Statement_of_Work_ACU.pdf

Statement of Work (SOW)

FOR

B-52 Fire Control Computer (ACU)

PR #: FD2060-20-00058

January 6, 2020

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Purpose: This Statement of Work (SOW) describes the services required to procure a production first article flight-ready Avionics Control Unit (ACU)/Fire Control Computer (FCC) for use on the B-52H aircraft. This service requires the contractor to accomplish the development IAW Source Control Drawing (SCD), 754-11100 and Nuclear Hardness Specifications outlined in the Boeing document D520-19041-1, this supersedes documents D520-12708-1 (unclassified) and D520-12708-2 (classified) and is specified in Boeing’s B-52 Nuclear Hardening document D675-60000-18, observing acceptable quality and relevant technical standards. The contractor shall deliver production first article assets that pass all qualification testing along with the official test results. Upon First Article approval, the Government reserves the right to execute subsequent delivery orders for production quantities. In production of the ACU the contractor shall manufacture, inspect, test, and deliver ACU assets that conform to the approved design.

1.2 Background: The SOW tasks the contractor to provide a Form, Fit, Function and Interface (F3I) production first article flight-ready ACU. The ACU is a Mission Critical item on the B- 52H. It requires Nuclear Certification and contains Hardness Critical Items. The design of the ACU is specific to the B-52H. The ACU is part of a system of avionics processors supporting the B-52H mission. The Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) has stated the legacy configuration of the ACU cannot be manufactured due to internal component obsolescence. The OEM further state that there are 20 parts that are obsolete with no known replacements across the circuit cards in the Line Replaceable Unit (LRU). Development of suitable F3I (Form, Fit, Function, and Interface) drop in replacement is required in order to meet this requirement. The ACU is not undergoing modernization, as such, this requirement is imperative to support and sustain the system for the B-52H platform.

2.0 Services Summary

Performance Objectives Reference Performance Threshold Delivery of two production first article flight units according to Source Control Drawing (SCD), 754-11100 utilizing the Nuclear Hardness Specifications outlined in the unclassified Boeing document D520- 19041-1 with the relevant classified appendices, which supersedes documents D520- 12708-1 (unclassified) and D520-12708-2 (classified) identified in the SCD. Boeing document D520-19041-1 is specified in Boeing’s B-52

4.2 All production first article

prototypes shall pass the Formal Qualification as specified in Source Control Drawing (SCD), 754-11100 and Nuclear Hardness Specifications outlined in the Boeing document D520- 19041-1.

Nuclear Hardening document D675-60000-18.

Submit Certification of completion of safety-of-flight test

4.4 The contractor shall submit a

certification of satisfactory completion of safety-of-flight test to the Government prior to delivery of the production first article flight-ready units

Deliver the complete technical data package required for procurement of the new design and repair level data.

4.6 No more than two revision

after initial submission with all drawing errors corrected and returned within seven calendar days.

3.0 Contractor Requirements

3.1 Loss of Government Property: Reporting Loss of Government Property, the contractor shall use the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) eTools software application to report loss of Government property at the site below IAW the FAR and applicable supplements and shall be in compliance with all applicable guidance and clauses listed in the contract. The reporting requirement does not change any liability provisions or other reporting requirements that may exist under the contract/order. http://www.dcma.mil/aboutetools.cfm

3.2 Return/Retention of Government Property: All deliverable items generated under the contract/order becomes the property of the Government and shall be returned to the Government upon completion of the contract/order. All Department of Defense (DD) Form 1423-1, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) deliverables become the property of the Government upon receipt.

3.3 Government System(s): The Government will provide contractor personnel access to system(s) necessary to perform tasks under the contract/order. Upon completion/termination of the contract/order or transfer/termination of contractor personnel, the system account(s) will be closed.

4.0 Technical Requirements

All requirements within this document are IAW SCD 754-11100 and Nuclear Hardness Specifications outlined in the Boeing document D520-19041-1. Unless stated within, all requirements shall comply with Source Control Drawing (SCD), 754-11100 and Nuclear Hardness Specifications outlined in the Boeing document D520-19041-1. Any action requiring approval shall be forwarded to the Government for approval prior to any work being accomplished. The new ACU shall be compatible with the B-52H model.

