Amendment 0001.pdf

W50S8E20R0002

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

A. This amendment is issued to provide answ ers to Request for Information 1 to 11, update the PWS as w ell as the CLIN references of 0001, 1001, 2001, and 3001, updating the delivery dates of all CLINS w ithin the solicitation, and updating proposal submittal as w ell as the Management Approach of subfactor 1 and subfactor 3 w ithin Section L, Section M, and FAR Clause 52.212-2.

B. All FAR provisions and clauses remain unchanged and in full force.

C. As in all of the amendments this amendment must be acknow ledged, see Block 11 above.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 29

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 10-Jun-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W50S8E20R0002

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

04-Jun-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

10-Jun-2020

CODE

USPFO NY 106 MISSION SUPPORT CONTRACTING

FRANCIS S GABRESKI ARPT BLDG 250

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

W50S8E 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION 1-11

Q1. Please confirm the proposal deadline is 07Jul20 at 1700 hours Eastern time.

A1. See Block 8 of the Standard Form 1449 for Solicitation Number W50S8E20R0002.

Q2. The revised Solicitation (p. 3) states both, “Each volume shall be submitted electronically via DOD SAFE” and “All of the proposal files shall be compressed (zipped) into one file entitled proposal zip using WinZip version 6.2 or later … and provided on CDs or DVDs.” Please clarify the method(s) required for proposal submission.

A2. Instructions for submitting for proposal have been modified and is part of this amendment.

Q3. Are offerors required to submit resumes of proposed personnel with proposals?

A3. The solicitation does not call out for resumes of proposed personnel.

Q4. If offerors submit qualified candidate resumes with proposals, will those resumes be considered during the evaluation?

A4. The solicitation does not call out for resumes of proposed personnel.

Q5. The Solicitation states (p. 3) that offerors should submit “2 digital copies” of all proposal files. Please clarify this instruction: does this mean we are to submit two CDs? Two DVDs? One of each? Or none, but rather submit via SAFE?

A5. Instructions for submitting for proposal have been modified and is part of this amendment.

Q6. Historically, how many FTEs have been utilized to fulfill the PWS requirements?

A6. There is no history concerning this PWS but see 1.8.4 of the PWS.

Q7. Does this requirement have an incumbent contractor?

A7. There is no incumbent contractor for this requirement.

Q8. What is the contract number under which any services related to this requirement are currently being provided?

A8. N/A Q9. The Solicitation (p. 4) states that offerors should provide as part of their Management Approach a “manning chart to support the requirements defined in PWS paragraph 5.” Because the RFP does not identify the number of FTE needed to fulfill the requirements, what form is this expected to take? Will the Government provide an example or template?

A9. See 1.8.4 of the PWS concerning FTE. A manning chart will need to be developed to support the requirement defined in the PWS.

Q10. Reference the previous question, if an offeror determines only one FTE is needed to fulfill the requirement, shall a manning chart still be required in the proposal?

A10. See 1.8.4. of the PWS.

Q11. Reference Solicitation p. 4, Section 3, Sub-factor 3: please verify the Government intended to state “Describe your approach for designing a[n] HPO program” and not “Describe your HPO program” or “Describe the HPO program your company will implement…” A11. Section 3, Sub-factor 3 has been updated.

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0001

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

SERVICES, NON-PERSONAL: CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL LABOR,TOOLS, PARTS, MATERIALS,

EQUIPMENT, TRANSPORTATION, ANDOTHER INCIDENTALS NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH

SERVICES LISTEDBELOW:TO PERFORM SERVICES AS THE GUARDIAN ANGEL WEAPONS

SYSTEM(GAWS) PHYSICAL THERAPIST FOR THE 103RD RESCUE SQUADRON ASINDICATED IN THE

PERFORMANCE STATEMENT OF WORK TITLEDHUMAN PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION (HPO)

SERVICES DATED 15 NOVEMBER 2019.PERFORMANCE PERIOD IS FROM 1 APR 20 – 31 MAR 21.WAGE

DETERMINATION NO. : 2015-4157 REV. 9 DATED: 07/16/2019SHALL APPLY.

To:

SERVICES, NON-PERSONAL: CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL LABOR,TOOLS, PARTS, MATERIALS,

EQUIPMENT, TRANSPORTATION, ANDOTHER INCIDENTALS NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH

SERVICES LISTEDBELOW:TO PERFORM SERVICES AS THE GUARDIAN ANGEL WEAPONS

SYSTEM(GAWS) PHYSICAL THERAPIST FOR THE 103RD RESCUE SQUADRON ASINDICATED IN THE

PERFORMANCE STATEMENT OF WORK TITLEDHUMAN PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION (HPO)

SERVICES DATED 15 NOVEMBER 2019 AND REVISED 10 JUNE 2020- SEE ATTACHMENT

A.PERFORMANCE PERIOD IS FROM 21 SEP 20 – 20 SEP 21.WAGE DETERMINATION NO. : 2015-4157

REV. 9 DATED: 07/16/2019SHALL APPLY.

CLIN 1001

SERVICES, NON-PERSONAL: CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL LABOR,TOOLS, PARTS, MATERIALS,

EQUIPMENT, TRANSPORTATION, ANDOTHER INCIDENTALS NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH

SERVICES LISTEDBELOW:TO PERFORM SERVICES AS THE GUARDIAN ANGEL WEAPONS

SYSTEM(GAWS) PHYSICAL THERAPIST FOR THE 103RD RESCUE SQUADRON ASINDICATED IN THE

PERFORMANCE STATEMENT OF WORK TITLEDHUMAN PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION (HPO)

SERVICES DATED 15 NOVEMBER 2019.PERFORMANCE PERIOD IS FROM 1 APR 21 – 31 MAR 22.

EQUIPMENT, TRANSPORTATION, ANDOTHER INCIDENTALS NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH

SERVICES LISTEDBELOW:TO PERFORM SERVICES AS THE GUARDIAN ANGEL WEAPONS

SYSTEM(GAWS) PHYSICAL THERAPIST FOR THE 103RD RESCUE SQUADRON ASINDICATED IN THE

PERFORMANCE STATEMENT OF WORK TITLEDHUMAN PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION (HPO)

SERVICES DATED 15 NOVEMBER 2019 AND REVISED 10 JUNE 2020- SEE ATTACHMENT

A.PERFORMANCE PERIOD IS FROM 21 SEP 21 – 20 SEP 22.

CLIN 2001

EQUIPMENT, TRANSPORTATION, ANDOTHER INCIDENTALS NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH

SERVICES LISTEDBELOW:TO PERFORM SERVICES AS THE GUARDIAN ANGEL WEAPONS

SYSTEM(GAWS) PHYSICAL THERAPIST FOR THE 103RD RESCUE SQUADRON ASINDICATED IN THE

SERVICES DATED 15 NOVEMBER 2019.PERFORMANCE PERIOD IS FROM 1 APR 22 – 31 MAR 23.

EQUIPMENT, TRANSPORTATION, ANDOTHER INCIDENTALS NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH

SERVICES LISTEDBELOW:TO PERFORM SERVICES AS THE GUARDIAN ANGEL WEAPONS

SYSTEM(GAWS) PHYSICAL THERAPIST FOR THE 103RD RESCUE SQUADRON ASINDICATED IN THE

PERFORMANCE STATEMENT OF WORK TITLEDHUMAN PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION (HPO)

SERVICES DATED 15 NOVEMBER 2019 AND REVISED 10 JUNE 2020- SEE ATTACHMENT

A.PERFORMANCE PERIOD IS FROM 21 SEP 22 – 20 SEP 23.

CLIN 3001

SERVICES, NON-PERSONAL: CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL LABOR,TOOLS, PARTS, MATERIALS,

EQUIPMENT, TRANSPORTATION, ANDOTHER INCIDENTALS NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH

SERVICES LISTEDBELOW:TO PERFORM SERVICES AS THE GUARDIAN ANGEL WEAPONS

SYSTEM(GAWS) PHYSICAL THERAPIST FOR THE 103RD RESCUE SQUADRON ASINDICATED IN THE

SERVICES DATED 15 NOVEMBER 2019.PERFORMANCE PERIOD IS FROM 1 APR 23 – 31 MAR 24.

EQUIPMENT, TRANSPORTATION, ANDOTHER INCIDENTALS NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH

SERVICES LISTEDBELOW:TO PERFORM SERVICES AS THE GUARDIAN ANGEL WEAPONS

SYSTEM(GAWS) PHYSICAL THERAPIST FOR THE 103RD RESCUE SQUADRON ASINDICATED IN THE

PERFORMANCE STATEMENT OF WORK TITLEDHUMAN PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION (HPO)

SERVICES DATED 15 NOVEMBER 2019 AND REVISED 10 JUNE 2020- SEE ATTACHMENT

A.PERFORMANCE PERIOD IS FROM 21 SEP 23 – 20 SEP 24.

DELIVERIES AND PERFORMANCE

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0001 has been changed from:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

POP 01-APR-2020 TO

31-MAR-2021

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974 FOB: Destination

FA6325

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

POP 21-SEP-2020 TO

20-SEP-2021

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0002 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 01-APR-2020 TO

31-MAR-2021

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

CAGE

POP 21-SEP-2020 TO

20-SEP-2021

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0003 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 01-APR-2020 TO

31-MAR-2021

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

CAGE

POP 21-SEP-2020 TO

20-SEP-2021

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 1001 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 01-APR-2021 TO

31-MAR-2022

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

CAGE

POP 21-SEP-2021 TO

20-SEP-2022

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 1002 has been changed from:

POP 01-APR-2021 TO

31-MAR-2022

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

CAGE

POP 21-SEP-2021 TO

20-SEP-2022

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 1003 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 01-APR-2021 TO

31-MAR-2022

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

POP 21-SEP-2021 TO

20-SEP-2022

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 2001 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 01-APR-2022 TO

31-MAR-2023

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

CAGE

POP 21-SEP-2022 TO

20-SEP-2023

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 2002 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 01-APR-2022 TO

31-MAR-2023

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

POP 21-SEP-2022 TO

20-SEP-2023

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 2003 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 01-APR-2022 TO

31-MAR-2023

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

CAGE

POP 21-SEP-2022 TO

20-SEP-2023

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 3001 has been changed from:

POP 01-APR-2023 TO

31-MAR-2024

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

CAGE

POP 21-SEP-2023 TO

20-SEP-2024

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 3002 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 01-APR-2023 TO

31-MAR-2024

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

CAGE

POP 21-SEP-2023 TO

20-SEP-2024

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 3003 has been changed from:

POP 01-APR-2023 TO

31-MAR-2024

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

CAGE

POP 21-SEP-2023 TO

20-SEP-2024

N/A FA6325 - 103 RSQ/PJ

SMSGT THOMAS PEARCE

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7974

The following have been modified:

SECTION L PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

1. PROPOSAL SUBMISSIONREQUIREMENTS

a. Each volume/file shall be submitted electronically via DoD SAFE (https://safe.apps.mil/).

Any portion of the proposal that is changed (as a result of negotiations or proposal revisions) should be annotated and dated. Each volume shall be clearly labeled with its title on the first page.

b. Each paragraph should be single spaced, and shall be separated by at least one blank line. A standard, 12-point minimum font size applies. Arial or New Times Roman fonts are required. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 8-point and may be produced in landscapemode.

c. The following volumes/files of material shall be submitted:

-Volume 1 Technical - 50 pages maximum -Volume 2 Past Performance - 25 pages maximum -Volume 3 Cost/Price - no page limit -Volume 4 Solicitation, Offer & Award Documents, and Certification/Representations -no page limit

Four (4) separate volumes/files will be submitted electronically.

NOTE: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated. Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government.

2. PROPOSAL FILES

a. Format. The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and Request for Proposal (RFP) number in the header and/or footer. A Table of Contents should be created using the Table of Content feature in MS Word. MS Word (doc) files shall use the following page setup parameters:

Margins – Top, Bottom, Left, Right – 1” Gutter – 0” From Edge – Header, Footer 0.5” Page Size, Width – 8.5” Page Size, Height – 11”

The following additional restrictions apply:

b. Files Submitted. Each volume/file shall be submitted as a PDF file. Each volume/PDF file shall be labeled with the volume number, date, and the offeror’s name.

c. Content Requirement. Offerors are cautioned that “parroting” of the technical requirements of the Performance Work Statement (PWS) with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform.

Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked.

All information shall be confined to the appropriate file. The offeror shall confine submissions to essential matters, sufficient to define the proposal in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Each file of the proposal shall consist of a Table of Contents, Summary Section, and the Narrative discussion. The Summary Section shall contain a brief abstract of the file. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked. The following shall be included in the Narrative discussion:

(i) VOLUME I – Technical Proposal. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Statements that the offeror understands, can, or will comply with the PWS (including referenced publications, technical data, etc.);

statements paraphrasing the PWS or parts thereof (including applicable publications, technical data, etc.); and phrases such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used,” etc., will be considered unacceptable. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror's proposal. Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailedart work, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired. The volume shall be organized into the following sections:

Section 1, Sub-Factor 1 - Management Approach: Recruiting, Retention, and Continuity of Services: Describe your management approach, recruiting and retention plan, and manning chart to support the requirements defined in PWS paragraph 5, Requirements. Describe your ability to provide personnel with the experience required to meet the required qualifications identified in PWS paragraph 1.8.

Section 2, Sub-Factor 2 - Offeror Integration: Integrated and Holistic Approach to HPO Services: Describe your management approach, personnel required, and system design to integrate strength and conditioning, physical therapy/injury management, and orthopedic manual physical therapy into a holistic HPO program providing the services identified in PWS paragraphs 5.0. Identify how your approach, personnel, and design will accomplish the objectives identified in PWS paragraph 1.8.

Section 3, Sub-Factor 3 - Approach for Designing HPO Program: Quality Control and Contract Administration. Describe your approach for designing a HPO program which will meet the administrative and reporting requirements identified in PWS paragraph 5.0.

Identify how your approach will aid in accomplishing the objectives identified in the PWS paragraph 1.2.

Section 4, Sub-Factor 4 - Offeror Proficiency: Proficiency and Knowledge Describe your proficiency with and knowledge of the specific services required in PWS concerning the Physical Therapist/Injury Manager, Athletic Trainer, and Strength and Conditioning Specialist (paragraph 5.3.). Identify how your proficiency and knowledge will aid in accomplishing the objectives identified in PWS paragraph 1.2 as they relate to a Guardian Angel Squadron.

(ii) VOLUME II – Cost/Price. The volume shall be organized into the following sections:

(1) The Offeror shall provide a completed Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs within the solicitation. Pricing for each CLIN shall be completed.

(2) Compliance. Failure to comply with the RFP requirements for Cost information may result in an adverse assessment of an offeror’s proposal and reduce or eliminate its chance of being selected for award. Offerors shall ensure that the information presented in this volume is consistent and correlates with the information contained in the other proposal volumes.

(3) General Instructions. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation(FAR)

15.402 and 15.403-1, certified cost or pricing data are not required based on the fact that adequate competition is expected for this procurement. Offers will be evaluated using the criteria in addendum 52.212-2, “Evaluation – Commercial Items.” Noncompliance with the Request for Proposal (RFP) requirements may hamper the Government's ability to properly evaluate the proposal and may result in elimination of the proposal from further consideration for contract award. Information other than certified cost or pricing data may be provided in contractor format providing that sufficient information is made available.

Information submitted shall be prepared following the instruction in FAR 15.403-5. It is the Government’s intention to award without discussions. Offerors are encouraged to present their best technical proposal and prices in their initial proposal submission. However, in accordance with (IAW) FAR Part 15.306, should discussions become necessary, the Government reserves the right to hold them. If this occurs, a competitive range will be determined and offerors notified. The competitive range may be limited for purposes of efficiency IAW FAR Part 15.306 (c)(2). If after receipt of proposals the Contracting Officer determines that there is insufficient information available to determine price reasonableness and none of the exceptions at FAR 15.403- 1 apply, the Offeror may be required to submit cost or pricing data. Additionally, in the event that adequate competition is not obtained, the Contracting Officer may incorporate FAR 52.215-20 entitled, “Requirements for Cost or Pricing Data or Information Other Than Cost or Pricing Data,” into the solicitation and request a Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data. Pricing shall be submitted fully completed and error free in the offer schedule of the RFP. The Unit Price, Amount and Net Amount shall be completed for every CLIN and Option CLIN. All final monetary extensions shall be in whole dollars only. In terms of “price reasonableness” the Government will focus on whether the price is too high to be considered fair and reasonable. In terms of “price realism”, the Government will focus on whether the price is too low. The Government’s concern is that the offeror may not understand the requirement or may be offering such a low price that there may be disruption to the program such as high employee turnover. In terms of “completeness”, the Government will focus on whether the price appears to cover all of the work identified in the PWS. In terms of “balance”, the Government will focus on whether the pricing is consistent throughout the term of contract to include any options.

Other than certified cost or pricing data is not anticipated for the award of contract; however, the Government reserves the right to request such information should it become necessary consistent with FAR Subpart 15.4, Contract Pricing. There are no page limitations for this volume. Proposal information included in this volume which is not directly related to Cost will be disregarded.

(iii) VOLUME III – Past Performance. This volume shall contain past performance information regarding similar contracts. This volume shall not exceed 25 pages plus five pages for each major subcontractor, excluding Past Performance Questionnaire Forms.

Offerors shall submit all Government and/or commercial contracts for the prime offeror and each major subcontractor in performance or awarded during the past three years, from the issue date of this RFP, which are relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation.

Relevant efforts are defined as services/efforts that are the same as or similar to the effort (as compared to North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 621340) required by the RFP. Data concerning the offeror shall be provided first, followed by each proposed major subcontractor, in alphabetical order. The Offeror shall also submit the written consent of its major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of its subcontractor’s past performance information to the Offeror. In addition, letters of commitment shall be included for all major subcontractors for their past performance to be considered. This volume shall be organized into the following sections:

(1) Section 1 – Contract Descriptions. This section shall include the following information in the following format.

(a) Contractor/Subcontractor place of performance, CAGE Code and DUNS Number. If the work was performed as a subcontractor, also provide the name of the prime contractor and

Point of Contact (POC) within the prime contractor organization (name, and current address, e-mail address, and telephone and fax numbers).

(b) Government contracting activity, and current address, Procuring Contracting Officer’s name, e-mail address, telephone and faxnumbers.

(c) Government’s technical representative/Contracting Officer’s Representative and current email address, telephone and faxnumbers.

(d) Government contract administration activity and the Administrative Contracting Officer’s name, and current e-mail address, telephone andfaxnumber.

(e) Government contract administration activity’s Pre-Award Monitor’s name, and current e-mail address, telephone and faxnumbers.

(f) Contract Number and, in the case of Indefinite Delivery type contracts, GSA contracts, and Blanket Purchase Agreements, include Delivery OrderNumbers.

(g) Contract Type (specific type such as Fixed-Price (FP), Cost Reimbursement (CR), Time & Material (T&M), etc.). In the case of IndefiniteDelivery contracts, indicate specific type (Requirements, Definite Quantity, and Indefinite Quantity) and secondary contract type (FP, CR, T&M,etc.).

(h) Awarded price/cost.

(i) Final or projected finalprice/cost.

(j) Original delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion or work.

(k) Final or projected final, delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion of work.

(2) Section 2 – Performance. Offerors shall provide a specific narrative explanation of each contract listed in Section 1, Contract Description, describing the objectives achieved and detailing how the effort is relevant to the requirement of this RFP. (a) For any contracts that did not/do not meet original schedule or technical performance requirements, provide a brief explanation of the reason(s) for the shortcomings and any corrective action(s) taken to avoid recurrence. The offerors shall list each time the delivery schedule was revised and provide an explanation of why the revision was necessary. All Requests for Deviation and Requests for Waiver shall be addressed with respect to causes and corrective actions. The offerors shall also provide copy of any Cure Notices or Show Cause Letters received on each contract listed and a description of any corrective action implemented by the offeror or proposed subcontractor. The offerors shall indicate if any of the contracts listed were terminated and the type and reasons for thetermination.

(b) For all contracts, the offeror shall provide data on all manufacturing warranty returns.

Data shall delineate total number of warranty returns, number of Could Not Duplicate

(CND), number of failures attributable to GFE component failures, and number and nature of failures attributable to the offeror’s deliveredproduct.

(3) Section 3 – Subcontracts. Offerors shall provide an outline of how the effort required by the RFP will be assigned for performance within the offeror’s corporate entity and among the proposed subcontractors. The information provided for the prime offeror and each proposed major subcontractor must include the entire company name, company address, CAGE Code, DUNS Number and type of work to be performed by citing the applicable Government PWS subparagraph number. This includes all subcontractors who will be providing critical hardware/services or whose subcontract is for more than 49% of the total proposed cost/price. This section will further include written consent of major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of their subcontractor’s past performance information to the Offeror.

In addition, letters of commitment shall be included for all major subcontractors

(4) Section 4 – New Corporate Entities. New corporate entities may submit data on prior contracts involving its offices and employees. However, in addition to the other requirements in this section, the offeror shall discuss in detail the role performed by such persons in the prior contracts cited. Information should be included in the files described in the sections above. Letters of Commitment shall be included in the proposal for these employees in order to be considered.

