Solicitation N6945022R0068 MCLB Albany GA MACC.pdf

Design-Bid-Build and Design-Build, Firm-Fixed Price (FFP), Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ), Multiple Aw ard Construction Contract (MACC) for Marine Corps Logistics Base (MCLB), Albany, GA, Area of Responsibility (AOR).

Work may be required in other areas managed by NAVFAC SE, if deemed necessary and approved by the NAVFAC SE Chief of Contracting Office.

This solicitation is being conducted as a competitive Small Business set-aside for f irms w ith the specialized experience and qualif ications required by the solicitation.

The North American Industry Classif ication System (NAICS) Code for this IDIQ MACC solicitation is 236220 – Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, w ith a corresponding size standard of $39.5M.

DENNIS BOURGAULT 904-542-6686

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

02-Jun-2022

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________1825 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________06 Jul 2022 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVFAC ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND SE

CORE CONSTRUCTION

BLDG 903 YORKTOWN

PO BOX 0030

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-0030

N69450

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE N69450

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

03:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

NAVFAC ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND SE

MACC CELL

BLDG 903 YORKTOWN AVE

PO BOX 30

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N6945022R0068 69

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N6945022R0068

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

NOT-TO-EXCEED (NTE)

The NTE amount is for the total of all Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contracts awarded under the solicitation.

A task order for the minimum guarantee will be issued concurrently with the award of the basic contract. Once the value of task orders placed exceeds the minimum guarantee amount, the minimum guarantee task order will be modified to de-obligate the funds from the task order.

The minimum guarantee of $1,000 will be fulfilled by the issuance of the first Task Order.

PERFORMANCE PERIOD

General Construction Projects for a period NTE five (5) years.

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 99,000,000 Each

GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS NTE 5 YEAR

FFP

DESIGN-BUILD (DB) AND DESIGN-BID-BUILD INDEFINITE-DELIVERY,

INDEFINITE-QUANTITY (IDIQ) MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION

CONTRACT (MACC) FOR MARINE CORPS LOGISTICS BASE (MCLB)

ALBANY, GEORGIA, AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY (AOR).

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: Y1AZ

NET AMT

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 5 yrs. ADC 99,000,000 FEAD MCLB ALBANY

INSPECTOR OF RECORD

814 RADFORD BLVD STE 20315

ALBANY GA 31704-0207

229-639-5959 FOB: Destination

N45201

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

This procurement is being solicited in accordance Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 6.203 as a Total Small Business Set-Aside. The North American Industry Classification Code System (NAICS) is 236220, Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. The small business size standard is $39,500,000 ($39.5M).

The work to be performed will primarily consist of building type general construction services, i.e., new construction, demolition, and total and partial repair work. The types of buildings and facilities include, but are not limited to, administrative, industrial, warehouses, maintenance, communications, school/training/education facilities, personnel support and services facilities, housing, recreational, food services, training areas, ranges and roads, for Department of Defense. Work may be required in other locations in the area of responsibility of NAVFAC SE, if deemed necessary and approved by the NAVFAC SE Chief of Contracting Office.

Projects will require either single discipline or multi-discipline design services or may include 100% construction performance specifications. Projects can be based on design-build, modified design-build or full plans and specifications format and may also require comprehensive interior design and incorporation of sustainable features.

In accordance with FAR 36.3, this procurement will use Two-Phase Design-Build Selection Procedures. Phase One of the procurement process is a narrowing phase of Offerors up to ten (10) Offerors (design-build teams) who offer the best technical value to the government, unless the Government determines that a number greater or less than ten

(10) is in the Government's best interest. Only those Offerors selected in Phase One will be allowed to proceed into Phase Two. In Phase Two, the successful Phase One Offerors will be required to submit technical and price proposals for a seed project. Offerors who fail to submit technical and price proposals for the seed project will not be considered for a MACC award.

The Government intends to award approximately five (5) contracts resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offerors whose proposals represent the best value after evaluation in accordance with the factors in the solicitation.

Each MACC will include a minimum guarantee of $1,000 with a five (5) year ordering period. There is no yearly or per contractor limit except for the total five-year maximum of $99M. Task orders will be firm-fixed-priced, normally in the range of $250,000 to $6,000,000 per order. However, task orders under or over these amounts may be considered if deemed to be in the Government’s best interest and approved by the NAVFAC SE Chief of Contracting Office.

EXHIBITS

The following documents are provided and considered part of the solicitation:

Exhibit A – Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet Exhibit B – Safety Data Sheet Exhibit C – NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (Form PPQ-0) Exhibit D – ProjNet How-to Guide Exhibit E – PIEE Vendor Access Instructions Exhibit F – Base Access Pass Registration Form

PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs)

All pre-proposal inquiries (PPIs) must be submitted in writing via the “Bidder Inquiry” in ProjNet at www.projnet.org/projnet. The bidder inquiry key for this solicitation is 9VX7EP-ZTG8E6, Project: N69450-22-R- 0068 MCLB Albany MACC. Be sure to select “NAVFAC” as the agency in the dropdown menu. All questions shall be submitted at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the closing date of the solicitation in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiry. Answers will be made via ProjNet; however, answers do not amend the solicitation. Any changes to the solicitation will be made via formal amendment(s) to this Request for Proposals (RFP) and will be posted on Contract Opportunities, https://beta.sam.gov/.

Offerors are encouraged to register on ProjNet for alerts and to stay abreast of bidder inquiries and Government responses that are posted in reference to this solicitation. Only self-registered users on ProjNet can submit and review inquiries. A “how to” guide has been provided via Exhibit D. Those submitting inquiries will receive a system-generated e-mail notification when their inquiry has been processed and responded to. Notifications are not made to registered users when a new inquiry is posted. It is the Offeror's responsibility to monitor for inquiries and responses.

PIEE SOLICITATION MODULE AND SAM.GOV

All postings of amendments and attachments, etc. will be posted directly to the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) Solicitation Module and SAM.gov. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to check the PIEE Solicitation Module and SAM.gov for all postings. For Phase Two of the solicitation, all amendments and attachments will be provided directly to those Offerors invited to participate in Phase Two via the PIEE Solicitation Module. See Exhibit E, PIEE Vendor Access Instructions, for additional information.

PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND SITE VISIT

Pre-Proposal Conference and Site Visit information will be provided in Phase Two of the solicitation.

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

In response to this RFP, the complete proposal shall include for Phase One both the Submission Requirements and the Non-Price Proposal, and for Phase Two both the Price Proposal and the Non-Price Proposal. No pricing information shall be included in the Non-Price Proposal.

The Submission Requirements Proposal, Price Proposal and Non-Price Proposal shall be submitted in each Phase in accordance with the solicitation. Offerors shall refer to Section 00 22 00 of the solicitation (“Evaluation Factors for Award”) for details regarding each submittal requirement.

Proposals shall be submitted electronically through the PIEE Solicitation Module, under Solicitation Number N6945022R0068, no later than the date and time specified on the DD SF1442, block 13. Hard copies will not be accepted. In order to submit a proposal through the PIEE Solicitation Module, you must be registered as a Proposal Manager in the DoD PIEE Suite located at https://piee.eb.mil/.

The first page of each Proposal should clearly state:

Type of Proposal (Submission Proposal, Price Proposal, Non-Price Proposal, Small Business Proposal) RFP Number and Title of Project Offeror’s Name

Offerors shall include the following information with their proposals:

Authorized negotiator’s Point of Contact (POC) POC telephone number POC email address CAGE Code (Offeror and any team members Federal Tax Identification Number (TIN) Indicate Small Business Type

*It is recommended to also include an additional POC including contact information.

The Offeror’s proposal must include all data and information required by the solicitation and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The Offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated herein, for nonconformance may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

A. PHASE ONE: Submission Requirements and Non-Price Proposal

Non-Price proposal and Submission Requirements shall be separate attached files and shall be labeled “Non-Price Proposal” and “Submission Requirements,” as appropriate. All files shall be Adobe PDF formatted, font size is to be Ariel or Times New Roman, point 11 or greater, and be under 10 MB total.

Submission Requirements Proposal

The Submission Requirements Proposal shall be organized as follows:

Section 1 – Executed SF1442 and Acknowledgment of all amendments (CAGE Code, and Federal Tax Identification Number (TIN) Section 2 – Original Bonding Capacity Letter (original shall be mailed to the address in block 7) Section 3 – Representations & Certifications required by Section 00600 of the RFP Section 4 – FAPIIS Certification Section 5 – VETS-4212 registration (or statement that Offeror is not required to submit a report)

Non-Price Proposal

Offerors submit the Non-Price proposal as an Adobe PDF file labeled “Non-Price Proposal.” All pages shall be numbered. Page limits, if stipulated, must be adhered to.

Submissions related to the Factors shall be labeled, and organized as follows:

Section 1 – Factor 1, Technical Approach (Narrative; Organizational Chart; JV Agreement, etc.)

Section 2 – Factor 2, Experience (EXH. A - Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheets) Section 3 – Factor 3, Safety (EXH. B - Safety Data Sheet) Section 4 – Factor 4, Past Performance (EXH. C or CPARS evaluations; Explanations, if applicable)

B. PHASE TWO

Only Offerors invited to participate in Phase Two will need to submit a Phase Two proposal. Those Offerors will receive a formal notification of the invitation to proceed into Phase Two. The completed Phase Two proposal shall include the Price Proposal and Non-Price Proposal. Offerors shall not submit any additional information, such as brochures.

Price Proposal

The Price Proposal shall be submitted as an Adobe PDF file and labeled “Price Proposal.” It shall be organized as follows:

Section 1 – Executed DD1155 (Including acknowledgment of all amendments) Section 2 – Original Bid Bond (SF-24) Section 3 – Representations & Certifications (If not included in Phase One proposal) Section 4 – FAPIIS Certification (If not included in Phase One proposal) Section 5 – VETS-4212 registration (or statement that Offeror is not required to submit a report) (If not included in Phase One proposal) Section 6 – Responsibility Determination Documents: In order to be eligible for award, the Offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards. In a separate tab, the Offeror shall provide the additional information in the price proposal package specified in Section 00 22 00 - Supplementary Instructions, below.

Non-Price Proposal

The Non-Price proposals shall be submitted as an Adobe PDF file and labeled “Non-Price Proposal.” All pages shall be numbered. Page limits, if stipulated, must be adhered to.

Submissions related to the Factors shall be labeled, and organized as follows:

Section 1 – Factor 5, Technical Solution (Narrative) Section 2 – Factor 6, Construction Schedule

TIMELY RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS

PROPOSALS SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO THIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL MUST BE RECEIVED NO

LATER THAN THE DATE AND TIME SPECIFIED IN BLOCK 13A OF THE SF1442.

Ultimately, it is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure timely proposal submission. An Offeror risks the late receipt and rejection of a proposal where it delays submitting its proposal until the last few minutes before the time set for receipt of proposals. Hard copy submissions will not be accepted. Proposals not received by the time and date specified shall be treated in accordance with FAR 52.215-1 "Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisitions" and may be rejected. Offerors are highly advised to submit at least one day prior to avoid late submission. (See FAR 15.208(b)(1)(i)).

INCURRED EXPENSES

The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation.

NO ALTERNATE OR MULTIPLE PROPOSALS

Neither multiple proposals, nor proposal variations or options, nor alternate or alternative proposals will be considered in the evaluation.

DEFINITIONS

The following definitions are provided to assist evaluators in the evaluation of each Non-Price Factor:

Strength: An aspect of an Offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Significant Weakness: A flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Deficiency: A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

COMBINED TECHNICAL/RISK RATING METHOD

Adjectival Rating and Descriptions: The following adjectival ratings and rating descriptions will be used to assign an overall rating to each technical proposal and to assign a rating for each technical, Non-Price factor.

Outstanding: Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good: Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable: Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal: Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable: Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Past Performance relevancy will be rated as either “Relevant” or “Not Relevant.”

Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Performance confidence assessments will be evaluated utilizing the following adjectival ratings:

Substantial Confidence: Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence: No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence: Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence: Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2018 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting AUG 2020 52.207-6 Solicitation of Offers from Small Business Concerns and

Small Business Teaming Arrangements or Joint Ventures (Multiple-Award Contracts)

OCT 2016

52.211-6 Brand Name or Equal AUG 1999 52.214-34 Submission Of Offers In The English Language APR 1991 52.214-35 Submission Of Offers In U.S. Currency APR 1991 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition DEC 2021 52.215-1 Alt I Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition (NOV

2021) - Alternate I

OCT 1997

52.216-27 Single or Multiple Awards OCT 1995

52.225-10 Notice of Buy American Requirement--Construction Materials

MAY 2014

52.225-10 Alt I Notice of Buy American Requirement--Construction Materials (Feb 2009) Alternate I

MAY 2014

252.204-7019 Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements MAR 2022 252.215-7008 Only One Offer JUL 2019 252.215-7010 Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data

Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data

JUL 2019

252.215-7013 Supplies and Services Provided by Nontraditional Defense Contractors.

JAN 2018

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.211-14 NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, AND ENERGY PROGRAM USE (APR 2008)

Any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation will be DO-C2 rated order certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) (15 CFR 700), and the Contractor will be required to follow all of the requirements of this regulation.

(End of provision)

52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

The Government contemplates award of an Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) resulting from this solicitation.

52.228-1 BID GUARANTEE (SEP 1996)

(a) Failure to furnish a bid guarantee in the proper form and amount, by the time set for opening of bids, may be cause for rejection of the bid.

(b) The bidder shall furnish a bid guarantee in the form of a firm commitment, e.g., bid bond supported by good and sufficient surety or sureties acceptable to the Government, postal money order, certified check, cashier's check, irrevocable letter of credit, or, under Treasury Department regulations, certain bonds or notes of the United States.

The Contracting Officer will return bid guarantees, other than bid bonds, (1) to unsuccessful bidders as soon as practicable after the opening of bids, and (2) to the successful bidder upon execution of contractual documents and bonds (including any necessary coinsurance or reinsurance agreements), as required by the bid as accepted.-

(c) The amount of the bid guarantee shall be 20 percent of the bid price or $3,000,000, whichever is less.-

(d) If the successful bidder, upon acceptance of its bid by the Government within the period specified for acceptance, fails to execute all contractual documents or furnish executed bond(s) within 10 days after receipt of the forms by the bidder, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract for default.-

(e) In the event the contract is terminated for default, the bidder is liable for any cost of acquiring the work that exceeds the amount of its bid, and the bid guarantee is available to offset the difference.

52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)

(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Southeast Attn: Garry Murphy and Lindsay Betteridge Bldg. 903 Yorktown Ave.

P.O. Box 30 Jacksonville, FL 32212-0030

(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.

52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) – ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995)

(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.

(b) An organized site visit has been scheduled for-- To be completed on individual task orders.

(c) Participants will meet at-- To be completed on individual task orders.

52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-48 https://www.acquisition.gov https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/class_deviations.html

52.252-5 AUTHORIZED DEVIATIONS IN PROVISIONS (NOV 2020)

(a) The use in this solicitation of any Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 1) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the date of the provision.

(b) The use in this solicitation of any Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) (48 CFR

Chapter 2) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the name of the regulation.

Section 00 22 00 - Supplementary Instructions

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Phase-One:

Factor 1 – Technical Approach Factor 2 – Experience Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Past Performance

Phase-Two:

Factor 5 – Technical Solution Factor 6 – Construction Schedule

In accordance with FAR 36.3, this procurement will use Two-Phase Design-Build Selection Procedures. Phase One of the procurement process is a narrowing phase of offerors up to ten (10) offerors (design-build teams) who offer the best technical value to the Government, unless the Government determines that a number greater or less than ten

(10) is in the Government's best interest. Only those offerors selected in Phase One will be allowed to proceed into Phase Two. In Phase Two, the successful Phase One offerors will be required to submit technical and price proposals for a seed project. Offerors who fail to submit technical and price proposals for the seed project will not be considered for a MACC award.

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. Relative Order of Importance:

The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is the technical factors (Factors 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6) are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 4). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are significantly more important than price.

For the two-phase design-build procurement, Factors 1-4 will be evaluated in Phase One, and Factors 5 and 6 will be evaluated in Phase Two. Factor 1 will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an Offeror is rated Unacceptable in Factor 1, they will not be considered for Phase Two. In making the best value award decision after Phase Two, the Government will consider Factors 2-6 and price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor:

(a) Submission Requirements (Phase One):

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Submit one electronic copy of the solicitation via PIEE, including all of the submittal requirements identified below.

Font size is to be Ariel or Times New Roman, point 11 or greater.

Non-Price proposal and Submission Requirements shall be separate attached files and shall be labeled "Non-Price Proposal" and "Submission Requirements" as appropriate. Both files shall be Adobe PDF formatted with a combined size not to exceed 10MB.

1. Executed SF1442. Offeror shall insert its company name and address in Block #14, telephone number in Block #15, acknowledge all amendments in Block #19 (if applicable), name and title of person authorized to sign in Block #20A, signature in Block #20B, and offer date in Block #20C of the SF1442. In addition, offeror shall provide its CAGE Code, and Federal Tax Identification Number (TIN) with its proposal. If proposing as a joint venture, offerors shall provide the Cage Code for the members of the joint venture.

2. Bonding. Offeror shall confirm that it has a single award bonding capacity of at least $6,000,000 and the ability to bond multiple projects.

3. SAM registration. Offeror shall ensure current registration on the System for Award Management (SAM) website, www.sam.gov, including that its Annual Representations and Certifications are complete and updated for this procurement. If a Representation or Certification required by Section 00600 of the RFP is not provided in SAM, include the representation or certification in your price proposal. This may include certifications such as FAR 52.209-7, FAR 52.209-11, and 52.209-12.

4. FAPIIS Certification. Offeror shall ensure Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System

(FAPIIS) Certification, www.fapiis.gov, as required by FAR 52.209-7, Information Regarding Responsibility Matters (July 2013).

5. VETS-4212 registration. Offeror shall ensure a current VETS-4212 report has been submitted to the

Department of Labor (DOL) website http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm, if the offeror is required to submit. An email confirmation of submission can be requested and received by the offeror from the DOL website and submitted in the proposal. If the offeror is not required to submit a report to VETS-4212, include a brief statement stating that the offeror is not required to submit a report. Visit the VETS-4212 website for details concerning if your company is required to submit a VETS-4212 report and to request an email confirmation of submission.

Note: The SAM, FAPIIS and VETS-4242 registrations must be in the name/CAGE/DUNS of the offeror identified on the SF1442.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

Offerors will be evaluated on the information required to be submitted in the solicitation submittal requirements identified above.

(b) Non-Price Factors (Phase One):

Submit one electronic copy of the solicitation via PIEE, including all of the submittal requirements identified below.

(1) Factor 1 - Technical Approach:

The composition and management of the firms proposed as the D/B team for this contract will be evaluated in this factor. The Offeror shall submit the following information:

1. Provide a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firm(s) and primary design firm(s) for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement. Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6).

2. Provide a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. If the experience of an entity is being claimed in Factor 2, that entity must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart.

The technical approach narrative shall be limited to one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) including the organizational chart. The information requested in item #3 below is not included in this page limitation.

3. In addition to the narrative, the Offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment signed by each member of the Offeror’s team identified above (e.g., joint venture member, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.).

NOTE: Letters of commitment for the Designer of Record shall be addressed from the Designer of Record to the Offeror. The Designer of Record’s letter of commitment shall be signed by the Designer of Record’s signing authority.

The assessment of the Offeror’s technical approach will be used as a means to evaluate the organizational structure and teaming relationships proposed by the Offeror. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis.

(2) Factor 2 - Experience:

(1) Construction Experience:

a. Submit five (5) relevant construction projects demonstrating Prime Contractor multi-discipline construction experience on relevant projects with a contract value of one million ($1,000,000) or greater.

b. Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past five (5) years of the Date of Issuance of this RFP. Construction and financial closeout constitute completion. Beneficial Occupancy is not considered completion.

c. Projects submitted for consideration shall include at least one (1) new construction project and one (1) renovation project.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and IDIQ-type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather, Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Exhibit A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double- sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP. A sufficiently detailed narrative describing the project’s unique features may be considered more favorably including, but not limited to the following:

1. Relevant projects where the Offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together.

2. Relevant projects that demonstrate DoD D/B/B or D/B experience.

3. Relevant projects that demonstrate Offeror’s experience on multiple facility types for construction.

4. Relevant projects that demonstrate Offeror’s experience effective on-site management and performing coordination and/or project phasing among various Government Contractors working on-site, the Activity, and Base Facilities.

5. Relevant projects that demonstrate Offeror’s experience exceeding UFC 1-200-02 High Performance and

Sustainable Building Requirements.

6. Offeror shall provide documentation on applicable projects that were certified through the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

7. Relevant projects that demonstrate Offeror’s experience overcoming significant site or soil limitations, major challenges, and/or unforeseen conditions.

8. Relevant projects that demonstrate Offeror’s experience implementing innovative, alternative methods/processes that reduced the project schedule and/or cost.

9. Relevant projects that demonstrate Offeror’s experience with facilities located in historic areas that will require consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO).

10. Relevant projects that demonstrate Offeror’s experience with Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) and Special Access Program Facility (SAPF) spaces with special construction features to achieve accreditation.

11. Relevant projects that demonstrate Offeror’s experience integrating cybersecurity requirements in accordance with UFC 4-010-06 Cybersecurity of Facility-Related Control Systems.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. With the exception of Offerors covered by Mentor-Protégé JV Agreements approved by the Small Business Administration, Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

The Offeror MAY NOT utilize experience of a subcontractor to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor.

(2) Design Experience:

a. Submit five (5) relevant design projects demonstrating multi-discipline design experience on project with a construction contract value of one million ($1,000,000) or greater.

b. Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

c. For design/build projects, the design portion of the contract shall have been completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. The Final Design completion date must be clearly indicated on the Project Data Sheet.

d. Projects submitted for consideration shall include at least one (1) new construction project and one (1) renovation project.

A project is defined as a complete design effort (accepted final design) performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Exhibit A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double- sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP. A sufficiently detailed narrative describing the project’s unique features may be considered more favorably including, but not limited to the following:

1. Relevant projects where the Offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together.

2. Relevant projects that demonstrate Department of Defense (DoD) design-build experience.

3. Relevant projects that demonstrate Offeror’s experience on multiple facility types for construction.

4. Relevant projects that demonstrate Offeror’s experience performing coordination and/or project phasing among various Government Contractors working on-site, the Activity, and Base Facilities.

5. Relevant projects that demonstrate Offeror’s experience exceeding UFC 1-200-02 High Performance and

Sustainable Building Requirements.

6. Offeror shall provide documentation on applicable projects that were certified through the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

7. Relevant projects that demonstrate Offeror’s experience overcoming significant site or soil limitations, major challenges, and/or unforeseen conditions.

8. Relevant projects that demonstrate Offeror’s experience implementing innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced the project schedule and/or cost.

9. Relevant projects that demonstrate Offeror’s experience with facilities located in historic areas that will require consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO).

10. Relevant projects that demonstrate Offeror’s experience with Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) and Special Access Program Facility (SAPF) spaces with special construction features to achieve accreditation.

11. Relevant projects that demonstrate Offeror’s experience integrating cybersecurity requirements in accordance with UFC 4-010-06 Cybersecurity of Facility-Related Control Systems.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a design subcontractor to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor. Offerors proposing multiple design firms should submit relevant project experience for all design firms. Failure to do so may result in a lower rating. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

NOTE: Letters of commitment for the Designer of Record shall be addressed from the Designer of Record to the Offeror. The Designer of Record’s letter of commitment shall be signed by the Designer of Record’s signing authority.

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five projects for construction and five for design.

Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience and five (5) for Design Experience will not be considered.

Missing data is considered a deficiency. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award.

(3) Factor 3 - Safety

The Offeror shall submit the following information: The Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate; and Total Case Rate (TCR) for the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY), as well as a safety narrative, as described further below. For a partnership or joint venture, the Offeror shall submit separate DART rates and TCR for the specified five (5) CY for each contractor who is part of the partnership/joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Any fatalities experienced within this 5-year timeframe must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.

NOTE: DART and TCR shall not be submitted for subcontractors.

1. DART Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2021, CY2020, CY2019, CY2018, and CY2017] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no DART rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Should a negative trend occur above moderate risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. DART cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, and/or restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness.

b. Calculation of DART rate: Multiply the total number of DART cases by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

DART RATE = Number of DART Incidents x 200,000

Total Number of Employee Labor Hours Worked

2. TCR Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2021, CY2020, CY2019, CY2018, and CY2017] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no TCR rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Should a negative trend occur above moderate risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. TCR cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.

b. Calculation of TCR rate: Multiply the total number of TCR incidents by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

TRC RATE = Number of TRC Incidents x 200,000

Total Number of Employee Labor Hours Worked

3. Technical Approach to Safety: Submit a narrative that addresses the following:

a. Describe the Offeror’ s approach to implementing and executing a Safety Management System (SMS) including Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, and Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the

SMS.

b. Describe the evaluation process used to select potential subcontractors.

c. Describe the processes of how the Offeror will oversee safety compliance of subcontractors at all levels throughout performance of the contract (to include the Offeror’s own in-house workforce).

d. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page.

4. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), CPARS, Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

A copy of the Safety Data Sheet to be used for submission of safety information is included as Exhibit B.

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The evaluation will collectively consider the DART rate, TCR, Technical Approach to Safety, and other sources of information available to the Government as part of such collective evaluation. The SSEB will evaluate the DART rates and TCR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

1. DART Rate: The SSEB will evaluate trends over the last five years considering changes that take it from one risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Negative trends occurring above moderate risk levels require the Offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. Missing data without a sufficiently detailed explanation is considered a deficiency. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award.

b. Declining trends that push the risk levels from Moderate Risk (MR) or higher to Low Risk (LR) or Very Low Risk (VLR) may indicate a strength.

c.