Amendment 0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

SP3300-21-Q-0003

AMENDMENT 0002

Amendment 0002 is hereby incorporated into Solicitation SP3300-21-Q-0003 and shall become part of any contract issued.

The purpose of this amendment is to answer contractor questions and to extend the due date for the submission of quotations from 16 November 2020 to 23 November 2020 at 1:00 PM EST.

1. Questions/Answers Question #1: Due to machine design, Dual tray delivery only possible for small parts below 8.85'' (225mm). Any parts higher than 8.85'' will not be able to have the dual function in the machine.

Will it be acceptable?

Answer #1: The Government is aware that the taller parts will not fit in the dual tray delivery.

Question #2: Would machine size of 21’2’' (6,450mm) tall x 14’12’’(4,570mm) wide x 10’1.7’’(3,092mm) deep with tray size of 13’2.5’’(4025mm) wide x 2’8’'(815mm) deep x 4.92’’(125mm) tall be acceptable?

Answer #2: No, this is not acceptable.

Question #3: Would Rack & Pinion drive system can be used instead of toothed belt drive?

Answer #3: Yes, whatever is the manufacturer's standard mechanism is acceptable.

Question #4: If Dual tray delivery does not require external tray delivery, is it acceptable?

Answer #4: No, this is not acceptable.

Question #5: Would Max. load capacity of 1433 lbs (650kg) per tray will be acceptable?

Answer #5: No, this is not acceptable.

Question #6: Metal divider with 5.9'' (150mm) x 6.88'' (175mm) or 7.87'' (200mm) x 6.88'' (175mm) with height 4.72''(120mm) would be acceptable?

Answer #6: Yes, that would be acceptable.

Question #7: Is it mandatory to have the operator console capable of being positioned anywhere across the side-to-side track of the machine opening? If it is not mandatory, is it ok to fix the console on left/right of the machine opening?

Answer #7: The sliding operators console is required.

Question #8: Since Inventory management capability is not stated as inclusive. Does the functionality need to be quoted as an option?

Answer #8: No.

Question #9: If the number of tray delivered per hour can be satisfied without the dual option, would it be possible to provide VLM without the dual tray option?

Answer #9: No.

SP3300-21-Q-0003

AMENDMENT 0002

Question #10: Can you recommend preferred electrical contractors that Camp Carroll has a good relationship with and who have completed work on base in the past?

Answer #10: Unfortunately, the Government cannot make any recommendations of sub-contractors. It is the contractor’s responsibility to assemble their own installation team.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

END OF AMENDMENT 0002

Amend 0001 Page 2

Acquisition Operations, J-7 Mifflin Avenue, Bldg 430 New Cumberland, PA 17070

717-770-5390 (P) Benjamin.Bailey@DLA.MIL