J&A_SPRRA116R0078-Redacted.pdf

PDF 621 KB Posted

Attached to
GRIP ASSY CONTRO, 1680-01-551-1574
Solicitation number
sprra1-16-r-0291
Issued by

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AVN Form S53 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 1

JUSTIFICATION FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

FOR SOLE SOURCE AND LIMITED COMPETITION

1. Agency: _________________________________________ Contracting Activity: _______________________________________ Document Identification Number: _______________________ Solicitation Number: _______________________________________

FAR Part 15 FAR Part 12 FAR Part 13.5

2. The action being approved is the acquisition of supplies/services on other than a full and open competition basis.

New Action Amendment: _______________________________________________________

3. The supplies/services required to meet the using activity’s needs are described as follows:

BRIEF DESCRIPTION NSN/PN QUANTITY ESTIMATED VALUE

*If too numerous, attach list of NSNs and AMSC codes.

This acquisition:

will not include an option.

will include a ______% option for increased quantity. Total estimated dollar value of option quantity is $____________.

will include an option to extend the term of the contract for a period of _______ months, exercisable in increments of

_______ months. Total estimated dollar value of all option periods is $___________________. The maximum dollar value of all option periods is $___________________.

The total estimated dollar value of this acquisition is: (inclusive of any options) $ ___________ The maximum dollar value of this acquisition is: (inclusive of any options) $ _________

4. The statutory authority permitting other than full and open competition is 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(1) – Available from only one or limited number of sources.

5. The acquisition is restricted to the only source(s) of supply known to have the capability of furnishing the required supplies/services. Source(s) are:

CAGE COMPANY NAME

The use of authority 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(1) is based on:

AMC 1. Suitable for competitive acquisition for the second or subsequent time.

AMC 2. Suitable for competitive acquisition for the first time.

AMC 3. Acquire, for the second or subsequent time, directly from the manufacturer.

AMC 4. Acquire, for the first time, directly from the manufacturer.

AMC 5. Acquire directly from the sole source contractor, who is not the manufacturer.

AMSC A. The Government’s right to use data in its possession is questionable. This code is under review and will be updated when the review is complete.

AMSC B. This must be acquired from a manufacturing source(s) specified on a source control drawing.

AMSC C. This part required engineering source approval by the design control activity in order to maintain the quality of the part.

AMSC D. The data needed to acquire this part is not economically available.

AMSC H. The Government does not have sufficient, accurate, or legible data to purchase this part from other than the current source. This code is under review and will be updated when the review is complete.

Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) - Huntsville AHAC

AX6C0173AX SPRRA1-16-R-0078

GRIP ASSEMBLY 1680-01-551-1574/Part # 724ES029-1 66 EACH/179 EACH

3 Year IDIQ

77272

81579

The Boeing Company

Mason Electric Company

SPRRA1-16-R-0078

AVN Form S53 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 3

Other: ___________________________________________________________________________________________

10. A listing of sources, if any, indicating an interest in writing in the acquisition are: (if none, state none)

CAGE COMPANY NAME

11. The actions, being taken to overcome barriers to competition before any subsequent acquisition are made: (Explain)

APPROVAL

APPROVAL LEVELS OF THE JUSTIFICATION – FAR 6.304

not exceeding $ 0,000…………………………… ……. Contracting Officer over $ ,000 not exceeding $1 ,500,000………………… Competition Advocate

TECHNICAL/REQUIREMENTS PERSONNEL CERTIFICATION – FAR 6.302-2(c) pporting data that is the responsibility of technical or requirements personnel and which form the basis for this justification have been

DLA COUNSEL AVIATION – DLAD 1.691(e)(ii) DLA Counsel Aviation has reviewed this Form S53 and concluded i creates a legally sufficient justification for restricting competition pursuant to 10 U.S.C.

2304(c)(1) and FAR 6.302-1 in acquisitions for NSNs in the federal supply system.

CONTRACTING OFFICER – FAR 6.303-2(b)(12) I hereby certify that the information contained in this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. If not exceeding $ 0,000, this signature serves as the approval.

Name and Title Signature Phone Date

COMPETITION ADVOCATE – FAR 6.304(a)(2) The Competition Advocate for the procuring activity designated pursuant to FAR 6.501 has reviewed and approved this Justification for a proposed contract over $ 0,000 but not exceeding $1 .5 million.

Name and Title Signature Phone Date

NONE

Firms are encouraged to seek source approval in order to compete for future solicitations by accessing he website www.amcomdmx redstone.army.mil/casl_cmo/casl_cmo_home on looking under Standardization Aviation and Missile Source Approval request (SAMSAR). Currently, there are no outstanding qualification requests on this item; however, this is a continuous method of identifying potential new sources of supply.

t has been determined that the Government's needs cannot be met by an item available in the commercial marketplace, therefore, FAR Part 12 will not be used. This is a spare part procured to an approved part number and is a military unique requirement not available in the commercial market place. No responses were received from the sources sought.

Lindy Grays, Contracting Officer February 24, 2016

Harriett Reddrick, Competition Advocate 25 February 2016

SPRRA1-16-R-0078

File details come from the government source that posted it.