RFI Questions_7.15.21.docx
DOCX document 21 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 280-22-0571
About this file
This document contains a request for information (RFI) from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration regarding case management and behavioral health services for separated families. The RFI seeks industry feedback on revising a draft performance work statement and improving the procurement prior to competition. The purpose of the future contract is to continue and expand on services provided under a previous agreement to organize and coordinate social and behavioral health services for members of the Ms. L and Ms. JP class action lawsuits who were separated at the US-Mexico border under the Zero Tolerance Policy between January 2017 and January 2021. Key services to be provided include child-focused pre-reunification counseling, post-reunification case management, parenting support, and behavioral health services. All responses to the RFI must be submitted electronically by July 30, 2021 to inform revisions to the procurement.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Work Statement_7.16.21.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions for RFI Contract Design Questions
1. Is the work described in the PWS reasonable?
2. Is Time and Materials the best contract format in your experience?
Programmatic Core Services Questions
1. Is the proposed method for child centered pre-reunification counseling services feasible?
2. With regards to pre-reunification counseling, do you foresee any problems with coordinating consent with another contractor for parents who are out of the country?
3. Is the current model of case management proposed feasible?
4. Is the current model of behavioral health service provision proposed feasible?
5. Are the proposed workforce and staff appropriate for the level of effort? (e.g. should we include a deputy project director or program manager, a project assistant, etc.)
6. Are the proposed data collection measures feasible?
7. Are there any challenges or barriers that the Government should be made aware of related to the scope of services?
8. Should travel be included and if so, for which services/tasks? How much travel (given telehealth and telebehavioral health are great options) should be incurred for these tasks?
9. Are the tracking system parameters proposed feasible?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .