Section_M-_16X0046.doc

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED

PAGE

OF

SECTION M (continued)

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

General Basis for Award:

( ) Multiple Awards: The Government intends to make an award to the offeror that represents the best value to the Government. Additional awards for the same item or items may be made to offeror(s) representing the next best value(s). Award(s) will be made in the combination that will assure the Government needs in terms of delivery, quality, and price will be met during the life of the contract(s). However, the government will award no more than ____ contracts per NSN or CLIN groups as a result of the solicitation.

(X) Single or Split Awards: The award of each individual item of supply specified in this solicitation will be made to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation and is most advantageous to the Government. In making the best value determination, the Government will make a comparative assessment of the offerors.

All proposals will be evaluated to determine that the offered price(s) reflects a technical understanding of the requirement and those considered unrealistic may be rejected.

Evaluation Factors:

The Government will base the determination of best value on a comparative assessment of the offeror’s prices, past performance, and other evaluation factors as identified in this solicitation. The determination of best value also considers the relative importance of the evaluation factors. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined are:

(X) approximately equal to price; or ( ) significantly less important than price. As the evaluated price becomes more equal, relative importance of all other evaluation factors become more significant.

( ) significantly more important than price. As other evaluation factors become more equal, the evaluated price becomes more important.

The final award decision may be made through a trade-off between price and the non-price factors.

The following factors, ranked in descending order of importance, will be considered in the evaluation of proposals received under this solicitation:

1. Price

2. Past Performance

3. Proposed Delivery

1. PRICE:

The offered price will be evaluated as adjusted by price related evaluation factors identified in this solicitation and, if indicated, the following:

(X) DLAD 52.216-9013, Evaluation of Offers for Indefinite Delivery Type (IDT) Solicitations ( ) DLAD 52.216-9013, ALT I, Evaluation of Offers for IDT Solicitations ( ) Other (i.e. Government First Article Testing, Contractor First Article Testing, Data, etc.)

The Government will also evaluate the reasonableness of offered prices.

2. PAST PERFORMANCE:

Past performance includes but is not limited to, the offeror’s record of conforming to specifications, to the standards of good workmanship, adherence to contract schedules, commitment to customer satisfaction, and cooperative behavior. The Government will use the past performance evaluation factors marked below:

(X) Past Performance Information Retrieval System – Statistical Reporting (PPIRS-SR)

(X) Socioeconomic Support

(X) AbilityOne Entity Support

The Government may solicit information from an offeror’s customers and business associates; federal, state, and local government agencies; and from other persons and organizations as deemed necessary. The Government reserves the right to limit the number of references it decides to query and to contact references other than those provided by the offeror.

Past Performance Information Retrieval System – Statistical Reporting (PPIRS-SR):

The Government will consider the offeror’s PPIRS-SR score/ranking and any other information provided relating to the offeror’s performance (see Section L). Evaluation of PPIRS-SR delivery assessments will be based upon a numerical scale ranging from 0 (low) to 100 (high). If no delivery records are found in PPIRS-SR, no delivery score will be assigned to the offeror for that specific FSC. Quality performance will be assessed based upon relative ranking among all offerors within a given FSC.

In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available in the PPIRS-SR, the offeror will be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably on past performance.

For further details concerning PPIRS-SR classification calculations and contractor data challenge procedures, see user guides under References at http://www.ppirs.gov/ Socioeconomic Support and AbilityOne Support:

Performance will be considered on prior contracts for:

(X) Subcontracting with small, veteran-owned small, service-disabled veteran-owned small, HUBZone small, and women-owned small business concerns; and historically black colleges and universities, and minority institutions, including compliance with the requirements of FAR 52.219-8 - Utilization of Small Business Concerns, FAR 52.219-9 - Small Business Subcontracting Plan, and DFARS 252.219-7003 - Small, and Women-Owned Small Business Subcontracting Plan (DoD Contracts)

(X) AbilityOne entity support

3. PROPOSED DELIVERY:

Offerors will be evaluated based on their offered delivery as compared to the Government’s required delivery. Preference may be given for offered deliveries that are shorter than the required delivery.

UCF SECTION M EVALUATION FACTOR FOR PREAWARD SURVEY: (SELF DELETING ON AWARD)

(a) Although a majority of awards are made without the necessity of conducting a preaward survey (PAS) of the proposed awardee, such a survey may be required to be conducted of those offerors listed in (1) through (5) below as follows. Firms or individuals that have:

(1) Been listed on the General Services Administration (GSA) list of parties excluded from federal procurement programs within the past 3 years from the date of solicitation opening or closing; or

(2) Undergone reorganization under bankruptcy laws within the past 3 years from the date of solicitation opening or closing, or are currently undergoing such reorganization; or

(3) Been known to the Contracting Officer to have a poor or marginal performance history; or

(4) Within the past year received a negative PAS for an item within the same federal supply class (FSC) as the item of supply, or for the same or similar service required under this solicitation; or

(5) Failed to liquidate indebtedness to DLA.

(b) As a consequence of the Government's cost incurrence associated with conducting a PAS, for purposes of determining the present responsibility of any offeror described in (a)(1) through (5) above and to ascertain the most advantageous offer received, price and other factors considered, the amount of $369, which is the average amount of the direct costs of performing the PAS, shall be added as an evaluation factor to such offeror's total offered price.

(c) Nothing in this provision affects the right of the Government to perform or not to perform a preaward survey on any offeror.

DLA Land and Maritime (local template) – March 2016