TEMPLATE Tanks RFP Evaluation.pdf
PDF 346 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Master Agreement AZ|CTR060738
- Contract number
- CTR060738
- Issued by
- Arizona
About this file
This document is a Tanks Solicitation Offer Scoring Sheet, a comprehensive evaluation template for rating offers related to underground storage tank (UST) and environmental remediation services in Arizona. The scoring sheet appears to be used by a state agency, likely the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ), to systematically assess and score contractor proposals across multiple categories including UST Permanent Closure, Site Investigation, Remediation Testing, Design & Implementation, Risk Evaluation & Assessment, and In-house Capacity Support.
The scoring sheet evaluates offers across three primary sections: Experience & Capacity (50% of total score), Method of Approach (35%), and Cost (15%), with potential bonus points for multi-category submissions. Contractors are scored on detailed criteria such as project descriptions, geographic work experience (with special consideration for Arizona and related ecoregions), key personnel qualifications, proposed subcontractors, and technical approach to various environmental remediation scenarios. The evaluation includes specific scoring for technical competencies like soil vapor extraction, multi-phase extraction, in-situ chemical oxidation (ISCO), and comprehensive risk assessment methodologies. The maximum possible score is 1000 points, with points allocated across different technical and operational capabilities that demonstrate a contractor's ability to perform complex environmental remediation services.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Offer Evaluation page: 1
Tanks Solicitation Offer Scoring Sheet - Template
Offeror: _____________________________
Reviewer: _____________________________
Categories of Work contained within the Offer:
• UST Permanent Closure
• Site Investigation
• Remediation Testing, Design, & Implementation
• Risk Evaluation & Assessment
• In-house Capacity Support
EXPERIENCE & CAPACITY SECTION (50%) SCORE: _____ (___ pts / ___ Max)
Attachment 2A – Question 2: Project Descriptions Score: ____ total pts earned / ___ pts possible
Rate each of the Project Descriptions provided to support each Scope of Work Category contained within the Offer by the following:
[15]: UST work in AZ or AZ-related Ecoregions [10]: UST work outside of AZ or AZ-related Ecoregions [5]: Non-UST work in AZ & AZ-related Ecoregions [0]: Non-UST work outside of AZ & AZ-related Ecoregions
UST Permanent Closure Score: ____total pts earned / __ pts possible
• Project Description #1 Score: ___
• Project Description #2 Score: ___
• Project Description #3 Score: ___
Site Investigation Score: ____total pts earned / __ pts possible
• Project Description #1 Score: ___
• Project Description #2 Score: ___
• Project Description #3 Score: ___
Remediation Testing, Design, & Implementation Score: ____total pts earned / __ pts possible
• Project Description #1 Score: ___
• Project Description #2 Score: ___
• Project Description #3 Score: ___
Risk Evaluation & Assessment Score: ____total pts earned / __ pts possible
• Project Description #1 Score: ___
• Project Description #2 Score: ___
• Project Description #3 Score: ___
Click for Eco Region Map Tool:
Ecoregion 10: North American Deserts Ecoregion 12: Southern Semiarid Highlands Ecoregion 13: Temperate Sierras https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?layers=1c8de09728da47c387e19b17a1ffbd92
Offer Evaluation page: 2
Attachment 2A – External References Score: ____ / __ pts possible
Rate each of the External References provided in the Offer as either: Relevant (Meets) [10 pts]; Not Relevant (Does Not Meet) [0 pts]
• External Reference #1 Score: ___
• External Reference #2 Score: ___
• External Reference #3 Score: ___
Attachment 2B – Organizational Profile Score: ____ total pts earned / __ pts possible
• Is the Firm certified with AZ BTR?
• Does the Firm propose at least one Key Personnel member as a bona fide employee that is registered with AZ BTR?
• Does the firm have at least one office location in AZ to perform the work?
Attachment 3B – Key Personnel Score: ____ total pts earned / __ pts possible
Rate each of the Key Personnel resumes provided within the Offer by the following:
[15]: UST work in AZ or AZ-related Ecoregions [10]: UST work outside of AZ or AZ-related Ecoregions [5]: Non-UST work in AZ & AZ-related Ecoregions [0]: Non-UST work outside of AZ & AZ-related Ecoregions
• Key Personnel #1 Score: ___
• Key Personnel #2 Score: ___
• Key Personnel #3 Score: ___
• Key Personnel #4 Score: ___
• Key Personnel #5 Score: ___
Click for Eco Region Map Tool:
Ecoregion 10: North American Deserts Ecoregion 12: Southern Semiarid Highlands Ecoregion 13: Temperate Sierras https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?layers=1c8de09728da47c387e19b17a1ffbd92
Offer Evaluation page: 3
Attachment 3C – Proposed Subcontractors
UST Permanent Closure
Score: ____ total pts earned / __ pts possible
Score: ____ total pts earned / pts possible
• Does the Offer contain at least one proposed subcontractor for each of the following?
o ADEQ-certified UST Service Provider o ADHS-certified Analytical Laboratory
• Does the Offer contain multiple proposed subcontractors for at least one of the above?
Site Investigation Score: ____ total pts earned / pts possible
• Does the Offer contain at least one proposed subcontractor for each of the following?
o ADWR-certified Driller o ADHS-certified Analytical Laboratory o BTR-registered Surveyor
• Does the Offer contain multiple proposed subcontractors for at least one of the above?
Remediation Testing, Design, & Implementation Score: ____ total pts earned / pts possible
• Does the Offer contain at least one proposed subcontractor for each of the following?
o ADWR-certified Driller o ADHS-certified Analytical Laboratory o BTR-registered Surveyor
• Does the Offer contain multiple proposed subcontractors for at least one of the above?
Offer Evaluation page: 4
METHOD OF APPROACH SECTION (35%)
Attachment 3A – Method of Approach Questions
UST Permanent Closure Section
UST Permanent Closure Question #1:
SCORE: _____ (___ pts / ___ Max)
Score: ____ total pts earned / pts possible
• Does the Offer identify ALL of the following?
o Assessment of soil for staining o Assessment of soil for odors o Assessment of soil samples by PID o Analysis of environmental samples by laboratory analytical methods
• Does the Offer identify ANY of the following?
o Assessment of equipment for staining o Assessment of equipment for damage o Assessment of equipment for corrosion o Assessment of equipment for loose fittings o Assessment of equipment for softening of plastic materials o Assessment of equipment for excessive microbial growth on system components o Assessment of equipment for stored product trapped in secondary containment
Offer Evaluation page: 5
Site Investigation Section
Site Investigation Question #1:
Score: ____ total pts earned / pts possible
Score: ____ total pts earned
• Does the Offer identify ALL of following?
o Defining the full extent of contamination in soil and groundwater o Quantifying contaminant transport rate in groundwater o Identifying all potential receptors o Evaluating threats to all identified potential receptors
Occupied confined spaces – Inhalation Pathway Potable wells – Water Ingestion Pathway On-site human activity – Soil Ingestion/Dermal Contact Pathways
• Does the Offer identify ANY of the following?
o Providing a concise summarization of full site characterization (e.g. narrative, graphical, tabular, etc.)
o CSMs must be updated with each new data collected
Site Investigation Question #2: Score: ____ total pts earned
• Does the Offer identify ALL of following?
o Full delineation of all soil and groundwater impacts by environmental sampling o Determining the transport rate and aquifer properties by:
Hydraulic Conductivity via slug and/or pump testing Groundwater gradient via groundwater elevation data o Evaluation of the Water Ingestion Pathway:
Sampling of potentially threatened potable wells Calculation of transport time from known plume extent to potable well receptor o Evaluation of the Inhalation Pathway Collecting exterior soil gas samples and PVI modeling o Evaluation of the Soil Ingestion and Dermal Contact Pathways Assessment of site surface conditions for exposed surficial soils
• Does the Offer identify ANY of the following?
o Determination of the transport rate
Application of tracer test method Quantification of fraction of organic carbon as an aquifer property o Evaluation of the Inhalation Pathway Collection of indoor air samples if results from exterior/sub-slab soil gas sampling indicate potential PVI threat by exceeding established screening levels and/or modeled acute risk failure o Evaluating Natural Attenuation Capacity and/or Rate:
Calculating the biodegradation capacity from comparison of biogeochemistry data collected in both unimpacted and impacted zones Identification/quantification of any transformation products (i.e. daughter compounds) Calculating the retardation factor by comparing the measured plume extent vs.
calculated non-attenuated transport rate Applying the push-pull testing method using compound-specific isotopic analyses
Offer Evaluation page: 6
Remediation Testing, Design, and Implementation Section Score: ____ total pts earned / pts possible possible
Remediation TDI Question #1 (Soil Vapor Extraction):
How many of the following does the Offer identify?
• Site/Contaminant Conditions:
o [Favorable]: Homogenous highly permeable lithology (e.g. sands/gravels/course materials allowing good air flow) OR [Unfavorable]: not low permeability lithology/not preferential flow path system (clays, bedrock, predominantly fine-grain materials) o Absence of confining layers (continuous or discontinuous) o Volatile contaminant compounds (high Henry’s Law constants, high vapor pressure, low aqueous solubility) OR not semi- or non-volatile contaminants o Sufficient vadose zone thickness (>5-10’) o Contamination present within vadose zone
• Pilot-testing procedures/parameters:
o Radius of Influence (constant rate test) [vacuum at distance from extraction point] o System curve (vacuum-flow “step test”) [vacuum and flow rate] o Sustained concentrations/mass of extracted contaminants [concentrations of contaminants] o Treatment technology selection [extracted contaminant mass flow rate; presence of metals within extracted contaminants]
• Number of air exchanges needed to reach corrective action goals [contaminant zone pore volumes, soil and vapor concentrations, volume exchange rate]
Remediation TDI Question #2 (Multi-phase Extraction):
How many of the following does the Offer identify?
• Site/Contaminant Conditions:
o [Favorable] Contamination of multiple subsurface media/phases (soil/vadose zone, groundwater/dissolved-phase, LNAPL) OR [Unfavorable] Contamination exclusively present with a single medium/phase o [Favorable] Presence of submerged contaminant mass/source o [Favorable] high permeability vadose zone with low transmissivity aquifer (e.g. sandy vadose zone; silts/clays aquifer) OR [Unfavorable] low permeability vadose zone and/or highly transmissive aquifer o Absence of confining layers (continuous or discontinuous) o Volatile contaminant compounds (high Henry’s Law constants, high vapor pressure, low aqueous solubility) OR not semi- or non-volatile contaminants
• Pilot-testing Procedures/Parameters:
o Radius of Influence (constant rate test) [vacuum at distance from extraction point] o System curve (vacuum-flow “step test”) [vacuum and flow rate] o Aquifer pump tests [hydraulic conductivity] o Zone/cone of influence (draw down test) [decrease in water column height at extraction point] o Sustained concentrations/mass of extracted contaminants [concentrations of contaminants] o Treatment technology selection [extracted contaminant mass flow rate; presence of metals within extracted contaminants] o Number of air exchanges needed to reach corrective action goals [vadose zone pore volumes, soil and vapor concentrations, volume exchange rate]
Offer Evaluation page: 7
Remediation TDI Question #3 (ISCO):
How many of the following does the Offer identify?
• Site/Contaminant Conditions:
o [Favorable] Contamination of multiple subsurface media/phases (soil/vadose zone, groundwater/dissolved-phase, LNAPL) OR [Unfavorable] Contamination exclusively present within soil/vadose zone o [Favorable/Applicable] Presence of submerged contaminant mass/source o Lithology:
[Favorable] homogenous highly permeable lithology (e.g. sands/gravels/course materials allowing good oxidant injection/transport)
[Favorable] areas of preferential flow paths fractured bedrock allowing good oxidant injection/transport)
[Unfavorable] low permeability lithology (clays; predominantly fine-grain materials) o [Favorable] Presence of confining layers (continuous or discontinuous) o [Unfavorable] High native/natural oxidant demand o Contaminant compounds of any volatility category (VOC, SVOC, NVOC)
• Pilot-testing Procedures/Parameters:
o Radius of Influence (injection test) [increased ORP, dissolved oxygen, conductivity at distance from injection point; decrease in contaminant concentrations] o Application method (injection pressure; LOSS of point if gravity feed proposed) o Oxidant chemistry selection (standard reduction potential of contaminant(s) vs. oxidant
[oxidation power]) o Native oxidant demand o Oxidant treatment mass requirement (contaminant mass, contaminated volume, treatment reaction stoichiometry “oxidant-contaminant ratio”) o Aquifer pump tests [hydraulic conductivity]
Offer Evaluation page: 8
Risk Evaluation & Assessment Section
Risk Evaluation & Assessment Question #1:
Score: ____ total pts earned / pts possible
• Does the Offer identify ALL of the following?
o Identifies these receptors and associated exposure pathways
Convenience Store; Inhalation Pathway Residences; Inhalation Pathway and Water Ingestion Pathway Dog Relief Area; Dermal Contact, Soil Ingestion, Inhalation Pathways o Identifies these specific regulatory standards Soil – residential Soil Remediation Levels (rSRLs) Groundwater – Aquifer Water Quality Standards (AWQS); Surface Water
Designated Use Numeric Water Quality Standards Vapor (or air exposure) – Regional Screening Levels (e.g. VISLs or RSLs) o Identifies that soil gas (or soil vapor) sample data can be used to evaluate the inhalation threat to the Convenience Store and Dog Relief Area o Identifies that soil contaminant concentration data is needed to evaluate the threat via dermal contact and soil ingestion routes for shallow subsurface contamination
• Does the Offer identify ANY of the following?
o Identifies the use of the lowest Surface Water Designated Use Numeric Water Quality
Standard for each CoC (Aquatic & Wildlife [warm] for toluene; Drinking Water for all others) o Describes the use of groundwater concentration data from private domestic wells for the modeling of inhalation threats (PVI) to residences o Identifies or demonstrates that soil rSRLs are not protective for vapor intrusion risk
Offer Evaluation page: 9
TOTAL OFFER SCORING SUMMARY
Section & Allocation Section Points
Possible (Out of 1000 total)
Offer Section Score
(Fraction to 1.0)
Offer Section Points (Possible Section Pts x
Offer Section Score) Experience & Capacity (50%) 500 Method of Approach (35%) 350 Cost (15%) 150 Multi-Category Bonus Total Offer Score
| UST PC Proj: |
| Desc: |
| 3: [Select] |
| 1: [Select] |
| 2: [Select] |
| SI Proj: |
| Desc: |
| 1: [Select] |
| 2: [Select] |
| 3: [Select] |
| RTDI Proj: |
| Desc: |
| 1: [Select] |
| 2: [Select] |
| 3: [Select] |
| Risk Proj: |
| Desc: |
| 3: [Select] |
| 2: [Select] |
| 1: [Select] |
| Ext Ref #1 Score: [Select] |
| Ext Ref #2 Score: [Select] |
| Ext Ref #3 Score: [Select] |
| 2B-1: [Select] |
| 2B-2: [Select] |
| 2B-3: [Select] |
| Key Pers: |
| 1: [Select] |
| 2: [Select] |
| 3: [Select] |
| 4: [Select] |
| 5: [Select] |
| Subs-UST PC A: [Select] |
| Subs-UST PC B: [Select] |
| Subs-UST PC Earned: 0 |
| Subs-SI Earned: 0 |
| Subs-SI A: [Select] |
| Subs-RTDI Earned: 0 |
| Subs-RTDI A: [Select] |
| Subs-SI B: [Select] |
| Subs-RTDI B: [Select] |
| MoA-SI-Q1 Earned: 0 |
| MoA-SI-Q1 A: [Select] |
| MoA-SI-Q1 B: [Select] |
| MoA-RTDI-Q1: [Select] |
| MoA-RTDI-Q3: [Select] |
| MoA-SI Earned: 0 |
| MoA-RTDI Earned: 0 |
| MoA-UST PC Earned: 0 |
| MoA-UST PC A: [Select] |
| MoA-UST PC B: [Select] |
| MoA-Risk Earned: 0 |
| MoA-Risk A: [Select] |
| MoA-Risk B: [Select] |
| MoA_Section_Earned: 0 |
| MoA_Section_Max: 140 |
| EC-2A-UST PC Proj Desc Earned: 0 |
| EC-2A-UST PC Proj Desc Max: 45 |
| EC-2A-SI Proj Desc Earned: 0 |
| EC-2A-SI Proj Desc Max: 45 |
| EC-2A-RTDI Proj Desc Earned: 0 |
| EC-2A-RTDI Proj Desc Max: 45 |
| EC-2A-Risk Proj Desc Earned: 0 |
| EC-2A-Risk Proj Desc Max: 45 |
| EC-2A-Q2 Max: 180 |
| EC-2A-Q2 Earned: 0 |
| EC-Ext Refs Earned: 0 |
| EC-Ext Refs Max: 30 |
| EC-2B Earned: 0 |
| EC-2B Max: 30 |
| EC-Key Pers: |
| Earned: 0 |
| Max: 75 |
| EC-Subcontractors Earned: 0 |
| EC-Subcontractors Max: 60 |
| EC_Section_Max: 375 |
| EC_Section_Earned: 0 |
| Final-EC_Section_Pts: 0 |
| Final-MoA_Section_Pts: 0 |
| Final-Cost_Section_Pts: 0 |
| FINAL OFFER SCORE: 0 |
| Subs-SI Max: 20 |
| Subs-RTDI Max: 20 |
| MoA-SI Max: 40 |
| MoA-RTDI Max: 60 |
| MoA-UST PC Max: 20 |
| MoA-Risk Max: 20 |
| Subs-UST PC Max: 20 |
| MoA-SI-Q2 Earned: 0 |
| MoA-SI-Q2 A: [Select] |
| MoA-SI-Q2 B: [Select] |
| MoA-RTDI-Q2: [Select] |
| CAT_UST_PC: [1] |
| CAT_RTDI: [1] |
| CAT_RISK: [1] |
| CAT_SI: [1] |
| CAT_CAPACITY: [1] |
| EC_Section_Score: 0 |
| MoA_Score: 0 |
| Text2: Max 100 pts (4 categories) |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .