Sources Sought Notice for System Control Module.docx

Sources Sought Notice

PLEASE RETURN THIS COMPLETED SURVEY TO STANLEY BIERNACKI

VIA E-MAIL AT STANLEY.R.BIERNACKI.CIV@ARMY.MIL

WITH THE SUBJECT LINE “SYSTEM CONTROL MODULE SURVEY RESPONSE”

NO LATER THAN 4:30 P.M. EST ON TUES., 26-JUL-2022

DESCRIPTION OF INTENT

The Army Contracting Command – Detroit Arsenal (ACC-DTA) is seeking to gain knowledge of interest, capabilities, and qualifications of various members of the community, to include both small and large businesses, for production of the component listed below. The military-unique part is a component of the M93 Gas Particulate Filter System. Responses to this survey will assist ACC-DTA in planning for a future purchase order.

TECHNICAL DATA PACKAGE (TDP)

There is a TDP associated with this procurement. It is distribution code “C”, which limits access to U.S. Government agencies and their contractors only. The TDP will only be made available to contractors if/when a solicitation is released.

FIRST ARTICLE TESTING (FAT)

FAT is required for this procurement.

NOTE: The Government is not committed to issue a solicitation nor award a contract as a result of this announcement. All survey input is voluntary and no compensation will be made for your firm’s participation.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE SURVEY

1. You may respond in total, or in part, to this survey. However, all responses must be received no later than 4:30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST) on Tuesday, 26-Jul-2022.

2. All completed surveys shall be sent via e-mail to:

Stanley Biernacki Contract Specialist, ACC-DTA E-mail: stanley.r.biernacki.civ@army.mil Subject Line: “System Control Module Survey Response”

3. Relevant sales media and product manuals may be included as attachments with your submission. Please clearly mark all proprietary information. If applicable, the front page of your response package should state "PROPIETARY INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN" (all caps). Also, please provide a release statement indicating the proprietary information may be distributed to Army personnel involved with this survey.

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION & LABELING

The Government acknowledges its obligations under 18 USC §1905 to protect information qualifying as confidential. Pursuant to this statute, the Government is willing to accept any trade secret or confidential restrictions placed on qualifying data forwarded in response to the survey questions, and to protect it from unauthorized disclosure subject to the following:

1. Clearly and conspicuously mark qualifying data as trade secret or confidential with the restrictive legend “CONFIDENTIAL” (all caps) including any explanatory text, so the Government is clearly notified of what data needs to be protected.

2. In marking such data, please take care to mark only those portions of the data or materials that are truly trade secret or confidential (overbreadth in marking inappropriate data as “CONFIDENTIAL” may diminish or eliminate the usefulness of your response). Use circling, underscoring, highlighting, or any other appropriate means to indicate those portions of a single page that need to be protected.

3. The Government is not obligated to protect unmarked data. Additionally, marked data that is already in the public domain or in the possession of the Government or third parties, or is afterward placed into the public domain by the owner or another party through no fault of the Government will not be protected once in the public domain. Data already in the Government’s possession will be protected in accordance with the Government’s data rights.

4. Confidential data transmitted electronically, whether by physical media or not, whether by the respondent or by the Government, shall contain any restrictive legend, with any explanatory text, on both the cover of the transmittal e-mail and at the beginning of the file itself. Where appropriate for portions only of an electronic file, use the restrictive legends “CONFIDENTIAL DATA BEGINS:” and “CONFIDENTIAL PORTION ENDS”.

5. In any reproductions of technical data or any portions thereof subject to asserted restrictions, the Government shall also reproduce the asserted restriction legend and any explanatory text.

6. The Government sometimes uses support contractors in evaluating responses. Consequently, responses that contain confidential information may receive only limited or no consideration since the respondent’s marking of data as “CONFIDENTIAL” will preclude disclosure of same outside the Government, and therefore will preclude disclosure to support contractors assisting the evaluation effort.

SOURCES SOUGHT QUESTIONNAIRE

A) Vendor Profile. Please complete the yellow-highlighted fields below.

1.

COMPANY NAME:

MAILING ADDRESS:

CAGE CODE:

POC NAME / TITLE:

PHONE NUMBER:

E-MAIL ADDRESS:

WEBSITE:

2. Business type for NAICS 339113 – Surgical Appliance & Supplies Manufacturing:

Please check all that apply.

8(a)

Small Disadvantaged

HUBZone

Women-owned

Large Business

None of the Above. Please Explain: ________________

Service-disabled Veteran-owned

Small Business

3. Nonmanufacturer Rule. To qualify as a small business concern for set-aside or sole source supply contracts, a small business must meet at least one of the qualifications listed below

Please indicate which qualification, if any, applies to your firm.

Manufacture the product itself; or

Supply a product manufactured by another small business if it is a nonmanufacturer; or

Supply the product of any sized manufacturer if the Small Business Administration has granted a waiver to the nonmanufacturer rule.

4. A current DD 2345, Military Critical Technical Data Agreement, must be on file with the Defense Logistics Information Service (DLIS) to access and view the TDP associated with this procurement. Does your firm have a current DD 2345 on file with DLIS?

Yes

No

Approval Pending. Application submitted on: [MM/DD/YYYY]

B) Item-specific Information. Please complete the yellow-highlighted fields below.

1. Has your firm manufactured the System Control Module for a U.S. Government agency in the past? If so, please list the contract number(s) and agency(ies).

2. Is your firm currently capable of manufacturing the System Control Module?

3. If your firm was awarded a contract for the System Control Module where would production take place?

4. Does your firm have experience with FAT? If so, please provide a brief summary of that experience.

5. What is your firm’s production lead-time for the System Control Module after receipt of an order? (Please respond in # of calendar days.)

6. What is your firm’s minimum, normal, and maximum sustainable monthly production rates for the System Control Module?

7. What is your firm’s current price per unit for the System Control Module?

8. Please identify your firm’s current quality management system. Also, is your firm independently certified in that system?

9. Is there any other pertinent information that your firm would care to disclose? If so, please list below and/or include as a Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) or Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) attachment.