4.1 Period and Place of Performance

4.1.1 Contract/Order Period of Performance: The period of performance for the contract/order is for 12 months with delivery of first article flight-ready prototypes within 300 calendar days of contract award.

Document Identifier

DID Title PWS Reference(s)

A001 DI-ADMN-

81250A

Conference Minutes 4.6.6

A002 DI-ADMN-

81505

Report, Record of Meeting Minutes 4.4, 4.6, 4.6.1, 4.6.5

A003 DI-CMAN-

80639D

Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) 4.3.4

A004 DI-MGMT-

80227

Contractor’s Progress, Status and Management Report

4.6.4

A005 DI-MGMT-

81650

Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) 4.6.7

A006 DI-MGMT-

81803

Item Unique Identification (IUID) Marking Plan

4.7.2

A007 DI-MGMT-

81804

Item Unique Identification (IUID) Marking Activity and Verification Report

4.7.4

A008 DI-MISC-

81384

Service Engineering Report 4.3.1, 4.4

A009 DI-MISC-

81832

Counterfeit Prevention Plan (CPP) 4.9

A010 DI-NDTI-

80603

Test Procedure 4.4

A011 DI-NDTI-

80809B

Test/Inspection Report 4.4

A012 DI-NDTI-

80566A

Test Plan 4.4

A013 DI-SESS-

81000E/T

Product Drawings/Models and Associated Lists

4.5

A014 DI-SESS-

81022D

Configuration Audit Summary Report and Certification

4.6.8

4.1.2 Place of Performance: These services will be performed at facilities established by the contractor. Flight testing or integration testing is expected to be performed on an USAF installation.

4.2 Task Description: The ACU design shall be a Form, Fit, Function, and Interface (F3I) replacement for the legacy item and shall incorporate current, nonproprietary parts and technology with qualified sources defined by drawings and specifications. The Contractor shall deliver to the 407 SCMS/GUEA for validation, two (2) production first article flight-ready units within 300 calendar days of contract award. All production first article units shall pass the Formal Qualification as specified in SCD754-11100. The new design shall incorporate considerations for: a) Reliability: the new design shall provide at a minimum the reliability as specified in SCD 754-11100; b) Maintainability: the new design shall be repairable in a depot maintenance facility and as specified in specification SCD 754-11100; c) Supportability: the new design shall incorporate parts standardization when possible to avoid obsolescence.

4.3 Formal Qualification Testing/First Article Testing

4.3.1 Verification of and compliance to Section 3 Requirements shall be accomplished by inspection, analysis, demonstration, test, or a combination of these methods as indicated in the Verification Cross-Reference Index as provided in Table 14 of the SCD 754- 11100, sheets 63-69. Prior to First Article submission to the Government, the contractor shall perform and complete Formal Qualification IAW SCD 754-11100 Section 4.1.2, sheet 59 (a)(b)(c). The contractor will perform at their location a Ground Test (Safety of Flight), Functional Test (Acceptance Test), and Environmental Qualification Test (ESS).

The complete qualification results, testing, and/or analysis shall be documented and provided in the Service Engineering Report. [A008, DI-MISC-81384: Service Engineering Report]. This shall serve as the certification of satisfactory safety of flight test completion.

4.3.1.1 Ground Test/Safety of Flight: IAW SCD: 754-11100 Section 4.1.2(e) sheet 58

4.3.1.2 Functional Test/Acceptance Test: IAW SCD: 754-11100 Section 4.1.2(b) sheet 59

4.3.1.3 Environmental Qualification Test (ESS): IAW SCD 754-11100 Section 4.1.2(c); sheet 59. ESS shall consist of the Random Vibration Test followed by the Thermal Cycling Test

4.3.2 Validation testing will be accomplished by the Government with contract support in the System Integration Laboratory (SIL) at Tinker AFB.

4.3.3 Flight test will be accomplished by the Government with contract support, test location to be determined.

4.3.4 The Contractor shall support the Government conducted SIL and Flight Test to include any trouble shooting to repair problems or correct any discrepancies after flight testing. Any changes to the established baseline after SIL and/or Flight Test will require the submission of an Engineering Change Proposal (ECP). [A003, DI-CMAN-80639D:

Engineering Change Proposal]

4.4 Formal Qualification Verification: The Contractor shall host verification of the ACU performance at its facilities at least two months after contract award and before prototype delivery in accordance with the verification/testing methods outlined in 4.3.1 of this SOW. The contractor shall prepare and submit a test plan to Government for approval. The test/inspection report shall be used to document test/inspection results, findings, and analyses that will enable the Government or contracting agency to evaluate compliance with system requirements, performance objectives, specifications, and test/inspection plans. [A008, DI-MISC-81384:

Service Engineering Report], [A002, DI-ADMN-81505: Report, Record of Meeting Minutes], [A010, DI-NDTI- 80603: Test Procedure], [A011, DI-NDTI-80809B, Test/Inspection Report]

4.5 Engineering Data: The contractor shall develop, produce, maintain, and deliver a Technical Data Package (TDP) that accurately depicts the final product. The TDP shall represent the approved, tested, and accepted configuration of the defined delivered item(s). TDP data includes, but is not limited to, Computer Aided Design (CAD) data, CAD models, model based definition data sets, Gerber data and Master Bill of Materials (MBOM). The TDP shall provide the necessary design, engineering, manufacturing, testing and quality assurance requirements information necessary to enable the procurement or manufacture of an interchangeable item that duplicates the physical and performance characteristics of the original product without additional design engineering effort or recourse to the original design activity or any third party. All engineering product definition data created as a result of this contract shall be considered a part of the TDP. The TDP shall be delivered IAW Air Force Product Data Specification drawing 9579776 Rev ML (CAGE 98752). No more than two revisions after initial submission and all drawing errors are corrected and returned within seven calendar days. Reference attached DD Form 1423 Block 16. [A013, DI-SESS-81000E/T: Product Drawings/Models and Associated Lists]

4.6 Engineering Data Guidance Conference: The contractor shall support and co-chair a Guidance Conference with the 407 SCMS and AFLCMC/WNY for engineering data within 30 days after contract award. The Conference shall be convened at a site and on a date agreed upon by the Government contracting officer and the contractor. The contractor shall prepare an agenda and record the minutes of the Guidance Conference. The contractor shall address, discuss, and provide status on the following: [A002, DI- ADMN-81505: Report, Record of Meeting Minutes]

a. Understanding of all CDRL requirements, applicable DIDs, specifications and standards.

b. TDP review requirements and schedules.

c. TDP delivery requirements and schedules.

d. Contractor’s drafting practices/procedures/TDP drawing formats/CAD programs.

e. The contractor's quality assurance procedures relating to

TDP documents, including quality control of subcontractor and vendor data.

f. The role of subcontractors and vendors who may deliver TDP documents under this contract.

g. The contractor's configuration management system, including methods for releasing documents, approving documents, and incorporating changes into documents.

h. Digital Technical Data Package (TDP) deliverables.

Note: Guidance Conference may be held in conjunction with other meetings or conferences.

4.6.1 In-Process Review (IPR): The contractor shall host, support, and co-chair an IPR of the engineering drawings and associated lists and other documentation to be included in the TDP. The IPR shall be conducted only after the contractor's quality assurance personnel have completely reviewed the data and determined that the data is of sufficient quality so that Government time will be effectively utilized during the review. IPR may be scheduled when data has reached the 50% percent completion point and shall be held, when possible, in conjunction with other reviews. The contractor shall notify the 407 SCMS/GUEA and AFLCMC/WNY a minimum of 30 calendar days prior to the anticipated date of completion point. The IPR shall focus on the contractor's progress in the preparation of the TDP. The contractor shall support and provide the necessary resources, i.e., meeting agenda, conference room, applicable data, minutes, and appropriate personnel available to answer any questions to perform the IPR effectively.

The contractor shall correct all discrepancies identified in the IPR. All subcontractor/vendor data shall be made available for review. If the quantity of subcontractor/vendor data is of sufficient magnitude, the 407 SCMS/GUEA may schedule a separate IPR at the subcontractor's/vendor's facility. [A002, DI-ADMN- 81505: Report, Record of Meeting Minutes]

4.6.2 Relationship of Contractor with Subcontractors & Vendors: The contractor shall levy on sub-contractors and sub-vendors the same requirements for TDPs as are levied on them by this contract. This requirement shall apply at all tiers of sub-contractor/vendor levels associated with the program.

4.6.3 Engineering Data Updates and Revisions: The contractor shall (and shall cause subcontractors and vendors to) update and maintain engineering data for the item(s) designed/ developed/modified/produced and funded by this contract for the life of this contract and shall incorporate all changes in accordance with the following:

a. All engineering changes shall be incorporated into the applicable engineering data within 90 days after engineering release/Air Force concurrence or at intervals of five changes, whichever occurs first, except a change involving safety, which shall be incorporated immediately.

b. All engineering changes shall be incorporated into the applicable engineering data prior to delivery of data for review.

c. All engineering changes shall be incorporated into the applicable engineering data prior to delivery of final media.

d. Revisions to existing engineering drawings/models and associated lists and other documentation to be included in the TDP for which the contractor is the current design activity shall result in the delivery of the entire revised document and associated data file. For example, when a portion of a document is revised the entire document shall be delivered.

4.6.4 Contractor's Progress, Status, and Management Report: The contractor shall provide a monthly status report via email to the 407 SCMS/GUEA and 407 SCMS/GULBA offices. These reports shall include: current master schedule; significant technical activities performed by the contractor and subcontractor if applicable during the previous month; projected tasks for the next month; expenditure data; identification of any risks to cost, schedule, and performance; and mitigation recommendations for any identified risks. [A004, DI-MGMT-80227: Contractor’s Progress, Status and Management Report]

4.6.5 Combined Kick-Off and Technical Interchange Meeting (TIM): The Contractor shall host a Kickoff meeting and TIM within 30 days of contract award. This meeting may be held via teleconference for purposes of convenience to all parties. The purpose of the meeting is to review all contractual, financial, technical, engineering and logistical requirements. The Contractor shall have personnel in attendance with decision authority to address these areas as appropriate. The contractor shall prepare an agenda and record the minutes for the meeting. [A002, DI- ADMN-81505: Report, Record of Meeting Minutes]

4.6.6 Program Management Reviews (PMR): The contractor shall prepare and present a semi-annual PMR to include an agenda and minutes. PMRs shall provide production status including potential delays and recovery plans, financial/schedule status, quality assurance status, logistics status, engineering/test issues, and program issues [A001, DI- ADMN-81250A, Conference Minutes]

4.6.7 Integrated Master Schedule (IMS): The contractor shall perform work in accordance with the approved IMS covering all major milestones, events, and deliveries.

An updated IMS shall be delivered as requested by the Government or anytime the contractor makes a change to the IMS. [A005, DI-MGMT-81650, Integrated Master Schedule].

4.6.8 Configuration Audit Summary Report: The Configuration Audit Summary Report provides a listing of text and marked-up technical documents (e.g., specifications, engineering drawings) that identify discrepancies between the materiel (including software) and the requirements delineated in the applicable technical documents. The Configuration Audit Certification provides a documented certification that the audit was completed and any discrepancies have been properly adjudicated. [A014, DI-SESS- 81022D, Configuration Audit Summary Report]

4.7 Item Unique Identification (IUID)

4.7.1 Item Identification and Valuation, unique item identification is a method of marking items with unique item identifiers which have machine-readable data elements. Unique item identification is required for all items to be delivered to the DoD that meet the criteria established IAW the FAR and applicable supplements and shall be in compliance with all applicable guidance and clauses listed in the contract.

4.7.2 The contractor shall mark items in accordance with contract clauses, and Military Standard (MIL- STD)-130N, Department of Defense Standard Practice / Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property. [A006, DI-MGMT-81803, IUID Marking Plan]

4.7.3 IAW the Department of Defense Guide to Uniquely Identifying Items Assuring Valuation, Accountability and Control of Government Property, the Government agent or contractor representative responsible for causing “life cycle events” (i.e., abandoned, consumed, destroyed by accident, destroyed by combat, donated, exchanged – repair, exchanged – sold, exchanged – warranty, expended – experimental/target, expended – normal use, leased, loaned, lost, reintroduced, retired, scrapped, sold – foreign Government, sold – historic, sold – non Government, sold – other federal, sold – state/local, and stolen) will update applicable item record(s) in the IUID Registry.

4.7.4 IUID Marking Activity and Verification Report: The contractor shall provide an IUID Marking Activity and Verification Report. A key attribute for the report is the Verification column which indicates pass/fail for each item’s Data Matrix Symbol Quality. [A007, DI-MGMT-81804, IUID Marking Activity and Verification Report]

4.8 Packaging

4.8.1 The contractor shall package and mark any GFM and production first articles IAW the contract (basic or order, as applicable) Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) Form

158, Packaging Requirements; MIL-STD-129P, Department of Defense Standard Practice / Military Marking for Shipment and Storage; MIL-STD-130N, Department of Defense Standard Practice / Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property; and MIL- STD-2073-1D, Standard Practice for Military Packaging. The contractor shall package and mark material IAW other applicable Government regulations including, but not limited to, those regarding security, safety and environmental concerns.

4.8.2 The contractor shall package and mark material for movement, shipment, receipt and storage in a manner that ensures the protection and preservation of the material for shipment to and storage at the destination. The contractor shall package electronic parts susceptible to static discharge damage IAW MIL-STD-1686C, Military Standard:

Electrostatic Discharge Control Program for Protection of Electrical and Electronic Parts, Assemblies and Equipment (Excluding Electrically Initiated Explosive Devices).

4.8.3 IAW MIL-STD-2073-1D, shipping containers received, which meet the requirements of the AFMC Form 158 and are suitable for return shipment of serviceable assets, shall be reclaimed and stored for reutilization. Unsuitable shipping containers shall be disposed of and replaced with new containers that meet the requirements of the AFMC Form 158.

4.9 Counterfeit Electronics Parts: The contractor shall establish policy and procedures to mitigate the risk of counterfeit electronics parts being installed in end items or otherwise entering the USAF/DoD inventory IAW Aerospace Standard AS5553A, Counterfeit Electronics Parts;

Avoidance, Detection, Mitigation, and Disposition.

4.9.1 Counterfeit Prevention Plan (CPP): Contractors that supply electronic parts or systems that contain electronic parts shall establish policies and procedures to avoid, detect, mitigate and disposition counterfeit electronic parts to prevent such parts from entering the USAF/DoD supply chain. These policies and procedures shall be documented in a CPP for submission and approval IAW Data Item Description (DID) DI- MISC-81832 and accomplished for all specified contract items. DI-MISC-81832 is applicable to Parts, Material and Processes Selection (PMPS) associated with delivery of systems and assemblies to the USAF and DoD. The requirements established by DI- MISC-81832 also apply to electronics components procured in sustainment of such systems and assemblies. The requirements of the recently DoD-adopted SAE AS5553 Counterfeit Electronics Parts; Avoidance, Detection, Mitigation, and Disposition shall also apply. At a minimum, the CPP shall address: [A009, DIMISC- 81832: Counterfeit Prevention Plan]

4.9.2 At a minimum, the CPP shall address:

4.9.2.1 Applicability: The contractor shall identify all Business locations and programs to which the CPP applies. The CPP shall address materials, hardware, electronic parts, and procured assemblies.

4.9.2.2 Definitions: The contractor shall utilize definitions per AS5553 to ensure consistency. Any contractor-derived definitions must be included in an appropriate CPP appendix or annex. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, appendix H)

4.9.2.3 Parts Availability and Use of Parts Brokers: The contractor shall not procure materials, systems, assemblies, subassemblies or parts from parts Brokers when available from Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) or their Authorized Distributors. In cases where materials, systems, assemblies, subassemblies or parts are no longer available from the OEM or their Authorized Distributors, procurement from Brokers may be authorized as defined by the contractor’s policy and their CPP. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.1, 4.1.2.e., appendix A)

4.9.2.4 Procurement Policies: The contractor shall provide and implement policy directing development and implementation of business practices and procedures, and processes to prevent procurement of Counterfeit materials and parts. The contractor shall identify the appropriate office(s), business units, functional organizations, and programs, which shall have responsibility for development, maintenance and implementation of the CPP. The CPP shall identify the specific roles and responsibility for each. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.2, 4.1.3, appendix B, C, D)

4.9.2.5 Risk Assessment: The contract shall address the risk of using unknown sources and/or unauthorized suppliers in the CPP. Application or technical risk assessments shall establish the effect that counterfeit parts may have on performance. Vendor or source of supply risk assessments shall establish the potential for obtaining counterfeit parts. Using any risk analysis tool acceptable to the Government, the contractor shall conduct a risk assessment based upon item characteristics and how likely it is that a counterfeit part will be received. The contractor shall identify and describe in the CPP how parts are selected for assessment and what risk is acceptable based upon the parts design, construction, material and functional requirements. As a minimum, analysis shall be completed for flagging high risk items, such as items that are obsolete, discontinued, rare, etc. The contractor shall require completion of a trade study, documented within the CPP that shall facilitate determining whether 100% testing of parts procured from after-market sources is more cost effective than qualification or requalification of a manufacturer. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.2, 4.1.3, appendix B, C, D)

4.9.2.6 Detection and Avoidance Responsibilities: The contractor shall establish processes for the review and approval of contractor and applicable subcontractor systems for the detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts, which processes shall be comparable to the processes established for contractor business systems under section 893 of the Ike Skelton

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383;

124 Stat. 4311; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note). The contractor shall flow down such requirements and processes to their subcontractors per ODASD Memo titled “Overarching DoD Counterfeit Prevention Guidance”, dated 16 March 2012.

(Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.4, 4.1.5, appendix E)

4.9.2.7 Testing and Verification: The contractor shall establish and accomplish testing and verification processes for items not received from an original equipment manufacturer, original component manufacturer, or authorized distributor that are identified as having high risk for counterfeit potential. These processes apply to prime contracts, and to subcontracts or suppliers below the prime contracts. The contractor shall provide a list of acceptable test facilities if the subcontractor or supplier does not have the capability to perform required testing. Submittal of Certificates of Compliance indicating the parts are not counterfeit shall be acceptable for verification of testing. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.4, appendix E)

4.9.2.8 Configuration Identification and Traceability: The contractor shall identify and control the configurations of all systems, assemblies, subassemblies and parts, and enable mechanisms to provide traceability of parts. The contractor shall report to the Government when control of the configurations of all systems, assemblies, subassemblies and parts, and mechanisms to provide traceability of parts are not possible. The contractor shall identify the specific systems, assemblies, subassemblies and parts beyond the contractors’ control. The contractor shall be responsible for detecting and avoiding the use or inclusion of counterfeit materials and parts, to include procured assemblies and subassemblies, in such products and shall be responsible for the rework or corrective action that may be required to resolve the use or inclusion of counterfeit materials and parts.

The cost of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts and the cost of rework or corrective action that may be required to remedy the use or inclusion of such parts are not allowable costs under Department contracts , unless: a) the contractor has established a counterfeit avoidance/detection system approved by the DoD, b) the counterfeit parts were procured from a DoD-accredited trusted supplier or provided as Government property, and c) the contractor has provide timely notification to the Government. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.6, appendix F)

4.9.2.9 Counterfeit Notification and Reporting: The contractor shall report in writing to the Procuring Activity within 30 days of determining any end item, component, part, or material contained in supplies purchased by the Department of Defense, or purchased by a contractor or subcontractor for delivery to, or on behalf of, the Department, contains counterfeit electronic parts or suspect counterfeit electronic parts for the purpose of investigation and notification of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI). The PCO shall coordinate reporting to the appropriate Program Management/Item Management, System Engineering Management, the AFMC Discrepant Materiel Reporting Program (DMRP) Office in 406 SCMS/GULAB, and the AFOSI. Additionally, the contractor shall within the same 30 day period ensure all suspected or confirmed counterfeit items are entered into the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) system, which will serve as the DoD central reporting repository. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.7, appendix G)

4.9.2.10 Counterfeit Prevention Training: The contractor shall provide appropriate training and shall require all personnel working procurement within their company, to include at a minimum their supply chain management specialists, receiving inspectors, and engineers, to complete said training. The contractor shall determine the appropriate training required. Training may be developed in-house or may be other Industry accepted training. The CPP shall describe and list the training provided by the contractor to their personnel.

4.10 Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP): The contractor shall participate in GIDEP IAW Air Force Joint Instruction (AFJI) 63-108, Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), and GIDEP Operations Manual S0300-BT-PRO-010, Government- Industry Data Exchange Program.

5.0 Administrative

5.1 Security: Contractor shall not release or remove system documentation, data, or reports generated by or through use of Government systems. All requests for information shall be forwarded to the PCO.

5.1.1 Security Clearance: The Contractor shall ensure applicable contractor/subcontractor personnel have security clearance(s) at the SECRET level for proper accomplishment of contract/order requirements. The security clearance(s) shall be obtained in accordance with the Department of Defense (DD) Form 254, Department of Defense Contract Security Classification Specification. The Contractor shall obtain necessary security clearance(s) by award of contract.

5.1.2 Cybersecurity: The Contractor shall complete an assessment of Cybersecurity impacts and provide Cybersecurity technical support. The Contractor shall design into the prototype the best practices of cybersecurity which include but are not limited to confidentiality, integrity, availability, authentication, and non-repudiation. The Contractor shall protect the system against compromising security requirements at all facilities committed to the prototype effort. The Contractor shall identify and document the applicability of the security for the system, the implementation of control compliance actions and technical measures recommended to meet or mitigate non-compliant controls.

5.2 Government Facility Access: The Government Program Manager will assist Contractor in processing the necessary DoD forms to obtain base or area badges for access to Government facilities. The Contractor shall obtain base identification for all Contractor personnel who make frequent visits to or perform work on the Air Force installation(s) cited in the delivery order.

Contractor personnel are required to wear or prominently display installation identification badges or Contractor-furnished, Contractor identification badges while visiting or performing work in the installation. Access to Government facilities is limited. Control of the facilities shall remain with the Government.

5.3 Contract Management: The PCO shall be responsible for contract management. Only the PCO can make changes affecting this contract. Any instances where implied or explicit direction, received from any Government representative and perceived by the contractor to affect performance of tasks under this contract, or to have a material impact on costs incurred in association with this contract, shall be brought to the immediate attention of the PCO for disposition and instructions before proceeding with any work thus affected. The 407 Supply Chain Management Group will provide the Government Program Manager for this contract.

Only the PCO/Government Program Manager has authority to review and approve contract deliverables.

5.4 Travel Requirements: Telecoms will be the primary means for conducting all meetings. No separate Travel line item will be incorporated into this effort. If instances arise in which the contractor determines it is in their best interest to send a representative, the contractor shall submit a Base Access Request to the PM and PCO in order to have the individuals properly cleared to attend the event. All costs for any such travel shall be borne by the contractor.

5.5 General Safety Requirements

5.5.1 The Contractor shall comply with all safety provisions, e.g., technical specifications, technical publications, Federal Occupational Safety and Health Standards (Title 29 CFR. Part 1910). If there is no applicable Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standard, use other applicable nationally recognized sources of safety, health, and fire prevention standards referenced in the work requirements of this contract.

5.5.2 The Contractor shall protect Government property to prevent damage during the period of time the property is in the possession of the Contractor. The Contractor shall report promptly to the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) all available facts relating to each instance of damage to Government property.