SPM4A816Q0005.pdf

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 1 of 33 gpd0116 Typewritten Text 10/07/2015

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 2 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 3 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 4 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 5 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 6 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 7 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 8 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 9 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 10 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 11 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 12 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 13 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 14 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 15 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 16 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 17 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 18 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 19 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 20 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 21 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 22 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 23 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 24 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 25 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 26 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 27 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 28 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 29 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 30 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 31 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 32 of 33

SPM4A816Q0005 Page 33 of 33

SPM4A8-16-Q-0005 /DLA-VICA/Odemaris Garcia

* RETURN DIRECTLY TO THE GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT OFFICE AT FAX NO. 804-279-5948

OR VIA EMAIL AT DSCR.IPEWEB@DLA.MIL. *

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Defense Logistics Agency - Aviation is collecting past performance information on the company listed below as part of its best value determination on an active procurement. Please complete the evaluation and return directly to the Government. The information is considered sensitive and will not be released to the Offeror.

Company (Offeror) Name:_______________________________________________

Address:_____________________________________________________________

RATING SCALE: Please use the following ratings to answer the questions, by placing an “X” in the appropriate box.

If you are unable to rate an item because it was not a requirement, never an issue, or you have no knowledge of the item in question, then you should mark “NA.”

EVALUATION CRITERIA:

Exceptional - The company’s performance was consistently superior. Performance was entirely favorable and you wouldn’t hesitate to do business with them again.

Very Good - The company’s performance was better than average, and you would willingly do business with them again. The contractual performance was mostly favorable and corrective actions, if any, that were taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory - The company’s performance was adequate for the project and you would consider doing business with them again. There were minor performance problems which were corrected.

Marginal – The company’s performance was below average and you would be hesitant to do business with them again. There were some significant performance issues and the vendor had some difficulty taking corrective action.

Unsatisfactory – The company’s performance was entirely unsatisfactory and you would not do business with them again under any circumstances. There were serious performance issues with the contractor and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

Neutral—No record exists.

FOR AREAS INDICATING EITHER EXCEPTIONAL OR UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE, PLEASE PROVIDE AN

EXPLANATION IN THE COMMENTS SECTION OF THE SURVEY.

QUALITY OF PRODUCT Neutral Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good

Exceptional

Provided a service that conformed to contract requirements, specs, and standards of good workmanship.

Submitted accurate reports.

Utilized personnel appropriate to the effort performed.

COST CONTROL Neutral Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very

Exceptional

Performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.

Submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

Demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.

Actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.

SCHEDULE Neutral Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very

Exceptional

Tasks were performed in a timely manner and within the period of performance of the contract.

SPM4A8-16-Q-0005 /DLA-VICA/Odemaris Garcia

* RETURN DIRECTLY TO THE GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT OFFICE AT FAX NO. 804-279-5948

OR VIA EMAIL AT DSCR.IPEWEB@DLA.MIL. *

Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS Neutral Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very

Exceptional

Demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

Maintained an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) or technical POC were apprised of technical, cost, and scheduling issues.

Presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.

Promptly notified the COR, technical POC, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.

Cooperated in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.

Demonstrated effective management of its subcontractors

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION Neutral Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very

Exceptional

Products/services adequately met the needs of the contract.

Contractor was able to perform with minimal or no direction from the COR or technical

POC.

I am satisfied with the performance of the contractor.

Expectation that we would award another contract to this firm.

Was the contract terminated for default? [ ] Yes [ ] No. If you answered yes, provide an explanation:

COMMENTS: (Required for all EXCEPTIONAL and UNSATISFACTORY ratings)

TYPE OF EQUIPMENT/SERVICE PROVIDED: _______________________________________________________

MANUFACTURER/ MODEL NUMBER OF THE EQUIPMENT:

THIS EVALUATION WAS COMPLETED BY:

BUSINESS NAME:______________________________ POINT OF CONTACT:__________________________

ADDRESS: _________________________________________________________________________________

PHONE: _________________________________ EMAIL: __________________________________________

SIGNATURE: _____________________________________________ DATE: __________________________