Atch_4_-_PPQ.doc
DOC document 124 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Repair Replace JEFF Louvers, St. Louis, MO Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- P15PS00924
About this file
Atch 4 - PPQ.doc
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_P15PS00924.pdf | ||
| Atch_1_-_Stamp.pdf | ||
| Atch_1_-_Specifications.pdf | ||
| Atch_5_-_Consent_Letter_Sample.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch_2_-_Drawings.pdf | ||
| Appdx_A_-_Additional_Information.pdf | ||
| Atch_3_-_Wage_Determination.pdf | ||
| A13_-_Draft_Specifications.pdf | ||
| A13_-_Draft_P15PS00924_-_JEFF_Louvers.pdf | ||
| A13_-_Draft_Drawings.pdf | ||
| A13_-_P15PS00924_-_Presol_Notice.pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
<<OFFEROR’S NAME>>
<<OFFEROR’S DUNS>>
Past Performance Survey / Questionnaire
The Company who has provided you with this survey questionnaire is proposing on a contract for the National Park Service. Past Performance is a very important evaluation factor for this acquisition, so input from previous customers of the offeror is very important. We would greatly appreciate you taking the time to complete this survey. The information is to be provided directly to the National Park Service, Midwest Region, Missouri Major Acquisition Buying Office (MABO).
The information you provide will NOT be disclosed to the Offeror. Please provide an honest assessment and immediately return to the e-mail or physical address provided below. If you have any questions, please contact Terri Dyke at 314-655-1661.
The NPS will use the information from this survey questionnaire to evaluate offerors competing for contract award. Please evaluate the contractor’s performance in each of the ratings areas described below. For each ratings area, please select the rating that most closely describes your evaluation of the contractor’s performance, by placing a check mark in the box next to or under it. Please provide written comments as needed to clarify / support each rating. If you wish, you may attach additional comments or information. Please complete and return this form as quickly as possible to the address provided below. Thank you in advance for your time, assistance and cooperation.
Please return this form to the following address, no later than the date requested by the offeror.
E-mail to terri_dyke@nps.gov (preferred) Survey / Questionnaire Completed By:
Company / Agency / Organization
Name / Title of Reference
Telephone Number
E-mail Address
Signature
Part 1
(To Be Completed by Company / Firm Requesting Reference) A. Prime Contractor/Offeror
Company Name & Address
Project Title/ Contract Number
Description of Project for Which Reference is Requested (Include type of work/trades performed)
| Complexity of Work (circle) |
| High |
| Medium |
| Low |
Location of Work
| Role on Project (circle) |
| Prime |
| Sub-contractor |
| Consultant |
Contract Amount
Date of Award
Project Status
| % Complete |
| Scheduled Completion Date |
| Actual Completion Date |
If you are contacted by NPS for information on work we have performed under contract for your company/organization, you are hereby authorized to respond to NPS inquiries.
B. Subcontractor (only complete if this PPQ is submitted for subcontractor past performance) Teaming Arrangements Information
Narrative:
| Name of Teaming Partner(s): |
| Type of Arrangement (i.e. joint-venture, sub-contract, mentor-protégé) |
| Percentage of the Cost of Contract Performance for Personnel of Teaming Partner |
| Description of Work / Effort Teaming Partner Would Perform |
| Prime Contractor (Name Here) |
| Percentage of the Cost of Contract Performance for Personnel of Prime Contractor |
| Description of Work / Effort Prime Contractor Would Perform |
Note: IAW FAR 52.219-14 –Limitations on Subcontracting applies. For general construction, prime contractor must perform at least 15 percent of the cost of the contract, not including the cost of materials, with its own employees.
Part 2
(To Be Completed by Person Providing Reference)
If the information provided in Part 1 is not accurate, please indicate and correct.
1. QUALITY OF WORK
Evaluate performance in complying with contract requirements, quality achieved and overall technical expertise demonstrated.
Excellent Quality
Above Average Quality
Average Quality
Below Average Quality
Unsuccessful or Experienced Significant Quality Problems & Issues
Remarks / Comments:
2. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
To what extent were contract performance requirements met? Consider contract performance period; were submittals provided in a timely manner; timely completion of punch-list items; submission of close out documents, i.e., “as-built drawings”. Timely / satisfactory response to warranty issues, etc.
Completed Substantially Ahead of Schedule
Completed on Schedule with no Significant Time Delays
Completed on Schedule with Minor Delays Under Extenuating Circumstances
Routinely failed to Schedule Perform Requirements
Remarks / Comments:
3. DOCUMENTATION QUALITY
To what extent were reports, submittals and other required documentation accurate, complete, comprehensive, and provided in a timely manner?
Excellent Quality
Above Average Quality
Average Quality
Below Average Quality
Unsuccessful / Extensive Quality Problems
Remarks / Comments:
4. COORDINATION
How well were sub-contractors, consultants, suppliers, and / or the labor force managed and coordinated? Or, if firm was a sub-contractor, how well did they respond to coordination efforts and work with other subs? Were there any problems and, if so, how were they handled and resolved?
Excellent
Above Average
Average
Below Average
Unsuccessful
Remarks / Comments:
5. GENERAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
How appropriate and effective were the firm’s general management and business practices? Consider such things as; did they provide quality, experienced managers and supervisors, technical and administrative personnel for the duration of the project; were appropriate personnel promptly available when needed, and responded in a prompt and acceptable manner to resolve problems, did they provide comprehensive, accurate price proposals, etc.
Excellent
Above Average
Average
Below Average
Unsuccessful
Remarks / Comments:
6. OVERALL SAFETY PROGRAM
How well did the contractor manage the construction project as it relates to general safety? Discuss any safety issues that arose during the course of the project.
Excellent
Above Average
Average
Below Average
Unsuccessful
Remarks / Comments:
7. BUDGET MANAGEMENT
How well did the contractor conform to the project budget? Did the contractor initiate unwarranted, unverifiable, change orders or change order requests, etc.?
Excellent
Above Average
Below Average
Unsuccessful
Remarks / Comments:
8. CLAIMS / LITIGATION
Was the contractor involved in any claims or litigation involving the project?
Yes (If “Yes”, please explain in remarks area below)
No
Remarks / Comments:
9. OVERALL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
To what extent were the end users satisfied with: Quality? Cost? Schedule?
| Quality |
| Cost |
| Schedule |
Exceptionally Satisfied
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Somewhat Dissatisfied (please explain)
Dissatisfied (please explain)
Remarks / Comments:
10. YOUR RECCOMENDATION
If given the opportunity and the choice, would you work with this contractor again?
Yes
No
Not Sure
Remarks / Comments:
11. OTHER REMARKS / COMMENTS
Use the space below to provide other information related to the contractor's performance. This may include selection of sub-contractors / consultants, flexibility in dealing with contract challenges, payment issues, their overall concern for the client's interest (if applicable), project awards received, etc.
Past Performance Questionnaire P15PS00924 – JEFF Repair/Replace Louvers
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .