Attachment 7d.pdf

ATTACHMENT # Solicitation #

Page 1 of 6 As of: 10.24.2011 Once this document has been completed, the information contained becomes Source Selection Sensitive in accordance with FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (PPI) COLLECTION DOCUMENT – PART 4B

PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE – PRINCIPAL SUBCONTRACTOR

The offeror is solely responsible for ensuring all Past Performance Information (PPI) Collection documents are completed and received by the Government by the solicitation closing time and date.

Section 1

PRINCIPAL SUBCONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE THIS SECTION:

Name of offeror firm:

Principal Subcontractor Firm Name:

Principal Subcontractor Firm Address:

Principal Subcontractor Firm DUNS:

Principal Subcontractor Firm Email:

Principal Subcontractor Firm Phone:

Principal Subcontractor Firm FAX:

We are the proposed principal subcontractor for an offer on DLA Disposition Service’s Solicitation No.

__________________, closing time and date _____________________, to provide ________________________ services at ___________________________. As such, we have listed you as a reference for work performed by our firm for your firm/agency. Your input on our performance is therefore requested as follows:

1) Please complete Sections 2, 3a. and 3b. of this document (PART 4B) and submit the completed document (Sections 1, 2, 3a. and 3b.) as follows:

a. Either fax the completed document to: ATTENTION: ________________, Contracting ______________, at __________________ (fax number), OR provide a scanned copy of the completed document to: _______________, Contracting __________, at ________________________________________. The Government must receive the completed document no later than the solicitation closing time and date.

Thank you.

s9d4245 Highlight

Page 2 of 6 As of: 10.24.2011 Once this document has been completed, the information contained becomes Source Selection Sensitive in accordance with FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Section 2

PRINCIPAL SUBCONTRACTOR REFERENCE TO COMPLETE THIS SECTION:

Reference Contract Title: ____________________________________ Contract #: _____________________________ Reference POC Name: _______________________________ Role/Title for the Contract: _______________________ How Long in this Role: _____________________ Email: _______________________ Phone: ______________________ Firm/Agency Reference Works for: _____________________________________________________________________ Contract Performance Location: ________________________________________________________________________ Performance Start Date: __________________________ Contract Completion Date: ___________________________ Total Contract Dollar Value: $_______________________ Description of Contract Requirements:

Hazardous Material/ Waste Streams Involved and Quantities/Volumes Disposed and Recycled:

Location of Pickup Point(s) or Other Services: ____________________________________________________________ Frequency of Pickup(s) or Other Services (e.g. once a month): _______________________________________________ Allowable Response Time after Notification for Performance (e.g., 30 days): ____________________________________ Types of Documents Contractor was required to Provide/Process (i.e. manifests, waste profiles, permits, etc.):

Significant Risks in Performance of the Contract:

Did firm perform work as the prime contractor or as a subcontractor? ______________________________ If as prime contractor, complete Section A. below; if as subcontractor, complete Section B. below.

Section A. Type and extent of subcontracting utilized by the firm:

If yes, how well did the firm manage the subcontractor(s)?

Did the subcontractor(s) perform the bulk of the effort or just add depth on specific technical areas?

Why were the subcontractors chosen to work on specific technical areas, what were those areas, and why were they accomplished by the subcontractor(s) rather than the firm?

Section B. What work was performed by the firm? % of total contract performance

Page 3 of 6 As of: 10.24.2011 Once this document has been completed, the information contained becomes Source Selection Sensitive in accordance with FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Section 3a.

PRINCIPAL SUBCONTRACTOR REFERENCE TO COMPLETE THIS SECTION:

Based on the following adjectival ratings scale, please evaluate the quality of the contractor’s performance by selecting the appropriate ratings and applying to elements I through V on the following pages.

NOT

SCALE: APPLICABLE UNSATISFACTORY MARGINAL SATISFACTORY VERY GOOD EXCEPTIONAL

N/A 1 2 3 4 5

DEFINITIONS:

EXCEPTIONAL: Performance met and exceeded many contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD: Performance met and exceeded some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY: Performance met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL: Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY: Performance did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery in a timely manner is not likely. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective action(s) appear or was/were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE: Self-explanatory.

Page 4 of 6 As of: 10.24.2011 Once this document has been completed, the information contained becomes Source Selection Sensitive in accordance with FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

I. QUALITY OF PRODUCT/SERVICE

N/A 1 2 3 4 5

a. Compliance with contract requirements (to include regulatory compliance)

b. Accuracy of reports and documentation (e.g. manifests, bills of lading)

c. Manifesting and land disposal notifications (includes basal notifications)

d. Waste profiling

e. Compliance with transportation laws and regulations (DOT, maritime, foreign)

f. Packaging, labeling, and disposal

g. Demonstrated knowledge of hazardous waste laws and regulations

If assigning a rating of 2 or 1, please provide examples of how the contractor did not meet contract requirements:

If assigning a rating of 4 or 5, please provide examples of how the contractor exceeded contract requirements:

II. SCHEDULE

N/A 1 2 3 4 5

a. Adherence to transportation scheduling

b. Adherence to performance timeframes (removal of waste/Mgt services)

c. Adherence to performance timeframes (analysis)

d. Timeliness in submission of initial documentation/reports

e. Timeliness in submission of final documentation/reports

f. Advance notice and scheduling/receipt of correct and complete documents

If assigning a rating of 2 or 1, please provide examples of how the contractor did not meet contract requirements:

If assigning a rating of 4 or 5, please provide examples of how the contractor exceeded contract requirements:

III. BUSINESS RELATIONS

a. Professionalism of staff

b. Reasonable, cooperative, and courteous behavior

c. Prompt notification of problems

d. Flexible and productive in problem solving

e. Effective corrective actions

f. Customer satisfaction

If assigning a rating of 2 or 1, please provide examples of how the contractor did not meet contract requirements:

If assigning a rating of 4 or 5, please provide examples of how the contractor exceeded contract requirements:

Page 5 of 6 As of: 10.24.2011 Once this document has been completed, the information contained becomes Source Selection Sensitive in accordance with FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

IV. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

N/A 1 2 3 4 5

a. Sufficient allocation of resources to perform contract requirements

b. Effective placement of key personnel

c. Internal communications result in effective and efficient management

d. Responsiveness in problem resolution

If assigning a rating of 2 or 1, please provide examples of how the contractor did not meet contract requirements:

If assigning a rating of 4 or 5, please provide examples of how the contractor exceeded contract requirements:

V. UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS (as applicable)

a. Compliance with all negotiated Subcontracting Plan goals

b. Compliance with submission of timely, accurate, required Subcontracting

Plan reporting through eSRS

c. Compliance with the requirements of FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small

Business Concerns

d. Compliance with DLA Mentoring Business Agreement (MGA) goals

e. Compliance with submission of timely, accurate, required DLA MBA periodic progress reports

If assigning a rating of 2 or 1, please provide examples of how the contractor did not meet contract requirements:

If assigning a rating of 4 or 5, please provide examples of how the contractor exceeded contract requirements:

Section 3b.

PRINCIPAL SUBCONTRACTOR REFERENCE TO COMPLETE THIS SECTION:

Other Comments (to include overall comments regarding highly rated or poorly rated performance):

Would you recommend this contractor for potential future awards? (Please check one of the following)

_____ DEFINITELY WOULD

_____ PROBABLY WOULD

_____ MIGHT OR MIGHT NOT

_____ PROBABLY WOULD NOT

_____ DEFINITELY WOULD NOT

Page 6 of 6 As of: 10.24.2011 Once this document has been completed, the information contained becomes Source Selection Sensitive in accordance with FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

If you have checked anything other than DEFINITELY WOULD recommend, please explain why:

<End>