Att.2_PastPerformanceQuestionnaire_NIHLM2016864.docx
DOCX document 18 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- NIHLM2016864
About this file
Att.2 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Att.1_RevTier_1_ISP_SOW_NIHLM2016864.docx | DOCX document | |
| ResponsestoQuestions_8-15-2016_NIHLM2016864.docx | DOCX document | |
| Att.1_20160516_Tier_1_ISP_SOW_NIHLM2016864.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
RFP # NIHLM2016864
Date:
Survey Pertains to Offeror:
Contract Number:
Name and Title of Person Completing Survey:
Company/Agency Name:
Contract Value (including options):
Performance Period:
Contract Type:
Project Description:
Rating Guidelines:
| Rating |
| Contract Requirements |
| Problems |
| Corrective Actions |
Exceptional (4) Exceeds Many
– Gov’t Benefit
| Few Minor |
| Highly Effective |
Very Good (3)
| Exceeds Some – Gov’t Benefit |
| Some Minor |
| Effective |
Satisfactory (2)
| Meets All |
| Some Minor |
| Satisfactory |
Marginal (1) Does Not Meet Some -Gov’t Impact
| Serious: Recovery Still Possible |
| Marginally Effective; Not Fully Implemented |
Unsatisfactory (0) Does Not Meet Most -Gov’t Impact
| Serious: Recovery Not Likely |
| Ineffective |
Instructions: Use the above adjectival ratings, along with substantive supporting comments for the following criterion:
1. Overall Quality of Service:
2. Timeliness of Performance:
3. Cost Control:
4. Business Relations:
*Would you select this firm again? (yes/no) yes
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .