SPRTA114R0196_______0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE Page 1

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

SPRTA1-14-R-0196-0002

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

10 APR 2014

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

FD20301400059ADV

5. PROJECT NO (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE

DLA AVIATION AT OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

DLR PROCUREMENT OPERATIONS (AO)

3001 STAFF DRIVE

TINKER AFB OK 73145-3070

BUYER: Breann Irving/DLA-AOAB breann.irving@us.af.mil Phone: (405) 734- 8107 Fax: (405) 734-8106 No Collect Calls

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6) CODESPRTA1

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE

X

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

SPRTA114R0196

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11-MAR-2014

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended. Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods. ( a ) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; ( b ) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or ( c ) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified. 17-APR-2014 3:00 PM

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

BY ________________________________________________________

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY ____________________________________________________

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

FACILITY CODE

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE

30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

PRESCRIBED BY GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

X

X X

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

Amendment/Modification SPRTA1-14-R-0196-0002

Continuation of block 14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

The purpose of this amendment is to add Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 and Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 to the solicitation and to extend the solicitation closing date to 17 April 2014.

FIRST: Add Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Respondents for Proposal Preparation using Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) Procedures.

SECOND: Add Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation Factor Award.

THIRD: Extend the solicitation closing date to 17 April 2014 at 3:00 PM Central Time FOURTH: All other terms and conditions remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

Request for Proposal SPRTA1-14-R-0196-0002

ADDENDUM TO PROVISION 52.212-1

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO RESPONDENTS FOR PROPOSAL PREPARATION USING

LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE (LPTA) PROCEDURES

General Instruction Instruction to Offerors (ITO):

(a) This section of the Instructions to Offerors (ITO) provides general guidance for preparing proposals as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the proposal. The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information requested by the ITO and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. Any Offeror who submits an incomplete package may be considered ineligible for award. The offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the solicitation. Non-conformance with the instructions provided in the ITO may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

(b) The proposal shall be clear, concise and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposal should not simply rephrase the Government’s requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet those requirements. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror’s proposal.

(c) Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed artwork, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.

(d) The proposal acceptance period is specified on page 1 of the model contract/solicitation. The offer shall make a clear statement in the proposal documentation that the proposal is valid until this date.

(e) In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.803(a)(10) (Contents of Contract Files), the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Unless the offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of such unsuccessful proposals.

General Information

Point of Contact:

The sole point of contact for this acquisition is Breann Irving. Address any questions or concerns you may have to this person. Written requests for clarification may be sent to breann.irving@tinker.af.mil

Debriefings:

The contracting officer will promptly notify offerors of any decision to exclude them from the competitive range, whereupon they may request and receive a debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.505. Offerors excluded from the competitive range may request a pre-award debriefing or they may choose to wait until after the source selection decision to request a post-award debriefing. However, offerors excluded from the competitive range are entitled to no more than one debriefing for each proposal. The Contracting Officer will notify unsuccessful offerors in the competitive range of the source selection decision in accordance with FAR 15.503. Upon such notification, unsuccessful offerors may request and receive a debriefing. Offerors desiring debriefing must make their request in accordance with the requirements of FAR 15.505 or 15.506, as applicable.

Discrepancies:

If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer in writing with supporting rationale. The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussions.

Distribution:

The “original” proposal shall be identified. Proposals shall be addressed to the Buyer and mailed to the address cited on the solicitation. Proposals may be emailed to Breann.Irving@tinker.af.mil by the closing date.

Contract Documentation The purpose of this section is to provide information to the Government for preparing the contract document and supporting file. The offeror’s proposal shall include a signed copy of the solicitation. This includes:

Solicitation/Contract Form Complete the signature/date block on page 1. Signature by the offeror on page 1 constitutes an offer, which the

Government may accept. The “original” copy should be clearly marked under separate cover and should be provided without any punched holes.

Supplies or Services and Costs/Prices All pricing information shall be addressed in this section of the RFP. Information shall be limited to Contract Line Item

Number (CLIN), including unit and extended pricing as specified in this section.

Inspection and Acceptance Completion of Clause 52.246-11, Higher-Level Contract Quality Requirement, if applicable in the Solicitation. Note:

The contractor shall comply with ISO 9001, 1994 (E) unless the alternate option is selected (see Clause ISO STD Note).

Contains Inspection and Acceptance (SEP 1999)/Contractor Fill-In box that shall be completed by vendors with the appropriate ‘Inspection Code’ and address, as submitted on their proposals.

Deliveries or Performance Complete F.O.B. Origin Clause IAW FAR 47.305(b).

Contract Administration Data Complete Activity Address Clause. If applicable, annotate remittance address within proposal.

Special Contract Requirements Used/Overhauled Government /Commercial Surplus shall be overhauled by the Government authorized repair sources to contract specifications

Contract Clauses Contains all other contract clauses and provisions, listed by reference or full-text that apply to this acquisition.

List of Documents, Exhibits and Other Attachments Contains a table that lists any type of file or document that is attached to the solicitation. No action needed by vendors or the Government.

Representations, Certification and Other Statements of Offerors Offeror should complete all appropriate blocks of this section and place “N/A” in the blocks that are not applicable to the offeror’s proposal.

Instructions, Conditions and Notices to Offerors or Respondents Contains instructions to prepare proposals for vendors, as stated herein.

Evaluation Factors for Award

Factor 1: Price/Cost Completion of the Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs section of the solicitation will represent the price proposal.

Factor 2- Technical Capability Technical proposals are not required. Technical acceptability will be determined based on the offerors compliance with the solicitation and the requirement as stated in the Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs section, submission of required documentation in accordance with the surplus notes, any reference specifications, engineering notes and all other attachments herein. For surplus material by submission of the offer, the offeror accedes to all surplus requirements and confirms their ability meet the surplus requirement.

Exceptions to Terms and Conditions Exceptions taken to terms and conditions of the model contract, to any of its formal attachments or to other parts of the solicitation shall be identified. Each exception shall be specifically related to each paragraph and /or specific part of the solicitation to which the exception is taken. Provide rationale in support of the exception and fully explain its impact, if any, on the performance, schedule, cost, and specific requirement of the solicitation. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being removed from consideration for award

Solicitation Exceptions

Paragraph/Page Requirement/ Portion Rationale

Applicable Page and Paragraph Numbers

Identify the requirement or portion to which exception is taken

Justify why the requirement will not be met

Other information required Authorized Offeror Personnel Provide the name, title and telephone number of the company/division point of contact regarding decisions made with respect to your proposal and who can obligate your company contractually. Also, identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government.

Person(s) that can obligate your company:

Name: _____________________________ Title: ______________________________ Telephone: __________________________

Person(s) authorized to negotiate with the Government:

Name: ______________________________ Title: _______________________________ Telephone: __________________________

Government Offices Provide the mailing address, telephone and fax numbers and facility codes for the cognizant Contract Administration Office, DCAA, and Government Paying Office. Also, provide the name and telephone and fax number for the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO).

Company/Division Address, Identifying Codes, and Applicable Designations On page 4 provide the company/division’s street address, county and facility code; and CAGE code. Denote the size of the business (large or small); and labor surplus area designation. This same information must be provided if the work for this contract will be performed at any other locations(s). List all locations where the work is to be performed and indicate whether such facility is a division, affiliate, or subcontractor, and the percentage of work to be performed at each location.

Subcontracting Plan Include a subcontracting plan (if applicable) in accordance with FAR 19.702. the plan must be approved by the PCO before contract award.

SUBMISSION OF COST OR PRICING DATA

(a) It is anticipated that pricing of this action will be based on adequate price competition; therefore, offerors are not required to submit cost or pricing data. However, if after receipt of proposals it is determined that adequate price competition does not exist, cost or pricing data (see FAR 15.406-2, Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data) shall be required. Use of a Standard Form 1411, contract Pricing Proposal Cover Sheet, for the submission of the offer and any supporting data is required only if certification is required. In lieu of the Standard Form 1411, contractor format acceptable if the same information is provided.

(b) If it is determined that adequate price competition does not exist, the offeror shall provide current, accurate and complete cost or pricing data within five (5) calendar days after receipt of the Contracting Officer’s request.

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD USING LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE PROCEDURES (IAW FAR 13.106-2(b), 14.201-5(c), and 15.204-5(c))

A. Basis for Contract Award This acquisition will utilize Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection procedures in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15.101-2, as supplemented. Technical tradeoffs will not be made and no additional credit will be given for exceeding acceptability. Award will be made to the acceptable offeror with the lowest evaluated cost or price, which is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR and whose proposal confirms to the solicitation requirements. The solicitation requirements include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications and all other information required by FAR 52.212-1 and its Addendum of this solicitation.

B. Number of Contracts to be Awarded The Government intends to select one contractor. However, the Government reserves the right to award multiple contracts for reduced quantities or no contract at all, depending on the quality of the proposals and prices submitted and the availability of funds. In the event both new manufactured and surplus offers are received, when surplus materials are available at the lowest price, the Government reserves the right to award multiple contracts if surplus are available at a lesser quantity than solicited.

C. Rejection of Unrealistic Offers The Government may reject any proposal that is evaluated to be unrealistic in terms of program commitments, including contract terms and conditions, or unreasonable cost when compared to Government estimates, such that the proposal is deemed to reflect an inherent lack of competence or failure to comprehend the complexity and risks of the program.

D. Correction Potential of Proposals The Government will consider, throughout the evaluation, the “correction potential” of any deficiency or proposal inadequacy. The judgment of such “correction potential” is within the sole discretion of the Government. If an aspect of an offeror’s proposal not meeting the Governments’ requirements is not considered correctable, the offeror may be eliminated from the competitive range.

E. Competitive Range Determination During the evaluation process multiple competitive range determinations may be made that eliminate Offerors from the competition. A competitive range determination may eliminate Offerors based on their initial proposal evaluation results, after discussions (if necessary), prior to issuance of the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) request or for efficiency.

If Offerors are excluded from the competitive range they may request a debriefing IAW FAR 15.505.

DISCUSSIONS

It is the Government’s intent to award without discussions; therefore, it is imperative that offeror’s submit their best terms initially. However, if during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs), and the Final Proposal Revisions (FPRs) will be considered in making the source selection decision.

PRE-AWARD SURVEY

The Government may conduct a pre-award survey (PAS) as part of this source selection. Results of the PAS (if conducted) will be evaluated to determine each offeror’s capability to meet the requirements of the solicitation.

PLANT VISITS

In the event discussions are necessary, plant visits may be conducted during the evaluation phase to develop knowledge for judging the potential for correction of the deficiencies.

SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS, TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors to be eligible for award. Any aspect of the proposal judged to be unacceptable would renter the entire proposal unacceptable. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the Offeror being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale.

EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR AWARD

IAW FAR 13.106-2(b), 14.201-5(c), and 15.204-5(c) For the purpose of award, offers will be evaluated for acceptability of evaluation factors described below:

FACTOR 1: Price/Cost Factor FACTOR 2: Technical Factor

A. ORDER OF IMPORTANCE

Factor 1 (Price/Cost) and Factor 2 (Technical) are of equal importance.

B. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY

Price will be evaluated first and the proposals will be listed from lowest to highest price. After price is evaluated the technical acceptability evaluation will begin; starting with the lowest evaluated priced offeror. The first proposal evaluated as technically acceptable will be considered the best value proposal and all other technical evaluations will cease. This means that all offers may not be completely evaluated. Only those offeror’s determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions will be considered for award. The technical factor rating depicts acceptable and unacceptable.

FACTOR 1: Price/Cost Factor

(1) The quantity utilized for evaluation will be based on the total quantity required at time of award by the Government Requirements group. The offeror’s price/cost proposal will be evaluated for award purposes by multiplying the proposed unit price by the quantity desired by the Government to determine the contractor’s total price.

(2) The proposed prices will be evaluated for reasonableness. Analysis of cost/price proposals will be performed using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR 15.404-1 in order to determine price reasonableness. Reasonableness must represent a price to the Government a prudent person would pay in the conduct of competitive business. Normally, price reasonableness is established through adequate price competition, but may also be determined through cost and price analysis techniques as described in FAR 15.404.

(3) The Government may reject any proposal that is evaluated to be unreasonable in terms of program commitments, contract terms and conditions, or unreasonable cost when compared to Government estimates, such that the proposal is deemed to reflect an inherent lack of competence or failure to comprehend the complexity and risks of the program.

(4) Offerors are cautioned against submitting an offer that contains unbalanced pricing. Unbalanced pricing may increase performance risk and could result in payment or unreasonably high prices. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly over or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques. The Government shall analyze offers to determine whether they are unbalanced with respect to separately priced line items or subline items. Offers that are determined to be unbalancedmay be rejected if the contracting officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the government.

Factor 2: Technical

(1) Technical proposals are not required. Technical acceptability will be determined based on the offeror’s compliance with the requirements as stated in Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs section and/or any referenced specifications, engineering notes and all other attachments herein.

(2) The delivery schedule will be evaluated based on the dates established in Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs section of the solicitation. It should be noted that the Government’s required delivery is based on the Requirements’ need date, and may not be attainable. Therefore, if a proposed delivery does not meet the Government’s required delivery, the proposed delivery may be considered responsive.

(3) Technical acceptability will be ascertained based on one of the ratings described below. Proposals will be evaluated for compliance with the solicitation; receipt of a responsive proposal to deliver the supplies in accordance with the solicitation, and/or any referenced specifications in the solicitation.