DRAFT_Statement_of_Work.pdf

RESTORE-L-SOW-001885

Rev -

Effective Date: June 10, 2016 Expiration Date: June 10, 2021

CHECK WITH SSCO NGIN DATABASE AT:

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

RESTORE-L

VISION SENSOR SUBSYSTEM

CAMERA

STATEMENT OF WORK

Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland

June 2016

CHECK WITH SSCO NGIN DATABASE AT:

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

CM FOREWORD

This document is a Satellite Servicing Capabilities Office (SSCO) Configuration Management

(CM)-controlled document. Changes to this document require prior approval of the applicable

Configuration Control Board (CCB) Chairperson or designee. Proposed changes shall be submitted to the SSCO Code 408 CM Office (CMO), along with supportive material justifying the proposed change. Changes to this document will be made by complete revision.

Questions or comments concerning this document should be addressed to:

NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center

SSCO, Code 408

Attention: Configuration Management Office

Greenbelt, Maryland 20771

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

SATELLITE SERVICING CAPABILITIES OFFICE

DOCUMENT CHANGE RECORD

Date: June 10, 2016 Sheet 1 of 1

TITLE: Restore-L Vision Sensor Subsystem Camera Statement of Work

REV

LEVEL

DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE AUTHORIZATION

- Initial release Per signature page

SSCO CM RELEASE

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

Restore-L Vision Sensor Subsystem Camera Statement of Work

Prepared By:

Approved

Ross M. Henry

Vision Sensor Subsystem Lead, NASA/551

06/10/16

Date

Reviewed By:

Approved

Kate Chamberlin

Vision Sensor Subsystem Deputy Lead, SGT/408

Kelvin Garcia

Restore-L I&T Lead, NASA/568

Tina Montt De Garcia

Restore-L Contamination Lead, NASA/546

Nathan Smith

Restore-L Materials Lead, NASA/541

Approved By:

Approved

Robert Smith

Restore-L Project Manager, NASA/408

Tom Venator

Restore-L Servicing Payload Manager, NASA/408

Kevin McAveety

Restore-L Mission Systems Eng. Lead (alt.), LM/408

Robert Dedalis

Restore-L Chief Safety Officer, NASA/380

Joe Joyner

Restore-L Quality Assurance Engineer, Orbital ATK/408 ii https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1-1

1.1 General Information ............................................................................................. 1-1

1.2 Basic Hardware Description ................................................................................ 1-1

1.3 Quantities ............................................................................................................. 1-2

1.4 Document Change Procedure .............................................................................. 1-3

1.5 Verb Application .................................................................................................. 1-3

1.6 Applicable Documents ......................................................................................... 1-4

1.6.1 Precedence ............................................................................................... 1-4

2.0 Schedule ............................................................................................................................. 2-1

2.1 Hardware Deliverables......................................................................................... 2-1

2.2 Project Schedule................................................................................................... 2-1

3.0 Management, Reporting, Documentation, and Reviews ............................................... 3-1

3.1 Reviews and Meetings ......................................................................................... 3-1

3.1.1 Weekly Status Teleconference ................................................................. 3-1

3.1.2 Written Monthly Reports ......................................................................... 3-1

3.1.3 Kickoff Meeting (KOM)/ Systems Requirements Review (SRR) ........... 3-2

3.1.4 Preliminary Design Review (PDR) .......................................................... 3-3

3.1.5 Critical Design Review (CDR) ................................................................ 3-4

3.1.6 Pre-Environmental Review (PER) ........................................................... 3-5

3.1.7 Test Readiness Review ............................................................................ 3-6

3.1.8 Pre-Ship Reviews (PSR) .......................................................................... 3-7

4.0 Manufacturing Requirements.......................................................................................... 4-8

4.1 Use of Travelers ................................................................................................... 4-8

4.2 Prohibited Plating and Alloys .............................................................................. 4-9

4.3 Fastener Integrity ................................................................................................. 4-9

4.3.1 Thread Locking ........................................................................................ 4-9

4.3.2 Fastener Torqueing .................................................................................. 4-9

4.4 Soldering .............................................................................................................. 4-9

4.5 Silicones ............................................................................................................... 4-9

4.6 Contamination Control....................................................................................... 4-10

5.0 Quality Assurance Requirements .................................................................................... 5-1

5.1 Mandatory Inspection Points ............................................................................... 5-1

6.0 Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) .................................................................... 6-1

6.1 Technical Requirements Compliance Matrix ...................................................... 6-1

6.2 Materials Identification and Usage List ............................................................... 6-2

6.3 Mechanical Deliverables ...................................................................................... 6-2

6.3.1 Interface Control Drawing (ICD)............................................................. 6-2

6.3.2 Computer Aided Design (CAD) Electronic Model ................................. 6-2 iii https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

6.3.3 Stress Analysis Report ............................................................................. 6-2

6.4 Electrical Deliverables ......................................................................................... 6-3

6.4.1 Electrical ICD .......................................................................................... 6-3

6.5 EEE Parts List ...................................................................................................... 6-3

6.6 Thermal Deliverables ........................................................................................... 6-3

6.7 End Item Data Package ........................................................................................ 6-3

6.7.1 Certificate of Conformance...................................................................... 6-4

6.7.2 As-Built Parts List.................................................................................... 6-4

6.7.3 As-Built Assembly Procedures ................................................................ 6-4

6.7.4 Material Certifications ............................................................................. 6-4

6.7.5 Test Reports ............................................................................................. 6-5

6.7.6 Summary of Non-conformances .............................................................. 6-5

6.8 Data Deliverables Summary and Expected Delivery ........................................... 6-6

7.0 Testing ................................................................................................................................ 7-1

7.1 Performance Test ................................................................................................. 7-1

7.2 EMI / EMC Test................................................................................................... 7-1

7.3 Vibration Test ...................................................................................................... 7-2

7.4 Thermal Vacuum Test.......................................................................................... 7-2

8.0 Hardware Handling, Cleaning, Packing & Shipping ................................................... 8-1

8.1 Handling & Storage ............................................................................................. 8-1

8.2 Cleaning ............................................................................................................... 8-1

8.3 Packing ................................................................................................................. 8-1

8.4 Shipping ............................................................................................................... 8-1

9.0 Abbreviations and Acronyms .......................................................................................... 9-1 iv https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

Table 1-1: Applicable Documents ............................................................................................... 1-4

Table 2-1: Hardware Deliverable Schedule ................................................................................. 2-1

Table 6-1: Data Deliverable Schedule ......................................................................................... 6-6

Table 9-1: Acronym List .............................................................................................................. 9-1

1-1 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 GENERAL INFORMATION

The Satellite Servicing Capabilities Office (SSCO) at Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) was established in 2009 to continue NASA’s 40-year legacy of satellite servicing and repair. Among its various pursuits, SSCO is responsible for the development of the Restore-L satellite servicing mission. Restore-L is a free-flying mission to be launched in 2020 to perform on-orbit satellite servicing on an operational Government asset in Low Earth Orbit (LEO).

This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the scope of work to be performed for design, development, fabrication, testing, and delivery of the Restore-L Vision Sensor Subsystem (VSS) spaceflight camera.

The technical requirements for performance, interfaces, design and construction, quality assurance, performance testing, and certification are provided in the accompanying technical specification, RESTORE-L-SPEC-001394, Rev A.

1.2 BASIC HARDWARE DESCRIPTION

The VSS camera will be utilized on the Restore-L servicing vehicle to provide situational awareness imagery of robotic servicing activities to ground operators. Multiple versions of the

VSS camera will be placed throughout the Restore-L spacecraft as well as at the ends of the two robotic servicing arms. As such, the VSS camera is envisioned to be a small, lightweight, yet versatile visible wavelength spaceflight camera system. The Government requires that the VSS camera be of the type commonly referred to in industry as a, “camera head” unit. That is, the VSS camera system shall consist of only the detector, lens assembly, and supporting electronics that outputs the camera’s imagery. Complicated data manipulation, buffering, or image processing is meant to occur outside of the camera, further downstream inside of the Restore-L avionics subsystem.

The Contractor shall provide the VSS camera body only. The Government will provide the final spaceflight-ready optical lenses to the Contractor. The Contractor shall be responsible for integrating these lenses onto each VSS camera and taking the entire camera system through environmental testing as described in the accompanying technical specification.

1-2 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

1.3 QUANTITIES

The Contractor shall design, fabricate, test and deliver the following units:

Order quantity of seventeen (17) flight VSS cameras, as defined in the accompanying specification document, “RESTORE-L-SPEC-001394, Rev A.”

o For nine (9) of theses seventeen (17) units, the Contractor will receive a flight qualified optical lens assembly from the Government. The Contractor will be responsible for the final flight installation of these lenses to the nine (9) VSS camera flight units and the subsequent environmental performance testing.

o For eight (8) of these seventeen (17) units, the Contractor will receive a non-flight

“ruggedized” commercial lens from the Government. The Contractor will be responsible for the temporary installation of theses lenses to the eight (8) VSS camera flight units and the subsequent environmental performance testing. Upon completion of the performance testing, the Contractor will deliver these VSS camera units to the Government with theses ruggedized commercial lenses installed, yet capable of being removed after delivery.

Order quantity of six (6) Engineering Development Units (EDU) VSS cameras, as defined in the accompanying specification document, “RESTORE-L-SPEC-001394, Rev A.”

o For all six (6) of these VSS camera EDU units, the Contractor will procure a commercial lens specified by the Government whose value will be less than $2K.

The Contractor will be responsible for the temporary installation of these lenses on to the six (6) VSS camera EDUs and the subsequent functional performance testing.

Upon completion of the testing, the Contractor will deliver these unit to the

Government with the commercial lenses installed, yet capable of being removed after delivery.

Order quantity of one (1) qualification model VSS camera, as defined in the accompanying specification document, “RESTORE-L-SPEC-001394, Rev A.”

o For the sole VSS camera qualification unit, the Contractor will receive a flight qualified optical lens assembly from the Government. The Contractor will be responsible for the final installation of this lens to the VSS camera qualification unit and the subsequent environmental prototype qualification testing.

Order quantity of two (2) sets of Electrical Ground Support Equipment (EGSE), as defined in the accompanying specification document, “RESTORE-L-SPEC-001394, Rev A.”

Set of documentation deliverables as defined in Section 3.3, the Contract Data

Requirements List (CDRL).

1-3 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

1.4 DOCUMENT CHANGE PROCEDURE

The Satellite Servicing Capabilities Office (SSCO, Code 408) maintains configuration control of this document. All changes will require a document revision to be processed through the SSCO

Next-Generation Integrated Network (NGIN) Configuration Management System.

1.5 VERB APPLICATION

Statements containing the verb “shall” are binding requirements regardless of location within this development specification. The verbs “should” and “may” are used for stating non-mandatory goals or denoting a statement of best practice. The verb “will” is used in a statement of fact, expected occurrence, or declaration of purpose.

1-4 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

1.6 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

All applicable and reference documentation identified in this document shall apply in the situations where they are specifically referenced. In the event of a conflict between the SOW and the

Specification or any applicable document, the contents of the SOW shall take precedence.

Table 1-1: Applicable Documents

DOCUMENT NUMBER TITLE

IEST-STD-1246E

Product Cleanliness Levels – Applications, Requirements, and

Determination

IPC J-STD-001ES

Requirements for Soldered Electrical and Electronic

Assemblies, Space Applications Addendum

NASA-STD-6016 Standard Materials and Processes Requirements for Spacecraft

NASA-STD-8739.1

Workmanship Standard For Polymeric Application On

Electronic Assemblies

RESTORE-L-SPEC-001394, Rev A Restore-L Vision Sensor Subsystem Camera Technical

Specification

RESTORE-L-RQMT-000518 Restore-L Mission Assurance Requirements (MAR)

540-PG-8072.1.2A Mechanical Fastener Torque Guidelines

541-PG-8072.1.2 GSFC Fastener Integrity Requirements

1.6.1 Precedence

If any of the documents invoked herein are changed during the life of the contract, the Contractor shall not use the later issue without prior written approval of NASA GSFC. The Statement of

Work shall take precedence over all documents invoked herein. Where there is a conflict in requirements, NASA GSFC shall be notified.

2-1 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

2.0 SCHEDULE

2.1 HARDWARE DELIVERABLES

The table below lists the required need date for the various VSS camera hardware deliverables as described in Section 1.3. The Contractor is free to develop their own staggered hardware deliverable schedule as long as it meets the baseline outlined below:

Table 2-1: Hardware Deliverable Schedule

HARDWARE DELIVERABLE QUANTITY REQUIRED DELIVERY

VSS Camera EGSE 1 12 months ATP

VSS Camera EDU 4 12 months ATP

VSS Camera Qualification 1 16 months ATP

VSS Camera Flight 8 17 months ATP

VSS Camera EGSE 1 17 months ATP

VSS Camera EDU 2 22 months ATP

VSS Camera Flight 9 22 months ATP

2.2 PROJECT SCHEDULE

The Contractor shall develop a top-level project schedule, which illustrates the schedule that the

Contractor intends to follow over the contract period of performance. Tasks shall be tracked to two week or less durations as appropriate.

The Contractor shall add additional detail to this schedule and continue to maintain and track the project schedule over the entire period of performance. The Contractor shall provide an update to the project schedule each month as part of their written monthly report as specified in section 3.1.2.

3-1 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

3.0 MANAGEMENT, REPORTING, DOCUMENTATION, AND REVIEWS

3.1 REVIEWS AND MEETINGS

The Contractor shall provide manpower, facilities, equipment, materials, and data (electronic and hard copy) to support the meetings and reviews defined in this SOW. Reviews may be conducted at NASA GSFC, at the Contractor, or remotely via teleconference or videoconference.

The Contractor should provide a review agenda no less than 2 weeks prior to the start of the review.

Advanced (draft acceptable) review packages shall be provided no less than 2 days prior to the start of the review.

A final version of the presentation package shall be delivered within five (5) working days following the review and shall include, review meeting minutes, final agenda, all required deliverable data described in each review subsection, and responses to all recommendations and action items discussed during the review.

3.1.1 Weekly Status Teleconference

The Contractor shall provide an informal weekly status teleconference via phone. This approximately thirty minute long meeting shall provide updates on technical and schedule progress.

3.1.2 Written Monthly Reports

The Contractor shall provide a monthly status report via email. The first report shall be delivered approximately thirty (30) days after authority to proceed is received. These reports shall provide data for the assessment of technical and programmatic (i.e. cost, schedule, etc.) progress. The monthly status reports shall include:

Current project schedule and changes from previous version.

Work accomplished for current reporting period.

Action item status.

Work planned for next reporting period.

Current problems, which impede performance or impact program schedule or cost, and proposed corrective action.

Other information that assists NASA GSFC in evaluating technical and schedule performance.

3-2 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

3.1.3 Kickoff Meeting (KOM)/ Systems Requirements Review (SRR)

Within thirty (30) days after contract award, the Contractor shall convene a Kickoff Meeting /

SRR. The Kickoff Meeting will provide a forum for the Contractor to review the updated technical specification compliance matrix submitted with the formal RFP response and solicit additional clarifications from NASA GSFC. In addition, the Contractor will outline a detailed plan to process exceptions that were identified in the formal RFP response.

The KOM / SRR package shall cover the following:

Review of updates to the technical specification Compliance Matrix per Section 6.1

Additional clarification of requirements from VSS camera technical specification

Discussion of foreseeable planned exceptions

Discussion of design concepts, manufacturing plans, integration and test plans, cleanliness plans (as available)

Identification of trade studies (if available)

Review and additional identification of Mandatory Inspection Points (MIPs) not specifically outlined in Section 5.1

Scheduling of additional milestone reviews (PDR, CDR, PER, PSR, etc.)

3-3 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

3.1.4 Preliminary Design Review (PDR)

A PDR will be held at a Government approved location to review the preliminary design of the

VSS camera and evaluate the design for compliance with the requirements of RESTORE-L-SPEC-

001394.

The PDR package shall contain the following:

Preliminary VSS camera design and architecture; including the Mechanical CAD model

Review of updates to Technical Compliance Matrix per Section 6.1

Estimated technical parameters and comparison to requirements

Discussion of critical trade studies, as applicable

Results of any electrical breadboard testing

Review of preliminary Materials Identification and Usage List (MIUL) per Section 6.2

Review of preliminary thermal analysis

Review of preliminary radiation analysis

Review of preliminary EEE Parts List

Review of preliminary Mechanical Interface Control Drawing per Section 6.3.1

Review of preliminary Electrical Interface Control Document per Section 6.4.1

Manufacturing plans, including:

o Provisions for meeting cleanliness requirements o Provisions for meeting ESD requirements o Provisions for meeting staggered VSS camera delivery dates per Section 2.1

Identification of long-lead and / or high-risk items

Risk mitigation plans, if any

3-4 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

3.1.5 Critical Design Review (CDR)

A CDR will be held at a Government approved location to review the final design of the VSS camera and evaluate the design’s readiness to proceed to manufacturing.

The CDR package shall contain the following:

Final VSS camera design / architecture; including the Mechanical CAD model

Review of updates to Technical Compliance Matrix per Section 6.1

Final technical parameters and comparison to requirements

Any delta’s from PDR

Responses to any PDR Requests For Action (RFA)

Results of engineering unit testing, as applicable

Delivery of final Materials Identification and Usage List (MIUL) per Section 6.2

Delivery of final thermal analysis

Review of final radiation analysis

Review of final EEE Parts List

Delivery of Stress Analysis Report per Section 6.3.3

Review of final Mechanical Interface Control Drawing per Section 6.3.1

Review of final Electrical Interface Control Document per Section 6.4.1

Review of Assembly Procedures

A drawing tree with Configuration Management status of all detailed drawings (goal is at least 80% of drawings released into Contractor’s CM system prior to start of manufacturing)

Review of hardware performance test procedures

Review of any outstanding impediments to expedient delivery

3-5 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

3.1.6 Pre-Environmental Review (PER)

A PER will be held at a Government approved location to review the status of the VSS program prior to start of environmental testing.

The PER package shall contain the following:

Review of updates to Technical Compliance Matrix per Section 6.1

Any delta’s from CDR

Responses to any CDR Request For Action

Review of executed Assembly Procedures for completed hardware

Review of as-built inspection photos for completed hardware

Review of executed Procedures

Review of environmental test plans:

o EMI/EMC o Vibration o Thermal Vacuum o Radiation (if applicable)

Environmental testing schedule

3-6 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

3.1.7 Test Readiness Review

The Contractor is required to hold a Test Readiness Reviews (TRR) prior to the commencement of each environmental test. Government concurrence of a successful TRR is required in order for the Contractor to proceed to test.

The TRR shall verify:

Acceptability of test procedures for the specific test under consideration

Test facilities are functionally able to receive the hardware

Test equipment, MGSE and EGSE is certified and calibrated, available for test duration, configured, and properly checked prior to connection to the flight hardware

All pre-test operations are complete

Calibration of all environmental equipment is current

Test specification/verification documents are under configuration control and available

Necessary test personnel are appropriately trained and certified and they are available to support the test

All associated risks and / or non-conformances have been mitigated or resolved

Any unresolved risks and / or non-conformances shall have NASA GSFC written concurrence to proceed at-risk

At the conclusion of the TRR, all parties must provide positive concurrence the subject hardware is ready for test. The Contractor shall provide for managing all resources, controlling schedules, managing all engineering, manufacturing and procurement activities, configuration management, Quality Assurance, documentation control, and distribution.

3-7 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

3.1.8 Pre-Ship Reviews (PSR)

The Contractor is required to hold two Pre-Ship Reviews (PSR) prior to delivering each set of hardware to NASA GSFC. Hardware deliverables are detailed in Table 2-1. The populated compliance matrix is to be presented at this review. Evidence for verification of each item in the compliance matrix for which the Contractor is responsible shall be provided.

The PSR shall take place at the completion of requirement verification tests and prior to shipment of the hardware to NASA GSFC.

The Pre-Ship Review (PSR) package shall contain the following:

Final review and approval of Technical Compliance Matrix per Section 6.1

Detailed review of executed environmental test procedures

Witness of final pre-ship functional test execution to verify hardware functionality prior to shipment.

A visual inspection for cosmetic defects and workmanship, and for proper marking and serialization

Documentation of any liens, nonconformance reports, NASA GSFC MRB’s, requests for deviation, open/unresolved issues and GSFC approved plans to close/resolve the issues

Detailed Review of the Correlated Thermal Model per Section 6.6

Detailed Review of the End Item Data Package per Section 6.7

4-8 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

4.0 MANUFACTURING REQUIREMENTS

The VSS camera shall be manufactured in accordance with the, “Restore-L Mission Assurance

Requirements (MAR)” document (RESTORE-L-RQMT-000518).

The Contractor shall review the MAR and provide a compliance matrix indicating their ability to conform to the various requirements. Within this compliance matrix, the Contractor shall indicate one the following responses for each of the various sections or Data Item Deliverables (DID):

Full Compliance: The Contractor fully meets the requirement as defined by the MAR.

Full Compliance, with exception: The Contractor fully meets the intent of the requirement, but with an exception. (i.e. a different industry standard is used or an internal work instruction). Additional details on the specific exception shall be provided. This scenario will required the contractor to submit an SSCO Request For Waiver (RFW) form.

Partial-Compliance: The Contractor meets some subset, but not all of the requirement as defined by the MAR. Additional details on the specific shortcomings of compliance shall be provided. This scenario will required the contractor to submit an SSCO Request For

Waiver (RFW) form.

Non-Compliance: The Contractor does not meet any aspect of the requirement as defined by the MAR. This scenario will required the contractor to submit an SSCO Request For

Waiver (RFW) form.

As the MAR is a program-level document whose contents may not be applicable to all component-level hardware builds, the Government will address exceptions, partial, and non-compliances on a case by case basis as part of the negotiations during the contract award process. Waivers may be granted where permissible.

4.1 USE OF TRAVELERS

Each VSS camera shall have an associated fabrication / assembly traveler that documents, the following information:

Detailed fabrication / assembly steps

Material lots and date codes

As-built material and parts lists

Polymeric mix records, cure data, and shelf life (including hardness verification)

Calibration information for measurement equipment

Actual inspected dimensions, where applicable

Actual recorded running and final torque for torqueing operations

Travelers shall describe each step in the assembly process in detail; including the name and signature of the operator, the name and signature of the inspector, and the date the operation was completed.

4-9 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

4.2 PROHIBITED PLATING AND ALLOYS

Cadmium and zinc plating is prohibited. Zinc containing alloys shall be considered for vacuum suitability. Only tin alloys containing less than 97% tin are acceptable. The use of electrolytic nickel plating requires a MUA to assess that it does not result in electromagnetic interference.

4.3 FASTENER INTEGRITY

The requirements of section 4.2.6.5 of NASA-STD-6016 are applicable as written (including those in sections 4.2.6.5.1 and 4.2.6.5.2), except as discussed below.

NASA GSFC directive 541-PG-8072.1.2B shall be used instead of NASA-STD-6008 to define the fastener management and control policy, responsibilities, and practices for structural fasteners, fracture-critical fasteners, and safety-critical fasteners that are procured, received, tested, inventoried, installed in space flight hardware, or used in critical ground support equipment applications (such as vibration test fixtures).

Where procurement and screening of fasteners in accordance with this specification is prohibitive in terms of cost, schedule, or special processing requirements, the Subcontractor may solicit pre-screened fasteners from NASA GSFC as Government Furnished Equipment (GFE).

4.3.1 Thread Locking

All fasteners shall be thread locked, staked, or otherwise positively secured in accordance with

540-PG-8072.1.2, Sections 1.4 and 1.5.

4.3.2 Fastener Torqueing

All fasteners shall be torqued in accordance with 540-PG-8072.1.2, Section 2.

4.4 SOLDERING

Any solder joints and soldering practices used in the VSS camera shall be compliant with the requirements of IPC J-STD-001ES. Operators performing soldering shall be certified to or IPC J-

STD-001ES.

4.5 SILICONES

The use of silicone containing materials shall require a Government approved MUA.

4-10 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

4.6 CONTAMINATION CONTROL

The Contractor shall provide their contamination control plan to the Government for approval.

Individual parts and assembly of the VSS camera shall conform to the Contractor’s contamination control plan for assembly of spaceflight hardware. Cleaning of component parts shall be performed with acetone, hexane, and/or isopropyl alcohol (IPA). If either solvent is too aggressive for a particular part, the Contractor shall apply a cleaning procedure using an alternative solvent that results in a surface contamination level of molecular contaminate of less than 1.0 mg/m2 (<

Level A per IEST-STD-1246E). Cleaning of optics shall be performed using Optima grade acetone.

Prior to Government delivery, each VSS camera shall be cleaned to a VC-0.5-1000-1500UV

(365 nm) per IEST-STD-1246E. Each VSS Camera shall double-bagged in heat-sealed, waterproof, vapor-proof, ESD-shielded, cleanroom compatible bagging along with redundant maximum humidity indicators.

5-1 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

The quality assurance requirements for the VSS camera program can be found in the Restore-L

Mission Assurance Requirements, “RESTORE-L-RQMT-000518.”

5.1 MANDATORY INSPECTION POINTS

Government Source Inspection is required. All work on this order is subject to inspection and test by the Government. The Government Quality Assurance (QA) representative shall be notified no less than five (5) working days in advance of the time articles or materials are ready for inspection or test. Shipment of VSS camera hardware shall not be made until inspected by or documented authorization to ship is received from the Government QA representative.

Mandatory government source inspection points shall include the following:

Manufacturing Facility Source Inspection: Prior to the start of hardware fabrication, the

Government shall inspect the Contractor’s manufacturing facility in order to verify compliance with the ANDI/ISO/ASQ Q9001 standard.

Camera Assembly: Solder joints and soldering applications on the VSS camera flight

Printed Circuit Boards (PCB) shall be inspected post assembly, prior to burn in and conformal coating. Inspections will be conducted to determine compliance with IPC J-

STD-001ES.

Camera Assembly: Staking and conformal coating applications to the VSS camera PCBs shall be inspected prior to installation into the camera flight housings. Inspections will be conducted to determine compliance with NASA-STD-8739.1, as referenced in Section 7.1 of the Restore-L Mission Assurance Requirements, “RESTORE-L-RQMT-000518.”

Camera Testing: Performance testing of each serial numbered VSS camera unit shall be witnessed by the Government to verify conformance with the camera technical specification, “RESTORE-L-SPEC-001394, Rev A,” unless waived by the Government.

6-1 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

6.0 CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRL)

Unless otherwise specified, all data deliverables shall be delivered electronically in Government approved formats such as Word, Excel, Acrobat, etc. Engineering records such as drawings, reports, calculations, etc. shall be provided to the Government in root file format. As-run travelers, procedures and / or Work Instructions shall be delivered as a scanned image file with ‘paper capture’ or Optical Character Recognition (OCR) to convert the file to a searchable format, such as Adobe PDF (Portable Document Format).

All documents provided to the Government that contain an Export Control Determination, or similar information sensitivity marking, shall have that marking maintained with that document and information at all times.

Data deliverables include all items outlined in the following subsections.

6.1 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS COMPLIANCE MATRIX

The Contractor shall develop a compliance matrix that contains the technical requirements listed in RESTORE-L-SPEC-001394, Rev A.

This matrix shall indicate the particular requirement and the document, procedure, or test that the

Contractor will utilize to meet said requirement (i.e., analysis document or test document). In addition, the Contractor shall identify any exceptions within the compliance matrix that are planned and will propose a method for meeting the intent of the requirement, or explain why the requirement is not feasible

A preliminary completed compliance matrix addressing all requirements of the technical specification, indicating a plan for how each requirement will be met will be presented at the

Kickoff Meeting / SRR as requested in Section 3.1.3.

The compliance matrix shall be updated throughout the contract with the final completed version due to the Government as part of the End Item Data Package (EIDP).

6-2 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

6.2 MATERIALS IDENTIFICATION AND USAGE LIST

The Contractor shall provide an electronic searchable parts list or separate electronic searchable

Materials Identification and Usage List (MIUL), as described in Section 9.3 of the Restore-L

Mission Assurance Requirements (MAR).

A single MIUL will be acceptable (i.e. each serial number camera will not require an individual materials list). The MIUL shall be submitted to the Government’s Material and Processes

Engineer (MPE) for review and approval, in a format agreed upon by both parties.

Material Usage Agreement (MUA) forms shall be prepared and submitted to the Government MPE for all materials that do not meet the requirements specified in the MAR, as described in Section

9.2 of that document.

6.3 MECHANICAL DELIVERABLES

6.3.1 Interface Control Drawing (ICD)

The Contractor shall submit a top-level interface control drawing of the VSS camera as defined by requirements 3.3.1 of RESTORE-L-SPEC-001394, Rev A. A final version of the ICD shall be included in the EIDP reviewed at the PSR.

6.3.2 Computer Aided Design (CAD) Electronic Model

The Contractor shall provide a mechanical CAD model for the VSS camera as defined by requirement 3.3.2 of RESTORE-L-SPEC-001394, Rev A.

6.3.3 Stress Analysis Report

A full stress analysis, based on the loading cases given in the RESTORE-L-SPEC-001394, Rev A, shall be performed and an analysis report shall be supplied as part of the CDR data package for a) verification of fracture classification and b) demonstration of compliance with structural factors of safety. The stress analysis report shall be made available as early in the procurement as possible, so that the Government may identify any fracture-critical parts that require NDE and additional crack growth analysis before integration into the final assembly. A one-time submittal for the report will be acceptable (i.e. each serial number camera will not require a separate analysis). The final stress report shall also be included in the EIDP.

6-3 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

6.4 ELECTRICAL DELIVERABLES

6.4.1 Electrical ICD

The Contractor shall provide an electrical ICD for the VSS camera as defined by requirement

3.4.5.1 of RESTORE-L-SPEC-001394, Rev A. A final version of the ICD shall be included in the

EIDP reviewed at the PSR.

6.5 EEE PARTS LIST

The Contractor shall provide a EEE parts list as defined by requirement 8.4 of RESTORE-L-

RQMT-000518. A final version of the parts list shall be included in the EIDP reviewed at the PSR.

6.6 THERMAL DELIVERABLES

The Contractor shall provide correlated thermal model of the VSS camera as defined by requirements 3.5.1 and 3.5.2 of RESTORE-L-SPEC-001394, Rev A.

6.7 END ITEM DATA PACKAGE

The End Item Data Package (EIDP) shall be delivered with the VSS camera and be made available for review at the Pre-Ship Review (PSR).

To expedite acceptance of the completed cameras, the Contractor should provide any partial or completed EIDP data as early as possible prior start of the PSR, preferably at least five (5) working days prior to the start of the review.

The EIDP shall include all deliverables described in the following subsections. Minor deviations in the EIDP may be approved on a case-by-case basis by the Government.

6-4 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

6.7.1 Certificate of Conformance

The Contractor shall submit a Certificate of Conformance (C of C), to certify that the materials and processes used in the parts supplied on this order, as well as the finished VSS camera assembly, meet all drawing, specification, and contract requirements. The C of C shall include the following information:

Supplier’s name and address

Purchase order number

Part number as specified on the purchase order

As-built revision level

Serial or lot number(s)

Date code

Date of manufacture for each enclosed item (if applicable)

Quantity

Certifying signature, title, and date

Any Class 1 MRB or deviation/waiver

6.7.2 As-Built Parts List

The Contractor shall provide the completed As-Built Parts List for all delivered VSS camera assembly serial numbers. This list shall include serialization, revisions, lot number, and expiration dates associated with all components used in the VSS cameras.

6.7.3 As-Built Assembly Procedures

The Contractor shall provided the completed as-built procedures that were used to fabricate and assemble the VSS cameras.

6.7.4 Material Certifications

The Contractor shall provide complete Materials Certifications and Test Reports for every component used in the VSS camera assembly.

This documentation includes:

Material chemical and physical reports

Material hardness test(s) results

Non-Destructive Examination reports

Sub-tier supplier certification paperwork

In-process work orders / logs

Polymeric mix records / cure data, including hardness verification

Dimensional inspection reports

6-5 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

6.7.5 Test Reports

The Contractor shall provide test reports for all mandatory testing performed on the VSS camera as outlined in Section 4.5 of RESTORE-L-SPEC-001394.

Test reports shall include the following:

Conclusions and recommendations regarding success of the test activity

Description of deviations from nominal results, failures, approved corrective actions and procedures, and retest

Traceability back to the requirement being verified by the specific test

Copy of as-run procedure (as appropriate), including name and signature of the Test

Operator and Quality Assurance witness

Identification of test configuration

Specific results of each procedure including automated test segments and associated analyses

Photograph(s) of test configuration

Photograph of test article prior to and upon completion of test

In addition to a copy of the as-run procedure, data collected during testing shall be compiled into a single file for all serial numbers and delivered electronically in mutually agreed upon format

(such as Excel), unless otherwise specified.

6.7.6 Summary of Non-conformances

The Contractor shall provide a summary list of all non-conformances effecting the VSS cameras.

This completed list shall include the following information:

Problem/anomaly reporting (complete copies of reports & correspondences)

Deviations/waivers/open items/non-conformances and their dispositions

Material Review Board (MRB) Reports

Failure Review Board (FRB) Reports

Root Cause and Corrective Action Notices / Forms

6-6 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

6.8 DATA DELIVERABLES SUMMARY AND EXPECTED DELIVERY

Delivery of Data Deliverables listed below may be staggered or delivered to the Government as soon as ready / available.

Table 6-1: Data Deliverable Schedule

DATA DELIVERABLE EXPECTED DELIVERY

Mission Assurance Requirements Compliance Matrix Formal RFP Response

Technical Requirements Compliance Matrix – Preliminary Formal RFP Response

Programmatic Schedule - Preliminary Formal RFP Response

Contractor Contamination Control Plan Formal RFP Response

Technical Requirements Compliance Matrix – Updates KOM/SRR, PDR, CDR, MRR, PSR

Technical Requirements Compliance Matrix – Final Five (5) days following the PSR

Materials Identification and Usage List (MIUL) - Preliminary PDR Presentation Package

Materials Identification and Usage List (MIUL) - Final CDR Presentation Package

Mechanical Interface Control Drawing - Preliminary PDR Presentation Package

Mechanical Interface Control Drawing - Final CDR Presentation Package

Mechanical CAD Model - Preliminary PDR Presentation Package

Mechanical CAD Model - Final CDR Presentation Package

Stress Analysis Report CDR Presentation Package

Electrical ICD - Preliminary PDR Presentation Package

Electrical ICD - Final CDR Presentation Package

EEE Parts List – As Designed PDR Presentation Package

EEE Parts List – As Built CDR Presentation Package

Correlated Thermal Model PSR Presentation Package

End Item Data Package (EIDP) Five (5) working days following the

PSR

7-1 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

7.0 TESTING

The Contractor will perform the following testing outlined in this section as it pertains to the specific VSS camera types:

All VSS camera flight units will be tested per the following sections to Acceptance Levels as defined by GSFC-STD-7000A, “General Environmental Verification Standard

(GEVS).”

The VSS camera qualification unit will be tested per the following sections to Prototype

Qualification as defined by GSFC-STD-7000A, “General Environmental Verification

Standard (GEVS).”

The VSS camera engineering development units (EDUs) will not undergo environmental testing. As such, only Section 7.1 herein applies.

Additional information and applicable caveats for each subset of tests are provided to the

Contractor below for consideration.

7.1 PERFORMANCE TEST

The summary of the required performance testing is covered in Section 4.5.2 of RESTORE-L-

SPEC-001394, Rev A. The Government shall review the VSS camera performance test procedure at the program CDR. All VSS camera units shall undergo performance testing at the following milestones:

Upon completion of VSS camera manufacturing

Pre & post each environmental test o Not applicable to VSS EDUs

Prior to delivery of the hardware to the Government

7.2 EMI / EMC TEST

The summary of the required EMI / EMC testing is covered in Section 3.6.6 of RESTORE-L-

SPEC-001394, Rev A. The Government shall review the VSS camera EMI / EMC test plan at the program PER.

In an effort to lower the overall VSS camera program cost, only the VSS camera qualification unit will undergo the full suite of EMI / EMC testing as specified in Section 3.6.6 of RESTORE-L-

SPEC-001394, Rev A. All VSS camera flight units will undergo the following subset of EMI /

EMC testing to screen for electrical workmanship issues:

Conducted Emissions (CE101, CE03, CE07, Inrush & Common Mode)

7-2 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page…