Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Make Repairs and Upgrades to Ed Center
- Solicitation number
- 140P5224R0024
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire. It requests information about a previous project completed by a contractor, including the quality of work, timeliness of performance, documentation, coordination, safety program, budget conformance, claims/litigation, and customer satisfaction. The questionnaire covers details such as whether the contractor was "Excellent", "Above Average", "Average", "Below Average", or had "Unsuccessful" performance in various areas. It also asks whether the customer would work with the contractor again. The responses are intended to provide an assessment of the contractor's past performance for consideration in evaluating their qualifications for a future federal contract opportunity.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation_140P5224R0024.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5224R0024.pdf | ||
| SOW-_Upgrade_BARA_Ed_Center.pdf | ||
| Bid_Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Name/Title, Firm Name & Address (City and State) which completed project:
2. Title of Project/Contract Number:
3. Description of Project which was completed:
4. Quality of Work:
Excellent Quality
Above Average Quality
Average Quality
Below Average Quality
Unsuccessful or Experienced Significant Quality Problems
5. Timeliness of Performance:
Completed Substantially Ahead of Schedule
Completed on Schedule with no Time Delays
Completed on Schedule with Minor Delays Under Extenuating Circumstances
OTHER (explain)
6. Documentation:
To what extent were reports, submittals and other required documentation accurate, complete?
Excellent Quality
Above Average Quality
Average Quality
Below Average Quality
Unsuccessful or Experienced Significant
Quality Problems
Remarks:
7. Coordination:
How well were subcontractors, suppliers, and/or the labor force managed and coordinated? Or, if firm was a subcontractor, how well did they respond to coordination efforts and work with other subs? Were there any problems and, if so, how were they handled?
Excellent
Above Average
Average
Below Average
Unsuccessful
Remarks:
8. Overall Safety Program
How well did the contractor manage the construction as it relates to safety? Discuss any safety issues that arose during the course of the contract.
Excellent
Above Average
Average
Below Average
Unsuccessful
Remarks:
9. Budget:
How well did the firm conform to the project budget? Did the contractor initiate unwarranted change orders or change order requests?
Excellent
Above Average
Average
Below Average
Unsuccessful
Remarks:
10: Claims/Litigation:
Was the contractor involved in any claims or litigation surrounding this project?
_______Yes ______No If yes, please explain.
Remarks:
11: Customer Satisfaction:
To what extent were the end users satisfied with: Quality? Cost? Schedule?
Exceptionally Satisfied Q____ C____S______
Highly Satisfied Q____ C____S______
Satisfied Q____ C____S______
Somewhat Dissatisfied(please explain) Q____ C____S______
Remarks:
If given the opportunity, would you work with this contractor again?
Yes_________ No_________ Not Sure__________-
Remarks:
Other Remarks:
Use the space below to provide other information related to the contractor’s performance. This may include selection of subcontractors, flexibility in dealing with contract challenges, payment issues, their overall concern for the client’s interest, etc.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .