Section_L-_Tailorable_Template_17R0088_NEW.doc
DOC document 49 KB Posted
- Attached to
- STORAGE BATTERIES
- Solicitation number
- SPE7LX17R0088
About this file
Section L 17R0088
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Section_B--code_and_part_number17R0088.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| SF1449_SPE7LX17R0088.pdf | ||
| Section_M-_Tailorable_Template_17R0088_NEW.doc | DOC document | |
| Section_D_Packaging_17R0088.pdf | ||
| Section_I_Clauses_17R0088.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CONTINUATION SHEET
REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED
PAGE
OF
SECTION L (continued)
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS
Proposals will be evaluated in terms of both price and other evaluation factors in accordance with the evaluation criteria contained in this solicitation. Offerors should thoroughly read and understand the terms and conditions contained in the solicitation. Failure to provide any information requested in the solicitation, may render the offeror’s proposal technically unacceptable and preclude it from any further consideration for contract award. Offerors should ensure that the information contained in their proposal is factual, accurate and complete. If the Government accepts the offer, it will contractually bind the successful offeror to the terms and conditions of the solicitations.
In addition to price, the Government will evaluate other business/technical factors in accordance with the evaluation criteria contained in the solicitation. These factors are deemed essential in order to determine the offer that best meets the Government’s needs.
1. PRICE:
Offerors shall submit a pricing proposal for the item(s) identified in the request for proposal (RFP), which may include supplies, tests, data, manuals, etc.
2. PAST PERFORMANCE:
Performance Risk will be assessed based on delivery history and quality history obtained from the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS), formerly known as PPIRS-SR, for the applicable category of goods being procured using the Federal Supply Class (FSC) and/or the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code. The Government may also consider general trends of a vendor in the areas of on-time delivery and/or quality that may not be reflected in SPRS for the particular FSC/NAICS and information from various other sources such as, contracting agency experience with the contractor, previous contract history available from DCMA, etc..
If negative information from sources other than SPRS or the contracting agency’s own experience impacts the evaluation, the affected offeror will be given the opportunity to discuss that information.
Award(s) will be made to the company(s) whose proposal(s) are determined to be the best value to the Government. The Government reserves the right to award to other than the lowest priced proposal or the highest rated (lowest risk) offer.
Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS):
SPRS provides past delivery and quality performance information. The sources of data include: the Department of Navy’s Product Data Reporting and Evaluation Program (PDREP), the Army's Logistics Modernization Program - Virtual Contracting Enterprise Reporting and Delinquency System (LMP-VCERADS), the Air Force’s JO18 (Delivery) and GO21 (Deficiency Reporting Information System), the Joint Deficiency Reporting System (JDRS) for joint Services aviation PQDRs, and DLA’s Supplier Relationship Management (SRM). SPRS classifications are based on the Federal Supply Class (FSC) or North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), are calculated monthly based upon 3 years of data, and are comprised of a Delivery Score and a Quality Color Ranking.
(a) Delivery Score The contractor’s delivery performance will be based on a weighted combination of the percentage of contract line items with on-time deliveries and the average days late for all deliveries.
(b) Quality Color Ranking Quality Color Ranking is based upon color/percentile groups. Contractor quality performance is based on a comparison among all contractors within an FSC. Contractor quality assessments are evaluated as follows:
| Color |
| Percent Group |
| Dark Blue |
| High Five Percent |
| Purple |
| Next 10 Percent |
| Green |
| Next 70 Percent |
| Yellow |
| Next 10 Percent |
| Red |
| Last Five Percent |
Dark Blue is evaluated more favorably than Purple
Purple is evaluated more favorably that Green
Green is evaluated more favorably than Yellow
Yellow is evaluated more favorably than Red See DLAD Procurement Note, L08 Use of Past Performance Information Retrieval System—Statistical Reporting (Pending note name change to ‘Supplier Performance
Risk System (SPRS))’ in Past Performance Evaluations for additional information. For further details concerning SPRS classification calculations and contractor data challenge procedures, see user guides under References at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil Other Past Performance Information:
The offeror may provide past performance information, as follows, for consideration along with the offeror’s ratings/rankings from automated systems, in evaluating past performance:
(a) A list of contracts, commercial or government, performed within the past two years, limited to three (3) government and three (3) commercial contracts for the same or similar items. The offeror shall provide or include a point of contact (POC), address, telephone number, an average dollar amount of the contract per annum, the period of performance, and a sample listing of the items provided for under the commercial contracts. For any government contracts, provide the government agency, a (POC), telephone number, appropriate contract number, estimated dollar value of the contract, period of performance, and a sample listing of the items provided. The Government reserves the right to limit the number of references it decides to contact.
(b) A listing of any “problems” or discrepancies (includes shortages, overages, damages, defects, or misshipments, etc.) experienced within the past year for the contracts or customers reported in reference to paragraph 1a. Include a brief description of how these problems were addressed and remedied.
The offeror shall describe the extent of its past performance in the past two years for the contracts reported in response to paragraph (a) above for:
( ) Subcontracting with small, women-owned small business concerns
3. DELIVERY:
See Section F of the solicitation for time, place and method of delivery or performance.
DLA Land and Maritime (local template) – January 2018
File details come from the government source that posted it.