Saudi_Arabia_Past_Performance_Survey-Attachment_2-Revised.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 23 KB Posted

Attached to
OPTION - SAUDI ARABIA WOMEN’S CORRECTIONS ACADEMY TRAINING PROJECT Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
PR7627943_01
Issued by
Department of State Office of Acquisition Management

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to OPTION - SAUDI ARABIA WOMEN’S CORRECTIONS ACADEMY TRAINING PROJECT, newest first.
File Type Posted
KSA_Women_Corrections_Academy-Solicitation1-Revised.docx DOCX document
Questions_from_vendors_W_Responses_OPMMOIUS_and_WSU_Comments-_FINAL_v1.docx DOCX document
Pricing.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Survey

PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
Introduction: The United States Department of State (DOS) is currently conducting a competitive procurement for its Saudi Arabia-Womens Correctional Training Program Services supporting U.S. Embassies and U.S. Agencies world-wide for which the prospective offeror [XXXXX] has been requested to identify customers with whom it is currently or has been recently under contract, to serve as potential references on its past performance record. You are being asked to complete the attached Contractor Past Performance Survey. You may also be contacted by a DOS procurement official to arrange a telephone interview, using the survey as the focal point of the interview. To ensure frank and open evaluations and expressions of opinions by evaluators, all parties are advised that the identity of respondents completing the survey will be held in confidence and will not be released or disclosed to the prospective offeror or outside the Government.
Instructions: Please complete all areas of this form indicated in light yellow.
PART I - CONTRACT INFORMATION
a. Contractor:XXXXX
b. Customer Name (Federal Agency or Other):
c. Technical Point of Contact Information
i. Name:
ii. Telephone Number:
iii. Facsimile Number:
iv. E-mail Address:
v. Mailing Address:
vi. Position Title/Grade:
d. Contract Number:
e. Type of Contract(Select responses from drop down menu)
i. Negotiated or Sealed Bidding:Negotiated
ii. Competitive or Non-Competitive:Competitive
iii. Firm-Fixed-Price, Cost-Plus, Time-and-Materials/Labor Hour, Hybrid, or Other:Firm-Fixed-Price
iv. Indefinite Quantity, Requirements, or neither:Indefinite Quantity
f. Contract Period of Performance:
h. Initial Contract Value: $
i. Current (or Completed) Contract Value: $
j. Brief Description of the Contract Requirement:

(Include a summary of the scope and complexity of the services provided.)

PART II - GOVERNMENT PAST PERFORMANCE/CUSTOMER SATISFACTION EVALUATION
EVALUATION RATINGS
EXCELLENT: Indicates the Contractor's performance within the area of evaluation clearly and consistently exceed contractual requirements.
SATISFACTORY: Indicates the Contractor's performance within the area of evaluation met the contractual requirements.
MARGINAL: Indicates the Contractor's performance within the area of evaluation experienced minor problems for which solutions were satisfactory.
UNACCEPTABLE: Indicates the Contractor's performance within the area of evaluation experienced serious problems. The Contractor is/was in danger of being unable to satisfy contractual requirements and timely recovery is not likely or did not occur.
EVALUATION AREA 1: QUALITY OF SERVICES
(Select the rating that applies from drop down menu)
Overall ability to proactively and aggressively perform contract requirements:
Overall ability to resolve performance issues:
Demonstration of reasonable and cooperative behavior in dealing with clients
Effectiveness and reliability of contractor's key personnel:
EVALUATION AREA 2: COMPLIANCE WITH SCHEDULES
(Select the rating that applies from drop down menu)
Overall performance in planning, scheduling, and monitoring:
Completion of major milestones on schedule:
Timely completion of efforts within period of performance:
EVALUATION AREA 3: PRICE/COST CONTROL
(Select the rating that applies from drop down menu)
Quality, completeness, and accuracy of price/cost proposals/invoices:
Accuracy and timeliness of cost reports:
Ability to perform within negotiated costs/prices:
Ability to provide innovative solutions that resulted in cost savings:
EVALUATION AREA 4: MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS
(Select the rating that applies from drop down menu)
Effictiveness in managing and directing contract resources:
Ability to work in collaboration with other contractors towards a common goal:
Ability to choose and manage quality subcontractors:
EVALUATION AREA 5: SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION
(Select the rating that applies from drop down menu)
Demonstrated support for small businesses through subcontracting opportunities:
Adherence to small business subcontracting goals
Demonstrated support for developing small business capabilities through mentoring campaigns
EVALUATION AREA 7: COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
(Select the rating that applies from drop down menu)
Adherence with regulatory requirements of contract
Proactive engagement to identify regulatory requirements
Proactive engagement to identify regulatory requirement risks
Proactive engagement to mitigate regulatory requirement risks
COMMENTS (Please include any additional comments concerning the past performance of the contractor):

Please Redact or Remove Rows 68-72

SAQMMA-16-R-0106

Attachment 12 - Past Performance Survey

&P

File details come from the government source that posted it.