(5) Past Performance Questionnaire. For all contracts identified in Section 1, Contract Descriptions, a Past Performance Questionnaire must be completed and submitted (see Attachment B). The offeror shall complete Part I of the Past Performance Questionnaire and e-mail the questionnaire to both the Government contracting activity and technical representative responsible for the past/current contract. The POCs shall be instructed to electronically complete Part II of the questionnaire and e-mail the entire questionnaire to the Contracting Office no later than the proposal due date, to saramargaret.e.luna.mil@mail.mil and fred.rodriguez1.mil@mail.mil. The offeror shall e-mail to the Contracting Officer a list of all the POCs who were sent a questionnaire. The Government must receive this list no later than the proposal due date. The POC List shall be submitted in Word for Windows Table Format to include the following fields: Solicitation Number; Company Name; Contract Number; Government Agency; POC Last Name, First Name; POC Title; POC Telephone Number; POC E-mail Address; and Date E-Mail to POC(month/day).

(6) Submissions. Offerors are discouraged from providing points of contact with another contractors’ facility, i.e., in case an offeror (or one of his/her team members) is in a subcontract with another contractor who has submitted a proposal on the same requirement. Offerors shall provide and submit the prime contract number and all Governmental agency POCs in lieu of subcontract numbers or prime contract POCs in situations as describedabove.

(7) Small Business Participation Past Performance. All Offerors shall submit information substantiating the Offerors’ past performance in complying with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, maximizing opportunities for U.S. small business subcontractors.

Offerors shall also provide a statement indicating whether any negative information has been reported in the past six years concerning the Offerors’ past compliance with FAR 52.219-8. If any such negative information has been reported, the Offeror may submit explanations or comments responding to such negative information. Offerors with no prior contracts containing FAR 52.219-8 shall certify the same.

(iv) VOLUME IV – SOLICITATIONS, OFFER AND AWARD DOCUMENTS

ANDCERTIFICATIONS/REPRESENTATIONS

Certifications and Representations – Each offeror shall complete (fill-in and signatures) the solicitation sections indicated below using the file (without modification to the file) provided with the RFP. An authorized official of the firm shall sign the SF 1449 and all certifications requiring original signature. An Acrobat PDF file shall be created to capture the signatures for submission.

Standard Form 1449 (SF 1449), Solicitation/Contract/Order for Commercial Items

Award will be made based upon availability of funds.

00600 Section– Annual Representations and Certifications

Solicitations, Offer and Award Documents and Certifications/Representations shall not be addressed separately from that submitted in VOLUME V – SOLICITATIONS, OFFER AND

AWARD DOCUMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS/REPRESENTATIONS.

SECTION M PROPOSAL INFORMATION

A. BASIS FOR AWARD

The award will be made based on the best overall (i.e., best value) proposal that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to the three evaluation factors: Technical, Cost/Price, and Past Performance. To arrive at a Best Value decision, the Source Selection Authority will integrate the evaluation of Past/Present Performance, Technical and Price as set out in the solicitation. In terms of the relative importance of the factors, the Technical factor is significantly more important than Present/ Past Performance and when combined however, the non-cost factors are significantly more important than the Price Factor. To receive consideration for award, a rating of no less than “Acceptable” must be achieved for the Technical factor (to include all subfactors).

B. EVALUATION CRITERIA. All proposals shall be evaluated by the Source Selection Team (SST).

1. The overarching evaluation approach for all factors and sub factors is as follows:

a. Adequacy of Response. The proposal will be evaluated to determine whether the offeror’s methods and approach have adequately and completely considered, defined, and satisfied the requirements specified in the RFP. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which each requirement has been addressed in the proposal in accordance with the proposal submission section of the RFP.

b. Feasibility of Approach. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the proposed approach is workable and the end results achievable. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which successful performance is contingent upon proven devices and techniques. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the offeror is expected to be able to successfully complete the proposed tasks and technical requirements within the required schedule. The following evaluation factors and sub factors will be used to evaluate each proposal. Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors and sub factors described below. The Government reserves the right to make award based upon the Cost/Price factor in the event that the Technical, and Past Performance evaluation results of all the offerors’ proposals are substantially the same.

2. The proposals will be evaluated under the three (3) evaluation factors:

Factor 1: Technical Proposal(Most important) Subfactor 1 - Management Approach: Recruiting, Retention, and Continuity of Services Subfactor 2 - Offeror Integration: Integrated and Holistic Approach to HPO Services.

Subfactor 3 - Approach for Designing HPO Program: Quality Control and Contract Administration.

Subfactor 4 - Offeror Proficiency: Proficiency and Knowledge

Factor 2: Price (Somewhat important) Factor 3: Past Performance (Least important)

Subfactor 1: Contract Descriptions.

Subfactor 2: Performance.

Subfactor 3: Subcontracts.

Subfactor 4: New Corporate Entities.

Subfactor 5: Past Performance Questionnaire.

Subfactor 6: Submissions.

Subfactor 7: Small Business Participation Past Performance.

Relative Importance of Factors. Technical proposal is significantly more important than Price. The Price Factor is more important than the past performance. The Past Performance and Technical/Management Factors, when combined, are significantly more important than Price.

(a) Factor 1 – Technical/Management Factor. The Technical evaluation provides an assessment of the offeror’s capability to satisfy the Government’s requirements. The evaluation will focus on the strengths, weaknesses and deficiencies of the offeror'sproposal.

2. The Technical factor is divided into the following subfactors:

Subfactor 1 - Management Approach: Recruiting, Retention, and Continuity of Services: This subfactor evaluates the offeror’s proposed management approach for the basic contract period and all option years. Marginal levels of overall management approach could indicate a lack of understanding concerning mission requirements and may result in the entire proposal receiving an unfavorable rating and/or being eliminated from the competitive range. Describe your management approach, recruiting, and manning chart to support the requirements defined in PWS paragraph

5.0 Describe your ability to provide personnel with the experience required to meet the qualifications identified in PWS paragraph 1.8. The evaluation will focus on the offerors’:

Recruitment- Ability to provide personnel with experience required to meet qualifications identified in PWS

Manning chart- Capability in describing the ability to provide and manage experienced personnel to meet the qualifications identified in PWS

Subfactor 2 - Offeror Integration: Integrated and Holistic Approach to HPO Services.: This subfactor evaluates the offeror’s integration of the HPO Program.

Describe your management approach, personnel required, and system design to integrate strength and conditioning, physical therapy/injury management and orthopedic manual physical therapy into a holistic HPO program providing the services identified in PWS paragraph 5.0. Identify how your approach, personnel, and design will accomplish the objectives identified in PWS paragraph 1.8. Major emphasis will be placed on the following:

Integration- Integrate strength and conditioning, physical therapy/injury management, orthopedic manual physical therapy, and operational psychology into a holistic HPO program providing the services identified in PWS

Integrate how your approach, personnel, and design will accomplish the objectives identified in the PWS

Subfactor 3 - Approach for Designing HPO Program: Quality Control and Contract Administration.: This subfactor evaluates the offeror’s approach for designing a HPO Program. Describe your approach for designing a HPO program which will meet the administrative and reporting requirements identified in PWS paragraph 5.0. Identify how your approach will aid in accomplishing the objectives identified in the PWS. The evaluation will focus on the offerors’:

Designing a HPO Program which will meet the administrative, logistics, and reporting requirements identified in the PWS

Identify how your approach will aid in accomplishing the objectives identified in the PWS

Subfactor 4 - Offeror Proficiency: Proficiency and Knowledge This subfactor evaluates the offeror’s proficiency with and knowledge of the HPO Program.

Describe your proficiency with and knowledge of the specific services required in PWS. Identify how your proficiency and knowledge will aid in accomplishing the objectives identified in PWS. The evaluation will focus on the offerors’:

Describe proficiency with and knowledge of the specific services required in the PWS concerning the Physical Therapist/Injury Manager, Athletic Trainer, and Strength and ConditioningSpecialist.

Identify how your proficiency and knowledge will aid in accomplishing the objectives identified in the PWS

Rating Scheme: Combined Technical/Risk Rating. The combined technical/risk rating includes consideration of risk in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings. Combined technical/risk evaluations shall utilize the combined technical/risk ratings listed in Table 1. There is no separate rating assigned to the individual tabs and no order of importance is stipulated. Tabs are simply used for evaluation purposes to derive a Factor rating.

In accordance with the Army Source Selection Supplement (AS3), Section 3.1, the Army methodology for evaluating Technical Approach and Related Risk is the Combined Technical/Risk Rating, (see Table 1 below). This methodology considers risk, in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, uncertainties, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings.

TABLE 1 – COMBINED TECHNICAL/RISK RATINGS

Color Rating Description

Blue Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

(a) Factor 2 – Price. Adjectival ratings shall not be used for offerors’ Cost/Price proposals. The Government will fully evaluate and negotiate all priced Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) for award. For award purposes, the total proposed price for all CLINs will be added together into a total sum (contract value). The evaluation of all option CLINs will not obligate the Government to exercise any option. The Offeror’s Cost/Price proposal will be evaluated asfollows.

a. FFP Evaluation. For a price to be fair and reasonable, it must represent a price to the Government that a prudent person would pay in the conduct of competitive business. The Offeror’s proposed fixed-price CLINs may be evaluated, using one or more of the techniques described in FAR 15.404-1 in order to determine if they are fair and reasonable.

b. Overall Cost/Price Proposal Evaluation: The overall Cost/Price proposal will evaluated for the following:

1) Compliance: The Cost/Price proposal submitted by the Offeror will be evaluated for compliance based upon the submission requirements contained in the Section L, Cost/Price instructions.

2) Unbalanced Pricing: The Offeror’s overall Cost/Price proposal will be evaluated for unbalanced pricing as defined in FAR 15.404-1(g). An offer may be rejected if the contracting officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government (see FAR 15.404-1(g)(1) through FAR 15.404- 1(g)(3)).

3) Errors: The Offeror’s Cost/Price proposal will be reviewed for errors. The Offeror may be given an opportunity to clarify certain aspects of their proposal at the sole discretion of the Contracting Officer.

4) Total Evaluated Price: The Total Evaluated Price consists of summing the Offeror’s proposed firm fixed-price CLIN prices (CLIN 0001, CLIN 0002, CLIN 0003, CLIN

2001, CLIN 2002, CLIN2003, CLIN 3001, CLIN 3002, CLIN 3003, CLIN 4001, CLIN

4002 and CLIN 4003).

To evaluate the option to extend services (FAR 52.217-8) CLINs, one-half of the proposed cost for the last year of the performance period under CLIN 4001, CLIN 4002 and CLIN 4003 shall be added to the Total Evaluated Price.

The resulting award will be a firm fixed price contract. Price reasonableness will be utilized in the evaluation of the Firm-Fixed Price effort.

Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

Utilization of 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services. Circumstances may arise that require the Contracting Officer to utilize FAR 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, upon the performance end date of Option Period 4, for no more than six (6) months.

Pricing for an additional six (6) months will be evaluated based off of pricing proposed for Option Period 4 by adding one-half of the offeror's final option period price to the offeror's total price. Thus, the offeror's total price for the purpose of evaluation will include the base period, 1st option, 2nd option, 3rd option, 4th option, and 1/2 of the 4th option.

Unbalanced Pricing may be evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(g), as applicable, to assess potential performance risk which could result in unreasonably high prices.

Definitions.

Reasonableness. A price is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business.

Completeness. The offeror’s proposal is in compliance with the Price

Volume instructions in the solicitation.”

Realism: In this regard, the Government is aware that an overly optimistic price proposal may lead to various negative impacts on both the agency and the contractor. Further, unrealistic price proposals may lead the Government to reasonably question the offeror understands of the requirement. An unrealistically low proposal increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Balance: Unbalanced pricing occurs when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more periods of performance is significantly different (much greater or much less). Unbalanced pricing may increase performance risk and may result in the payment of unreasonably high prices.

(b) Factor 3 - Past Performance. Each offeror’s past performance will be reviewed to determine relevancy and confidence assessment. The Past Performance evaluation will assess the relative risks associated with an offeror’s likelihood of success in performing the solicitation’s requirements as indicated by that offeror’s record of past performance. Performance risk is assessed at the factor level after evaluating aspects of the offeror’s recent past performance and focusing on performance that is relevant to the services being procured under this solicitation. Offerors are cautioned that in conducting the performance risk assessment, the Government may use data provided in the offeror’s proposal and data obtained from other sources, such as the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) or similar systems and State Department Watch Lists.

Past performance areas of evaluation include:

- Business Relations

- Quality of Service

- Schedule

- Cost Control

- Customer Satisfaction

- Compliance with Socio-Economic Goals

(1) Each offeror will receive a performance confidence assessment rating based on the Offeror’s recent past performance, focusing on performance that is relevant to the requirements of this solicitation. There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation. The first is to evaluate the offeror’s past performance to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection.

(2) Recency Assessment. An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the past three (3) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.

(3) Relevancy Assessment. To be relevant, the effort must be of similar in nature of work, size, and complexity. The Government will conduct an in-depth evaluation of all recent performance information obtained to determine if it is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the services/products being procured under this solicitation. Recent past performance is defined as not more than three (3) years from the RFP release date; relevant in terms of similar nature of work, size, and complexity.

- There are four levels of relevancy as shown in Table 2. With respect to relevancy, more relevant past performance is a stronger predictor of future success and will have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance.

- A relevancy determination of the offeror’s (including joint venture partner(s)…