Strippit Punch Press - Brand Name Justification.pdf
PDF 101 KB Posted
- Attached to
- BRAND NAME - Det 9 LVD Strippit Punch
- Solicitation number
- FA4887Q0041
About this file
This document is a Sole Source (Including Brand Name) Justification - Simplified Procedures for Certain Commercial Items. The Air Force is seeking to award a firm-fixed-price purchase order for an LVD Strippit Punch Press to support the mission of Detachment 9 at Luke Air Force Base. This is a brand name requirement as the personnel at Detachment 9 are trained on and currently use LVD products. The estimated contract cost is $332,705. Market research identified two capable vendors, including one small business, but the product falls under a NAICS code that does not have a waiver to the Non-Manufacturer Rule, so the requirement will be solicited openly as a brand name rather than a small business set-aside. The contracting officer has determined the anticipated price will be fair and reasonable.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation for the brand name LVD Strippit Punch Press for Detachment 9. This is a firm-fixed-price purchase order, with quantities listed in the solicitation. Offerors must meet the salient characteristics in the attached document. The solicitation is subject to the availability of funds, and the government reserves the right to cancel the solicitation.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sole Source (Including Brand Name) Justification - Simplified Procedures for Certain Commercial Items
March 2023 Page 1 of 3March 2023 Page 1 of 3
NOTE: If a Justification was approved for the preceding acquisition, a copy of the approved Justification for the predecessor action must be included in the staff package for approval of the instant Justification. This applies to Justification staff packages that are submitted for review and approval at a level above the contracting officer. The predecessor Justification will be used as a reference document by the approving official.
Is this a new or amended J&A Document? New Amended ( Prior to Award Only! )
Is this a Bridge Action as defined in the AF Bridge Action Reduction Plan? Yes No
Funding level for this acquisition: >SAT and < $750K > $750K and < $15M
Contracting Activity: 56 CONS/PKA
Purchase Request / Local ID Number: F2UT504072AW02
Program / Project (and PE, if applicable): Det 9 LVD Strippit Punch Press
Program Type (PEO or Other Contracting):
Authority: AFFARS 5313.501 - 10 U.S.C. 3572, Implementation of Simplified Acquisition Procedures (41 U.S.C. 1901)
AFFARS 5313.501 - 10 U.S.C. 3403, Special Emergency Procurement Authority (41 U.S.C. 1903)
Estimated Contract Cost (including options): $332,705.00 Justification Type: Class Individual
COORDINATION ( AFFARS 5306.304(a)) Sign and Save Procedure
** The text in the signature blocks below is editable, including the title.
** To remove a row, click the "X" next to the signature block. CAUTION: Once removed, it can only be restored by downloading the BLANK FORM again.
Date
05 Aug 2024
Contracting Officer Jacqueline C. Aranda
56 CONS/PKA, 623-856-2733
Signature
X
APPROVAL (AFFARS 5306.304(a) )
Date
05 Aug 2024
Contracting Officer Jacqueline C. Aranda
56 CONS/PKA, 623-856-2733
Signature
Sole Source (Including Brand Name) Justification - Simplified Procedures for Certain Commercial Items
March 2023 Page 2 of 3March 2023 Page 2 of 3
I. Contracting Activity.
56 CONS/PKA
II. Nature and/or description of the action being processed.
A new purchase order will be awarded to fulfill this requirement.
III. Description of supplies/services required to meet agency needs.
The LVD Punch Press is used to support the Det 9 mission which allows Luke Air Force Base to create unique non-commercial training resources for the pilot training mission of the 56th Fighter Wing. This press specifically will be used to cut sheet metal which is used in the manufacturing of various aircrew training devices on Luke Air Force Base.
IV. Statutory authority permitting other than full and open competition.
FAR 6.302-1(c)(1) - Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements
V. Demonstration that the contractor's unique qualifications or nature of the acquisition requires the use of the authority cited above (applicability of authority).
A brand name requirement is appropriate for this requirement due to the need for LVD products at Detachment 9. The personnel working in Detachment 9 are currently trained on how to use LVD products and Detachment 9 currently owns LVD products. If LVD systems are not purchased, additional costs will be incurred for the retraining and integration of the new systems with the exists LVD systems. Furthermore, the use of LVD systems throughout the Detachment 9 shops will ensure the viability of designs created in software which is designed to interact with LVD systems. If other systems are purchased, new software would also be required to support manufacturing on those systems.
VI. Description of efforts made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as practicable.
This requirement is being openly solicited as Brand Name rather than sole source to provide opportunity to other vendors who may supply the LVD Strippit Punch Press rather than soliciting a sole source award from the manufacturer.
VII. Determination by the Contracting Officer that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable.
The Brand Name nature of this requirement will allow for competition to determine whether the government receives a fair and reasonable price. If competitive quotations cannot be received, the quotes received will be evaluated in comparison to purchases previously deemed fair on reasonable on past purchases for similar items.
VIII. Description of the market research conducted and the results, or a statement of the reasons market research was not conducted.
Market research was conducted on SAM.gov as well as FPDS.gov to determine possible vendors capable of supplying the required items. A survey of SAM.gov showed that the manufacturer (LVD dba Strippit Inc.) is registered as a large business and eligible to compete for this requirement. A survey of FPDS showed that Hartech Group LLC had previously supplied similar requirements to the federal government. Furthermore, a preliminary quote was received from Hartech Group LLC which showed the capability to fulfill this requirement.
There are no known mandatory sources or enterprise solutions that currently exist to aid this acquisition. A survey was conducted on SAM to determine the availability of vendors capable of supporting the requirement.
Sole Source (Including Brand Name) Justification - Simplified Procedures for Certain Commercial Items
March 2023 Page 3 of 3March 2023 Page 3 of 3
Two capable vendors were identified, one of which is a small-business. However, there is not a waiver to the Non-Manufacturer Rule for the NAICS code that this product falls under (333517). Therefore the small business set-aside will be dissolved and this requirement will be solicited as a Brand Name requirement specifically for the LVD Strippit Punch Press.
IX. Any other facts supporting the use of Other Than Full and Open Competition.
There is not a waiver to the Non-Manufacturer Rule for the NAICS code that this product falls under (333517). Therefore the small business set-aside will be dissolved and this requirement will be solicited as a Brand Name requirement specifically for the LVD Strippit Punch Press. This will allow for both small and large businesses to compete for the requirement rather than choosing one business size category and guaranteeing a sole source award.
X. List of any sources that expressed, in writing, an interest in the acquisition.
Hartech Group LLC provided a preliminary quote which showed that they were willing and capable of supplies the items required for this acquisition.
XI. A statement of the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers to competition before making subsequent acquisitions for the supplies or services required.
For future requirements, 56 CONS will continue to conduct thorough market research to determine the maximum number of competitive quotes are received by eligible vendors.
XII. Certification by the Contracting Officer.
As evidenced by my signature above, I have determined this document to be both accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.
XIII. Certification by the technical/requirements personnel.
As evidenced by my (our) signature(s) above, I (we) certify that any supporting data contained herein, which is my (our) responsibility, is both accurate and complete.
Remove the Guidance pages below.
Sole Source (Including Brand Name) Justification - Simplified Procedures for Certain Commercial Items March 2023 Page of International Agreement Competitive Restrictions (IACR) March 2023 Page of NOTE: If a Justification was approved for the preceding acquisition, a copy of the approved Justification for the predecessor action must be included in the staff package for approval of the instant Justification. This applies to Justification staff packages that are submitted for review and approval at a level above the contracting officer. The predecessor Justification will be used as a reference document by the approving official.
Is this a new or amended J&A Document?
Is this a Bridge Action as defined in the AF Bridge Action Reduction Plan?
Funding level for this acquisition:
Authority:
Justification Type:
COORDINATION ( AFFARS 5306.304(a)) ** The text in the signature blocks below is editable, including the title.
** To remove a row, click the "X" next to the signature block. CAUTION: Once removed, it can only be restored by downloading the BLANK FORM again.
APPROVAL (AFFARS 5306.304(a)) NOTE: A signature block will appear here based on the funding level selected above.
(See "Specific Guidance for Completing this Template" below.)
I. Contracting Activity.
II. Nature and/or description of the action being processed.
III. Description of supplies/services required to meet agency needs.
IV. Statutory authority permitting other than full and open competition.
V. Demonstration that the contractor's unique qualifications or nature of the acquisition requires the use of the authority cited above (applicability of authority).
VI. Description of efforts made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as practicable.
VII. Determination by the Contracting Officer that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable.
VIII. Description of the market research conducted and the results, or a statement of the reasons market research was not conducted.
IX. Any other facts supporting the use of Other Than Full and Open Competition.
X. List of any sources that expressed, in writing, an interest in the acquisition.
XI. A statement of the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers to competition before making subsequent acquisitions for the supplies or services required.
XII. Certification by the Contracting Officer.
XIII. Certification by the technical/requirements personnel.
Specific Guidance for Completing this Template
I. Contracting Activity. (FAR 6.303-2(b)(1))
Fully identify the contracting agency and organizational activity responsible for the proposed contracting action.
II. Nature and/or description of the action being processed. (FAR 6.303-2(b)(2))
State whether the action will be awarded as a new contract or by modification to an existing contract (identify contract number) and identify the type contract planned (FAR 12.207 and DFARS 212.207).
An individual Justification cannot be used to support more than one contract irrespective of the quantities or the dollar value stated therein. If a proposed contract will contain unpriced options (including NTE prices), those options must be supported by a separate Justification prior to option exercise or the Justification supporting the basic contract must be a Class Justification. For Class Justification situations (covers more than one contract) where the number of contracts in the class can be identified: (1) Provide a brief general description of actions; (2) identify the supplies and services that are being acquired; and (3) for each contract in the class identify the contractor, estimated value, type of contract and rationale for contract length, and estimated award date. Where the same information applies to more than one contract within the class, it need only be stated one time.
III. Description of the supplies/services required to meet agency needs. (FAR 6.303-2(b)(3))
Specifically describe the supplies and/or services to be acquired, the total estimated value of the acquisition - including options (provide cost estimate by year and, for class Justifications, by contract action), and the estimated delivery dates/periods of performance If commodities are being procured, provide quantities. All contract line items (CLIN) -- e.g., technical data, support equipment, support services, etc. -- should be listed. If all of the ancillary requirements associated with a particular item are not specifically described in the Justifications, those ancillary requirements cannot be included in the resulting contract and would require a second Justification. Also, state the type of appropriation (e.g., 3010, 3400) that will be used to fund each requirement listed.
If approval for more than one fiscal year requirement is needed, give the rationale for this request. Generally, the scope of these actions is limited to current requirements only, so that actions may be taken to facilitate competition for out-year requirements.
In some cases, there are no feasible actions that could develop future competition, and it is reasonable to seek approval for more than one fiscal year's requirements.
For ID/IQ or requirements contracts, use the maximum dollar value of the total estimated orders as the estimated Justification dollar value.
IV. Statutory authority permitting other than full and open competition. (FAR 6.303-2(b)(4)) V. Demonstration that the contractor's unique qualifications or nature of the acquisition requires the use of the authority cited above (applicability of authority). (FAR 6.303-2(b)(5)) Provide, in narrative form, a detailed explanation supporting and clearly relating to the conditions described by the FAR for using the particular authority cited. This section is normally the most detailed part of the justification as the essence of the justification is presented here. For acquisitions that include both supplies and services, separately justify the use of the authority for the services and supplies.
Contracting without providing for full and open competition shall not be justified on the basis of lack of advance planning by the requiring activity or concerns related to the amount of funds available (e.g., funds will expire) (10 U.S.C. 3204) VI. Description of efforts made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as practicable.
(FAR 6.303-2(b)(6))
Describe all efforts taken (or to be to be taken) to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as practicable under the circumstances. Although Market Research is covered in Section VIII, the information in Section VI should correlate with the Market Research described in Section VI. The following issues should be addressed in this paragraph:
Sources Sought Synopsis (used as part of market research). If a sources sought synopsis was issued, state the date the synopsis was issued and a brief description of its content. If any responses were received, describe in detail the results of the screening process and the rationale for determining the unacceptability of any synopsis respondents. Reference FAR 13.105, Synopsis and Posting Requirements.
Other Actions. In this paragraph, discuss any other actions taken or planned to facilitate competition for this acquisition. The discussion should include actions tried or considered even if the actions were unsuccessful. If the efforts were unsuccessful, so state and describe why.
Qualifying Country Sources. If qualifying country sources have expressed interest, but are to be excluded, provide supporting rationale.
VII. Determination by the Contracting Officer that the anticipated cost to the government will be fair and reasonable. (FAR 6.303-2(b)(7))
Include a statement by the contracting officer that the anticipated cost will be considered fair and reasonable and provide the basis for this determination. The steps that will be taken to ensure the final contract price will be fair and reasonable are also described here. Describe the extent of cost or price analysis anticipated including the requirements for certified cost or pricing data, technical evaluations, and audits.
VIII. Description of the market research conducted and the results, or explain why market research was not conducted. (FAR 6.303-2(b)(8))
Generally, some form of market research should be conducted. Discuss any market research conducted pursuant to FAR Part 10 and describe results of that research. Market research is any effort undertaken to determine if sources capable of satisfying the agency's requirements exist and to determine if commercial items or non-developmental items are either available or can be modified so that they will satisfy the agency's needs. Market research should be focused not only on identifying alternate sources, but also on alternate equipment or substitutes that might fulfill the Government needs with only minor modification. Regardless of the approach used, the results should provide a high level of confidence that no other qualified sources exist.
When other exceptions from the requirement to obtain full and open competition are relied upon, the market research might be limited to an examination of the acquisition history and experience with the marketplace under previous acquisitions for the same or similar items.
If no market research was conducted, so state and provide the rationale.
IX. Any other facts supporting the use of Other Than Full and Open Competition. (FAR 6.303-2(b)(9)(i))
Provide any other facts supporting the use of other than full and open competition, including an explanation of why technical data packages, specifications, engineering descriptions, statements of work, statements of objectives, or purchase descriptions suitable for full and open competition have not been developed, are not being developed, are not being used, or are not available.
X. List of sources, if any, that expressed interest in the acquisition. (FAR 6.303-2(b)(10))
If a sources sought synopsis was done and all interested sources are included in Section VI, it is acceptable to state, “See Section VI above.”
XI. A statement of the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers to competition before making subsequent acquisitions for the supplies or services required. (FAR 6.303-2(b)(11))
Describe any actions taken or to be taken to foster competition for future acquisitions of the supplies or services being acquired. Describe potential actions that could be taken to remove the barriers to competition that have been identified in the justification and include a milestone schedule, where available, for accomplishing these actions. For example, if a follow-on competitive acquisition is planned, so state and provide the planned award date, or state that the Government will attempt to acquire rights in technical data and computer software sufficient to compete follow-on acquisitions as a priced option in the contract action that is the subject of this Justification, or (if applicable) state how the Government intends to challenge nonconforming markings on technical data and computer software delivered to it under previous contracts so those markings can be removed in order that the technical data and computer software may be used in support of a follow-on competitive acquisition, or describe plans to qualify additional sources.
Address efforts to ensure competition for future spare parts and maintenance in support of systems or equipment covered by the justification, even when these acquisitions will be accomplished by other organizations. Include a discussion on available breakout data.
If no actions are planned, so state and provide reasons. If approval is sought for more than one year, explain why a sole source effort is required for the planned time duration.
For a non-competitive follow-on acquisition to a previous award for the same supply or service supported by a Justification citing the same authority, include a discussion of the actions planned to overcome barriers to competition established in the previous justification, the status of those actions, and the results of those actions. The approval authority shall determine whether the planned actions were completed. If the planned actions were not completed, the justification for the follow-on acquisition shall be approved by the approval authority one-level above the approval authority for the previous justification (see FAR 13.501(a)(2)). If the previous justification was approved by the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE), the approval remains at the SPE level.
[DFARS 213.501(a) and DFARS PGI 206.304(a)(S-70)(ii)] XII. Certification by the Contracting Officer. (FAR 6.303-2(b)(12))
As evidenced by his/her signature, the contracting officer has determined this document to be both accurate and complete to the best of his/her knowledge and belief.
XIII. Certification by the technical/requirements personnel. (FAR 6.303-2(c))
As evidenced by their signatures, the technical and/or requirements personnel have certified that any supporting data contained herein, which is their responsibility, is both accurate and complete.
Do You Need to "REDACT" Text?
This template is interactive and has special features. In its current state, it cannot be redacted. In order to redact any portion of this template, you must first convert it to a normal PDF file. Click here for instructions.
9.0.0.2.20120627.2.874785
| security_markings: |
| CurrentPage: |
| PageCount: |
| new: |
| amended-with-original: |
| Yes: |
| No: |
| range_under-700K: |
| range_700K-13.5M: |
| Contracting-Activity: 56 CONS/PKA |
| PR-ID-Number: F2UT504072AW02 |
| Program-Project: Det 9 LVD Strippit Punch Press |
| Program-Type: |
| class: |
| individual: |
| Estimated_Cost: 332,705.00 |
| Sign_and_Save_1: |
| Date: 05 Aug 2024 |
| Date: 05 Aug 2024 |
| Name: |
| Signature: |
| Hide-PM-Coord: |
| Hide-CO-Coord: |
| Hide-CSO-Coord: |
| Hide-Legal-Coord: |
| Hide-COCO-Coord: |
| Hide-CA-Coord: |
| Hide-Blank-1-Coord: |
| Hide-Blank-2-Coord: |
| Section-I-Text: |
| Section-II-Text: |
| Section-III-Text: |
| Section-IV-Text: |
| Section-V-Text: |
| Section-VI-Text: |
| Section-VII-Text: |
| Section-VIII-Text: |
| Section-IX-Text: |
| Section-X-Text: |
| Section-XI-Text: |
| Section-XII-Text: |
| Section-XIII-Text: |
| Remove-Guidance-Pages: 1 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .