20260304 AMSS Kit Components RFI update 2 April 26.docx

DOCX document 55 KB Posted

Attached to
RFI- AMSS Kit Components
Solicitation number
PdMFSS-2601
Issued by

About this file

This is a Request for Information (RFI) for the Arctic Mobility Sustainment System (AMSS), a U.S. Army initiative seeking mature Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) or Technology Readiness Level 7+ technologies to equip dismounted Soldiers for 72-hour Arctic operations. The RFI seeks ten categories of equipment: Arctic Transport System with Cover (soldier-towable sled compatible with UH-60 aircraft), Arctic Heater with Safety Modification Kit (lightweight, multi-fuel capable, heating shelter from -40°F to +40°F in one hour), Locking Carabiners (24 kN closed major axis strength for tactical mountainous tasks), Oval-type Carabiners (24 kN strength for towing up to 800 lbs), Bow Saw (locking/stowable design), Collapsible Avalanche Shovel (dual-mode shovel/hoe with D-handle for mittened use), Loppers (18-24 inches), Multipurpose Tool (cleaning and repair capability), Emergency Blanket (supporting 98th percentile soldier dimensions with 12-24 hour thermal insulation at -40°F to -65°F), and Emergency Stove (collapsible, wood and solid fuel compatible). All systems must be Berry Amendment and Buy American Act compliant, fully operational at -40°F (ideally -65°F), ergonomic for cold-weather clothing, lightweight, subdued in color, possess five years useful life and ten years storage life, and meet MIL-STD-810H environmental standards.

Responses must be submitted electronically by April 16, 2026, at 5:00 PM EST to the Army's Product Manager Force Sustainment Systems (PdM FSS) at raul.a.lopez.civ@army.mil and clinton.b.mcadams.civ@army.mil in PDF or DOCX format with 12-point font and one-inch margins. Submissions should include a completed Submission Form and a white paper not exceeding ten pages containing a cover page with product information and manufacturer details, executive summary, technical description, specifications with quantitative metrics, supply chain risk assessment, product utilization history and test results, required tools and equipment, transportation requirements, consumables, unit cost estimate, CAGE Code, and manufacturing capability with production capacity and timeline. The RFI explicitly states this is not a solicitation for proposals and does not constitute a commitment to procure; however, selected technologies will be invited to demonstrate capabilities at an Industry Day in June 2026, with invitation decisions communicated by end of May 2026. No reimbursement will be provided for response costs, proprietary information will be handled accordingly, and responses will not be returned.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
20260304 AMSS Kit Components RFI 6 April 26.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Request for Information (RFI):

INTRODUCTION: This announcement constitutes a Request for Information (RFI) notice for the Arctic Mobility Sustainment System (AMSS) described below.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This RFI notice is being issued for the purpose of determining market capability of sources and assessing industries’ current capabilities in specific technological areas. This does not constitute an Invitation for Bid (IFB), a Request for Proposal (RFP), a Request for Quote (RFQ) or an indication that the Government will contract for any of the items and/or services contained in this notice. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. NO SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS EXIST AT THIS TIME. Any information provided does not constitute a proposal but will be considered an exchange of capabilities and ideas. The Government will not be responsible for any cost incurred in furnishing this information or potential participation in the event. This RFI does not constitute a commitment, implied or otherwise, that the government will take procurement action in this matter. All information received in response to this notice that is marked Proprietary will be handled accordingly.

Responses will be reviewed, and candidate technologies of interest will be invited to participate in an Industry Day event in June 2026 to demonstrate and show the technology based on information provided in response to this RFI. Additional field evaluations may be completed.

The due date for responses to this RFI is 16 April 2026, 5pm EST.

BACKGROUND:

The Arctic Mobility Sustainment System (AMSS) addresses the need for equipment to operate effectively in the Arctic environment, where extreme cold, challenging terrain, and long distances require specialized capabilities. AMSS is being developed as a system that enables dismounted Soldiers to transport sustainment and survivability equipment essential for 72-hour operations. Current arctic equipment is outdated, unit-procured, and often in disrepair, failing to optimize Soldier mobility and survivability. The AMSS mitigates these gaps by improving mobility, reducing logistical strain, and enhancing Soldier safety in hazardous cold weather environments.

Product Manager Force Sustainment Systems (PdM FSS) is evaluating solutions to address gaps in legacy systems to include, but not limited to, rapid deployment and strike, system weight, equipment modernization, and system durability. Information received from this RFI may ultimately result in requests for equipment manufacturers to demonstrate their capabilities at no cost or risk to the Government.

REQUIREMENTS:

Mature technologies (TRL 7+) and products that can provide the following capabilities are of interest:

1. Arctic Transport System with Cover

a. Shall be towable by soldiers while on skis, snowshoes, or on foot, and be compatible with existing soldier equipment.

b. Front and rear side attachment points.

c. Front and rear push points.

d. Shall fit in a UH-60 with closed doors.

e. Appropriately sized to carry shelter and other issued end items.

f. Shall have multiple lift points to enable soldiers to lift, carry or maneuver without pinching, causing injuries to hands.

g. Shall be capable of being towed by snowmobiles and other Climatic Zone 7 all-terrain motorized vehicles.

h. Additional Components

i. Harness

1. Quick release capability.

2. Pole/Trace line anchor system.

ii. 5x 9ft Trace Lines

2. Arctic Heater w/ Safety Mod Kit

a. Shall be easily assembled and maintained by soldiers to prevent damage to equipment and bodily harm.

b. Shall be operable and able to direct/vent exhaust outside of a shelter.

c. Shall be lightweight and portable.

d. Shall be compatible with Class III Petroleum, Oil, and Lubricants.

i. Diesel, kerosene, or motor gas-based fuels.

ii. Wood, coal, Naphthal/White gas.

e. Shall have a fire mat.

f. Shall heat an arctic shelter from –40 to +40 in one (1) hour.

g. Maximum time to repair shall not exceed 15 mins for 90% of field level maintenance tasks.

3. Locking Carabiners

a. Shall support tactical tasks in mountainous terrain.

i. Ascent/Descent.

ii. Negotiating steep inclines.

iii. Supporting Casualty evacuation.

b. Shall enable soldiers to lift, carry, and maneuver equipment and personnel.

i. Closed Major Axis Strength - 24 kN.

ii. Open Major Axis Strength - 8 kN.

iii. Minor Axis Strength - 8 kN.

4. Oval-type Carabiner (Locking not required)

a. Shall support towing of a sled system weighing up to 800lbs.

i. Closed Major Axis Strength – 24kN.

ii. Open Major Axis Strength - 8 kN.

iii. Minor Axis Strength - 8 kN.

b. Shall support towing by Climatic Zone 7 vehicles.

5. Bow Saw

a. Locking: locked when in operation, stowable when not in use.

b. Integrated: Minimal likelihood of losing components that render the saw inoperable.

6. Collapsable Avalanche Shovel

a. Shall serve as a shovel/hoe system.

i. Separate modes for traditional shoveling and use as a hoe.

b. Shall have a “D-handle” for use with mittens.

i. T – handles are not compatible with mittens worn in the arctic environment.

7. Lopper

a. At least 18”, ideally 20-24".

b. One per squad or one per team.

8. Multipurpose Tool

a. Shall be able to clean an arctic heater system.

i. Plyer

ii. Picks

iii. Philips and flathead screwdriver.

b. Make sled repairs

i. Plyer/wrench to service bolts.

c. Make shelter repairs

i. Plyer

9. Emergency Blanket

a. Shall support 98th percentile height/weight measurements of a soldier.

i. Male – 73", ~200lbs

ii. Female - 68”, ~166lbs

b. Shall provide ≥ 12 hours of thermal insulation to maintain safe body temperature for a casualty in ambient temperatures of –40 F down to -65 F.

c. Shall provide ≥ 24 hours of active heating in ambient temperatures of –40 F down to -65 F.

d. Shall have access points to provide medical treatment without removing the casualty from the system.

e. Shall have multiple carrying handles for lifting, carrying, and maneuver.

f. Shall be compatible with litter systems.

g. Shall be small and lightweight while still meeting performance requirements.

10. Emergency Stove

a. Collapsible

b. Lightweight

c. Shall be compatible with both wood and solid fuel sources.

These systems shall have the following:

1. Berry Amendment compliant.

2. Buy American Act compliant.

3. Fully operational at –40 F, and ideally at -65 F with ice, snow, moisture, and thermal cycling.

4. Ergonomically suitable for soldiers wearing issued cold-weather clothing (mittens, multiple layers).

5. Lightweight while still meeting operational requirements.

6. Meet relevant MIL-STD-810H environmental requirements.

7. Five (5) years of useful life.

8. 10 years of storage life.

9. Shall be of subdued color that blends in with arctic environments and does not produce a large signature.

10. Capable of operating for a continuous 72-hour mission.

CONTENT AND FORMAT OF PRODUCT DESCRIPTIONS: The electronic copy of responses is to be in .PDF or .DOCX compatible format using a size 12 font with one-inch margins. Following a review of the responses received, PdM FSS may elect to request additional information, to gain additional information about their proposed solution(s).

SUBMISSION – should include:

The intent of the product synopsis is to identify systems/technologies that have already been shown to meet many of the performance requirements listed above and could be demonstrated. To respond to this RFI, please complete the attached Submission Form and the below listed information of interest white paper, NOT TO EXCEED 10 PAGES, with additional pertinent information.

Do not attach marketing brochures, test reports, or other extraneous materials to your submission as they will not be reviewed nor will they be considered as part of the evaluation.

INFORMATION OF INTEREST

The US Army seeks Commercial-Off–The-Shelf (COTS) or emerging technologies of Technology Readiness Level 7 (TRL 7) or higher (See definitions at the end of this document) that represent the state of the art. Contractors are requested to provide all of the following information for consideration within a white paper (not to exceed 10 pages):

a. A cover page labeled with the heading Arctic Mobility Sustainment System (AMSS) Product Information including product name, the manufacturer, and manufacturer address, technical point of contact, telephone number, email address and at least one photograph of the end item.

b. An executive summary describing the product.

c. No more than 10 pages including:

a. Product technical description. Fully describe the product inclusive of all components. (i.e. operational concept, system weight, system cube when packed for transportation, system dimensions when deployed for use, and any other applicable components.

b. Narrative and graphical depiction of the proposed system including core technologies, deployment methods, and important subsystems.

c. Product specifications with particular emphasis on quantitative metrics and capability. Applicable physical attributes to include parameters such as capacities, input requirements, salient output capabilities, or other quantitative characteristics as appropriate.

d. Any identified areas of concern or risk in the supply chain for the product.

e. Relevant history of product (or similar product) utilization and any test results applicable to the system requirements. Test reports may be requested after review.

f. Identify all tools and equipment required for operation.

g. Transportation requirements and limitations.

h. Consumables – Discuss all system consumables, including maintenance items.

i. Catalog price or rough estimate of unit cost.

j. Provide the product’s Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code.

i. U.S. Based Companies

1. Companies based in the U.S that need a CAGE Code must first create an account at SAM.gov and then begin a new entity registration. The company will be required to provide core business information, including its legal name, physical address, and Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN), which must match IRS records. After all required sections are completed and submitted, the registration will be validated. Upon successful activation, a CAGE Code is automatically assigned to the company’s profile.

ii. International Based Companies

1. Companies located outside of the U.S. must first obtain a NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) from their country’s National Codification Bureau (NBC) or directly from the NATO Support and Procurement Agency (NSPA). Once an NCAGE Code has been assigned, the company must register on SAM.gov to become eligible to conduct business with the U.S. government.

k. Detailed description of manufacturing capability to include production capacity and throughput information.

i. Capability to scale production.

ii. Production timeline to deliverable systems.

l. Locations of manufacturing.

If your technology is of interest, the Government Team will contact you with an invitation to participate in an Industry Day that will occur in June 2026.

All companies will be notified of invitation/non-invitation decisions before the end of May 2026.

The Government reserves the right to request additional clarifying information from each respondent.

SUBMISSION DATE AND ADDRESS: Electronic responses to this notice are requested to be emailed to the following Points of Contact no later than 16 April 2026, 5pm EST.

· Raul Lopez, Project Lead, raul.a.lopez.civ@army.mil

· Clinton McAdams, Project Engineer, clinton.b.mcadams.civ@army.mil The subject line of the e-mail should contain the words Arctic Mobility Sustainment System (AMSS).

Please note: Brochures or other descriptions of general organizational or individual capabilities will not be accepted as a response. All responses will be assigned an identification number, and an email will acknowledge receipt.

NOTE: This RFI is issued for the purpose of determining market capability of sources and does not constitute an indication that the Government will contract for any of the items and/or services contained in this notice. All information received in response to this notice that is marked Proprietary will be handled accordingly. Responses may not include classified material. Responses to this notice will not be returned. No reimbursement will be made for any costs to provide information in response to this announcement or any follow-up information requests. Information contained herein is based on the best information available at the time for publication, is subject to revision, and is not binding upon the Government. Availability of any formal solicitation will be announced under a separate Federal Business Opportunities announcement.

REFERENCES

Department of Defense Technology Readiness Levels, Defined*

Technology Readiness Level
Description
1. Basic principles observed and reported.
Lowest level of technology readiness. Scientific research begins to be translated into applied research and development. Examples might include paper studies of a technology’s basic properties.
2. Technology concept and/or application formulated.
Invention begins. Once basic principles are observed, practical applications can be invented. Applications are speculative and there may be no proof or detailed analysis to support the assumptions. Examples are limited to analytic studies.
3. Analytical and experimental critical function and/or characteristic proof of concept.
Active research and development is initiated. This includes analytical studies and laboratory studies to physically validate analytical predictions of separate elements of the technology. Examples include components that are not yet integrated or representative.
4. Component and/or breadboard validation in laboratory environment.
Basic technological components are integrated to establish that they will work together. This is relatively “low fidelity” compared to the eventual system. Examples include integration of “ad hoc” hardware in the laboratory.
5. Component and/or breadboard validation in relevant environment.
Fidelity of breadboard technology increases significantly. The basic technological components are integrated with reasonably realistic supporting elements so it can be tested in a simulated environment. Examples include

“high fidelity” laboratory integration of components.

6. System/subsystem model or prototype demonstration in a relevant environment.
Representative model or prototype system, which is well beyond that of TRL 5, is tested in a relevant environment. Represents a major step up in a technology’s demonstrated readiness. Examples include testing a prototype in a high-fidelity laboratory environment or in simulated operational environment.
7. System prototype demonstration in an operational environment.
Prototype near, or at, planned operational system. Represents a major step up from TRL 6, requiring demonstration of an actual system prototype in an operational environment such as an aircraft, vehicle, or space. Examples include testing the prototype in a test bed aircraft.
8. Actual system completed and qualified through test and demonstration.
Technology has been proven to work in its final form and under expected conditions. In almost all cases, this TRL represents the end of true system development. Examples include developmental test and evaluation of the system in its intended weapon system to determine if it meets design specifications.
9. Actual system proven through successful mission operations.
Actual application of the technology in its final form and under mission conditions, such as those encountered in operational test and evaluation. Examples include using the system under operational mission conditions.

DEFINITIONS:

BREADBOARD: Integrated components that provide a representation of a system/subsystem and which can be used to determine concept feasibility and to develop technical data. Typically configured for laboratory use to demonstrate the technical principles of immediate interest. May resemble final system/subsystem in function only.

“HIGH FIDELITY”: Addresses form, fit and function. High-fidelity laboratory environment would involve testing with equipment that can simulate and validate all system specifications within a laboratory setting.

“LOW FIDELITY”: A representative of the component or system that has limited ability to provide anything but first order information about the end product. Low-fidelity assessments are used to provide trend analysis.

MODEL: A functional form of a system, generally reduced in scale, near or at operational specification. Models will be sufficiently hardened to allow demonstration of the technical and operational capabilities required of the final system.

OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT: Environment that addresses all of the operational requirements and specifications required of the final system to include platform/packaging.

PROTOTYPE: A physical or virtual model used to evaluate the technical or manufacturing feasibility or military utility of a particular technology or process, concept, end item or system.

RELEVANT ENVIRONMENT: Testing environment that simulates the key aspects of the operational environment.

SIMULATED OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL: Either 1) a real environment that can simulate all of the operational requirements and specifications required of the final system, or 2) a simulated environment that allows for testing of a virtual prototype; used in either case to determine whether a developmental system meets the operational requirements and specifications of the final system.

*Source: DoD Deskbook 5000.2-R, Appendix 6, Technology Readiness Levels and Their Definitions.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .