SF30_SPE7M115R00230001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

See Block 14

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE SPE7M1 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SPE7M115R0023

X

2015 NOV 16

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of OffersX X is extended, is not extended.

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, X is required to sign this document and return 1 copies to issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning

DLA LAND AND MARITIME

MARITIME SUPPLY CHAIN

PO BOX 3990

COLUMBUS OH 43218-3990

15C. DATE SIGNED 16C. DATE SIGNED

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

11/17/2015

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

Opening/Closing Date Changed to:

2015 NOV 16 / 2015 DEC 16

TIME 3:00 PM

See Attached Continuation Sheet(s).

(X)

CHECK ONE

PAGE OF PAGES

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

13. THIS APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE

Amendment 0001 reopens the solicitation effective November 17, 2015, with closing date as follows: December 17, 2015: 3:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time

The sections identified in the subject solicitation are hereby added, deleted or replaced with the requirements and corresponding solicitation sections on the subsequent pages of the Amendment herein.

Page 2 of Original Solicitation:

SECTION A - GENERAL INFORMATION FOR OFFERORS

Paragraph 1 replaced with:

1. The scope of the contract consists of NSNs 2510015601159 and 2510015612540. Split Award Contracts are possible. Due to high quantity and repetitive demands on past buys, the Government may place a maximum of two awards. This initiative is for Indefinite Quantity Contract(s), which will provide DLA-Direct coverage (stocked by DLA) throughout the Continental United States—CONUS.

Paragraph 3 replaced with:

3. The proposals received in response to this solicitation will be evaluated under “Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA)” source selection procedures in accordance with (IAW) FAR 15.101-2 as described in Section M.

Please note that all pages of the solicitation must be completed and returned to the Bid Room.

The Government may elect to make a split award by awarding two contracts under this solicitation in order to maintain multiple viable manufacturing sources to preserve competition. If a split award is made for these NSNs, the Government baseline requirements is to order quantities via the percentage allocations for each delivery order. In the event an LTC vendor is unable to perform on a delivery order in accordance with its applicable split award allocation, the Contracting Officer may issue a delivery order to the other split award LTC vendor that is in excess of that LTC. Compliance to the split allocation will be measured over the contract term on a yearly basis. Orders authorized by the Contracting Officer under this paragraph to a single (i.e., the other) LTC vendor shall not count towards the percentage allocation requirements of that LTC vendor’s contract.

Page 3 of Original Solicitation:

SECTION B – SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES

See Attachment B-1 Section B Pricing, Delivery, and Packaging Spreadsheet

EXPLANATION OF PRICING TAB Replaced with:

Pricing – Prices shall be FOB Origin and shall include applicable packaging costs. Price columns are set up for the First Year only. The base period consists of three years, but each of the years is individually priced.

Offeror’s Unit Prices: (Offeror fill-in) In the event an offeror opts to not propose on a specific percentage of ADQ, the offeror should so indicate by stating “No Bid” for the percentage ADQ. The proposal will not be evaluated for that split. An offerors decision to enter a no bid for a certain percentage ADQ will not preclude its proposal from being considered for an award. The pricing must include packaging as specified in PIDs (Procurement Item Descriptions) in this solicitation. Delivery is specified by clause DLAD 52.211-9054 (Delivery Tab on Section B spreadsheet).

YEAR 2-5 Percentages: (Offeror fill-in) Please propose a percentage increase/decrease for each of the

PAGE 2 OF 9 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

SPE7M115R0023-0001

subsequent years. This percentage is used to adjust the unit prices annually for each of the subsequent years.

After application of the percentage increases, the results will be rounded to the nearest cent. For the Year 2, these percentages will be applied to the Year 1 prices. For the Year 3, these percentages will be applied to the Year 2 prices, and so on.

COLUMN NAME - EXPLANATION

CLIN - Solicitation Line Item.

NSN - National Stock Number.

Nomenclature - Name of Item.

UI - Unit of Issue.

ADQ - Annual Demand Quantity OFFEROR’S UNIT PRICE (100% of ADQ) – Offeror’s price for the specified quantity of ADQ and the equivalent proportion of future Government demands for the NSN.

OFFEROR’S UNIT PRICE (60% of ADQ) – Offeror’s price for the specified quantity of ADQ and the equivalent proportion of future Government demands for the NSN.

OFFEROR’S UNIT PRICE (50% of ADQ) – Offeror’s price for the specified quantity of ADQ and the equivalent proportion of future Government demands for the NSN.

OFFEROR’S UNIT PRICE (40% of ADQ) – Offeror’s price for the specified quantity of ADQ and the equivalent proportion of future Government demands for the NSN.

Page 5 of Original Solicitation:

CONTRACT QUANTITY LIMITATIONS Replaced with:

CONTRACT QUANTITY LIMITATIONS

Split awards – The Government anticipates making split awards (awards for the same NSNs) as a result of this solicitation. If split awards are made, the contract minimum for each award during the contract period* will be a proportion of the overall minimum cited below. For example, if two awards are made at a 60/40 split the Government is obligated to purchase 60% of the minimum from the one awardee and 40% from the other. Regardless of the number of awards made under this solicitation, the Government may order, and each awardee is obligated to deliver, up to the maximum cited below:

The contract minimum will be $95,862.43, which is the total of the minimum estimates for all NSNs. The minimum estimate for each NSN is calculated as three(3) per cent of the estimated annual demand value for each item.

The contract maximum during the contract period* will be $31,954,143.60.

*Note: Contract period as defined in this clause means the extended contract shall be inclusive of any/all option periods.

The Government is obligated to order only the minimum quantity or dollar figure stated above.

Page 14 of Original Solicitation:

Delete 52.211-9033 Packaging and Marking Requirements (Apr 2008) DLAD

Page 15 of Original Solicitation:

Delete 52.211-9020 Time of Delivery – Accelerated (Jun 2008) DLAD

Replace 52.211-9054 Time of Delivery – Negotiated IQCs and Simplified Acquisitions for IDPOs (NOV 2011) DLAD with:

Proc STO 211-9054 TIME OF DELIVERY- CONTRACTS (SEPT 2015)

TIME OF DELIVERY- CONTRACTS

PAGE 3 OF 9 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

(a) The time of delivery of supplies to be furnished under any delivery order issued under this contract shall be stated in the order. The Government reserves the right to request phased delivery within the limits of the applicable schedule set forth below.

(b) Delivery is required in accordance with the schedule set forth below.

Within the number of days stated below after date of delivery order National Stock Numbers (NSNS) Quantity (that may be ordered any calendar month) Government required Offeror’s proposed

See Section B-1 Delivery Tab for all below information.

_______ Up to ___________ each ___________ ___________ Each additional _________ each (or less) add: ___________ ___________ ________ Up to _______________each ___________ ___________ Each additional _________ each (or less) add: ___________ ___________ ________ Up to _______________ each ___________ ___________ Each additional _________ each (or less) add: ___________ ___________ ________ Up to _______________ each ___________ ___________ Each additional _________ each (or less) ADD: ___________ ___________

(c) Unless otherwise specified above, your proposal will be deemed to offer delivery in accordance with the required schedule. The Government may elect to consider for award only those proposals which comply with the required schedule but reserves the right to consider proposals which exceed the required schedule. You are therefore encouraged to submit a proposal even if you cannot comply with the required delivery schedule. If you can comply with the required delivery schedule but could offer better prices for a longer schedule, you may submit two (2) or more proposals on each item. The Government reserves the right to make awards on the basis of offerors’ proposed delivery schedules.

(d) Delivery orders will be mailed or otherwise furnished to the Contractor on or before the day the order is dated. Therefore, in computing time available to perform each order, the Contractor must take into consideration the time required for the delivery order to arrive through ordinary mail.

(e) In the event this solicitation provides for a partial set-aside for Small Business, and the set-aside portion is awarded to the same firm that received the award of the non-set-aside portion, then the quantities shown above will be doubled.

(End of Text)

Page 24 of Original Solicitation:

Replace 52.215-9013 Production Facility Changes (Nov 2011) DLAD with:

Proc STO 215-9013 PRODUCTION FACILITY CHANGES (SEPT 2015)

(a) The performance of any of the work contracted for in any place other than that named in the contract is prohibited unless specifically approved by the Contracting Officer. Written requests for a change in production facilities must be submitted in writing to the Contracting Officer. Changes in production facilities may be approved, provided:

(1) Performance by small business or in labor surplus areas as required by the contract will not be changed;

(2) The change will not cause a delay in delivery or necessitate a change in the purchase description;

(3) The free on board (f.o.b.) point is not changed; and

(4) Each request is supported by a price reduction of $250.00 to cover the Government's administrative costs to process the change.

(b) The Government reserves the right to deny approval even if these four elements are met.

(End of Text)

PAGE 4 OF 9 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

Delete 52.215-9016 Notice to Contractors and Defense Finance Accounting Services (DFAS) (Nov 2011) DLAD

Delete 52.216-9017 Single or Multiple Awards (NOV 2011) DLAD

Page 29 of Original Solicitation:

Delete 52.232-9010 Accelerated Payments to Small Business (Apr 2014) DLAD

Page 30 of Original Solicitation:

Delete 52.248-9001 Exemption from Value Engineering (Sep 2008)

Page 38 of Original Solicitation:

Replace 52.215-9008 Facsimile Bids and Proposals (Nov 2011) DLAD with:

Proc STO 215-9008 FACSIMILE PROPOSALS (SEPT 2015)

(a) Facsimile proposals, amendments (including final proposal revisions (FPRs)), and withdrawals will be considered only if authorized in the solicitation by Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.215-5, Facsimile Proposals (Section L). Fax machines should be programmed to include the telephone number as the distant station identification (ID). This information is required to assist in properly documenting receipt.

(b) Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Internet Bid Board System (DIBBS). DIBBS does not permit facsimile proposals. Facsimile proposals in response to DIBBS solicitations will be rejected and returned to the offeror.

(c) The telephone number of the receiving facsimile equipment is 614-692-4275. For proposal security reasons facsimile equipment is not located in the place designated for receipt of offers. Regular interoffice pick-up of facsimile transmissions occurs daily. Proposals, amendments to proposals, withdrawals of proposals, and final proposal revisions (FPRs) received by facsimile equipment prior to 3:00 PM Eastern Time on the day of closing will be presumed to have been received on time.

(End of Text)

Page 39 of Original Solicitation:

Delete 52.215-9010 All or None (Invitation for Bid (IFB)/Request for Proposal (RFP) Only) (Nov 2011) DLAD

Page 40 of Original Solicitation:

Delete 52.211-9011 Business Systems Modernization (BSM) Delivery Terms and Evaluation (May 2006) DLAD

Page 41 of Original Solicitation:

Delete 52.21-9013 Evaluation of Offers for Indefinite Delivery Type Solicitations (Nov 2011) DLAD

SECTION L (Continued) (Attachment #4 to Original Solicitation)

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

Entire Section replaced with:

Proposals will be evaluated on the basis of price and non-price evaluation factors in accordance with the evaluation criteria contained in Section M of this solicitation. Offerors should thoroughly read and

PAGE 5 OF 9 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

understand the terms and conditions contained in the solicitation. Failure to provide any information requested in the solicitation, may render the offeror’s proposal technically unacceptable and preclude it from any further consideration for contract award. Offerors should ensure that the information contained in their proposal is factual, accurate and complete. If the Government accepts the proposal, it will contractually bind the successful offeror to the terms and conditions of the solicitations.

In addition to price, the Government will evaluate non-price factors in accordance with the evaluation criteria contained in the solicitation. These factors are deemed essential in order to determine the offer that best meets the Government’s needs.

The Government is conducting a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable source selection in accordance with (IAW) FAR 15.101-2. All offers will be evaluated to determine technically acceptability. As these NSNs have been determined split award candidates, award decision will be made to the technically acceptable source(s) IAW the evaluation factors cited in Section M of this solicitation.

1. PRICE:

Offerors shall submit a pricing proposal for the item(s) identified in the request for proposal’s (RFP’s) supplies with the offeror’s insertions of its proposed prices for each contract line item on which the offeror is making a proposal.

2. PAST PERFORMANCE:

Performance Risk will be assessed based on delivery history and quality history obtained from the Past Performance Information Retrieval System Statistical Reporting (PPIRS-SR) for the applicable category of goods being procured using the Federal Supply Class (FSC) and/or the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code.

Past Performance Information Retrieval System – Statistical Reporting (PPIRS-SR):

PPIRS- SR provides past delivery and quality performance information. The sources of data include: the Department of Navy’s Product Data Reporting and Evaluation Program (PDREP), the Army's Logistics Modernization Program - Virtual Contracting Enterprise Reporting and Delinquency System (LMP-VCERADS), the Air Force’s JO18 (Delivery) and GO21 (Deficiency Reporting Information System), the Joint Deficiency Reporting System (JDRS) for joint Services aviation PQDRs, and DLA’s Supplier Relationship Management (SRM). PPIRS-SR classifications are based on the Federal Supply Class (FSC) or North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), are calculated monthly based upon 3 years of data, and are comprised of a Delivery Score and a Quality Color Ranking.

(a) Delivery Score The contractor’s delivery performance will be based on a weighted combination of the percentage of contract line items with on-time deliveries and the average days late for all deliveries.

(b) Quality Color Ranking Quality Color Ranking is based upon color/percentile groups. Contractor quality performance is based on a comparison among all contractors within an FSC. Contractor quality assessments are evaluated as follows:

Color Percent Group Dark Blue High Five Percent Purple Next 10 Percent Green Next 70 Percent Yellow Next 10 Percent Red Last Five Percent Dark Blue, Purple, and Green are evaluated approximately equal and more favorably than Yellow. Yellow is evaluated more favorably than Red

PAGE 6 OF 9 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

See DLAD provision 52.215-9003, Use of Past Performance Information Retrieval System- Statistical Reporting for additional information. For further details concerning PPIRS-SR classification calculations and contractor data challenge procedures, see user guides under References at http://www.ppirs.gov/

3. DELIVERY:

See Section F of the solicitation for time, place and method of delivery or performance.

SECTION M (continued) (Attachment #5 to Original Solicitation

EVALUATION FACTOR FOR AWARD

Entire Section replaced with:

General Basis for Award:

Single or Split Awards: More than one award may be made under this solicitation to maintain multiple viable manufacturing sources to enhance competition. The Government will award to the Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) or the Lowest Priced combination of technically acceptable offers in which both offers prices are determined fair and reasonable. All proposals will be evaluated to determine that the offered price(s) are fair and reasonable.

Evaluation Factors:

An offeror must meet or exceed the minimum requirements of the following factors to be eligible for award:

• Material Requirement Factor

• Delivery Requirement Factor

• Past Performance

1. PRICE:

A. The evaluated price for year one of the base period shall be arrived at by multiplying the Government’s estimated annual demand quantity (ADQ) by the offered unit price by the applicable portion of the split (i.e., if the total estimated ADQ for NSN is 100 units and Firm A offers on a 60% split, the estimated ADQ used to calculate Firm A’s evaluated price for the NSN will be 60 units).

B. The Government intends to make two awards to maintain multiple viable manufacturing sources to enhance competition based on the evaluation of the price combination of acceptable offerors totaling 100% of the requirement (i.e., either a 60%-40% split OR a 50%-50% split) that results in awards to two different offerors. The total price for the 60%-40% split combination will be determined by selecting the lowest priced offer for the 60% split and then from the remaining offers select the lowest price for the 40% split. The total price for the 50%-50% split combination will be determined by selecting the two lowest priced offers for that split. The 60/40 split combination and the 50/50 split combination will be compared and award will be made to the lowest priced combination of offers in which both offers are determined fair and reasonable.

C. Pricing for each split-award offer will be compared to the lowest price proposal for 100% of the requirement solely to evaluate whether it is reasonable for the Government to award split. If no combination of split-award proposals can be found fair and reasonably priced, the Government will award to the lowest priced proposal for 100% of the requirement.

D. Evaluation of Offers – Contractor First Article Testing: The cost to the Government to review the contractor’s first article test report shall be a factor in evaluation of the price. The Government’s review cost will be added to the offered price of the applicable item. Unless cited elsewhere in this solicitation, PAGE 7 OF 9 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

the costs are as follows: $200.00 for an internal review plus $950.00 for each engineering support activity (ESA) review. ESA reviews are required if the items being acquired are identified as critical application items or critical safety items.

E. The Government will evaluate offered prices on the basis of fairness and reasonableness.

F. The Government may determine that a proposal is unacceptable if the prices proposed on different splits (100%, 60%, 50%, or 40%) are materially unbalanced between one another. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable evaluated price at 100%, the price of one or more of the remaining splits is significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques.

An offer may not be considered for award of an NSN if the Contracting Officer determines that the offeror’s pricing for the NSN is unbalanced.

2. Subjective judgement on the part of the Contracting Officer during evaluations is implicit throughout this source selection. Each non-price factor will be assigned a rating of “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” based on whether the proposal meets the basic minimum requirements delineated further. A rating of “Acceptable” shall be required for all non-price factors for a proposal to be considered for award.

“Acceptable” is defined as meeting the RFP requirements; “Unacceptable” is defined as not meeting the RFP requirements.

3. MATERIAL REQUIREMENT: The offeror must propose to the EXACT item required by the Government as indicated in the Procurement Item Description (PID). If the offeror is not proposing to provide the EXACT item requested by the Government; the offeror will not be eligible for award, unless the proposed item is added to the PID by amendment prior to the date set for final proposal revisions.

4. DELIVERY REQUIREMENT: The offeror must propose a delivery timeframe for the NSN that meets the Government’s delivery requirements as indicated in the Delivery Tab on the Section B spreadsheet. Any ramp up time requested, will not be counted against the company’s proposed delivery time frame. Failure to meet the Government’s delivery may preclude consideration of the proposal any further.

5. PAST PERFORMANCE: Past performance includes but is not limited to, the offeror’s record of conforming to specifications, to the standards of good workmanship, adherence to contract schedules, commitment to customer satisfaction, and cooperative behavior. The Government will use the Past Performance Information Retrieval System – Statistical Reporting (PPIRS-SR) for evaluation.

Past Performance Information Retrieval System – Statistical Reporting (PPIRS-SR):

The Government will use the offeror’s PPIRS-SR score/ranking to determine acceptability of Past Performance.

Evaluation of PPIRS-SR delivery assessments will be based upon a numerical scale ranging from 0 (low) to 100 (high). To be considered “Acceptable,” the offeror must have a delivery score of 70 or higher. Any delivery score below 70 will deem the offer technically unacceptable. If no delivery records are found in PPIRS-SR, no delivery score will be assigned to the offeror for that specific FSC. A color of green, purple or dark blue for Quality performance will be considered “Acceptable.” Quality ratings with colors yellow and red will deem the offer technically unacceptable.

In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available in the PPIRS-SR, the offeror will be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably on past performance.

For further details concerning PPIRS-SR classification calculations and contractor data challenge procedures, see user guides under References at http://www.ppirs.gov/.

PAGE 8 OF 9 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

SECTION J - LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

List of Attachments

Description File Name ATTACH.Amend 0001 to Att B-1

CL15056001 HV

SUPER KIDS 1159 AND

2540 - Jo

PAGE 9 OF 9 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED: