RFP N4008522R2535.pdf
PDF 494 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Civil and Paving Multiple Award Construction Contract Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N4008522R2535
About this file
This solicitation requests proposals for up to four Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity Multiple Award Construction Contracts to provide civil and paving projects for Marine Corps installations in North Carolina. The total contract value over five years is not to exceed $95 million. Work will be performed primarily at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune and Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, but may also occur at other installations within the Marine Corps Installation East area of responsibility. This is a HUBZone set-aside solicitation issued by the Naval Facilities Engineering Command. Proposals are due by the date and time specified in block 13A of the Standard Form 1442. Award will be made to responsible offerors determined to provide the best value based on price and evaluation of corporate experience, safety, management approach, and past performance factors.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N4008522R2535 Amend 03.pdf | ||
| 22R2535 Pricing Sheet.pdf | ||
| 22R2535 DWG Amend02.pdf | ||
| N4008522R2535 Amend 02.pdf | ||
| Site Visit Roster.pdf | ||
| Construction Experience Project Data Sheet.pdf | ||
| N4008522R2535 Amend 01.pdf | ||
| 22R2535 Specs.pdf | ||
| 22R2535 DWG_Part1.pdf | ||
| Construction Experience Project Data Sheet.pdf | ||
| PPQ.pdf | ||
| 22R2535 DWG_Part2.pdf | ||
| 22R2535 DWG_Part3of3.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
LPTA95MCON
INDEFINITE QUANTITY/INDEFINITE DELIVERY (IDIQ) MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (MACC) FOR CIVIL AND PAVING
PROJECTS PRIMARILY AT MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS IN NORTH CAROLINA
Solicitation No.: N40085-22-R-2535 See Section 00 21 00 - Proposal Requirements
This solicitation is restricted to HUBZone small business concerns
REQUIRED INFORMATION (TO BE FILLED IN BY OFFEROR):
OFFEROR POC: POC EMAIL ADDRESS:
ALTERNATE POC: ALTERNATE POC EMAIL ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CAGE CODE: UEI NUMBER:
EMILY A. WALTON (910) 451-2582 EXT 5247
NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".
10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS
NEGOTIATED
28-Jun-2022
(RFP)
(IFB)
X
CALL:
B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)
See Item 7
2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION
SEALED BID
3. DATE ISSUED
9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME
SOLICITATION
X
NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)
Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)
11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________180 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________
12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?
(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)
X YES NO
13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:
A. Sealed offers in original and __________4 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________ (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.
shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.
B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.
C. All of fers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.
D. Offers providing less than _______180 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.
SOLICITATION, OFFER,
AND AWARD
(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)
1. SOLICITATION NO.
IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.
4. CONTRACT NO.
7. ISSUED BY CODE
NAVFACSYSCOM MID-ATLANTIC
ROICC CAMP LEJEUNE
1005 MICHAEL ROAD
CAMP LEJEUNE NC 28547-2521
N40085
PAGE OF PAGES
1 OF
CODE
(Title, identifying no., date):
12B. CALENDAR DAYS
(hour)
Sealed envelopes containing offers
5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.
8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)
(910) 451-5629FAX:TEL: (910) 451-2582 TEL: FAX:
N4008522R2535 51
20B. SIGNATURE
(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK
TO SIGN
NSN 7540-01-155-3212
SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)
CODE FACILITY CODE
17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specified below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.
the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)
AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES
18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.
19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS
(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)
AMENDMENT NO.
DATE
20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN
OFFER (Type or print)
AWARD (To be completed by Government)
21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:
22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM
(4 copies unless otherwise specified)
CODE
(Insert any number equal to or greater than
20C. OFFER DATE
25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO
10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)
CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY
(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)
See Item 14
(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS
30B. SIGNATURE
29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)
document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .
gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.
30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
30C. DATE
(Type or print)
TEL: EMAIL:
31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE
BY
CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE
(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT
(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER
N4008522R2535
Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation
ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
0001 95,000,000 Each Civil Paving MACC
FFP
Base Period and Four Option Years, Not to Exceed $95,000,000 for the total period of performance, for all combined contracts awarded under the solicitation.
FOB: Destination
PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: LPTA95MCON
NET AMT
DELIVERY INFORMATION
CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /
CAGE
0001 365 dys. ADC 95,000,000 ROICC CAMP LEJEUNE
MCKENNEY HARTMAN
BUILDING 1005
1005 MICHAEL ROAD
CAMP LEJEUNE NC 28547-2521
910-451-2581 EXT 5275
FOB: Destination
N44249
Section 00 21 00 - Instructions
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. GENERAL
1.1 NOTICE TO OFFERORS
1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS
1.3 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT
2. GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE SEED PROJECT
3. BASIS FOR AWARD
4. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
5. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
5.1 PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND SITE VISIT
5.2 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
5.3 SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM)
5.4 INCORPORATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSALS
6. ATTACHMENTS
1. GENERAL
1.1 NOTICE TO OFFERORS
1.1.1 This solicitation is being issued as a HUBZone set-aside. The NAICS code for this procurement is 237310 and the size standard is $39.5M.
1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS
1.2.1 This solicitation is formatted as a Request for Proposal (RFP) in accordance with the requirements designated by Part 15 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). This method permits evaluation of proposals based on price competition, technical merit and other factors; permits impartial and comprehensive evaluation of the offeror’s proposals; permits discussions if necessary; and ensures selection of the source whose performance provides the best value to the Government. This acquisition will be solicited as a competitively negotiated procurement as a total small business set-aside.
1.2.2 The Government reserves the right to reject any or all proposals at any time prior to award; to negotiate with any or all offerors; to award the contracts to other than the offeror submitting the lowest total price; to award to other than the offeror submitting the highest technically rated proposal; and to award to the offeror submitting the proposal determined by the Government to be the most advantageous (best value) to the Government. OFFERORS ARE
ADVISED THAT AWARD MAY BE MADE WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS OR ANY
CONTACT CONCERNING THE PROPOSALS RECEIVED. Therefore, proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable price and technical terms. Offerors should not assume that they will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to qualify, discuss, or revise their proposals. However, the Government reserves the right to clarify certain aspects of proposals or conduct discussions providing an opportunity for the offeror to revise its proposal.
1.3 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT
1.3.1 This acquisition will result in the award of up to four (4) Design-Bid-Build, Indefinite- Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Multiple Award Construction Contracts (MACC) for the Marine Corps Installation East Area of Responsibility for a range of civil and paving projects.
The Government intends to award no more than four (4) contracts resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offerors whose proposals represent the best value, after evaluation, in accordance with the factors in the solicitation.
1.3.2 The resulting contracts will provide for paving and civil construction projects primarily located at Marine Corps Installations East (MCI East). The proposed seed project for this solicitation is titled Paving Parking Lot G480 with an estimated price range between $250,000 and $500,000. Task orders under the MACC will be design-bid-build. Work will be primarily performed at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune (including the New River Air Station and other related facilities) and Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point. However, it may also be performed at other military and government installations/sites under the Marine Corps Installation East Area of Responsibility.
1.3.3 The completion date for the basic contract is one (1) year from the date of contract award with four (4) one-year option periods. The total five-year (base and four, one-year options) estimated construction cost for all contracts is not to exceed $95,000,000.00 for the life of the contract. Task orders will be firm fixed price and will be predominately in dollar value from $150,000 to $10,000,000; however, smaller and larger dollar value projects may be considered at the discretion of the Contracting Officer. The Government guarantees an award amount of $5,000.00 to each successful offeror over the full term of the contract, including option years.
1.3.4 After award of the initial contracts and seed project, the successful IDIQ contractors will compete for task orders based on lowest price. Only the successful IDIQ contractors will compete for task orders.
1.3.5 The intent of this contract is that all IDIQ Contractors participate in pre-proposal conferences, site-visits, and submit proposals on each project. Contract awardees will be expected to submit a proposal for all Request for Proposals (RFP). However, in the event that a MACC awardee is unable to submit a proposal on a particular RFP the Contractor is required to notify the Contracting Officer, at the time proposals are due, that they will not be submitting a proposal. A MACC awardee can only elect to withdraw from submitting a proposal on three (3) task order RFPs during the course of each year of the contract. Additional withdrawal requests, in excess of three per year, may result in the Government choosing not to exercise remaining options.
2. GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE SEED PROJECT
2.1 The initial project to be awarded as the first task order, along with the basic contract, will be Paving Parking Lot G480. The work includes milling asphalt, resurfacing, installing culvert, painting parking spaces, and regrading adjacent swales.
2.2 Pursuant to FAR 52.232-18, Availability of Funds, the Government’s obligation under this solicitation, or any task order or contract that might result from the solicitation is entirely subject to, and contingent upon, the availability of appropriated funds. Should the Government be unable to award the seed project, the Government guarantees an award in the amount of $5,000.00 to each successful offeror upon award of the Multiple Award Construction Contracts. This minimum guarantee is over the full term of the contract, including option years. No legal liability on the part of the Government shall arise until funds are made available to the Contracting
Officer and a task order or contract is awarded by the Contracting Officer. Any offeror proposing on this solicitation does so at its own cost and with the full knowledge that a task order for the seed project, might not result from this solicitation.
3. BASIS FOR AWARD
3.1 The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contracts; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contracts to the offerors submitting the lowest priced, technically acceptable offers.
3.2 As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.
3.3 The LPTA process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition because the best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price.
3.4 In order to permit efficient competition, the Navy will utilize the following methodology.
Proposals will initially be screened for price and placed in order (lowest price to highest price).
The Navy will then evaluate the technical factors of the six lowest priced proposals. The Navy will make award to the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal(s) from among the eight lowest priced proposals. However, the Navy, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to increase the number of proposals it will review under this methodology. Accordingly, under this methodology, the technical factors of some proposals may not be evaluated by the Navy. If discussions are deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer, all proposals will be evaluated (both technical and price) for the purpose of establishing a competitive range.
3.5 An overall non-price factors rating must be at least “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award. An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor results in the overall non-price factors proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An overall non-price factors rating of “UNACCEPTABLE” makes a proposal ineligible for award.
4. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
4.1 The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:
Factor 1 – Corporate Experience Factor 2 – Safety Factor 3 – Management Approach Factor 4 – Past Performance
4.2 The distinction between corporate experience and past performance is corporate experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.
4.3 The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is that the technical factors (Factors 1 through 3) are of equal importance to each other and, when combined, are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment (Factor 4).
When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are of approximately equal importance to price.
4.4 The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.
4.5 Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.
(a) Price:
(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:
Provide one (1) marked original, one (1) marked copy and one (1) electronic copy (CD format) of the solicitation submittal requirements identified below. The electronic copy does not have to include the price for the seed project; however, the price for the seed project must be included in the original and hard copies. In case of variation, the original hard copy proposal takes precedence over electronic or copies.
(i) Executed SF1442. Offeror shall insert its company name and address in Block #14, telephone number in Block #15, acknowledge all amendments in Block #19 (if applicable), name and title of person authorized to sign in Block #20A, signature in Block #20B, and offer date in Block #20C of the SF1442. In addition, Offeror shall provide its Unique Entity ID, CAGE code, and Federal Tax ID number with its proposal.
(ii) Completed Proposed Price for the Seed Project.
(iii) Bid bond (SF-24). Offeror shall submit a bid bond (SF-24) in the amount of 20% of total project bid price for the seed project or $3,000,000, whichever amount is less. The bid bond shall be in the name of the offeror identified on the SF1442. In addition, the offeror shall provide a letter from its bonding company confirming that it has a single award bonding capacity of at least $5,000,000 and the ability to bond multiple projects.
(iv) SAM registration. Offeror shall ensure current registration on the SAM Website, www.sam.gov, including Annual Representations and Certifications are complete and updated for this procurement. If a Representation or Certification required by Section 00600 of the RFP is not provided in SAM, include the representation or certification in your price proposal.
(v) FAPIIS Certification. Offeror shall ensure Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) Certification as required by FAR 52.209-7, Information Regarding Responsibility Matters.
(vi) VETS-4212 registration. Offeror shall ensure a current VETS-4212 report has been submitted to the Department of Labor (DOL) website, http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm, if the Offeror is required to submit. An email confirmation of submission can be requested and received by the Offeror from the DOL website and submitted in the price proposal. If the Offeror is not required to submit a report to VETS- 4212, include a brief statement and justification explaining why the Offeror is not required to submit a report. Visit the VETS-4212 website for details concerning if your company is required to submit a VETS-4212 report and to request an email confirmation of submission.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PRICE PROPOSAL PACKAGE:
Responsibility Determination Information - In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards. In a separate Tab, the offeror shall provide the following information in the price proposal package:
1. One (1) Signed Bank Reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If offeror’s firm has a line of credit – provide information on how many figures offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures – exact line of credit is not required).
2. The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies. The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror.
3. Description of offeror’s facilities and equipment.
4. Other offeror’s work presently under contract.
Although required to be submitted with offeror’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm’s responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award.
Proposal packages from unsuccessful offerors will not be returned to the offeror, but shall be destroyed by the Contracting Officer. No certificate of destruction will be issued.
(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price for the seed project. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items, if applicable. The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:
(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.
(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.
(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.
(iv) Comparison of market survey results.
(b) Non-cost/price Factors:
The offeror shall submit one original, marked “Original”, 2 copies marked “copy”, each in a separate three-ring binder (1.5 inch. maximum), and one electronic copy on CD with the following characteristics:
• Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, UEI, Cage Code, Point of Contact, Title, phone number, and email address.
• Text pages 8 ½ x 11 format; 12 point font
• One complete electronic copy of the technical proposal factors as a single .pdf searchable file on a CD-ROM (include with the “Original” technical submission).
If there are any conflicts between hard copies and/or electronic copies, the “Original” hard copy will govern.
Refer to individual factors for page limitations. Pages that exceed indicated page limitations shall not be evaluated.
Factor 1 – Corporate Experience:
(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:
The Offeror shall submit the following information:
Submit a minimum of three (3) up to a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the projects proposed for this MACC. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:
Size: A final construction cost between $50,000 and $1,000,000
Scope/Complexity: Projects performing a range of paving and civil construction projects.
In addition to meeting the Size requirement, relevant projects must demonstrate experience with new and repaired bituminous construction, new and repaired concrete structures, such as curb and gutters, drainage structures, sidewalks, flumes, pavement and slabs. All types of work do not need to be demonstrated on the same relevant project.
Additionally, submitted relevant projects shall demonstrate the following:
a) Offerors shall have acted as the prime contractor on submitted projects. Offeror’s experience performing as subcontractor will not be considered, nor will experience of companies proposed to work as subcontractors on the awarded contract.
b) Projects submitted for the Offeror must have been completed within five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.
c) A project is defined as a complete project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.
d) The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment 5) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).
e) For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods, self-performance).
f) If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the JV members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all JV members may be rated lower. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined. For a JV, the offeror shall submit the signed JV agreement. For 8(a) Mentor-Protégé Joint Ventures, the offeror shall submit the signed U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) approved Mentor-Protégé agreement.
(g) If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.
(h) Experience of proposed subcontractors will not be considered for corporate experience.
(ii) Basis of Evaluation:
The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five projects. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) will not be considered.
Factor 2 – Safety
(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:
The Offeror shall submit the following information: The Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate; and Total Case Rate (TCR) for the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY), as well as a safety narrative, as described below. For a partnership or joint venture, the Offeror shall submit separate DART and TCR rates for the specified five (5) CY for each contractor who is part of the partnership/joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Any fatalities experienced within this 5-year timeframe must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.
NOTE: DART and TCR shall not be submitted for subcontractors
1. DART Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2017, CY2018, CY2019, CY2020, and CY2021] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no DART rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why.
a. DART cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, and/or restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness.
b. Calculation of DART rate: Multiply the total number of DART cases by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked
DART RATE = Number of DART Incidents x 200,000
Total Number of Employee Labor Hours Worked
2. TCR Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2017, CY2018, CY2019, CY2020, and CY2021] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no TCR rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why.
a. TCR cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.
b. Calculation of TCR rate: Multiply the total number of TCR incidents by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked
TCR Rate = Number of TCR Incidents x 200,000
Total Number of Employee Labor Hours Worked
3. Technical Approach to Safety: Submit a narrative that addresses the following:
a. Describe the Offeror’ s approach to implementing and executing a Safety Management System (SMS) including Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.
b. Describe the evaluation process used to select potential subcontractors.
c. Describe the processes of how the Offeror will oversee safety compliance of subcontractors at all levels throughout performance of the contract (to include the Offeror’s own in-house workforce).
d. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page.
4. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.
(ii) Basis of Evaluation:
The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. To meet the minimum requirements, the Offeror must demonstrate the following:
1. DART rates at or below 2.99
2. TCR Rates at or below 4.49
NOTE: If the Offeror’s rates exceed the established levels above for any of the five years, it will result in a deficiency.
3. Technical Approach to Safety
a. Offeror describes a viable SMS that addresses elements; such as Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.
b. Offeror describes a methodical process of evaluating subcontractor’s safety performance in their selection process.
c. Offeror describes a logical management plan to hold both themselves and their subcontractors accountable for adhering to the safety requirements of the contract.
4. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.
Factor 3 – Management Approach Note: Site visits WILL BE REQUIRED for all projects. This contract vehicle will be used to provide response to both emergency and routine projects. For routine projects, the offerors must be able to attend site visits within 24 hours of notification. All initial awarded Contractors will be required to participate in all MACC site visits and submit proposals for each project. Failure to participate in site visits and failure to submit proposals on Task Orders may result in the Contractor forfeiting its minimum guarantee or the Government not exercising the option to extend the term of the contract for an additional option year.
(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:
Offeror shall submit a detailed narrative management plan describing how the offeror intends to successfully complete the work required by this contract. The narrative plan shall not exceed four (4) single-sided pages (or two (2) double-sided pages), and at a minimum, must address the following:
• Offeror’s location of office that will be performing the work.
• Offeror’s strategy to quickly respond to requests for proposals and pre-award site visits (both emergency and routine site visits).
• Offeror’s strategy for successful execution of the work and managing multiple concurrent projects, including the following:
o Identify what trades and/or services will be performed by your in-house personnel;
o Identify what trades and/or services will be subcontracted and provide a written commitment, signed by each major subcontractor, demonstrating their commitment to support your company on various task order projects at Camp Lejeune.
• Offeror’s strategy for providing an adequate workforce (labor, job site superintendents, etc.)
to work on several different task order projects simultaneously.
(ii) Basis of Evaluation:
Offerors will be evaluated on the extent to which they demonstrate a clear understanding of the requirements, as outlined above. The standard has been met when the offeror demonstrates ability to quickly respond to site visits and RFP’s, having access to an adequate work force through in-house personnel & subcontractors, and an adequate workforce to work on several different task order projects simultaneously. Any information submitted in excess of the four (4) pages will not be considered. Failure to address any of the items above will receive an “Unacceptable” rating and will not be eligible for award.
Factor 4 - Past Performance:
(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements
IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE
PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1, Corporate Experience. AN
OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.
IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment D), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Emily Walton, via email at emily.a.walton6.civ@us.navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.
Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.
Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1, Corporate Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.
In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/Entity Identifier numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.
While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.
A copy of the blank Past Performance Questionnaire to be used for requesting client references is included as Attachment 6.
(ii) Basis of Evaluation
The degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., PPIRS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance considering:
- A pattern of successful completion of tasks;
- A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;
- A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.); and
- Recency of tasks performed that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at hand
5. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
5.1 PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND SITE VIST
Information for the site visit pertaining to the seed project will be issued via Amendment once the final date/location has been determined.
5.2 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
In response to the request for proposal, the complete proposal shall include both the Price Proposal and the Non-Price Factors Proposal, submitted in accordance with the above Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for each factor as follows:
5.2.1 Price Proposal and Non-Price Factors Proposal – The Price Proposal and the Non-Price Factors Proposal shall be submitted in separate 3-ring binders. All pages shall be numbered and binders shall be appropriately tabbed, conforming to the proposal submittal requirements’ structure for each evaluation factor. Price and Non-Price Factors proposals must be submitted in sealed envelopes/boxes. Any pricing information included in the Non-Price Factors proposal will not be considered. Similarly, any Non-Price information included in the Price Proposal will not be considered. Proposal shall be labeled “PRICE PROPOSAL or NON-PRICE FACTORS PROPOSAL for RFP N40085-22-R-2535, CIVIL/PAVING
MACC, ATTN: EMILY WALTON; DO NOT OPEN IN MAIL ROOM”.
5.2.2 The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information required and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated herein for non-conformance may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.
5.2.3 All proposals shall be mailed or hand carried to the following address:
NAVFAC ROICC Camp Lejeune ATTN: Emily Walton 1005 Michael Road Camp Lejeune, NC 28547-2521
5.2.4 Hand Carried Proposals
Offerors who would like to hand deliver their proposal and who do not currently have a valid badge issued by the Department of Defense (DoD) to enter Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune must do the following:
Submit the full name of the individual(s) requiring sponsorship as it appears on a valid driver’s license or state-issued identification card no less than three working days prior to the proposal due date. The name(s) of the individuals shall be submitted to the contract specialist via email at emily.a.walton6.civ@us.navy.mil. Sponsorship is required for all individuals not possessing DBIDs or DoD identification to access Camp Lejeune.
The request for sponsorship email shall contain a subject line formatted as follows:
“Request Sponsorship for Proposal Delivery, Solicitation N40085-22-R-2535”
Proposals may be delivered via the US Postal Service, UPS, FedEx, or other delivery service;
however, the responsibility lies with the offeror to ensure timely delivery. To allow for mail delivery of proposals, amendments revising the scope of work will not be posted by the Government with less than three working days remaining until the proposal due date. If the Government determines the scope of work needs to be changed within the two working days remaining until the proposal due date, the proposal due date will be extended to allow prospective offerors to mail amendment acknowledgement and/or proposal revisions.
5.2.5 PROPOSAL SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO THIS RFP MUST BE RECEIVED NO
LATER THAN THE DATE AND TIME SPECIFIED IN BLOCK 13A OF THE SF1442.
Proposals not received by the time and date shall be treated in accordance with FAR 52.215- 1, Instructions to Offerors-Competitive Acquisitions, and may be rejected.
5.3 PRE-PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI)
All RFIs must be submitted in writing and received by the Contract Specialist ten (10) calendar days prior to the solicitation closing date in order to permit adequate time to reply to the RFI.
There is no guarantee that RFI’s submitted after the cut-off date will be answered before the solicitation closes. Submit all questions to emily.a.walton6.civ@us.navy.mil.
5.4 OPPORTUNITIES/SAM.GOV
Amendments will be posted directly to https://www.SAM.gov. The drawings and specifications will be posted on SAM. It is the contractor’s responsibility to check SAM for all postings.
5.5 INCORPORATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
The Contractor’s technical proposal, including revisions and amendments, made prior to contract award and a copy of which is in the possession of both parties, will be incorporated into this contract upon award by reference with the same force and effect as if set forth in full text. All contractor personnel shall meet or exceed the qualification standards, experience levels and trade background set forth in the technical proposal. In the event of an inconsistency between the provisions of this contract and the technical proposal, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order: (i) the contract (excluding the technical proposal), and then (ii) the technical proposal.
6. ATTACHMENTS
(1) Specifications
(2) Drawings 1 of 3
(3) Drawings 2 of 3
(4) Drawings 3 of 3
(5) Construction Experience Project Data Sheet
(6) NAVFAC Past Performance Questionnaire
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
52.207-6 Solicitation of Offers from Small Business Concerns and
Small Business Teaming Arrangements or Joint Ventures (Multiple-Award Contracts)
OCT 2016
52.222-5 Construction Wage Rate Requirements--Secondary Site of the Work
MAY 2014
52.236-28 Preparation of Proposals--Construction OCT 1997 252.215-7008 Only One Offer JUL 2019 252.215-7013 Supplies and Services Provided by Nontraditional Defense
Contractors.
JAN 2018
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT
52.204-16 COMMERCIAL AND GOVERNMENT ENTITY CODE REPORTING (JUL 2016)
(a) Definition. As used in this provision--
Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code means—
(1) An identifier assigned to entities located in the United States or its outlying areas by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Branch to identify a commercial or government entity;
or
(2) An identifier assigned by a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) or by the NATO Support and Procurement Agency (NSPA) to entities located outside the United States and its outlying areas that the DLA Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Branch records and maintains in the CAGE master file. This type of code is known as a NATO CAGE (NCAGE) code.
(b) The Offeror shall enter its CAGE code in its offer with its name and address or otherwise include it prominently in its proposal. The CAGE code entered must be for that name and address. Enter ``CAGE'' before the number. The CAGE code is required prior to award.
(c) CAGE codes may be obtained via--
(1) Registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) at www.sam.gov. If the Offeror is located in the United States or its outlying areas and does not already have a CAGE code assigned, the DLA Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Branch will assign a CAGE code as a part of the SAM registration process. SAM registrants located outside the United States and its outlying areas shall obtain a NCAGE code prior to registration in SAM (see paragraph (c)(3) of this provision).
(2) The DLA Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Branch. If registration in SAM is not required for the subject procurement, and the offeror does not otherwise register in SAM, an offeror located in the United States or its outlying areas may request that a CAGE code be assigned by submitting a request at https://cage.dla.mil.
(3) The appropriate country codification bureau. Entities located outside the United States and its outlying areas may obtain an NCAGE code by contacting the Codification Bureau in the foreign entity's country if that country is a member of NATO or a sponsored nation. NCAGE codes may be obtained from the NSPA at https://eportal.nspa.nato.int/AC135Public/scage/CageList.aspx if the foreign entity's country is not a member of NATO or a sponsored nation. Points of contact for codification bureaus, as well as additional information on obtaining NCAGE codes, are available at http://www.nato.int/structur/AC/135/main/links/contacts.htm.
(d) Additional guidance for establishing and maintaining CAGE codes is available at https://cage.dla.mil.
(e) When a CAGE Code is required for the immediate owner and/or the highest-level owner by 52.204-17 or 52.212-3(p), the Offeror shall obtain the respective CAGE Code from that entity to supply the CAGE Code to the Government.
(f) Do not delay submission of the offer pending receipt of a CAGE code.
(End of Provision)
52.215-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION (JAN 2017)
(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--
“Discussions” are negotiations that occur after establishment of the competitive range that may, at the Contracting Officer's discretion, result in the offeror being allowed to revise its proposal.
“In writing or written” means any worded or numbered expression which can be read, reproduced, and later communicated, and includes electronically transmitted and stored information.
“Proposal modification” is a change made to a proposal before the solicitation's closing date and time, or made in response to an amendment, or made to correct a mistake at any time before award.
“Proposal revision” is a change to a proposal made after the solicitation closing date, at the request of or as allowed by a Contracting Officer as the result of negotiations.
“Time”, if stated as a number of days, is calculated using calendar days, unless otherwise specified, and will include Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays. However, if the last day falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, then the period shall include the next working day.
(b) Amendments to solicitations. If this solicitation is amended, all terms and conditions that are not amended remain unchanged. Offerors shall acknowledge receipt of any amendment to this solicitation by the date and time specified in the amendment(s).
(c) Submission, modification, revision, and withdrawal of proposals. (1) Unless other methods (e.g., electronic commerce or facsimile) are permitted in the solicitation, proposals and modifications to proposals shall be submitted in paper media in sealed envelopes or packages (i) addressed to the office specified in the solicitation, and (ii) showing the time and date specified for receipt, the solicitation number, and the name and address of the offeror.
Offerors using commercial carriers should ensure that the proposal is marked on the outermost wrapper with the information in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (c)(1)(ii) of this provision.
(2) The first page of the proposal must show--
(i) The solicitation number;
(ii) The name, address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the offeror (and electronic address if available);
(iii) A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item;
(iv) Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the offeror's behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation; and
(v) Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent's authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.
(3) Submission, modification, or revision, of proposals.
(i) Offerors are responsible for submitting proposals, and any modifications, or revisions, so as to reach the Government office designated in the solicitation by the time specified in the solicitation. If no time is specified in the solicitation, the time for receipt is 4:30 p.m., local time, for the designated Government office on the date that proposal or revision is due.
(ii)(A) Any proposal, modification, or revision received at the Government office designated in the solicitation after the exact time specified for receipt of offers is “late” and will not be considered unless it is received before award is made, the Contracting Officer determines that accepting the late offer would not unduly delay the acquisition; and--
(1) If it was transmitted through an electronic commerce method authorized by the solicitation, it was received at the initial point of entry to the Government infrastructure not later than 5:00 p.m. one working day prior to the date specified for receipt of proposals; or
(2) There is acceptable evidence to establish that it was received at the Government installation designated for receipt of offers and was under the Government's control prior to the time set for receipt of offers; or
(3) It is the only proposal received.
(B) However, a late modification of an otherwise successful proposal that makes its terms more favorable to the Government, will be considered at any time it is received and may be accepted.
(iii) Acceptable evidence to establish the time of receipt at the Government installation includes the time/date stamp of that installation on the proposal wrapper, other documentary evidence of receipt maintained by the installation, or oral testimony or statements of Government…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .