RFI_Attach_7_Editable_Contractor_RFI_Survey_Response_Template_1.docx

INSERT Vendor NAME HERE ONRR IT Mod Integrator RFI Survey Response Vendor ONRR IT Modernization & Replacement RFI Survey

· Please provide answers to all questions based on your proposed solution and any customization required to meet the specifics of this RFI.

· The response is limited to 45 pages with no smaller than 11-point font. However, you may use the Optional Capability Statement, Advice, and Considerations (item 2 under section 1.5 Submission Instructions) to augment your response. This optional item is limited to 15 pages.

· If the information is not applicable to your company, indicate “X” in the “N/A” column.

· In a response that requires ONLY a Yes or No response, indicate an “X” in the appropriate column.

GENERAL (G)

Company name:

Company address

Company address:

Name (First, Last):

Name (First, Last)

Position Title

Position Title:

Phone number.

Phone number:

E-mail address.

E-mail address:

Web site URL

Web site URL:

1. Large Business

2. Small Business (SB)

3. Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB)

4. Section 8(a) Business

5. Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB)

6. Economically Disadvantaged Woman-Owned Small Business (EDWOSB)

7. Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) Small Business

8. Veteran-Owned Small Business

9. Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB)

10. Indian economic enterprise (IEE)

11. Indian Small Business Economic Enterprise (ISBEE)

GWACS (List all that apply):

GSA MAS (List all that apply):

What is the recommended price arrangement for each of the following items. The choices are: LH, T&M, FFP.

· Discovery

· Discovery

· Development

· Postproduction Support

· Development

· O&M

· Postproduction Support

· O&M

1) Salesforce Product,

2) Proof of Principle,

3) Agency/Department,

4) System Description/Overview,

5) Alignment to ONRR Vision,

6) Total value: $

a) O&M Value

b) Development Value

b) If yes please provide an overview of your experience to include:

1) Snowflake Product,

2) Proof of Principle,

3) Agency/Department,

4) System Description/Overview,

5) Alignment to ONRR Vision,

6) Total value: $

a. O&M Value

b. Development Value

b) If so, please elaborate.

b) If so, please elaborate.

b) How would you address potential integration challenges with legacy systems or other third-party tools, and are there better platform choices that might offer smoother integration in the long term?

b) Do these platforms offer the flexibility needed for potential new functionality, user growth, or integration with other systems in the future?

c) If not, do you have a recommendation we should consider?

b) Please explain your reasoning, including any risks or benefits.

b) Why or why not?

c) Are there specific features or limitations of these platforms that could impact the successful completion of ONRR's efforts?

b) Can you provide examples of platforms you have implemented in similar contexts?

b) If so, please elaborate and indicate which one’s you have worked with and which ones you have not worked with.

b) If so, which specific products?

c) If yes, please provide an overview of your experience to include –

1) The products implemented,

2) Period of performance,

3) Agency/Department,

4) System Description/Overview,

5) Alignment to ONRR Vision,

6) Total value: $

b) If so which specific products?

c) If yes, please provide an overview of your experience to include –

1) The products implemented,

2) Period of performance,

3) Agency/Department,

4) System Description/Overview,

5) Alignment to ONRR Vision,

6) Total value: $

b) Please provide an overview of your experience to include –

1) The Products implemented,

2) Period of performance,

3) Agency/Department,

4) System Description/Overview,

5) Alignment to ONRR Vision,

6) Total value: $

b) Provide project overviews - time, cost, desc, alignment to our requirement.

b) What were the key challenges you faced, and how did you address them to ensure a successful migration? Please provide project specifics (Dates, Overviews, Cost and Schedule ranges, outcomes) where able.

b) What steps do you take to ensure continuity of financial operations during the migration process and post-migration stabilization?

b) Were data or transaction relays across multi-cloud / platform environments a concern?

b) Would you recommend any alternative platforms that could offer better resource utilization, cost control, or faster time-to-value for the BPR modules?

b) Which of the subgroup(s) if any, do you recommend ONRR consider for this requirement as it relates to the FM module? The GSA MAS subgroups include:

1) Additional Financial Management (FM) Solutions

2) Financial Management (FM) Service/Solution Adoption and Transition Services

3) Financial Management (FM) Technology Operations Support Services

4) Core Financial Management Solutions (Core FS)

b) Do you recommend ONRR pursue a solution that has received this recognition and if so, what solution do you recommend and why?

b) What level of detail and organization would be ideal to help you assess the feasibility, requirements, and scope of a project like this, especially in relation to the integration of Salesforce, Snowflake, and a new financial system?

b) What specific topics or sessions would you find most beneficial during the Industry Day to better understand the scope, requirements, and technical landscape of the project?

Contractor Survey Response to RFI # DOIDFBO250003 ONRR IT Mod Integrator Support Page 26 of 27