during a Conference.
· The Solution shall be fully functional on existing Army end user devices.
· The Solution shall enable Voice and Video Quality of Service (QoS) consistent with Non-Assured services as described in the DoD UCR.
· The Solution shall be compliant with the mandatory requirements described in applicable sections of the DoD UCR 2013 Change 1 and UC XMPP Change 1 (or latest revisions).
· The Solution shall be available on Army EIs and Computing Environments (CEs) that are both fixed and mobile. (Examples: Army desktop, laptop, and tablet computers; Army mobile devices such as smart phones).
· The Solution shall provide the ability to perform all UC functions in a virtual desktop (thin/zero client) environment.
· The Solution shall require the use of Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) for authentication through hard tokens (such as Common Access Card (CAC), SIPRNet token, alternate logon Token (ALT) token, or derived certificates).
· The Solution shall provide the ability to automatically or manually configure the UC client codec and associated bit rate.
· The Solution shall store and log security classification markings for active and recorded sessions.
· The Solution shall display the security classification banner.
· The Solution shall ensure all users are aware, notified, and acknowledge notification when 911 calling and emergency services are not supported or available.
· The Solution shall enable USG Administrators to install, operate and troubleshoot the system correctly on the first attempt 90% of the time as measured by the number of service desk tickets escalated to Tier III (service provider).
· The Solution shall have a product availability state of 99.9% (0.999) with Recovery Point Objective of 8 hours and Recovery Time Objective of 24 hours (Mission Assurance Category (MAC) II, high availability local).
· The Solution shall have no single point of failure that could cause an outage of more than 0.1% of users.
General Requirements at FOC
· The Solution shall provide the ability to provide a meeting invite for active or future UC sessions.
· The Solution shall have the ability to initiate a service from any of the other services (Chat, IM, Voice, Video, Desktop sharing).
· The Solution shall allow users the ability to view network performance indicators for a Voice or Video session, at minimum endpoint latency and established bitrate.
· The Solution shall provide an availability model for the service, showing all availability calculations and showing how the overall availability will be met.
· The Solution shall provide a web client as an alternative to a locally installed UC client.
Cybersecurity Requirements The Contractor shall maintain administrative, technical, and physical safeguards and controls required for the security level and services being provided in accordance with the Cloud Computing Security Requirements Guide (SRG) Version 1 Release 2 found at http://iase.disa.mil/cloud_security/Pages/index.aspx.
· The proposed solution shall possess an approved DoD Provisional Authorization (PA) for information level 5 (NIPRNet) and Information level 6 (SIPRNet) NLT 90 Days after contract award
· The contractor will be responsible for generating and providing Risk Management Framework (RMF) required accreditation related documentation and artifacts to the Army UC Soft Client Service Information System Security Manager (ISSM). RMF artifacts must be submitted for Authority to Operate (ATO) NLT 180 days after contract award
· The contractor will support the Assessment & Authorization (A&A) process for Army UC Soft Client Service
· The contractor will be responsible for performing Cybersecurity vulnerability scans
· The contractor will conduct Information Assurance Vulnerability Management (IAVM) Monitoring and Response activities, to include development and production of all necessary documentation to support these activities
· The contractor should refer to Appendix D for additional security requirements Fielding Objectives Fielding is in two increments: Initial Operating Capability (IOC) and Final Operating Capability (FOC). IOC shall be complete no later thant contract award (C) + 350 days; FOC will span C + 1,500 days (provided option is exercised). IOC will consist of all IOC requirements being fielded to 150K NIPR and 15K SIPR users in the CONUS Southwest (SW) region and Home Station Mission Command Center (HSMCC) locations. FOC will consist of all IOC and FOC requirements to a total of 900K NIPR uses/100K SIPR users world-wide. Users shall be onboarded over time as noted in the table below:
| Network |
| Timeline |
| No. of Users |
| Location |
| NIPR |
| C+350 |
| 150 K |
| SW |
| SIPR |
| C+350 |
| 15 K |
| HSMCC+SW |
| NIPR |
| C+700 |
| 300 K |
| CONUS/EUR |
| SIPR |
| C+700 |
| 85 K |
| World-wide |
| NIPR |
| C+1,050 |
| 275 K |
| EUR |
| NIPR |
| C+1,350 |
| 145 K |
| PAC |
| NIPR |
| C+1,500 |
| 30 K |
| SWA |
Fielding should follow Post/Camp/Station modernization, Joint Regional Security Stack (JRSS) and Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) implementation.
Management Objectives The Contractor shall provide the overall program management and personel in order to successfully provide UC Soft Client Subscription services to the Army at the required performance level. This shall include as a minimum:
Service Management Objective.
The contractor shall have a single point of contact for coordination with the Government Program Management Office; successfully integrate and coordinate all activity needed to provide the UC Soft Client Subscription Service; provide corrective action plans, timely identification of issues, and effective management of subcontractors; ensure it provides the appropriate management and resources to ensure overall success of the program is achieved, including maintaining schedule, program reviews, test events, training, deployment to designated locations, sustainment, quality, program management, and risk management; maintain professional and ethical behavior of all contractor personnel.
Contract Administration Objective The contractor shall establish processes and assign appropriate resources to effectively administer the UC Soft Client Subscription Service and its associated deliverables. The contractor shall promptly respond to Government requests for contractual actions.
Subcontract Management Objective The contractor shall be responsible for any subcontract management necessary to integrate work performed on this requirement and shall be responsible and accountable for subcontractor performance on this requirement. The prime contractor will manage work to ensure no Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) considerations. Contractor shall ensure its personnel and all subcontractors it employs in this effort have the appropriate clearances.
Operations Management Objective The contractor will provide an operations management team that provides the periodic and real time reporting, and oversight of help desk functions specified in this SOO. The operations management team shall be staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
Help Desk Support Objective The Army has established the Army Enterprise Service Desk (AESD) and a tiered support structure for the UC Soft Client Service effort.
· Tier 0 - self-service via web portal with UC Soft Client knowledge available to users
· Tier 1 - initial incident handling, resolution, escalations when required, and dispositioning
· Tier 2 - dedicated UC Soft Client problem resolution in coordination with UC Soft Client service owner/service manager The contractor shall establish a Tier 3 support desk for UC Soft Client problem resolution provided by the UC Soft Client software provider and UC Soft Client -based application service providers. Contractor shall supply 24/7/365 Tier 3 support via dedicated solution experts. The contractor shall propose the workflow and key interface processes to take advantage of the AESD Business to Business (B2B) relationship. The contractor shall coordinate a B2B interface with the AESD during the first 90 days of contract execution.
Contractor Service Level Agreement (SLA) and Reporting Objectives The contractor shall propose a Service Level Agreement (SLA) to cover support, services, reporting, maintenance, licenses, backups, recovery procedures, security levels, cybersecurity controls, accreditation and certification, performance metrics, and service continuity.
Service Reporting The service provider shall report security events and technical outages to the Regional Cyber Center (RCC) within 1 hour.
Training Objective The contractor shall provide training and access to training materials/user manuals to assist personnel with use, administration, and management of the service. The contractor shall provide all lesson plans and training material to the Government.
Change Management Objective The contractor shall follow the Change Control process as referenced in Section 5.3.2 Change Control, in the DoD Cloud Computing SRG v1r2. Within 90 days of contract award, the contractor shall develop a change management process and submit it to the Government for approval.
Test and Evaluation (T&E) Objective Within 45 days of contract award, the Contractor shall develop a test plan which demonstrates that the system meets the requirements identified in this SOO. The Government must approve the test plan prior to test execution. Using the approved Test Plan, the Contractor shall verify the functionality of UC Soft Client Service with USG oversight.
Accessibility - Section 508 All Electronic and Information Technology (EIT) products and services proposed shall fully comply with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, per the 1998 Amendments, 29 United States Code (U.S.C.) 794d, and the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board's Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards at 36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1194. The contractor shall identify all EIT products and services provided, identify the technical standards applicable to all products and services provided, and state the degree of compliance with the applicable standards. Additionally, the contractor shall clearly indicate where the information pertaining to Section 508 compliance can be found (e.g., contractors or other vendor’s exact web page location). The contractor must state tasks to meet section 508 accessibility in the PWS.
Identity Management and Synchronization Objective In response to this RFP, the contractor shall describe the proposed solution’s identity management and authentication approach. The contractor shall include all directory source information and PKI authentication service required from the Government. Paragraph 3.2 below describes DoD Identity and Authentication Services.
XMPP Gateway Objective Contractor shall provide an Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) Gateway/Boundary or XMPP compliant solution. The solution shall be XMPP compliant with the mandatory requirements described in applicable sections of the DoD UCR 2013 Change 1 and Department of Defense Unified Capabilities (UC) Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) 2013 (UC XMPP 2013) Change 1, dated June 2015 (or latest revisions). At a minimum the XMPP Gateway must be able to provide IM/Chat and Presence capabilities for up to 3 different Tactical Interfaces. See para 3.4 for the XMPP interface description.
Client Software Deployment Objective Within 90 days of contract award, the contractor shall provide the following items:
a. Both the Desktop and Mobile Software Client versions of their UC soft-client software to NETCOM
b. Additional configuration settings, Registry Settings, or any other changes that are required for the target client system to utilize the UC Soft Client Service.
Client Hardware Specification Requirement In response to this RFP, the contractor shall provide the following items:
a. A list of minimum hardware and software requirements that Army End User Devices must meet to install the client software and use the UC Soft Client Services.
b. A list of compatible headsets and camera hardware that interoperates with the proposed system.
c. A list of compatible Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) client and server systems.
Licensing Approach and Objective In response to this RFP, the contractor shall identify their proposed solution’s licensing requirements and identify its approach to leverage existing Army Purchased Licensing and Joint Enterprise License Agreements/Enterprise Licensing Agreements (JELA/ELA) or cost savings based on economies of scale/bulk purchasing.
The contractor shall identify how it will transfer ownership of any licenses purchased under this contract to the U.S. Government at contract completion.
System Interfaces (Informational)
0. Network Interfaces Cloud Access Point (CAP) A DoD CAP is a system of network boundary protection and monitoring devices, otherwise known as an IA stack, through which CSP infrastructure will connect to a DoD Information Network (DoDIN) service: the NIPRNet or SIPRNet. At a minimum, the CAP will provide the following protections:
· Protects the DoDIN and its network services
· Protects other DoD missions from incidents that affect a particular CSP’s supported missions
· Provides perimeter defenses and sensing for applications hosted in the commercial cloud service
· Extends the DoD demilitarized zone (DMZ) architecture to external facing mission systems and applications The CAP and CSP will provide the end users with the connectivity necessary to draw services allowing the UC Soft Client Software to connect to UC Soft Client Services hosted in CSP Data Centers (DCs).
Joint Regional Security Stacks (JRSS) The UC Soft Client Service end user traffic will traverse the Joint Regional Security Stacks (JRSS) and SBCs within the DISN core for all traffic that flows between the installation through the CAP and out to the CSP hosting facility.
DoD Identity and Authentication Services Enterprise Directory Services (EDS) and Identity Management Enterprise Directory Services (EDS) is DISA’s Identity Management capability that consolidates each of the Service’s identity data from Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC), Human Resources and other sources and provides a single interface to locate, access, and securely share identity data. EDS also provides synchronization capabilities by way of provisioning to support account lifecycle (add, remove, changes) management.
DISA will host the EDS Service and associated synchronization and provisioning tools necessary to replicate identity data, along with changes, based on downstream receivers.
Details about the DISA Enterprise Directory Services (EDS) can be found in Section 2.2.5, Enterprise Directory Services (EDS), of the Department of Defense Unified Capabilities Framework 2013 (UC Framework 2013). Specific EDS requirements can be found in Section 2.12.2.2.6, Enterprise Directory Services, of the DoD UCR 2013 Change 1.
The Identity Synchronization Service (IdSS) is a part of the DISA Enterprise Directory Services (EDS). IdSS connects to authoritative identity data sources, including the DMDC and the Global Directory Service (GDS) to collect and groom identity data and to provision and maintain persona-based user objects in LDAP directories such as the Enterprise Applications Services Forest (EASF).
Synchronization Options The EDS Service is a LDAP schema (LDAP directory structure, LDAP directory records, and LDAP directory record attributes) of the remote DEE GAL, DMDC and other feeds into a single database. IdMI supports the following sync options:
· IdMI Forefront Identity Manager (FIM) Sync push to IdMI customer AD Lightweight Directory Services (LDS)
· Sync from IdMI AD LDS to component synchronization service instance (specify push or pull)
· AD LDS Replica partnership between IdMI AD LDS and component AD LDS Replica Partner. AD Replication is a dynamic network-sensitive latency-tolerant connection NETCOM will contact the DISA EDS Helpdesk to work through the process to set up an IdMI feed as required and agreed upon.
Third Party Application Integration E-mail users currently access e-mail services via their MS Outlook and Outlook Web Access (OWA) clients. UC Soft Client end users currently have access to Local Directory Services on the DISA LSCs and ESCs where the Local Directory only contains information for other users served by that LSC or ESC. EDS Integration will provide UC end users with the same Enterprise Directory information that is available to Enterprise E-mail users and will also support automatic updates of the UC user’s address data (DSN and COM numbers, SIP Usernames, IM Addresses) from UC ESCs to the DMDC and the DEE GAL.
DISA Authentication Gateway Services (AGS) The Authentication Gateway Services (AGS) is a Government deployed Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) authentication middleware that provides a centralized endpoint for user authentication and propagates that authentication to applications it protects. AGS allows customers to meet the requirements of USCYBERCOM Communication Task Order (CTO) 07-15. It is currently deploying on NIPR and SIPR to perform authentication and identity translation for applications inside DISA DECCs. AGS provides the following services for relaying CAC authentication information to relying party back-ends:
· Header Injection - authenticates user and provides authentication information in a HTTP/S Header to relying party (RP) application
· Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) assertion - authenticates user and provides authentication information in a signed SAML assertion to the
· RP application or cloud provider
· Username/Password support - (Under Evaluation) authenticates user based on username and password against a pre-populated directory service provided by the RP (LDAP, AD, and Relational DB)
· Kerberos ticket service on user's behalf, then provides service ticket to the RP application DISA DSN and Voice ISP Interface Unless the contractor proposes another acceptable solution, the Army intends to utilize DISA DSN and Voice ISP services. The Voice ISP provides connectivity to the PSTN and E911. The CSP shall provide Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Trunks from the CSP Session Border Controller (SBC) to DISA managed Enterprise SBCs. Details about the DISA Voice Service Provider are located at the following URL: http://www.disa.mil/Network-Services/Voice/Voice-ISP-PSTN. Based on contractor requirements the Army will coordinate with DISA and provide services to the contractor as Government Furnished Property (GFP).
XMPP Interface To meet the XMPP compliant (IM/Chat and Presence services) interoperability objective, XMPP must support server-to-server federation (i.e., server-to-server interoperability) via Extensible Markup Language (XML) in support of near real-time, text-based messaging (including instant messaging, group chat, and the exchange of presence information). UC XMPP functionality and requirements can be located in the Department of Defense Unified Capabilities (UC) Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) 2013 (UC XMPP 2013) Change 1, dated June 2015.
Tactical The Army operates roughly 3 different Tactical XMPP systems on both NIPRNet and SIPRNet; Cisco Unified Communications Manager, Microsoft Lync Server, and Jive’s OpenFire XMPP Server
If the Army executes a Tactical Integration Option, the responsible tactical representative will initiate a connectivity request via the Army Enterprise Helpdesk which would then be passed to the contractor to begin defining the XMPP interface as required.
Tactical Enclave migration to the Contractor XMPP Gateway will be executed as Individual XMPP Interface CLINs due to the specific configurations and testing needed for each of the different tactical configurations.
Other
a. There may be additional XMPP interfaces that will require integration.
Client Software Deployment NETCOM will include the Desktop version of the software package and configuration settings in the AGM baseline as well as packaging and deployment using Systems Center Configuration Manager (SCCM). NETCOM will be responsible for ensuring the client software is installed on all systems prior to site-specific implementation. NETCOM will submit the Mobile Client software and settings through the DoD Application Vetting Environment (D.A.V.E.) process.
Appendix A. References The guidance versions listed below shall be used, unless superseded by a current version or unless otherwise stated. The following publications are applicable to the implementation and management of this project. The Contractor shall be responsible for ensuring complete knowledge of the applicable documents listed in this section necessary to execute this project successfully. In the event of a conflict between the documents referenced herein and the contents of this SOO, the following applies in a descending hierarchal order of precedence: RFP, SOO; Exhibit A, CDRL. If conflicts do exist between the documents, the Contractor shall report any perceived or actual documentation conflict without delay to the USG.
| Document |
| Link |
| AR 190-13, The Army Physical Security Program, 30 October 1993 |
| http://www.apd.army.mil/ProductMaps/Administrative/ArmyRegulation.aspx |
| AR 25-2, Information Assurance, 13 November 2007 |
| http://www.apd.army.mil/ProductMaps/Administrative/ArmyRegulation.aspx |
| AR 381-12, Threat Awareness and Reporting Program, 4, October 2010 |
| http://www.apd.army.mil/ProductMaps/Administrative/ArmyRegulation.aspx |
| AR 530-1, Operations Security, 26 September 2014 |
| http://www.apd.army.mil/ProductMaps/Administrative/ArmyRegulation.aspx |
| AR Regulation (AR) 25-1, Army Information Technology, 25 June 2013 |
| http://www.apd.army.mil/ProductMaps/Administrative/ArmyRegulation.aspx |
| Army Chief Information Office (CIO)/G-6, “Guidance for Migration to, and Use of, Commercial Cloud Service Providers” 10 August 2015 |
| http://ciog6.army.mil/Portals/1/CloudStrategy07312015.pdf |
| Army Chief Information Officer/G-6, Army Cloud Computing Strategy, March 2015 |
| http://ciog6.army.mil/Portals/1/20150424_Army_Cloud_Computing_Strategy.pdf |
| Army Cloud Computing Strategy, March 2015 |
| http://ciog6.army.mil/Portals/1/Army_Cloud_Computing_Strategy%20Final_v1_0.pdf |
| Army Enterprise Cloud Computing Reference Architecture |
| http://ciog6.army.mil/Architecture/tabid/146/Default.aspx |
| Army Regulation 500-3, US Army COOP Policy and Planning |
| http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r500_3.pdf |
| Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Manual (CJCSM) 6510.01B, Cyber Incident Handling Program, 18 December 2014 |
| http://dtic.mil/cjcs_directives/cdata/unlimit/m651001.pdf |
| CNSSI 1253, Security Categorization and Control Selection for National Security Systems |
| https://www.cnss.gov/CNSS/issuances/Instructions.cfm |
| CNSSI 4009, Committee on National Security Systems (CNSS) Glossary, April 6, 2015 |
| https://www.cnss.gov/CNSS/openDoc.cfm?KA4kqjuFjin+DeThLkDLHg== |
| Committee on National Security Systems Instruction (CNSSI) 1253, Security Categorization and Control Selection for National Security Systems, March 27, 2014 |
| https://www.cnss.gov/CNSS/openDoc.cfm?uJ66fkQZZOcPGO/3q8o4fQ== |
| Department of Defense (DoD) Cloud Computing Security Requirements Guide, Version1.2, Release 1, 12 January 2015 |
| http://iasecontent.disa.mil/cloud/Downloads/Cloud_Computing_SRG_v1r2.pdf |
| Differentiating COOP and DR |
| http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-34-rev1/sp800-34-rev1_errata-Nov11-2010.pdf |
| DISAI 240-110-36, Personnel Security. |
| https://disa.deps.mil/ext/resource/disa_publications_issuances/DISA%20Instructions1/Forms/Site%20View.aspx |
| DoD 5200.01-R, DoD Information Security Program, February 24, 2012. |
| http://dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/520001_vol1.pdf |
| DOD 5200.2-R, DOD Personnel Security Program. |
| http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/520002r.pdf |
| DoD 8570.01, Certifications Requirements, August 15, 2004 |
| http://www.prim.osd.mil/Documents/DoDD_857001_IA_Training_CA_Workforce%20Management.pdf |
| DoD 8570.01-M, Information Assurance Workforce Improvement Program, January 24, 2012 |
| http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/857001m.pdf |
| DoD Cloud Security Requirements Guide |
| http://iase.disa.mil/cloud_security/pages/index.aspx |
| DOD Concept of Operations (CONOPS) for Cloud Computer Network Defense (CND) Draft v1 |
| http://iasecontent.disa.mil/stigs/pdf/U-Cloud_CND_Conops_v1_DRAFT_v4.pdf |
| DoD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement |
| http://farsite.hill.af.mil/ |
| DoD Instruction 8510.01, Risk Management Framework for DoD IT |
| http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/851001_2014.pdf |
| DODI 8500.01, Cybersecurity, March 14, 2014 |
| http://dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/850001_2014.pdf |
| DODI 8500.2, Information Assurance Implementation, February 06, 2003 |
| http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a573956.pdf |
| DODI 8520.03, Identity Authentication for Individuals, May 13, 2011 |
| http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/852003p.pdf |
| Federal Acquisition Regulation |
| http://farsite.hill.af.mil/ |
| Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative (FDCCI) |
| http://www.cio.gov/pages.cfm/page/FDCCI |
| FedRAMP |
| http://www.fedramp.gov/ |
| National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual and Supplement, February 2006 |
| http://www.dss.mil/documents/odaa/nispom2006-5220.pdf |
| NIST SP 800-144, Guidelines on Security and Privacy in Public Cloud Computing, December 2011 |
| http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-144.pdf |
| NIST SP 800-145, The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing, December 2011 |
| http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-145.pdf |
| NIST SP 800-53; Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information System and Organizations, Revision 4, April 2013 |
| http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-53r4.pdf |
| NIST SP 800-59, Guideline for Identifying an Information System as a National Security System, April 2003 |
| http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-59.pdf |
| NIST SP 800-60, Guide for Mapping Types of Information and Information Systems to Security Categories, April 2008 |
| http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-60v1r1.pdf |
http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-60v2r1.pdf
| NIST Special Publication 800-37, Guide for Applying the Risk Management Framework to Federal Information Systems: A Security Life Cycle Approach |
| http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-37-rev1/sp800-37-rev1-final.pdf |
| NIST Special Publication 800-53, Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations |
| http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-53r4.pdf |
| Office of Management and Budget Memorandum (OMB M)-11-11, Continued Implementation of Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD) 12-Policy for a Common Identification Standard for Federal Employee and Contractors, February 3, 2011 |
| https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2011/m11-11.pdf |
| OMB 2011 Federal Cloud Computing Strategy |
| https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/egov_docs/federal-Cloud-computing-strategy.pdf |
| OMB M-07-19, FY 2007 Reporting Instructions for the Federal Information Security Management Act and Agency Privacy Management, July 25, 2007 |
| https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/fy2007/m07-19.pdf |
| OMB M-11-11, HSPD 12-Policy for a Common Identification Standard for Federal Employees and Contractors |
| https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2011/m11-11.pdf |
| Ports, Protocols, and Services Management (PPSM) |
| http://www.disa.mil/network-services/enterprise-connections/ppsm |
| Section 508 Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards |
| http://www.Section508.gov |
| Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGS) |
| http://iase.disa.mil/Pages/index.aspx |
Appendix B. CDRL Summary Note that DD Form 1423s submitted with this RFP include complete information on each required CDRL. All deliverables shall be supplied in either Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Project or Visio formats, as appropriate, and shall be in version 2013. Digital photographs shall be delivered in JPEG format. Scanned documents shall be delivered in portable document format (.pdf) compatible with the most current Government version. This summary is provided for reference information only.
Unified Capabilities Soft Client Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) Summary
| CDRL # |
| Title |
| Schedule for Submission |
| Description of Document |
| A001 |
| Real-Time Outage or Service Degradation Reporting |
| Implement at IOC for Government review and approval. Available to users in real-time. |
| The contractor shall report real-time outages for particular computing environments, regions, locations and users affected immediately to those users through alternative messaging means, such as e-mail, and through a standard status portal site, for both on NIPRNet and SIPRNet UC Soft Client services. |
The contractor shall provide for users with the ability to opt-out of email notifications.
| A002 |
| Program Management Plan (PMP) |
| Draft to be submitted with proposal. Final to be submitted within 30 days of contract award. Document shall be updated during contract performance as required. |
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .