P17PS00502_Att_3_Hazmat.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- NAMA_LINC_204959_Roof_Masonry Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- P17PS00502
About this file
Hazmat
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| P17PS00502_Amendment_000002.pdf | ||
| PreProposal_sign_in.pdf | ||
| PreProposal_Agenda_Heather.pdf | ||
| P17PS00502_Amendment_000001.pdf | ||
| P17PS00502_Solicitation.pdf | ||
| P17PS00502_Att_2_Dwgs.pdf | ||
| P17PS00502_Att_1_Specs.pdf | ||
| B08_Presol_NAMA-204959_Lincoln-Memorial_Roof_Masonry.pdf | ||
| Sources_Sought_NAMA_204959_LINC_Roof_Masonry.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
SURVEY (UPDATED)
Lincoln Memorial 2 Lincoln Memorial Circle NW
Washington, DC June 14, 2017
Terracon Project 70177206
Prepared For:
VHB
Williamsburg, Virginia
Prepared By:
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Raleigh, North Carolina mgiller Text Box National Mall and Memorial Parks Replace Lincoln Memorial Roof and Repair Masonry NAMA 204959 and 185965
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Objective
2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION
3.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES
3.1 Asbestos
3.2 Lead Paint Sampling
3.3 Limited Visual Assessment for Hazardous Materials
3.4 Limited Mold Assessment
4.0 REGULATORY OVERVIEW
4.1 Asbestos
4.2 Lead Paint
4.3 Hazardous Materials
4.4 Mold
5.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs)
5.2 Limited Lead Paint Sampling
5.3 Limited Visual for Hazardous Materials
5.4 Mold
6.0 GENERAL COMMENTS
Appendix A Asbestos Survey Sample Summary Appendix B Identified Asbestos-Containing Materials Appendix C Asbestos Laboratory Analytical Reports Appendix D Lead Paint Sample Summary Appendix E Lead Paint Laboratory Analytical Reports Appendix F Photographs
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 1
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY (UPDATED)
LINCOLN MEMORIAL
2 LINCOLN MEMORIAL CIRCLE NW
WASHINGTON, DC
Terracon Project No. 70177206 June 14, 2017
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) conducted an asbestos survey, limited lead paint chip sampling, limited visual survey for hazardous materials, and a limited visual mold assessment at the Lincoln Memorial located at 2 Lincoln Memorial Circle NW in Washington, DC. This survey was conducted on April 13 and June 1, 2017 by an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act( AHERA) in general accordance with NPS IDIQ Task Order Authorization No. P17PD00580 dated February 24, 2017. Building components that may be impacted by planned renovation were surveyed and homogeneous areas of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM) were visually identified and documented.
Although reasonable effort was made to survey accessible suspect materials, additional suspect but un-sampled materials could be located in walls, in voids or in other concealed areas.
Suspect ACM samples were collected in general accordance with the sampling protocols outlined in EPA regulation 40 CFR 763 (AHERA). Samples were delivered to an accredited laboratory for analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). Per the client’s request, roof and the interior of the Lincoln Memorial are included in this survey.
1.1 Project Objective
We understand the purpose of these services was to identify and quantify asbestos-containing materials and lead paint as well as document visually the presence of other hazardous materials or suspect mold growth that may be present prior to renovation activities. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulation 40 CFR 61, Subpart M, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), prohibits the release of asbestos fibers to the atmosphere during renovation or demolition activities. The asbestos NESHAP requires that potentially regulated ACM be identified, classified and quantified prior to planned disturbances, renovation, or demolition activities.
The Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) has promulgated a worker protection standard for the disturbance of lead-containing paints during renovation and demolition projects. OSHA regulation 29 CFR 1926.62 established airborne lead concentration limits for the Construction Industry. OSHA has not established limits for lead content in bulk materials. Their interpretation on this issue is that any amount of lead may cause airborne concentrations above the established limits. Therefore, during renovation or demolition
Hazardous Materials Survey (Updated) Lincoln Memorial ■ Washington, DC June 14, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. 70177206
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 2 activities, which may disturb lead, employees must be protected from lead exposures. The limited lead paint sampling was performed to meet informational needs to comply with the OSHA Lead in Construction Standard (29 CRF 1926.62). Currently, proposed renovation/demolition actions which may impact lead containing paint is subject to OSHA regulation 29 CFR 1926.62.
2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION
The Lincoln Memorial is an American national monument constructed from 1914 to its opening in 1922. The Memorial has a bookstore, an exhibit space, an undercroft, police room, ranger break room, janitor’s closet and statue area. The 27,336 square feet structure is made of granite block, marble, and limestone. Interior finishes of the Memorial consists of plaster and drywall, and flooring consists of vinyl floor tile, ceramic tile, concrete or pink marble. The exhibit space has a suspended ceiling tile grid. Domestic water lines were insulated with foam or fiberglass. The heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) system within the bookstore ducts were insulated with fiberglass.
3.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES
3.1 Asbestos
An AHERA and Commonwealth of Virginia Accredited Asbestos Building Inspector, Mr.
Russell Chapman (VA Accredited Asbestos Inspector Number 3303003784), conducted the survey. At the client’s request, the survey was conducted as required by EPA NESHAP regulations prior to renovation activities.
3.1.1 Visual Assessment
Our survey activities began with visual observation of the facility to identify homogeneous areas of suspect ACM. A homogeneous area consists of building materials that appear similar throughout in terms of color, texture and date of application. The interior and roof assessment was conducted throughout visually accessible areas of the building. Building materials identified as concrete, glass, wood, masonry, metal or rubber were not considered suspect.
3.1.2 Physical Assessment
A physical assessment of each homogeneous area of suspect ACM was conducted to assess the friability and condition of the materials. A friable material is defined by the EPA as a material, which can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry. Friability was assessed by physically touching suspect materials.
3.1.3 Sample Collection
Based on results of the visual observation, bulk samples of suspect ACM were collected in general accordance with AHERA sampling protocols. Random samples of suspect materials were collected in each homogeneous area. Sample team members collected bulk samples
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 3 using wet methods as applicable to reduce the potential for fiber release. Samples were placed in sealable containers and labeled with unique sample numbers using an indelible marker.
Ninety-six (96) bulk samples were collected from thirty-one (31) homogeneous areas of suspect ACM. A summary of suspect ACM samples collected during the survey is included as Appendix A. Photographs are included as Appendix F.
3.1.4 Sample Analysis
Bulk samples were submitted under chain of custody to EMSL Analytical, Inc. (EMSL) of Morrisville, North Carolina for analysis by PLM with dispersion staining techniques per EPA’s Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (600/R-93-116). The percentage of asbestos, where applicable, was determined by microscopic visual estimation.
EMSL is accredited under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program NVLAP (Accreditation Number 200671-0).
3.2 Limited Lead Paint Sampling
Terracon collected paint chip samples to assess the lead content in percent by weight of select painted surfaces in the building. Suspect lead paint samples were collected in general accordance with the EPA’s work practice standards for conducting lead paint activities (40 CFR 745.227). Currently, any proposed renovation/demolition is subject to the OSHA regulations (29 CFR 1926.62 – Lead Exposure in Construction).
3.2.1 Lead Paint Sample Collection and Analysis
The lead paint sampling began with the Terracon walking the interior, observing painted surfaces, and selecting sample locations. After the sampling strategy was determined, Terracon collected eleven (11) representative paint chip samples from surfaces throughout the memorial.
Paint chip samples were submitted under a chain of custody to EMSL of Kernersville, North Carolina. Paint chip samples were analyzed by Flame Atomic Absorption method SW846- 7420. EMSL is an American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) accredited laboratory (ELLAP, Lab Code 102564), to perform Flame Atomic Absorption analysis. A summary of the paint chip samples collected during the survey is presented in Appendix D.
3.3 Limited Visual Survey for Hazardous Materials
Terracon conducted a limited visual survey for hazardous materials consisting of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in light ballasts, mercury bulbs/light tubes, mercury-containing devices, radioactive signs, chloroflourocarbons (CFCs), and lead-containing batteries. No samples were collected as part of this service. A summary of findings regarding this service is included in Section 6.2.
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 4
3.4 Limited Visual Mold Assessment
Based on the multiple sources of potential indoor and outdoor contaminants that can affect indoor air quality, the visual assessment is conducted to evaluate general indoor hygiene, suite maintenance practices, moisture intrusion, uncontrolled condensate formation, and odors. The assessment focuses primarily on collecting observational data (i.e., information obtained by visual assessment of the accessible sections of the suite and interviews with the building management, owners, and occupants). The visual assessment can help to formulate plans for more in-depth investigation.
The visual assessment included:
an observation of the physical structure and potential indoor and outdoor sources of indoor air pollutants;
the determination of the type of enclosure (walls, windows, roof, and foundation), age, location, and condition;
the determination of the types of finishes on walls, floors, and ceilings, the types of furnishings;
the identification of housekeeping activities and products, office equipment, and any renovation activities; and the identification of any discoloration or odor that could indicate moisture intrusion, water damage and microbial growth
The visual assessment was limited to the areas of planned renovation and was conducted in general accordance with guidelines published by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA®).
Destructive sampling or testing to inspect interior wall cavity spaces or mechanical enclosures was not within the scope of work for this project.
4.0 REGULATORY OVERVIEW
4.1 Asbestos
The asbestos NESHAP (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M) regulates asbestos fiber emissions and asbestos waste disposal practices. It also requires the identification and classification of existing building materials prior to demolition or renovation activities. Under NESHAP, asbestos-containing building materials are classified as either friable, Category I non-friable or Category II non-friable ACM. Friable materials are those that, when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Category I non-friable ACM includes packings, gaskets, resilient floor coverings and asphalt roofing products containing more than 1% asbestos.
Category II non-friable ACM are any materials other than Category I materials that contain more than 1% asbestos.
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 5
Friable ACM, Category I and Category II non-friable ACM which is in poor condition and has become friable or which will be subjected to drilling, sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading and which could be crushed or pulverized during anticipated renovation or demolition activities are considered regulated ACM (RACM). RACM must be removed prior to renovation activities which will disturb the materials.
The EPA requires that no person remove more than 35 cubic feet (1 cubic meter), 160 square feet (15 square meters), or 260 linear feet (80 linear meters) of regulated asbestos-containing material without a permit issued by the EPA. Applications must be postmarked or received by the EPA at least 10 working days prior to the scheduled removal start date. The application must be mailed to the following address:
• Asbestos Coordinator
USEPA
Region III Mail Code 3LC62 1650 Arch St.
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029
The OSHA Asbestos standard for construction (29 CFR 1926.1101) regulates workplace exposure to asbestos. The OSHA standard requires that employee exposure to airborne asbestos fibers be maintained below 0.1 asbestos fibers per cubic centimeter of air (0.1 f/cc).
The OSHA standard classifies construction and maintenance activities which could disturb ACM, and specifies work practices and precautions which employers must follow when engaging in each class of regulated work. States which administer their own federally-approved state OSHA programs may require additional precautions.
4.2 Lead Paint
The lead paint sampling activities were conducted in general accordance with the EPA’s work practice standards for conducting lead paint activities (40 CFR 745, and State and local regulations) to meet informational needs to comply with the OSHA Lead in Construction Standard. Lead is regulated by the EPA and OSHA.
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) gave the USEPA authority to regulate the waste status of demolition or renovation debris, including lead-containing materials. Specific notification and testing requirements must be addressed prior to transporting, treating, storing, or disposing of hazardous wastes. Lead containing wastes are considered hazardous waste under RCRA if Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) results exceed 5 milligrams per liter (mg/L). EPA exempts from most RCRA requirements those generators whose combined hazardous waste generation is less than 100 kilograms (kg) per month.
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 6
Detectable lead quantities may constitute a lead dust hazard during renovation/demolition activities. Personnel performing renovation/demolition activities that may disturb painted components with concentrations of lead above the designated analytical detection limit should comply with current OSHA regulations in order to minimize employee exposure. OSHA defines lead-based paint as a paint, which contains lead, regardless of the concentration. Currently, any proposed renovation/demolition is subject to the OSHA regulations (29 CFR 1926.62 – Lead Exposure in Construction). The OSHA regulation defines specific training requirements, engineering controls and working practices for construction personnel subject to this standard.
Occupational exposure to lead occurring in the course of construction work, including maintenance activities, painting, alteration and repairs is subject to the OSHA “Interim” Lead Exposure in Construction standard.
Construction work covered by 29 CFR 1926.62 includes any repair or renovation activities or other activities that disturb in-place lead-containing materials, but does not include routine cleaning and repainting where there is insignificant damage, wear, or corrosion of existing lead-containing coatings or substrates. Employers must assure that no employee will be exposed to lead at concentrations greater than 50 micrograms per cubic meter ( g/m3) averaged over an eight-hour period without adequate protection. The OSHA Standard also establishes an action level of 30 g/m3 which if exceeded triggers the requirement for medical monitoring.
The above overview is not intended to be inclusive of all potentially pertinent regulatory information. The relevant EPA and OSHA standards should be consulted prior to undertaking activities involving the demolition, renovation, or maintenance of surfaces coated with lead-based paints.
4.3 Hazardous Materials
Materials such as heavy metals (e.g., mercury and lead), CFCs, PCBs, and various other chemicals/hazardous substances may be found at commercial/industrial facilities. These materials may be located in containers or be contained in various building materials, fixtures, or equipment. These materials, if improperly managed, may be considered environmental hazards and, therefore, require special handling and disposal considerations prior to, or in conjunction with, renovation or demolition efforts to prevent their entry into the environment.
Hazardous materials are regulated under different federal and state statutes including the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and RCRA.
4.4 Mold
There are no state or federal exposure limits established for fungal aerosols. There are currently no regulatory standards or medically based threshold limit or dose-response relationships for exposure to airborne or surface concentrations of mold spores. Terracon relies upon experience, professional judgment, current scientific literature, guidelines and recommendations made by professional organizations and experts, and statistical methods in interpreting mold assessment results.
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 7
5.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Asbestos
Based on the results of laboratory analysis, samples of the following materials were identified to contain asbestos:
Black Mastic on East Wall in Skylight Room Black Mastic on West Wall in Skylight Room Joint compound associated with drywall systems in the Police Room
In addition, suspect asbestos-containing spray-applied fireproofing was observed on the undercroft. Terracon was unable to sample the material due to safety concerns. This material is assumed to contain asbestos.
The asbestos-containing mastics are considered NESHAP Category II non-friable ACMs in good condition. The joint compound and assumed asbestos-containing fireproofing is considered RACM in good condition. These materials must be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to renovation activities that may disturb these materials.
It should be noted that suspect materials, other than those identified during the April 13 and June 1, 2017 surveys may exist within the structure. Should suspect materials other than those which were identified during this survey be uncovered prior to or during the abatement and renovation activities, those materials should be assumed asbestos-containing until sampling and analysis can confirm or deny their asbestos content.
5.2 Limited Lead Paint Sampling
Lead was detected above the laboratory detection limit in the following paint chip samples collected from the building:
Brown on Metal Duct White and Orange on Metal Pipe Brown on Metal Pipe White on Plaster Ceramic Tile
These and similarly painted surfaces should be assumed to contain lead paint.
Detectable lead quantities may constitute a lead dust hazard during renovation or demolition activities. Terracon recommends that personnel performing activities that may disturb painted components with concentrations of lead above the designated analytical detection limit should comply with all current OSHA regulations in order to minimize employee exposure. OSHA defines Lead Paint as a paint, which contains lead, regardless of the concentration. Currently, Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 8 any proposed renovation/demolition is subject to the OSHA regulations (29 CFR 1926.62 – Lead Exposure in Construction). The OSHA regulation defines specific training requirements, engineering controls and working practices for construction personnel subject to this standard.
There are also federal and state regulations, which require characterization of demolition debris to determine the proper disposal procedures. Caution should always be used during demolition or renovation operations to prevent potential lead exposure. Additionally, Terracon recommends that mechanical disturbance (sanding, grinding) of the lead paint be avoided.
5.3 Limited Visual Survey for Hazardous Materials
5.3.1 PCBs in Light Ballasts
Terracon conducted a representative visual assessment of light fixtures and electrical transformers to assess the prevalence of PCB-containing items. Typically, ballasts manufactured prior to 1979 are presumed to contain PCBs unless clearly marked as containing “No PCBs”. Ballasts that do not contain a “No PCBs” label are presumed to be PCB containing.
During the visual survey, Terracon identified ballasts that were labeled to not contain PCB’s.
It is possible, however, that some ballasts not observed during our survey may contain PCBs.
If ballasts and equipment are found to contain PCBs and the ballasts/equipment are to be removed as part of potential renovation activities, Terracon recommends that they be removed and properly recycled or disposed in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations.
5.3.2 Mercury
Metallic mercury is a silver-white liquid at room temperature. Elemental and inorganic mercury compounds are used in manufacturing scientific instruments, thermostats, electric equipment, mercury vapor lamps and high intensity discharge (HID) lights. Mercury is considered a hazardous material due to its ability to bioaccumulate within the environment. Recycling mercury-containing components reduces the load of mercury entering the environment.
Terracon did not identify any suspect mercury-containing thermostats during the visual survey of the Lincoln Memorial. However, approximately 200 fluorescent light bulbs were observed during the visual survey. These units historically contain mercury vapor. Terracon recommends that any suspect mercury-containing thermostats and fluorescent light bulbs be removed and properly disposed or recycled prior to demolition activities in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations. Prior to renovation or demolition, these items should be removed intact, packaged to prevent breakage and transferred to an approved recycling facility that recovers mercury. Bulbs that are no longer in use or removed as part of the renovation project should be managed as Universal Waste mercury containing equipment or lamps (as appropriate).
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 9
5.3.3 Radioactive Materials
Radioactive materials in low levels are typically used in smoke detectors (typically americium-
241) and exit signs (tritium). Most smoke detectors sold today use one microcurie or less of americium-241. A 2001 Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) study found people with two of these smoke detector units in their homes receive less than 0.002 millirems of radiation dose each year. That dose can be compared to the “background radiation” that people receive from space and the earth. EXIT signs that glow in the dark often contain a radioactive gas called tritium. Tritium, also known as 3H or H-3, is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen. In EXIT signs the gas is contained in sealed glass tubes lined with a light-emitting compound. The tritium gives off low-energy beta radiation that causes the lining to glow. This type of radiation cannot penetrate a sheet of paper or clothing. If inhaled, it leaves the body relatively quickly.
Tritium gas is odorless, colorless and tasteless, and is lighter than air.
Terracon identified approximately 10 smoke detectors during the visual survey that may contain radioactive materials. Suspect tritium EXIT signs were not observed within the project site. Terracon recommends the removal and proper disposal or recycling of ionizing radiation smoke detectors from the building prior to renovation or demolition activities in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations.
5.3.4 CFCs
A CFC is an organic compound that consists of carbon, hydrogen, chlorine, and fluorine.
Many CFCs have been widely used as refrigerants, propellants, and solvents.
Chlorofluorocarbons are purported to cause depletion of the atmospheric ozone layer.
Equipment (refrigerators and air conditioners) which may contain CFCs were observed within the project site. Terracon did not determine actual refrigerant content/quantities and, therefore, is unable to verify if the indicated type and/or quantities of the listed refrigerants exists in these units. Prior to removal of CFC-containing equipment, the refrigerants should be removed by credentialed personnel qualified under an EPA CAA Section 608 training/certification program using EPA registered refrigerant recovery equipment and reclaimed by an EPA-certified refrigerant reclaimer.
5.3.5 Lead in Batteries
Batteries contain heavy metals such as mercury, lead, cadmium, and nickel; therefore, these items should be recycled in order to prevent impact to facility property, components, or the environment. Recovered metals and plastics from recycled batteries can be used to make new batteries.
Approximately two (2) ‘EXIT’ signs, which may contain dry cell, lead-acid batteries, were observed within the project site. Since there is no current renovation or demolition plan, the batteries may remain in-place. However, as part of routine maintenance, batteries that are
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 10 no longer in use should be removed intact, packaged to prevent leakage, and transferred to an approved recycling facility for management as Universal Waste lead-acid containing batteries.
5.4 Mold
Based on visual observations, no evidence of discoloration or odor that could indicate moisture intrusion, water damage or microbial growth was observed in the renovation area;
therefore, no tape lift samples were collected.
6.0 GENERAL COMMENTS
These hazardous materials consulting services were conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the same locale. The results, findings, conclusions and recommendations expressed in this report are based on conditions observed during our survey of the building. The information contained in this report is relevant to the date on which this survey was performed, and should not be relied upon to represent conditions at a later date. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for use by VHB for specific application to their project as discussed. This report is not a bidding document. Contractors or consultants reviewing this report must draw their own conclusions regarding further investigation or remediation deemed necessary. Terracon does not warrant the work of regulatory agencies, laboratories or other third parties supplying information, which may have been used in the preparation of this report. No warranty, expressed or implied is made.
APPENDIX A
ASBESTOS SURVEY SAMPLE SUMMARY
HA Sample Number Description Sample Location Lab Results
1 01 Pipe Wrap over Mineral Wool Undercroft None Detected 1 02 Pipe Wrap over Mineral Wool Undercroft None Detected 1 03 Pipe Wrap over Mineral Wool Undercroft None Detected 2 04 Door Caulk N.E. Entrance to Undercroft None Detected 2 05 Door Caulk N.E. Entrance to Undercroft None Detected 2 06 Door Caulk N.E. Entrance to Undercroft None Detected 3 07 Mortar at N.E. Undercroft Entrance N.E. Entrance to Undercroft None Detected 3 08 Mortar at N.E. Undercroft Entrance N.E. Entrance to Undercroft None Detected 3 09 Mortar at N.E. Undercroft Entrance N.E. Entrance to Undercroft None Detected 4 10 Black Cove Base and Mastic Police Room None Detected 4 11 Black Cove Base and Mastic Police Room None Detected 4 12 Black Cove Base and Mastic Police Room None Detected
Drywall and Joint Compound Police Room
Drywall: None Detected Joint Compound: 2% Chrysotile
Composite: <1% Chrysotile Must assume >1%
Drywall and Joint Compound Police Room
Drywall: None Detected Joint Compound: 2% Chrysotile
Composite: <1% Chrysotile Must assume >1%
Drywall and Joint Compound Police Room
Drywall: None Detected Joint Compound: 2% Chrysotile
Composite: <1% Chrysotile Must assume >1%
6 16 12 x 12 Vinyl Composite Tile and Mastic Police Room None Detected 6 17 12 x 12 Vinyl Composite Tile and Mastic Police Room None Detected 6 18 12 x 12 Vinyl Composite Tile and Mastic Police Room None Detected 7 19 Pipe Wrap at Undercroft Catwalk Area Undercroft None Detected 7 20 Pipe Wrap at Undercroft Catwalk Area Undercroft None Detected 7 21 Pipe Wrap at Undercroft Catwalk Area Undercroft None Detected 8 22 HVAC Wrap in Bookstore Bookstore None Detected 8 23 HVAC Wrap in Bookstore Bookstore None Detected 8 24 HVAC Wrap in Bookstore Bookstore None Detected 9 25 Pipe Wrap on Roof Drain Skylight Room None Detected 9 26 Pipe Wrap on Roof Drain Skylight Room None Detected 9 27 Pipe Wrap on Roof Drain Skylight Room None Detected 10 28 Black Mastic on East Wall Skylight Room 5% Chrysotile 10 29 Black Mastic on East Wall Skylight Room Positive Stop 10 30 Black Mastic on East Wall Skylight Room Positive Stop 11 31 Black Mastic on West Wall Skylight Room 35% Chrysotile 11 32 Black Mastic on West Wall Skylight Room Positive Stop 11 33 Black Mastic on West Wall Skylight Room Positive Stop 12 34 Caulk at Upper Roof Flashing Upper Roof None Detected 12 35 Caulk at Upper Roof Flashing Upper Roof None Detected 12 36 Caulk at Upper Roof Flashing Upper Roof None Detected 13 37 Mortar at Main Roof Flashing Main Roof None Detected 13 38 Mortar at Main Roof Flashing Main Roof None Detected 13 39 Mortar at Main Roof Flashing Main Roof None Detected 14 40 Mortar at Upper Roof Upper Roof None Detected 14 41 Mortar at Upper Roof Upper Roof None Detected 14 42 Mortar at Upper Roof Upper Roof None Detected 15 43 Caulk at Upper Roof Fan Vent Upper Roof None Detected 15 44 Caulk at Upper Roof Fan Vent Upper Roof None Detected 15 45 Caulk at Upper Roof Fan Vent Upper Roof None Detected 16 46 Caulk at Main Roof Penetration Main Roof None Detected 16 47 Caulk at Main Roof Penetration Main Roof None Detected 16 48 Caulk at Main Roof Penetration Main Roof None Detected 17 49 Roof Tar on Brick at Skylight Room S.E. Corner Skylight Room None Detected 17 50 Roof Tar on Brick at Skylight Room S.E. Corner Skylight Room None Detected 17 51 Roof Tar on Brick at Skylight Room S.E. Corner Skylight Room None Detected 18 52 Caulk on Duct in Undercroft Undercroft None Detected 18 53 Caulk on Duct in Undercroft Undercroft None Detected 18 54 Caulk on Duct in Undercroft Undercroft None Detected
Appendix A
ASBESTOS SURVEY SAMPLE SUMMARY
Lincoln Memorial
2 Lincoln Memorial Circle
Terracon Project No. 70177206 Washington, DC
A-1
HA Sample Number Description Sample Location Lab Results
Appendix A
ASBESTOS SURVEY SAMPLE SUMMARY
Lincoln Memorial
2 Lincoln Memorial Circle
Terracon Project No. 70177206 Washington, DC
19 55 Ceiling Tile in Exhibit Space Exhibit Space None Detected 19 56 Ceiling Tile in Exhibit Space Exhibit Space None Detected 19 57 Ceiling Tile in Exhibit Space Exhibit Space None Detected 20 58 Adhesive on Ceramic Tile Janitor's Closet None Detected 20 59 Adhesive on Ceramic Tile Janitor's Closet None Detected 20 60 Adhesive on Ceramic Tile Janitor's Closet None Detected 21 61 Adhesive on back of Small Ceramic Tile Janitor's Closet None Detected 21 62 Adhesive on back of Small Ceramic Tile Janitor's Closet None Detected 21 63 Adhesive on back of Small Ceramic Tile Janitor's Closet None Detected 22 64 Plaster Stairwell to Roof None Detected 22 65 Plaster Stairwell to Roof None Detected 22 66 Plaster Stairwell to Roof None Detected 22 67 Plaster Stairwell to Roof None Detected 22 68 Plaster Stairwell to Roof None Detected 22 69 Plaster Breakroom None Detected 22 70 Plaster Breakroom None Detected 22 71 Plaster Breakroom None Detected 22 72 Plaster Breakroom None Detected
1 1 Roof Core Lower Level North None Detected 1 5 Roof Core Lower Level East None Detected 1 8 Roof Core Lower Level South None Detected 1 11 Roof Core Lower Level (Top Layer) South Perimeter None Detected 2 2 Topping Slab Lower Level North None Detected 2 6 Topping Slab Lower Level East None Detected 2 14 Topping Slab Lower Level (Under Flashing) South Perimeter None Detected 2 15 Topping Slab Lower Level South Perimeter None Detected 3 3 Roof Flashing Lower Level North None Detected 3 7 Roof Flashing Lower Level East None Detected 3 9 Roof Flashing Lower Level South None Detected 3 13 Roof Flashing Lower Level South Perimeter None Detected 4 4 Patch Material Under Flashing Lower Level North None Detected 5 10 Roof Patch Lower Level South None Detected 6 12 Roof Core Bottom Layer Lower Level South Perimeter None Detected 7 16 Flashing Upper Level West None Detected 7 19 Flashing Upper Level South None Detected 7 22 Flashing Upper Level East None Detected 8 17 Roof Core Upper Level West None Detected 8 20 Roof Core Upper Level South None Detected 8 23 Roof Core Upper Level East None Detected 9 18 Topping Slab Upper Level West None Detected 9 21 Topping Slab Upper Level South None Detected 9 24 Topping Slab Upper Level East None Detected
Bolded samples indicate asbestos-containing materials.
Roof Samples (June 1, 2017)
A-2
APPENDIX B
IDENTIFIED ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS
H A
Sa m pl e
N o.
D es cr ip tio n
M at er ia l L oc at io n Pe rc en t/T yp e As be st os N
ES
AP
C la ss ifi ca tio n C on di tio n
Es tim at ed
Q ua nt ity
Bl ac k M as tic o n
Ea st
W al l E as t W al l o f S ky lig ht
R oo m 5%
C hr ys ot ile C at eg or y
II
N on -fr ia bl e G oo d
S qu ar e Fe et
B la ck M as tic o n
W es t W al l W es t W al l o f S ky lig ht
R oo m
C hr ys ot ile
C at eg or y
II
N on
-fr ia bl e
G oo d
S qu ar e
Fe et
D ry w al l a nd
J oi nt C om po un d
P ol ic e
R oo m D ry w al l:
N on e D et ec te d
Jo in t C om po un d:
C hr ys ot ile
C om po si te
1% C hr ys ot ile
N /A
G oo d 1, S qu ar e
Fe et
H A
Sa m pl e
N o.
D es cr ip tio n
M at er ia l L oc at io n Pe rc en t/T yp e As be st os N
ES
AP
C la ss ifi ca tio n C on di tio n
Es tim at ed
Q ua nt ity
N /A
N /A
Fi re pr oo fin g
U nd er cr of t
A ss um ed
N /A
U nk no w n U nk no w n
C at eg or y
II:
o th er n on -fr ia bl e m at er ia ls
Fr ia bl e:
a ny m at er ia l t ha t c an b e cr um bl ed
, p ul ve riz ed o r r ed uc ed to p ow de r b y ha nd
R A
C M
: R eg ul at ed A sb es os -C on ta in in g M at er ia l -
(a ) f ria bl e as be st os m at er ia l, (b ) C at eg or y
I n on
-fr ia bl e m at er ia l t ha t h as b ec om e fri ab le
c) C at eg or y
I n on
-fr ia bl e m at er ia l t ha t w ill b e or h as b ee n su bj ec t t o sa nd in g, g rin di ng , c ut tin g or a br ad in g, o r ( d)
C at eg or y
II
no n-fri ab le m at er ia l t ha t h as th e hi gh p ro ba bl ily o f b ec om in g fri ab le
C at eg or y I N on -fr ia bl e:
p ac ki ng s, g as ke ts
, r es ili en t f lo or c ov er in gs
, a nd a sp ha lt ro of in g pr od uc ts
Te rra co n
P ro je ct
N o.
A ll qu an tit ie s sh ou ld b e ve rif ie d by th e ab at em en t c on tra ct or
ID
EN
TI
FI
ED
A
SB
ES
TO
S-
C O
N
TA
IN
IN
G M
AT
ER
IA
LS
AS
SU
M
ED
A
SB
ES
TO
S- C
O N
TA
IN
IN
G
M
AT
ER
IA
LS
Ap pe nd ix
B
ID
EN
TI
FI
ED
A
SB
ES
TO
S-
C O
N
TA
IN
IN
G M
AT
ER
IA
LS
Li nc ol n
M em or ia l
Li nc ol n
M em or ia l C irc le W as hi ng to n, D
C
B -1
APPENDIX C
ASBESTOS LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
OrderID: 291703026
OrderID: 291703026
OrderID: 291704453
OrderID: 291704453
APPENDIX D
LEAD PAINT SAMPLE SUMMARY
Sample # Sample Location/Description Material Location Lead
Concentration (% Weight)
LP-1 White on Drywall Janitor's Closet- Ceiling <0.010% LP-2 Brown on Metal Door Frame N.E. Entrance <0.010% LP-3 White on CMU Black N.E. Entrance <0.010% LP-4 Glazing on Ceramic Tile N.E. Entrance <0.010% LP-5 Brown on Metal Duct Undercroft 31% LP-6 White and Orange on Metal Pipe Police Room 23% LP-7 Brown on Metal Pipe Ranger Break Room 9.50% LP-8 White on Plaster Ranger Break Room 0.11% LP-9 White on Drywall Police Room <0.010% LP-10 Ceramic Tile Janitor's Closet <0.014% LP-11 Ceramic Tile- Small Janitor's Closet <0.010%
Terracon Project No. 70177206
Samples in bold letters were identified to contain detectable concentrations of lead.
Appendix D
LEAD PAINT SURVEY SAMPLE SUMMARY
Lincoln Memorial
2 Lincoln Memorial Circle Washington, DC
APPENDIX E
LEAD PAINT LABORATORY ANALYICAL REPORTS
Client Sample Description ConcentrationLab ID Analyzed Lead
Collected
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
706 Gralin Street, Kernersville, NC 27284 Phone/Fax: (336) 992-1025 / (336) 992-4175 http://www.EMSL.com greensborolab@emsl.com
Attn: Russell Chapman Terracon Consultants, Inc.
2401 Brentwood Road Suite 107 Raleigh, NC 27604
Received: 04/18/17 9:00 AM
70177206 / Lincoln Memorial HazMat Survey
Fax: (919) 873-9555 Phone: (919) 873-2211
Project:
4/17/2017Collected:
Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B/7000B)*
021702284 CustomerID: TITA51 CustomerPO: 70177206 ProjectID:
EMSL Order:
021702284-00011 <0.010 % wt4/19/20174/17/2017 021702284-00022 <0.010 % wt4/19/20174/17/2017 021702284-00033 <0.010 % wt4/19/20174/17/2017 021702284-00044 <0.010 % wt4/19/20174/17/2017 021702284-00055 31 % wt4/19/20174/17/2017 021702284-00066 23 % wt4/19/20174/17/2017 021702284-00077 9.5 % wt4/19/20174/17/2017 021702284-00088 0.11 % wt4/19/20174/17/2017 021702284-00099 <0.010 % wt4/19/20174/17/2017 021702284-001010 <0.014 % wt4/19/20174/17/2017 021702284-001111 <0.010 % wt4/19/20174/17/2017
James Cole, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory
Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.32.3 Printed: 4/19/2017 9:59:07 AM
*Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is 0.010 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request. The QC data associated with the sample results included in this report meet the recovery and precision requirements unless specifically indicated otherwise.
Definitions of modifications are available upon request.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Kernersville, NC EMSL Lab ID 102564 is accredited by the AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Program (AIHA-LAP), LLC in the Environmental Lead accreditation program for Lead in Paint Chips.
Initial report from 04/19/2017 09:59:07
OrderID: 021702284
OrderID: 021702284
APPENDIX F
PHOTOGRAPHS
Terracon Project No.: 70177206 Photos Taken on April 13, 2017
Photo #1 View of Lincoln Memorial. Photo #2 View of Undercroft.
Photo #3 Additional view of Undercroft. Photo #4 View of sampled pipe wrap in
Undercroft area.
Photo #5 View of sampled fiberglass pipe wrap in Undercroft.
Photo #6 View of sampled mortar at roof flashing.
Photo #7 View of sampled caulk at roof penetration.
Photo #8 View of sampled fiberglass wrap on roof drain.
Photo #9 View of sampled roof tar in skylight room.
Photo #10 View of Black Mastic on East
Wall in skylight room. Positive for asbestos.
Photo #11 View of Black Mastic on West
Wall in skylight room. Positive for asbestos.
Photo #12 View of sampled floor tile in Police room.
Photo #13 View of drywall in Police room.
Positive for asbestos.
Photo #14 Additional view of drywall in
Police room. Positive for asbestos.
Photo #15 View of Fireproofing beneath elevator area. Assumed positive.
Photo #16 View of Built-up Main Roof.
Photo #17 View of Flashing on Main Roof.
Photo #18 Brown on Metal Duct in
Undercroft area.
Photo #19 White and Orange on Metal
Pipe in Police Room.
Photo #20 Brown on Metal Pipe in Ranger
Break Room.
Photo #21 Small Ceramic Tile in Janitor’s
Closet.
Photo #22 Ceramic Tile in Janitor’s Closet. Photo #23 Ceramic Tile in N.E. Entrance.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .