Past_Performance_Questionaire.pdf

140L3722R0001 NIFC 300 JWH Fire Sprinkler Replacement

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

NOTICE TO OFFERORS

Contained herein is the draft letter and questionnaire that the Contracting Officer will use to solicit past performance information from customers that the Offeror has identified in response to the solicitation. This questionnaire may also be submitted for references of key personnel.

As stated in the solicitation, the Contracting Officer, in the interest of expediency, will start collecting past performance information before proposal receipt. Offerors are requested to submit their past performance information in advance of the proposal due date. The past performance questionnaire below shall be used by offerors to send to their previous customers.

The questionnaire includes multiple questions regarding past performance and instructs individuals to return the completed questionnaire to the Government. Failure by offerors to submit past performance information early or by customers to submit completed questionnaires shall not be a cause for rejection of the offeror’s proposal, nor shall it be reflected in the

Government's evaluation of the offeror's past performance.

Offerors are encouraged to submit the attached cover letter and questionnaire to their references and request the return of the questionnaire to the Contracting Officer as soon as possible, prior to the established closing date of the solicitation. Offerors shall complete

Blocks 1 and 2 of the questionnaire.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

MEMORANDUM FOR PROJECT OWNERS/REFERENCES

FROM: Department of Interior

Bureau of Land Management

National Interagency Fire Center

3833 S Development Ave, Suite 1200

Boise, ID 83705-5354

SUBJECT: Request for Performance Information

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. We are currently evaluating this company for award of a contract for a project entitled, “NIFC 300 JWH Fire Sprinkler Replacement” in Boise, Idaho.

It is requested that you complete the attached questionnaire providing detailed information on the performance history of the firm identified.

It is essential that this office receive your official response not later than January 5th, 2022.

Please email your response to ellenjohnson@blm.gov.

Sincerely, //SIGNED//

Ellen Johnson

Contract Specialist

1. Contractor Name, Address & Phone

Number:

2. Contract Number(s):

3. Awarded Contract Value:

4. Final Contract Value:

5. Period of Performance:

6. If there was a difference in awarded and final contract value, please explain why.

7. Type of Contract(s) Used: (Check all that apply)

[ ]FP

[ ]FPI

[ ]CR

[ ]T&M

[ ]Labor Hour

[ ]8(a) Direct

Award

[ ]Sealed Bid

[ ]Negotiated

[ ]TO/DO

[ ]SB Set-Aside

[ ]Competitive

[ ]8(a) Direct Award

[ ]Requirements

[ ]Sole Source

[ ] Construction of Buildings

[ ] Heavy/Civil Engineering

Construction

[ ] Specialty Trade Construction

[ ] Demolition

[ ] Service

8. Description of Requirement:

9. Ratings: Satisfactory: Performance met contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Unsatisfactory: Performance did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery was not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contained problems for which the contractor’s corrective actions appeared or were ineffective.

If the question is not applicable, please insert N/A following the question.

Questionnaire Satisfactory/Yes Unsatisfactory/No

a. How would you describe the quality of the contractor’s management relationship with government counterparts, including ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes?

b. How timely and effective was the contractor when dealing with contract problem resolution issues?

c. How well did the contractor respond to emergency situations?

d. How was the contractor’s quality overall?

e. How well did the contractor adhere to the schedule?

f. Was the project completed in a timely manner?

g. How well did the contractor perform within contract costs?

h. How well did the contractor manage any subcontractors?

i. Were subcontractors paid in a timely manner?

j. Were materials paid in a timely manner?

k. Were submittals complete and provided in a timely manner?

l. Was this project performed in arctic conditions?

m. Were as-builts complete and submitted in a timely manner?

n. How well did the contractor correct building/construction problems?

o. How timely was completion of punch list items?

p. Were warranty issues addressed promptly?

q. How effectively were safety issues dealt with?

r. How effectively did the contractor manage the entire project?

s. How effectively did the contractor mobilize?

t. Did the contractor apply sufficient resources (personnel/facilities) for the project?

u. Did the contractor perform at least 15 percent of the work with its own employees?

10. COMMENTS:

11. Respondent’s Identification:

Name:

Position/Title:

Address & Phone Number:

Relationship and Time Involved with Program/Contract:

Date of Evaluation:

Block 1: Name, address and phone number of the contract being evaluated. Identify the specific division being evaluated if there is more than one.

Block 2: Contract number(s) used to evaluate performance.

Block 3: Contract value, including any option periods.

Block 4: Final contract value.

Block 5: Period of performance dates.

Block 6: If there was a difference between the awarded amount and the final contract value, please provide an explanation.

Block 7: Please check all that apply.

Block 8: Provide a description of the requirement.

Block 9: Ratings’ definitions and questions. Please check or indicate the appropriate rating.

Block 10: For any Unsatisfactory rating, please provide an explanation for the rating.

Block 11: Please provide your information as respondent. This information will not be shared with the contractor.