Attachment_D_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 23 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- PR20069877
About this file
ATTACHMENT D PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ATTACHMENT_A_TERMS_AND_CONDITIIONS.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_C_PRICE_schedule_HSBP1012Q0150_.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Revised_Scope_of_Work_-_Laredo_BPSH_Displaced_Parking_9-14-12.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE CUSTOMER SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
Please complete the following questionnaire and return it via email to the attention of the individuals named below:
Contract Specialist, Joshua Bedregal at joshua.bedregal@dhs.gov Telephone: 202-325-4109
This survey pertains to: __________________________________________________________ Department/Component: _________________________________________________________ Solicitation Number: ____________________________________________________________ Date of Survey: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Person Completing Survey: _______________________________________________ Signature of Person Completing Survey: _____________________________________________ Your Company/Agency: _________________________________________________________ Your Role in this Contract: _______________________________________________________ Survey Period of Performance: ____________________________________________________ General description of products/services required under the contract: ______________________
RATINGS
Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible.
Assign each area a rating of either 4 (Outstanding), 3 (Good), 2 (Acceptable), or 1 (Unsatisfactory). Use the attached Rating Guidelines as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating. Annotate with N/A if not a rating consideration or inapplicable to the contract effort.
QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
1. Compliance with contract requirements:
1 2 3 4 N/A
2. Accuracy of reports:
1 2 3 4 N/A
3. Level of knowledge, experience, and training of personnel:
1 2 3 4 N/A
4. Capability of personnel to perform required services:
1 2 3 4 N/A
5. Effectiveness of personnel in performing required services:
1 2 3 4 N/A
6. Overall quality of product/service:
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | N/A |
| 7. | Product performance: | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | N/A |
| 9. | Ease of use: | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | N/A |
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
1. Reliability:
1 2 3 4 N/A
2. Responsive to technical direction:
1 2 3 4 N/A
3. Meets contract delivery schedules and/or task deadlines:
1 2 3 4 N/A
BUSINESS RELATIONS:
1. Effective management, including subcontracts:
1 2 3 4 N/A
2. Reasonable/cooperative behavior:
1 2 3 4 N/A
3. Responsive to contract requirements:
1 2 3 4 N/A
4. Notification of problems:
1 2 3 4 N/A
5. Flexibility:
1 2 3 4 N/A
6. Pro-active vs. reactive:
1 2 3 4 N/A
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
1. The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction:
a. Contractor Management Personnel (circle one) Yes No
b. Contractor Onsite Facility Personnel (circle one) Yes No
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
ATTACHMENT D
HSBP1012Q0150
Rating Guidelines
| QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE |
| COST CONTROL |
| TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE |
| BUSINESS RELATIONS |
| 4-Outstanding |
| There were no quality issues, and the contractor significantly exceeded the contract performance requirements without commensurate additional costs to the customer. |
| There were no cost management issues, and the contractor significantly exceeded the contract requirements, achieving cost savings to the customer. |
| There were no delays, and the contractor significantly bettered the agreed upon schedule. |
| Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues significantly exceeded customer expectations. |
| 3-Good |
| There were no, or minimal, quality problems, and the contractor exceeded the contract requirements. |
| There were no, or minimal, cost management issues, and the contractor exceeded the contract requirements. |
| There were no, or minimal, delays that affected achievement of contract requirements; however, the contractor was still able to better or meet the agreed upon schedule. |
| Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues exceeded the contract requirements. |
| 2-Acceptable |
| The contractor met the contract requirements. However, overall compliance required some assistance from the customer. |
| The contractor met the contract requirements. However, customer provided some assistance to the contractor to manage costs. |
| The contractor met the agreed upon schedule. However, customer provided some assistance to ensure the contractor met the agreed upon schedule. |
| Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues met the contract requirements. |
| 1-Unsatisfactory |
| Nonconformances compromised the achievement of contract requirements. |
| Contractor was unable to manage costs effectively. |
| Contractor delays jeopardized achievement of contract objectives. |
| Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues were not timely or effective. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .