ASAP_Draft_RFP3_Questions_with_Govt_Responses.docx

Advanced Subscale Aerial Platform (ASAP) “Draft” RFP 02 Dec 2016 #W31P4Q-17-R-0024

STATEMENT OF WORK

Original Question: Section 3.1.2 Flight Services – During Industry Day the Government indicated the availability of SR-121 RATOs. Will the Government further provide available quantities and life expectancy? Additionally, will the Government provide any available specification(s) and ICDs?

RESPONSE: It is the Government’s intent to provide the SR-121 RATO. The interface information will be provided with the final RFP as part of the MQM-107 TDP. The Government will be responsible for making sure the required quantity of RATOs is available. The life expectancy of the RATOs should not be an issue.

Follow-on Question: Regarding the performance specification(s) for SR-121 RATOs, is there a performance specification available for these RATOs?

RESPONSE: The interface information is contained in the MQM-107 TDP available by request from the Contracting Officer. The hardware interface is the RATO Installation Kit (13281046). The electrical interface is covered by the Junction Box drawing (13376296) and MIS 39710.

Original Question: Section 3.1.4 & 3.19 & 3.22 Flight Qualification & Production Acceptance Test Planning – Reference to DI-NDTI-80566; there does not appear to be an accompanying CDRL which sets forth the distribution, number of copies, and addresses. Does the Government intend to define a CDRL for this DI?

Response: This information is defined in CDRL A007.

Follow-on Question: CDRL A007 not provided to date, will it be provided with the final RFP release?

RESPONSE: CDRLs will be added to the FEDBIZOPPS site.

Original Question: Section 3.1.6 & 3.21 3.24 Flight Qualification & Production Acceptance Test Report(s) – Reference to DI-NDTI-80809; there does not appear to be an accompanying CDRL which sets forth the distribution, number of copies, and addresses. Does the Government intend to define a CDRL for this DI?

Response: This information is defined in CDRL A013.

Follow-on Question: CDRL A013 not provided to date, will it be provided with the final RFP release?

RESPONSE: CDRLs will be added to the FEDBIZOPPS site.

Original Question: Section 3.6.10 Health Hazard Assessment Report – Reference to DI-SAFT-80106; there does not appear to be an accompanying CDRL which sets forth the distribution, number of copies, and addresses. Does the Government intend to define a CDRL for this DI?

Response: This information is defined in CDRL A004.

Follow-on Question: CDRL A004 not provided to date, will it be provided with the final RFP release?

RESPONSE: CDRLs will be added to the FEDBIZOPPS site.

Original Question: Section 3.12 Technical Data – Reference to DI-ERDS-80940; there does not appear to be an accompanying CDRL which sets forth the distribution, number of copies, and addresses. Does the Government intend to define a CDRL for this DI?

Response: This information is defined in CDRL A018.

Follow-on Question: CDRL A018 not provided to date, will it be provided with the final RFP release?

RESPONSE: CDRLs will be added to the FEDBIZOPPS site.

Original Question: Section 3.14.2 Configuration Management Program – Reference to DI-CMAN-80858; CDRL A014 refers to DI-SESS-80858C. Which callout is correct?

Response: the correct callout should be DI-SESS-**** and not DI-CMAN-****-defined in configuration CDRLs (A009, A010, A011, A021, A022, & A023).

Follow-on Question: CDRL A010 not provided to date, will it be provided with the final RFP release?

RESPONSE: CDRLs will be added to the FEDBIZOPPS site.

Original Question: Sections 3.14.10, 3.14.11, & 3.14.12 – Noted sections refer to DI-CMAN-… while corresponding CDRLS, (A009, A011, A023, & A021) refer to DI-SESS-… Which callouts are correct?

Response: the correct callout should be DI-SESS-**** and not DI-CMAN-****-defined in configuration CDRLs (A009, A010, A011, A021, A022, & A023) Follow-on Question: CDRL A010 not provided to date, will it be provided with the final RFP release?

RESPONSE: CDRLs will be added to the FEDBIZOPPS site.

Original Question: Section 3.43.9.12 Performance and Cost Reports – Reference to DI-FNCL-80912; there does not appear to be an accompanying CDRL which sets forth the distribution, number of copies, and addresses. Does the Government intend to define a CDRL for this DI?

Response: This information is defined in CDRL A016.

Follow-on Question: CDRL A016 not provided to date, will it be provided with the final RFP release?

RESPONSE: CDRLs will be added to the FEDBIZOPPS site.

GENERAL/MISCELLANOUS

Original Question: Would the Government make available for usage the existing MQM-107 transport/storage containers as GFP? Additionally, would the Government provide the existing CAD definition or Drawings for these containers?

Response: Any MQM-107 transport/storage containers not in use will be available “as is”. Drawings for these cases are in the MQM-107 Technical Data Package.

Follow-on Questions: We have been unable to locate these drawings in the provided TDP. Can you please provide P/N or document number for these items? Also, if possible, can you provide quantity of containers that are available?

RESPONSE: Please request an updated TDP from the Contracting Officer. The Government has well over 150 transport/storage containers available for use on this contract. The MQM-107 shipping container drawing is 13225025. MIS26427 is the Product Function Specification for the container.

Draft RFP Original Question: There is no CLIN to address SOW Para 3.30 Training Response: a revised CLIN structure was posted that added CLINs 0082 – 0086 for training. The previous CLINs 0082 CDRLs and 0083 CMR were moved to CLINs 0087 and 0088 respectively.

Comment: In reviewing the revised RFP, the CDRLs and CMR are shown as CLINs 0092 and 0093 respectively.

RESPONSE: An additional set of CLINs were added to the Recommended CLINs List since the last round of questions were answered shifting the CDRLs and CMR CLINs to 0092 and 0093, respectively.

SOW Specific Questions Original Question: All SOW Paragraphs have an associated CLIN to which they are tied to except:

3.30 Training (past experience is that Tech Manuals are to be delivered as part of the training). Can the government clarify which CLIN to price this under?

Response: a revised CLIN structure was posted that added CLINs 0082 – 0086 for training. The previous CLINs 0082 CDRLs and 0083 CMR were moved to CLINs 0087 and 0088 respectively.

Comment: In reviewing the revised RFP, the CDRLs and CMR are shown as CLINs 0092 and 0093 respectively.

RESPONSE: An additional set of CLINs were added to the Recommended CLINs List since the last round of questions were answered shifting the CDRLs and CMR CLINs to 0092 and 0093, respectively.

Section I - Specific Question Will the Government consider adding FAR 52.232.14 Notice of Availability of Progress Payments Exclusively for Small Business Concerns and FAR 52.232-16 Progress Payments to the final Solicitation?

RESPONSE: FAR Clause 52.232-16 has been added to the RFP.

Questions

1. CLIN 82 Training Option References SOW paragraph 3.29 Updated Target Technical Manuals. Should it reference 3.30 Training?

RESPONSE: CLIN 82 should reference SOW Paragraph 3.30

2. A Number of the CDRLs listed in the response to the questions are not on the current CDRL list. Will they be included in the list with the final RFP package?

a. CDRL A007 Listed in the response to the questions is not listed in the CDRL List published in October 2016.

b. CDRL A013 Listed in the response to the questions is not listed in the CDRL List published in October 2016.

c. CDRL A004 Listed in the response to the questions is not listed in the CDRL List published in October 2016.

d. CDRL A016 Listed in the response to the questions is not listed in the CDRL List published in October 2016.

RESPONSE: The CDRLs will be provided on the FEDBIZOPPS website

3. CDRL A028 and A029 have the same title but different Authority (A028 is DI-MISC-81397C and A029 is DI-MGMT-81398C) are these correct?

RESPONSE: there is a slight difference in the titles, one is a report, one is a plan.

4. SOW Para 3.40 Unique Identification (IUID) does not have a CLIN. With this be provided with final RFP?

RESPONSE: 3.40 will be done using a Sub-ESM if required.

5. Can you further delineate how the FFP pricing will be evaluated? RFP Section M states that “The base year and all option years shall be included in the price calculation”. Does this include the options such as Spares Critical List option, Repairs Option, Level 3 TDP Option, Repair/Maint Plan Option, etc.? If so, how will these be compared among offerors?

RESPONSE: Section M has been revised to answer any questions relative to this area.

3-Feb-17