PRS ISSP 05-17-21.pdf

TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 1

PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

1. PURPOSE: This exhibit explains the requirements and standards for performance of service necessary for acceptable contract performance. It describes the quality assurance methods the Government will use to evaluate the Contractor’s performance in meeting the contract requirements, and describes the responsibility of the Contractor when a standard for performance is determined to be in noncompliance with contract requirements. The Performance Requirements Summary Table in this Technical Exhibit details the following information:

1.1 Column 1 – Required service under provision of contract.

1.2 Column 2 – Standard for performance of required service.

1.3 Column 3 – The acceptable quality level (AQL) for performance of required service. The AQL is the maximum percent defective (or the number of defects per hundred units) that, for purposes of sampling inspection can be considered satisfactory.

1.4 Column 4 – The inspection method and frequency that required services will be evaluated by the

Government.

2. BASIS FOR GOVERNMENT’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES: The primary quality assurance procedures that will be used by the Government to inspect and evaluate a Contractor’s performance will be 100% inspection.

3. CRITERIA FOR RANDOM SAMPLE INSPECTIONS: Random sampling inspection criteria are derived from

ANSI/ASQ Z1.4-2003. When the number of unsatisfactory ratings in the Contractor’s performance determined by the Government Inspector exceeds the AQL Ac number for any requirement, the Contractor shall complete a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR). The CDR shall require the Contractor to explain, in writing, why performance was unacceptable, how performance shall be returned to acceptable levels, and how reoccurrence of the problem shall be prevented in the future.

4. DETERMINATION OF CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

4.1 If the number of defects for a specific service is equal to or greater than the AQL maximum allowable degree of deviation, the service shall be determined unacceptable.

4.2 When performance in any specific service is determined unacceptable and clearly, the fault of the

Contractor, the Contractor shall re-perform the work at no additional cost to the Government.

PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY TABLE

Task Submittal Schedule AQL Inspection Method

C.3.1. Kick Off Teleconference

Kick-Off Teleconference notes to be provided electronically to the

COR.

Within three business days after the Kick Off Teleconference call occurred.

90% 100% Inspection

C.3.2. Work Plan Written Work Plan to be provided electronically to the COR.

Within 15 business days of contract award.

90% 100% Inspection

C.3.3. Existing ISSP Review and Refinement

Written revisions to the ISSP document to be provided electronically to the COR.

30 calendar days after each Quarterly IPR meeting.

90% 100% Inspection

Update the Idea Database of collected and reviewed sustainability/resiliency ideas.

30 calendar days after each Quarterly IPR meeting.

90% 100% Inspection

C.3.4. Quarterly ISSP IPRs

Materials for each of quarterly ISSP IPRs.

Prior to the scheduled IPR. 90% 100% Inspection

Written ISSP IPR Summary Report for each of the quarterly IPRs to be provided electronically to the COR.

15 calendar days after IPR ended. 90% 100% Inspection

C.3.5. Mid-Quarter ISSP Project Meetings

Materials for each Mid-Quarter ISSP Project Meeting.

Prior to the scheduled Mid- Quarter ISSP Project Meeting.

90% 100% Inspection

Written Project Status Report to be provided electronically to the

COR.

15 calendar days after Mid- Quarter ISSP Project Meetings.

90% 100% Inspection

C.3.6. ISSP Program and Project Planning, Assistance, Development, Execution, and Tracking

Written revised list of recommended projects for execution to be provided electronically to the COR.

30 calendar days after each Quarterly IPR meeting.

90% 100% Inspection

Written PMPs for 24 assigned projects (20 LOE team-executed and 4 Contractor-executed plans) to be provided electronically to the

COR.

30 calendar days after project is approved (approval will flow downward from Garrison Command or PAIO, as needed)

90% 100% Inspection

Written Project Completion Reports for the 24 assigned projects to be provided electronically to the COR.

30 calendar days after project completion.

90% 100% Inspection

Research summaries on strategic sustainability/resiliency planning efforts in industry and at other military installations to be provided electronically to the

COR.

30 calendar days after each Quarterly IPR meeting.

90% 100% Inspection

Written ISSP Program documentation; white papers, concept papers, briefings, technical materials, articles, outreach/promotion materials, award package nominations, research summaries, and information summaries to be provided electronically to the

COR.

30 calendar days after each Quarterly IPR meeting (when requested).

90% 100% Inspection

Task Submittal Schedule AQL Inspection Method

Develop and updated ISSP program standardized reports, slides, and templates used to facilitate and document requirements C.3.1 through C.3.7 to be provided electronically to the

COR.

30 calendar days after each Quarterly IPR meeting (when requested).

90% 100% Inspection

C.3.7. Sustainability Report

Written Draft Fort Leonard Wood Sustainability Report to be provided electronically to the

COR.

16 Sep 2022 90% 100% Inspection

Written Final For Leonard Wood Sustainability Report to be provided electronically to the

COR.

30 Sep 2022 90% 100% Inspection

C.4. Monthly Progress Reports

Written monthly reports documenting progress on the contract requirements and submitted to the COR via email.

The first and last report may cover more than a month with prior concurrence by the COR.

Invoices for partial payment will be submitted with the submission of the monthly progress reports.

Monthly; no later than the 10th calendar day following the reporting period.

90% 100% Inspection