OHDOT_315-25_Calculations_Sealed__1_.pdf
PDF 619 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Competitive Selection OH|DOT31326-11
- Contract number
- DOT31326-11
- Issued by
- Ohio
About this file
This document is a structural calculation report for a Cured-In-Place Pipe (CIPP) liner project prepared by RETTEW Associates, Inc. for the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT). The calculations were performed using CLinT software version 2.0.2 and are specifically for a 24-inch vitrified clay pipe with 10% ovality, designed for State III conditions. The professional engineer David Hoglund from RETTEW Associates, Inc. in Uniontown, Ohio, sealed and signed the document on January 3, 2024.
The report details the technical specifications and design parameters for an Ultra-Violet Light Cured-In-Place Pipe Lining project, using an AL1800 CIPP product with off-site resin impregnation. The liner thickness is calculated as 0.14 inches, with calculations covering stability under groundwater pressure, all loads, and imposed deferred ovality. The design takes into account various factors including soil conditions (granular, Class II), groundwater levels, surface loads, and pipe characteristics. The calculations verify the liner's performance under different load conditions, with all critical design ratios (CDRs) meeting or exceeding the required minimum of 1, indicating the liner's structural adequacy for the specified conditions.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 313Pricing__1_.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Affirmation_and_Discolsure_Form__1_.pdf | ||
| 313-26__1_.pdf | ||
| Signature__87_.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR
ABEL RECON
315-25 Liner Pipe State of Ohio, Department of Transportation
ULTRA-VIOLET LIGHT CURED-IN-PLACE PIPE LINING
DESIGN PARAMETERS
CIPP Liner Thickness for Non-Pressure Pipes
REFERENCES
Supplement Specification 899
CIPP Liner Thickness for Non-Pressure Pipes Design Spreadsheet by Abel Recon has been reviewed and is in accordance with design standards as listed above. Input parameters for specific sites in the future are to be verified by others for acceptance.
RETTEW ASSOCIATES, INC.
3475 Forest Lake Drive, Suite 100
Uniontown, OH 44685 David Hoglund, Professional Engineer
S T
AT
E OF OH
IO
R
EGISTERED
P R
O F
E
SSIONAL E
NG
IN
E E
R
PE.81461
HOGLUND
DAVID
1/3/2024
PART 1: SUMMARY REPORT
DISCLAIMER
CLinT can only make calculations based on the given input data and accordingly this tool is offered without warranty or guarantee as to the reliability of its results in specific projects. Users are assumed to recognize that the selection of design input data is crucial for calculating the liner thickness that will perform without failure in given conditions and over the design period.
CLinT Page 1 of 31/2/2024v.2.0.2
F49E-8BD6-CCCC-467W-ZKIPGACV
ODOT 24" 3-20 VF 10% OvalityProject Name
Designer
02-Jan-24Date
PROJECT
ClinT DESIGN
ODOT 24" 3-20 VF 10% Ovality Design for State III t 0.14 in
PART 1: SUMMARY CLinT Page 2 of 31/2/2024v.2.0.2
F49E-8BD6-CCCC-467W-ZKIPGACV
24.0 in=Size :
0.1tp =
75.4P in=
Circular
W =
H = D
Vitrified Clay Pipe ft18.00 ft ft
17.50
0.50 ft ft 2.5020.00 winv s w w,sy
Hy y
H
Trench (Backfill) psi=SSLp 0.00Dead Loads:
Railway
Highway
1,500 psis =M
= pcf120sg
H25 n/a:
HOST PIPE
Condition: Yes, Major
Major
Not
Other Wall Defects
Corrosion/Abbrasion
Corrosive Environment
SITE CONDITIONS (DEPTHS)
SOIL CONDITIONS
SURFACE LOADS
Live Loads
LINER PROPERTIES
Hinge Cracks/Fractures
Fig.1-2: Pipe and GW depths.
Fig.1-1: Host pipe shape
24.0 in= in
Shape : Material :
Product: AL1800 CIPP
Off site
Yes
Resin Impregnation:
GRP Material:
CIPP
ε = 0.68%L
II
90%
Intact
Granular
Soil Class
SPD
Soil State
Soil Type
Pipe laid in :
Host pipe's depth at:
∘ Soffit
∘ Invert
Groundwater:
∘ Top topy ft17.99 ∘ Depth, level
∘ Head, at soffit
∘ Head, at invert
2,500,000 75.0%psiE (C0 L,5= = σ F 50,000 75.0%(F L,5= =psi
0.30ν =)
L wcr = 0.02 in
Ov0 = 10.00%
Fig.1.0: Host pipe cracking mode
RESULT
0.04
1.028
3.011
1.851
18.648
32.422 n/a
Design for State III
CDR1
CDR2
CDR3
CDR4
CDR5
CDR6
CDR7
g t =
= in
Groundwater pressure Imposed deferred ovalityAll loads n/a
≥ 1
≥ 1
P
P
≥ 1
≥ 1
P
P
≥ 1
> 1
P in (Bottom arc)
Critical Shape Design
(Per MOP 145)
12Rarc =
0.14 in
PART 1: SUMMARY CLinT Page 3 of 31/2/2024v.2.0.2
H
W p p
SCC
ε
Fσ
CE
ν p g
M
H y y
H y
Host pipe wall thickness, in.tp
P Perimeter (inside), in.
(Diameter)= D
NOTATIONS and ABBREVIATIONS
Radius of bottom arc, in.
Radius of corner arc, in.
Rb
Rc
Initial ovality of circular rigid pipe, %.Ov0
Depth of host pipe's top (crown), ft.
Groundwater head above pipe soffit, ft.
Groundwater head above pipe invert, ft.
Depth of groundwater level, ft.
Depth of pipe invert, ft.
Soil constrained modulus, psi.
Soil density, pcf.s
Surface static load, psi.
Retention factor for creep, %.Flexural modulus, short-term, psi.
Strain Corrosion, in/in.
Poisson's ratio
Retention factor for strength, %.Flexural strength, short-term, psi.
Host Pipe
Liner Properties
Stress Corrosion Cracking
Pressure from highway load (at depth of pipe or liner crown), psi.
Pressure from railway load (at depth of pipe or liner crown), psi.
Result g t
CDR0
CDR2
CDR3
CDR4
CDR5
CDR6
CDR7
Annular gap, in.
CDR Capacity/demand ratios for:
• Groundwater pressure (Design for State I, II, III)
• Stability under all loads (Design for State III only)
• Imposed deferred ovality (Design for State II, III)
Deflection (serviceability)
Material strength
Stress corrosion cracking
Buckling stability
Wall crushing
Material strength
Stress corrosion cracking tmin
L,50F
L,500
SSL
LLR
LLH
s w,s top inv w w
L
L
CDR1 Buckling stability
Height (inside), in.
Width (inside), in.
Site Conditions
H Thickness of soil cover above obvert, ft.sy Depth of host pipe's soffit (obvert), ft.s =
Soil Conditions
SPD Standard Proctor Density, %.
Surface Loads
Initial elliptical ovality of circular flexible pipe, %.OvE0
Radius of side arc, in.Rs
Width of opened crack in non-circular rigid pipe, in.wcr
= D (Diameter)
Hinge rotation angle, %.θ0
Radius of top arc, in.Rt
Liner thickness, in. Minimaly required liner thickness, in.
CLinT 1/2/2024 Page 1 of 7
PART 2: CALCULATIONS
DISCLAIMER
CLinT can only make calculations based on the given input data and accordingly this tool is offered without warranty or guarantee as to the reliability of its results in specific projects. Users are assumed to recognize that the selection of design input data is crucial for calculating the liner thickness that will perform without failure in given conditions and over the design period.
v.2.0.2
F49E-8BD6-CCCC-467W-ZKIPGACV
ODOT 24" 3-20 VF 10% OvalityProject Name
Designer
1/2/2024Date
PROJECT
ClinT DESIGN t ODOT 24" 3-20 VF 10% Ovality 0.14Design for State III in
PART 2: CALCULATIONSCLinT Page 2 of 71/2/2024
DESIGN PARAMETERS
PROFILE PARAMETERS
Design Arc : 12.00
90.00 °=
0.0 in=
0.04 inImperfections : g
0.00
0.0
BLISTER MODE
1=k arc
R arc
Hb
= in (to the pipe wall)
L arc = 37.70 in
GEOMETRY, IMPERFECTIONS
Fig.2-1: Design arc (red).
j w in α (half-angle)
Per MOP 145
0.78%
0.05%
0.00%
2.00%
10.83% dOv dOv dOv dOv
Ov L u
INITIAL AND LONG-TERM OVALITY -- CIRCULAR PIPE
If OvL > 20%, FEA recommended
10.00%Ov0 = If Ov0 >20%, FEA recommended
Fig.2-2: Cracking mode
0.1400=A in²/in
0.000229=I in⁴/in
LINER
0.14=t
74.96=P in (at neutral axis) in
Load Factors : 0.80
0.90
1.00
Resistance Factors :
0.80
1.60=γ GW
1.20=γ DL
1.60γ LL = φLM φLF φLε φS
(ASCE)
Soil thickness in overburder pressure calculation No
LRFD Design
Apply tunnel loading per ASCE 27-17 :
PART 2: CALCULATIONSCLinT Page 3 of 71/2/2024
PART 1: STABILITY UNDER GROUNDWATER PRESSURE (Critical Design)
Critical Angle Condition
Not checked (CIRCULAR PIPE) p cr,w,d
RESISTANCE
3.57= psi
N
M cr,w,d cr,w,d 41.70
83.98 lb-in/in lbs/in
Critical Buckling Pressure
0.1754
1.1000
1.5645 κ κ κ =
M
N,4h p
0.68%
33,750
1,500,000 psi psiσ ε L,d
F,50,d
E F,50,d =
Material Stiffness, Strength and Elongation
LOAD
Design Load = Groundwater pressure (factored) p p 2.17=w 3.47=w,u psi psi M 34.77
79.39N lb-in/in lbs/in
10,643.00σ = psi
567.09σ = psi
11,210.08σ = psi
0.61%ε =w,u w,c,u w.h,u w,f,u w,u w,u
H 5.00=w ft.NOTE: Service GW level had to be raised to satisfy the design method requirements, Material Strength
Stress Corrosion Cracking
= 3.011
= n/a
P σ F,50,d σ w,c,u
CDR2 =
ε L,d ε w,u
CDR3 =
LIMIT STATES
1.028= P p cr,w,d p w,u
CDR1 =Buckling Stability ≥ 1
≥ 1
PART 2: CALCULATIONSCLinT Page 4 of 71/2/2024
PART 2: STABILITY UNDER ALL LOADS
Ncr,w,d 469.06
RESISTANCE
= lbs/in
Multi-wave Critical Hoop Force
LIMIT STATES
Wall Crushing
1.851
= 18.648
= P
P
Ncr,m,d Nu
CDR4 =
σ F,50,d σ h,u
CDR5 =
Buckling Stability ≥ 1
≥ 1 w,III,u
DL,III,u
LL,III,u
LOAD
Groundwater
19.20=
253.38=
1,809.88=
14.86=
0.00=
18.00
0.22
14.86=
Service Loads: Factored Loads:
p 1.01= p 17.84= p
H s,III w,III p p soil,III p DL,III
SSL,III
H w,III p p p LL,III
LLH,III
LLR,III
p v,u
N σ h,u u
Dead Loads
Live Loads
= 0.35p
All Loads
1.20=gDL
1.60=g
Gg = 1.60
LL
0.63
0.00
0.63
All loads are calculated at depth of liner crown (top of the liner) ft ft
0.50 psi psi psi psi psi psi psi psi psi psi psi psi lbs/in
Load Factors:
ASCE
15.71=p v psi
PART 2: CALCULATIONSCLinT Page 5 of 71/2/2024
PART 3: STABILITY UNDER IMPOSED DEFERRED OVALITY
LOAD
Parallel Plate Loading
0.05%= in/in
1,040.96= psi
Load Effects ε ov,III, u σov,III, u
LIMIT STATES
Stress Corrosion Cracking
32.422
= n/a
= P σ F,50,d σ
CDR6 =
ε L,d ε
CDR7 =
Material Strength ov,III, u ov,III, u
≥ 1
RESISTANCE
0.68%
33,750
1,500,000 psi psiσ ε L,d
F,50,d
E F,50,d =
Material Stiffness, Strength and Elongation
PART 2: CALCULATIONSCLinT Page 6 of 71/2/2024
Design Arc, Imperfections k Blister mode.
Half-angle, °.
Radius, in.
Midpoint-to-invert distance, in.
arc
R arc
Hb
Flattening (half-angle), °.
Intrusion, in.
Annular gap, in.g w j p cr,w,d Design critical buckling pressure, psi.
Design critical bending moment per unit length, lb-in/in.
Design critical hoop force per unit length, lbs/in.N
M cr,w,d cr,w,d κ κ
Amplification factor for critical bending moment.
Amplification factor for critical hoop force.
Reduction factor for critical buckling pressure.κ
M
N,4h p
Resistance
STABILITY UNDER GROUNDWATER PRESSURE
Design long-term material flexural strength, psi.σ F,50,d
Design long-term flexural modulus of liner material, psi.E F,50,d
Design imperfection: Long-term 4-H ovality, %.Ov4H q dOv Deferred ovality • Due to soil overburden pressure, %.
dOv Deferred ovality • Due to surface dead load, %.
dOv Deferred ovality • Due to live load, %.
dOv Total deferred ovality (factored), %.
LOv Long-term ovality, %.
Deferred hinge rotation angle, %. d q Long-term hinge rotation angle, %. L
• Circular pipe (rigid or flexible)
• Non-circular pipe (rigid)
Deferred ovality of non-circular flexible pipe (factored), %.
R Long-term arc radius (to the neutral axis), in. L
• Non-circular pipe (flexible)dOv NC
0Ov Initial ovality (vertical deflection), %.
Initial hinge rotation angle, %. 0 u q
Design imperfection: Long-term elliptical ovality, %.Ovel
Ovality, Hinge Rotation α Arc angle at long-term arc radius , °. L L Lenght of arc (at neutral axis), long-term equal to initial, in.L
NOTATIONS and ABBREVIATIONS
Liner t A I
P
Cross-section area (per unit length), in²/in.
Area moment of inertia (per unit length), in⁴/in.
Liner perimeter (at neutral axis), in²/in.
R
LRFD Factors γ GW γ DL γ LL Load factor Line loads
Load factor for Groundwater Pressure
Load factor Dead Loads φLM φLF φLε φS Resist. factor for Constraint Soil Modulus
Resist. factor for Flexural Strength
Resist. factor for Corrosion Strain
Resist. factor for Flexural Modulus
Radiusof arc used in design (to the neutral axis of the liner), in.
Liner thickness, in.
PART 2: CALCULATIONSCLinT Page 7 of 71/2/2024
Service groundwater pressure (unfactored), psi.
p p w w,u Groundwater pressure (factored), psi.
Max bending moment (from factored groundwater pressure), lb-in/in.
Hoop force (from factored groundwater pressure), lbs/in.
Max flexural stress (factored), psi.
Hoop stress (factored), psi.
Compressive stress (factored), psi.
Tensile strain (factored), in/in (%).
M
N σ σ σ ε w,u w,c,u w.h,u w,f,u w,u w,u
Load
Limit States
CDR1
CDR2
CDR3
Capacity/demand ratios for buckling stability.
Capacity/demand ratios for material strength.
Capacity/demand ratios for stress corrosion cracking.
Design long-term material flexural strength, psi.
Design corrosion strain limit (long-term material elongation), in/in (%).
σ ε L,d
F,50,d α Critical angle (half-angle), °.crit α
Critical Angle Condition arc Angle of design arc (half-angle), °.
STABILITY UNDER ALL LOADS
Correction factor for the depth of burial (Luscher, 1966), unitless.R h N cr,m,d Design multi-wave critical hoop force (based on Moore, 1987, 1989), lbs/in.
N u Total factored vertical force, per unit length of liner, lbs/in.
Resistance
Load p w,u Factored groundwater pressure, psi.
p soil,u Factored soil overburden pressure, psi.
p LL,u Factored surface live load pressure, psi.
p SL,u Factored surface dead load pressure, psi.
p v,u Factored total load (vertical pressure) on top of liner, psi.
Factored hoop stress, psi.σ h,u
Limit States
CDR4
CDR5
Capacity/demand ratios for buckling stability under all loads.
Capacity/demand ratios for wall crushing.
STABILITY UNDER IMPOSED DEFERRED OVALITY
Load
Limit States
CDR6
CDR7
Capacity/demand ratios for material strength under imposed deferred ovality.
Capacity/demand ratios for stress corrosion cracking.
Parallel Plate Loading
Factored flexural stress, psi.
ε Factored strain (elongation), in/in. ov,III, u σov,III, u
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .